Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

lfgLFG 搜索

Agent Skill

lfg 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

9,270

周安装

375

GitHub Stars

15,913

下载量

2,910
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:lfg(LFG 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin
仓库路径:skills/lfg
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin --skill lfg
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin --skill lfg

简介

lfg 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 适用于游戏组队匹配查询、玩家技能评估和多人协作活动组织等场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和联网需求。
  • 建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法,注意维护状态及是否触发文件读写操作。
  • lfg 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

CRITICAL: You MUST execute every step below IN ORDER. Do NOT skip any required step. Do NOT jump ahead to coding or implementation. The plan phase (step 1) MUST be completed and verified BEFORE any work begins. Violating this order produces bad output.

When invoking any skill referenced below, resolve its name against the available-skills list the host platform provides and use that exact entry. Some platforms list skills under a plugin namespace (e.g., compound-engineering:ce-plan); others list the bare name. Invoking a short-form guess that isn't in the list will fail — always match a listed entry verbatim before calling the Skill/Task tool.

  1. Invoke the ce-plan skill with $ARGUMENTS. GATE: STOP. If ce-plan reported the task is non-software and cannot be processed in pipeline mode, stop the pipeline and inform the user that LFG requires software tasks. Otherwise, verify that the ce-plan workflow produced a plan file in docs/plans/. If no plan file was created, invoke ce-plan again with $ARGUMENTS. Do NOT proceed to step 2 until a written plan exists. Record the plan file path — it will be passed to ce-code-review in step 3.
  2. Invoke the ce-work skill. GATE: STOP. Verify that implementation work was performed - files were created or modified beyond the plan. Do NOT proceed to step 3 if no code changes were made.
  3. Invoke the ce-code-review skill with mode:autofix plan:<plan-path-from-step-1>. Pass the plan file path from step 1 so ce-code-review can verify requirements completeness. Read the Residual Actionable Work summary the skill emits.
  4. Persist review autofixes (REQUIRED after step 3, before residual handoff) Check git status --short. If ce-code-review mode:autofix changed files, stage only those review-fix files, commit them with fix(review): apply autofix feedback, and push the current branch before continuing. If an upstream exists, run git push. If no upstream exists, resolve a writable remote dynamically: prefer origin when present, otherwise use git remote and choose the first configured remote. Then run git push --set-upstream <remote> HEAD. Do not proceed to step 5, run browser tests, or output DONE while review autofix edits remain only in the working tree. If no files changed, explicitly note that there were no review autofixes to persist.
  5. Autonomous residual handoff (only when step 3 reported one or more residual downstream-resolver findings; skip when it reported Residual actionable work: none.) Do not prompt the user. This step embraces the autopilot contract: residuals must become durable before DONE, but the agent never stops to ask. Never block DONE on tracker filing failures once residuals have been durably recorded. A no_sink outcome is success only when the findings are present in the PR body or in the pushed fallback file.

1. Load references/tracker-defer.md in non-interactive mode. Pass the residual actionable findings from step 3's summary (or the run artifact when the summary was truncated). 2. Collect the structured return: {filed: [...], failed: [...], no_sink: [...]}. 3. Compose a ## Residual Review Findings markdown section from the structured return: - For each item in filed: a bullet with severity, file:line, title, and a link to the tracker ticket URL. - For each item in failed: a bullet with severity, file:line, title, and the failure reason (e.g., Defer failed: gh returned 401 — tracker unavailable). - For each item in no_sink: a bullet with severity, file:line, and title inlined verbatim so the PR body or fallback file is the durable record. 4. Detect the current branch's open PR without prompting: gh pr view --json number,url,body,state 5. If an open PR exists, update it directly with gh; do not load any confirmation-driven PR update skill. Append or replace the ## Residual Review Findings section in the current PR body, write the new body to an OS temp file, then run: gh pr edit PR_NUMBER --body-file BODY_FILE 6. If no open PR exists, create a tracked fallback file at docs/residual-review-findings/<branch-or-head-sha>.md containing the composed section and the source PR-review run context. Stage only that file, commit it with docs(review): record residual review findings, and push the current branch. If an upstream exists, run git push. If no upstream exists, resolve a writable remote dynamically: prefer origin when present, otherwise use git remote and choose the first configured remote. Then run git push --set-upstream <remote> HEAD. This is the durable no-PR sink. Do not output DONE until either the existing PR body has been updated or this fallback file commit has been pushed. If both paths fail, stop and report the failed commands; do not silently proceed.

  1. Invoke the ce-test-browser skill with mode:pipeline.
  2. Invoke the ce-commit-push-pr skill. This commits any remaining changes, pushes the branch, and opens a pull request. If step 5 already opened a PR (check with gh pr view --json number,url,state 2>/dev/null), skip PR creation but still commit and push any uncommitted changes.
  3. Output <promise>DONE</promise> when complete

Start with step 1 now. Remember: plan FIRST, then work. Never skip the plan.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.39%
按下载量换算1,117

Claude

31.72%
按下载量换算923

Cursor

18.26%
按下载量换算531

Gemini CLI

9.14%
按下载量换算266

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills