Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

learning-docs学习文档

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

312

周安装

13

GitHub Stars

13

下载量

104
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:learning-docs(学习文档)
来源仓库:https://github.com/maroffo/claude-forge
仓库路径:skills/learning-docs
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/maroffo/claude-forge --skill learning-docs
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/maroffo/claude-forge --skill learning-docs

简介

辅助文档、README 和内容稿件的整理与改写,提升可读性和结构清晰度。

  • 适合提炼章节、统一术语、检查链接或整合零散材料为规范文档。
  • 使用时应保留项目事实,避免将未确认信息写成确定结论。
  • 涉及对外文案时需控制语气,防止过度营销或夸大能力描述。
  • learning-docs 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

ABOUTME: Project knowledge capture through engaging LEARNING.md files

ABOUTME: Documents architecture, decisions, bugs, lessons learned in conversational style

Learning Documentation

Quality Notes

  • Take your time reviewing recent work thoroughly before writing
  • Quality of insights matters more than covering every change
  • Re-read what you wrote: is it useful to a future reader, or just filler?

Purpose

Capture project knowledge in LEARNING.md - a living document that grows with the project. Not boring docs, but engaging technical storytelling.

When to Update

  • After fixing non-trivial bugs
  • After architectural decisions
  • After integrating new tech
  • After solving tricky problems
  • Before context switches (end of day/week)

Structure

Sections: Project Overview, Architecture (mermaid diagrams), Tech Stack & Decisions (table: Technology | Why | Trade-offs), Lessons Learned (dated: Context → Problem → Solution → Takeaway), Pitfalls & Gotchas, Best Practices Discovered

Writing Style

DoDon't
Conversational toneDry technical prose
Analogies that clarifyJargon without context
Concrete examplesAbstract descriptions
"We tried X, it broke because Y""X is not recommended"
Honest about mistakesSanitized corporate-speak

Examples

Good:

We spent 2 hours debugging why webhooks weren't firing. Turns out Redis was silently dropping messages when memory hit 80%. Added maxmemory-policy volatile-lru and monitoring. Lesson: always monitor your message queues, silence is not golden.

Bad:

Webhook reliability was improved by adjusting Redis configuration parameters.

Workflow

  1. Read existing LEARNING.md (or create if missing)
  2. Review recent work (git log --oneline -10)
  3. Ask what was learned, what was tricky
  4. Append new lessons in conversational style (dated, searchable)
  5. Capture solutions in docs/solutions/[category]/ for searchable reuse

Solutions Directory

For solved problems worth referencing again, create files in docs/solutions/:

docs/solutions/
├── auth/           → Authentication, authorization, sessions
├── performance/    → Profiling, caching, optimization
├── infrastructure/ → CI/CD, Docker, deployment
├── database/       → Migrations, queries, indexing
├── testing/        → Patterns, fixtures, flaky test fixes
└── debugging/      → Hard bugs, investigation techniques

Format: docs/solutions/[category]/YYYY-MM-DD_short-description.md

Each solution file:

# Problem
[What broke / what we needed]

# Solution
[What fixed it, with code if relevant]

# Why It Works
[Root cause or design rationale, 1-3 sentences]

When to use LEARNING.md vs solutions/: LEARNING.md for narrative retrospectives, architectural decisions, broad lessons. Solutions/ for specific, searchable, reusable fixes; "how did we solve X?" answers.

Vault copy: After writing to docs/solutions/, also append to vault: obsidian append file="<project> - Solutions" content="### YYYY-MM-DD: [title]\n[Problem/Solution/Why]". Creates cross-project discoverability.

Session Analysis

Analyze past sessions to identify improvement opportunities. Session files live in ~/.claude/projects/ (project paths: slashes→dashes).

CRITICAL Rules

  • NEVER read raw session files (100k+ lines, token killer)
  • ALWAYS use jq to extract summaries
  • Focus on patterns, not individual messages

What to Look For

PatternExampleFix
Token wasteRead same file 5+ timesCache key info, update CLAUDE.md
Wrong pathsBuilt feature, then found existing codeBetter initial search, architecture docs
Repeated mistakesSame lint error 3 sessionsPre-commit hook, CLAUDE.md note
Missing automationManual steps every sessionScript it, add to workflow
Context lossRe-learn after compactionSave state to LEARNING.md before limit

Key jq Commands

Sessions live in ~/.claude/projects/PROJECT_NAME/session_*.json.

  • Tool call counts: jq '[.messages[].content[]? | select(.type=="tool_use") |.name] | group_by(.) | map({tool:.[0], count: length}) | sort_by(-.count)'
  • Repeated reads: jq -r '... | select(.name=="Read") |.input.file_path' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20
  • Error patterns: jq -r '... | select(.type=="tool_result" and (.content | tostring | test("error"))) |.content' | head -50

Propose Improvements As

CLAUDE.md updates, new skills, scripts, LEARNING.md entries, pre-commit hooks.

Vault Pattern Annotation

When a lesson learned maps to a skill domain, append to ## Skill Candidates in the relevant Second Brain note:

obsidian append file="Second Brain - Development" content="\n| <pattern> | <target-skill> | <project> | YYYY-MM-DD | weak |"

Signal starts as weak. The knowledge-sync skill promotes to strong when 3+ projects or 2+ independent sources confirm the pattern. Create the ## Skill Candidates section (with table header) if it doesn't exist yet.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.86%
按下载量换算40

Claude

29.21%
按下载量换算30

Cursor

19.79%
按下载量换算21

Gemini CLI

8.92%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills