Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
运维和基础设施需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

legacy-modernizer遗产现代化者

Agent Skill

legacy-modernizer 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

36,720

周安装

1,515

GitHub Stars

8,727

下载量

11,880
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:legacy-modernizer(遗产现代化者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jeffallan/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/legacy-modernizer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jeffallan/claude-skills --skill legacy-modernizer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jeffallan/claude-skills --skill legacy-modernizer

简介

增量迁移策略、依赖关系映射和外观设计,用于安全地实现遗留系统的现代化。

  • 指导五步工作流程:评估系统、计划迁移、通过特征测试构建安全网、通过带有功能标志的 Strangler Fig 模式增量迁移,并在淘汰遗留代码之前进行验证
  • 包括绞杀者无花果正面的参考模板、功能标志包装和表征测试模式,以捕获作为黄金大师的现有行为
  • 通过显式回滚触发器、流量增量验证(5% → 25% → 50% → 100%)以及删除遗留代码之前的单发布周期稳定性证明,强制实施零生产中断
  • 提供评估模板、依赖关系映射指南和监控设置说明,以记录风险并在整个迁移过程中保留业务逻辑

SKILL.md

Legacy Modernizer

Core Workflow

  1. Assess system — Analyze codebase, dependencies, risks, and business constraints. Produce a dependency map and risk register before proceeding.

- *Validation checkpoint:* Confirm all external integrations and data contracts are documented before moving to step 2.

  1. Plan migration — Design an incremental roadmap with explicit rollback strategies per phase. Reference references/system-assessment.md for code analysis templates.

- *Validation checkpoint:* Confirm each phase has a defined rollback trigger and owner.

  1. Build safety net — Create characterization tests and monitoring before touching production code. Target 80%+ coverage of existing behavior.

- *Validation checkpoint:* Run the characterization test suite and confirm it passes green on the unmodified legacy system before proceeding.

  1. Migrate incrementally — Apply strangler fig pattern with feature flags. Route traffic via a facade; shift load gradually.

- *Validation checkpoint:* Verify error rates and latency metrics remain within baseline thresholds after each traffic increment (e.g., 5% → 25% → 50% → 100%).

  1. Validate & iterate — Run full test suite, review monitoring dashboards, and confirm business behavior is preserved before retiring legacy code.

- *Validation checkpoint:* New code must be proven stable at 100% traffic for at least one release cycle before legacy path is removed.

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
Strangler Figreferences/strangler-fig-pattern.mdIncremental replacement, facade layer, routing
Refactoringreferences/refactoring-patterns.mdExtract service, branch by abstraction, adapters
Migrationreferences/migration-strategies.mdDatabase, UI, API, framework migrations
Testingreferences/legacy-testing.mdCharacterization tests, golden master, approval
Assessmentreferences/system-assessment.mdCode analysis, dependency mapping, risk evaluation

Code Examples

Strangler Fig Facade (Python)

# facade.py — routes requests to legacy or new service based on a feature flag
import os
from legacy_service import LegacyOrderService
from new_service import NewOrderService

class OrderServiceFacade:
    def __init__(self):
        self._legacy = LegacyOrderService()
        self._new = NewOrderService()

    def get_order(self, order_id: str):
        if os.getenv("USE_NEW_ORDER_SERVICE", "false").lower() == "true":
            return self._new.fetch(order_id)
        return self._legacy.get(order_id)

Feature Flag Wrapper

# feature_flags.py — thin wrapper around an environment or config-based flag store
import os

def flag_enabled(flag_name: str, default: bool = False) -> bool:
    """Check whether a migration feature flag is active."""
    return os.getenv(flag_name, str(default)).lower() == "true"

# Usage
if flag_enabled("USE_NEW_PAYMENT_GATEWAY"):
    result = new_gateway.charge(order)
else:
    result = legacy_gateway.charge(order)

Characterization Test Template (pytest)

# test_characterization_orders.py
# Captures existing legacy behavior as a golden-master safety net.
import pytest
from legacy_service import LegacyOrderService

service = LegacyOrderService()

@pytest.mark.parametrize("order_id,expected_status", [
    ("ORD-001", "SHIPPED"),
    ("ORD-002", "PENDING"),
    ("ORD-003", "CANCELLED"),
])
def test_order_status_golden_master(order_id, expected_status):
    """Fail loudly if legacy behavior changes unexpectedly."""
    result = service.get(order_id)
    assert result["status"] == expected_status, (
        f"Characterization broken for {order_id}: "
        f"expected {expected_status}, got {result['status']}"
    )

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Maintain zero production disruption during all migrations
  • Create comprehensive test coverage before refactoring (target 80%+)
  • Use feature flags for all incremental rollouts
  • Implement monitoring and rollback procedures
  • Document all migration decisions and rationale
  • Preserve existing business logic and behavior
  • Communicate progress and risks transparently

MUST NOT DO

  • Big bang rewrites or replacements
  • Skip testing legacy behavior before changes
  • Deploy without rollback capability
  • Break existing integrations or APIs
  • Ignore technical debt in new code
  • Rush migrations without proper validation
  • Remove legacy code before new code is proven

Output Templates

When implementing modernization, provide:

  1. Assessment summary (risks, dependencies, approach)
  2. Migration plan (phases, rollback strategy, metrics)
  3. Implementation code (facades, adapters, new services)
  4. Test coverage (characterization, integration, e2e)
  5. Monitoring setup (metrics, alerts, dashboards)

Knowledge Reference

Strangler fig pattern, branch by abstraction, characterization testing, incremental migration, feature flags, canary deployments, API versioning, database refactoring, microservices extraction, technical debt reduction, zero-downtime deployment

Documentation

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

27.35%
按下载量换算3,249

OpenCode

25.78%
按下载量换算3,063

Antigravity

18.68%
按下载量换算2,219

Gemini CLI

11.52%
按下载量换算1,369

Cursor

8.28%
按下载量换算984

Codex

3.53%
按下载量换算419

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills