Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

linkedin-post-enginelinkedin 帖子引擎

Agent Skill

linkedin-post-engine 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

16,249

周安装

651

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

5,260
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:linkedin-post-engine(linkedin 帖子引擎)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bdseerden/linkedin-post-engine
安装命令:
openclaw skills install linkedin-post-engine
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install linkedin-post-engine

简介

基于研究支持的钩子与结构生成高效、有说服力的 LinkedIn 帖子。

  • 适合撰写专业领域的高质量内容以提升影响力。
  • 输入主题或关键词,系统生成带链接与结构的完整文案。
  • 需人工审核内容真实性与链接有效性,避免误导性信息。
  • 建议结合品牌调性调整语气与风格后再发布。linkedin-post-engine 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
linkedin-post-engine
description
Write high-performing, persuasive, and authentic LinkedIn posts across any professional niche. Uses research-backed hooks, proven post structures, and LinkedIn-specific formatting to maximize reach, saves, comments, and profile actions. Use when creating LinkedIn posts, carousels-by-text, thought leadership, founder updates, case studies, hiring posts, launch posts, or converting X/Twitter ideas into LinkedIn content.
metadata

READ BEFORE USE

HOW TO USE THIS SKILL EFFECTIVELY

READ BEFORE USE

LinkedIn Post Engine

Overview

This skill helps you create strong LinkedIn posts that feel human, useful, and credible.

It combines:

  • proven hook frameworks,
  • clear narrative structures,
  • proof-first writing,
  • and practical CTA design.

Keywords: linkedin, thought leadership, personal brand, founder posts, b2b content, storytelling, case study, hooks, engagement, authority


Process Workflow

Phase 1: Audience + Positioning (CRITICAL)

Before writing, define:

  1. Audience — Who is this for? (founders, recruiters, engineers, operators, marketers, sales leaders, etc.)
  2. Goal — Reach, authority, leads, hiring, trust, replies, profile visits?
  3. Core insight — What is the one thing worth remembering?
  4. Proof — What makes this believable (numbers, before/after, constraints, mistakes, outcomes)?

If proof is missing, use placeholders like [X%], [Y hours] and request exact values.

Phase 2: Structure + Hook Selection

Choose a format first, then write:

  • Story
  • Framework
  • Contrarian
  • Case study
  • Teardown
  • Build-in-public

Then select 2-3 hooks and finalize one.

Phase 3: Draft + Polish

  • Keep paragraphs short (1-2 lines)
  • Front-load specifics
  • Remove generic filler
  • End with one clear CTA
  • Add 3-6 hashtags max

LinkedIn Feed Dynamics (Practical)

What usually performs best:

  1. Strong first two lines (stops the scroll)
  2. Specificity (numbers > adjectives)
  3. Credible vulnerability (mistakes + lessons)
  4. Clear structure (easy to skim on mobile)
  5. Conversation CTA (quality comments over empty likes)

Avoid:

  • Buzzword soup
  • Generic motivation posts
  • Overlong hashtag blocks
  • Fake certainty without evidence

Hook Formulas (Most Important)

The Contrarian Hook

  • “Most people do [X]. That’s exactly why they stay stuck.”
  • “Unpopular opinion: [industry belief] is outdated.”

The Specific Result Hook

  • “In [timeframe], we improved [metric] by [number]. Here’s how.”
  • “We cut [cost/time] by [X%]. Not with a new tool—by changing this one workflow.”

The Mistake Hook

  • “I made this [role]-mistake for months. It cost us [outcome].”
  • “We shipped the wrong thing fast. Here’s what fixed it.”

The Framework Hook

  • “The [3-step/4-step] framework I use for [outcome].”
  • “If I had to restart as [role], I’d follow these 5 rules.”

The Question Hook

  • “Would you let your team do [X] without [Y]?”
  • “What’s your biggest bottleneck in [domain] right now?”

High-Performing Post Formats

1) “This runs now” (Operational Story)

Best for real systems, workflows, and automations.

Template:

  • bold claim
  • “Not as a demo. As an actual [responsibility/workflow].”
  • “Here’s what it does:” with 4-6 concrete bullets
  • measurable result
  • perspective line + CTA question

2) Case Study

Template:

  • starting problem
  • constraints
  • intervention
  • before/after metrics
  • key lesson
  • optional “comment TEMPLATE” CTA

3) Contrarian Opinion

Template:

  • challenge popular view
  • explain why it fails in practice
  • give 3 practical principles
  • ask a polarizing but constructive question

4) Framework Post

Template:

  • name framework
  • 3-5 steps
  • one mistake to avoid
  • one practical “do this today” action

5) Build-in-Public Update

Template:

  • what shipped this week
  • what worked
  • what broke
  • what changed next
  • ask for informed feedback

Persuasion Principles

Use these to increase clarity and trust:

  • Specificity: “Saved 3.2 hours/week” beats “saved time.”
  • Mechanism: Explain how, not just outcomes.
  • Credibility: Mention tradeoffs, not only wins.
  • Relevance: Tie insight to audience reality.
  • Clarity: One post = one core idea.

Writing Rules

  • Hook in first 1-2 lines
  • 1-2 sentence paragraphs
  • Prefer plain language over hype
  • Use emojis sparingly as section markers
  • Keep claims realistic
  • Never invent outcomes, clients, or credentials

Hashtags:

  • 3-6 max
  • niche + function + audience mix
  • avoid spammy broad tags only

Output Contract

By default, provide:

  1. 3 hook options
  2. 1 full post
  3. 1 spicier variant
  4. 3 first-comment ideas (to deepen discussion)

Optional on request:

  • NL / EN / NL-EN mixed variants
  • X/Twitter adaptation
  • Short + long versions
  • Carousel text outline

Quick Prompt Template

When user gives a raw idea, ask/fill:

  • Audience:
  • Goal:
  • Topic:
  • Proof points:
  • Tone:
  • CTA preference:

Then generate outputs per contract above.


Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Generic “AI changed everything” without concrete examples
  • No proof signals
  • Too many ideas in one post
  • CTA mismatch (asking for leads on a pure thought-leadership post)
  • Over-formatting with noisy symbols

Execution Checklist

Before finalizing:

  • [ ] Hook is strong and specific
  • [ ] Core claim is clear
  • [ ] Includes at least one proof signal
  • [ ] Easy to skim on mobile
  • [ ] CTA invites real conversation
  • [ ] Hashtags are relevant and limited
  • [ ] Tone feels authentic to author

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

82.19%
按下载量换算4,323

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills