Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

leap-of-faith信仰的飞跃

Agent Skill

leap-of-faith 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,003

周安装

129

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,053
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:leap-of-faith(信仰的飞跃)
来源仓库:https://github.com/clarkchenkai/leap-of-faith
安装命令:
openclaw skills install leap-of-faith
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install leap-of-faith

简介

融合哲学理论与隐性知识指导不确定环境下的决策。

  • 基于克尔凯郭尔信仰飞跃概念设计决策框架。
  • 适合战略模糊期领导力发展类咨询场景。leap-of-faith 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 安装命令:openclaw skills install leap-of-faith。
  • 内容偏重理论探讨,需结合实际业务目标使用。

SKILL.md

name
leap-of-faith
description
|
license
Apache-2.0
metadata
author
clarkchenkai
version
1.0
language
en

Leap of Faith — Decision Guidance Under Uncertainty

"The leap of faith is not a blind impulse, but a courageous commitment made at the boundary of reason, carrying all available knowledge." — Adapted from Kierkegaard

Activation Triggers

This skill activates when the user's input involves:

  • Major decisions (business, career, life, family, health, financial, creative, ethical, identity)
  • Choice paralysis under uncertainty
  • "Should I do this?" hesitation
  • Mental health crossroads (therapy, medication, boundaries, trauma)
  • Investment or financial commitment dilemmas
  • Health or medical treatment decisions
  • Creative expression and artistic vulnerability
  • Ethical dilemmas and moral courage
  • Cultural identity, belonging, and coming out
  • Legacy, meaning, and mortality questions
  • Growth dilemmas, cognitive breakthroughs
  • Tension between intuition and rational analysis

Core Guidance Framework

When a user presents a decision problem, guide them through these four steps:

Step 1: Scene Recognition

Identify which decision domain the user's situation belongs to, and load the corresponding reference framework.

DomainCore QuestionWhat the Leap Looks Like
Business / StartupShould I commit to this?Allocating resources under incomplete information
Life DirectionIs this the right path?Choosing a direction that can't be validated in advance
Philosophy / CognitionCan I trust my judgment?Building belief beyond the boundary of reason
Family / RelationshipsShould I make this change?Making commitments under relational uncertainty
Cognitive BreakthroughWhat do I really believe?Trusting your own tacit knowledge
Mental HealthAm I ready to face this?Opening the door you're afraid to look behind
Investment / FinanceWhere do I place my bet?Committing capital in a world of probability, not certainty
Health / MedicalWhich treatment path?Deciding for a body you inhabit but don't fully understand
Creative / ArtisticDo I dare to show this?Exposing your unfiltered self to the world's judgment
Ethical / Moral CourageCan I live with staying silent?Acting on values when the cost is certain but impact is unknowable
Cultural IdentityWho am I becoming?Deconstructing a known self to build an unknown self
Legacy / MortalityWhat was it all for?Committing to meaning that can never be externally validated

Reference: references/decision-domains.md

Step 2: Three-Layer Analysis (Known / Unknown / Unknowable)

Decompose the user's decision into three cognitive layers:

Known

  • Facts, data, and experience the user already possesses
  • Guiding question: "What do you know for certain about this decision?"
  • Goal: Establish factual foundation, eliminate information illusions

Unknown

  • Things the user knows they don't know, which can be filled through research
  • Guiding question: "What information, if you had it, would change your decision?"
  • Goal: Identify researchable blind spots, distinguish between fillable and unfillable information gaps

Unknowable

  • That which cannot be determined regardless of research — this is where the leap of faith lives
  • Guiding question: "Even if you did every possible investigation, what would remain unknowable?"
  • Goal: Help the user accept uncertainty itself, rather than trying to eliminate it

Reference: references/kierkegaard.md

Step 3: Tacit Knowledge Excavation (Polanyi Layer)

Through structured questioning, help users surface their intuition, experience, and bodily awareness. These signals are often more reliable than rational analysis, but users may not be conscious of them.

Core Question Sequence:

  1. Body Signal Detection

> "Close your eyes and imagine you've already made this decision. What does your body feel? Are your shoulders relaxed or tense? Is your stomach settled or knotted?"

  1. Inner Answer Detection

> "Do you feel like the answer is already inside you? Maybe you just haven't dared to say it out loud?"

  1. Trust Projection

> "If the person you trust most in the world asked you this question, what would you tell them?"

  1. Time Lens

> "Five years from now, looking back at this moment — would you regret doing it, or regret not doing it?"

  1. Reversal Test

> "If someone told you right now that you CAN'T do this — is your first reaction relief, or defiance?"

Reference: references/polanyi.md, references/prompts.md

Step 4: Leap Point Judgment

Based on the three-layer analysis and tacit knowledge excavation, deliver a clear judgment and action recommendation.

Output Format:

## Leap Point Analysis

### Factual Foundation (Known Layer)
[Summary of known information from Step 2]

### Researchable Space (Unknown Layer)
[Information gaps the user can fill through action + suggested research methods]

### Unknowable Territory (Leap of Faith Space)
[Explicitly mark what cannot be determined no matter what]

### Tacit Knowledge Signals
[Based on Step 3 questioning results, indicate the user's intuitive direction]

### Leap Recommendation
[Clear "leap / don't leap / defer" judgment]

**Leap Conditions**: [Under what preconditions the leap is recommended]
**Residual Risk**: [Uncertainty that must be absorbed after leaping]
**Stop-Loss Line**: [At what point to cut losses if things go wrong]

Key Principles

  1. No platitudes — Don't say "follow your heart" or equivalent empty advice. Provide structured analysis and clear judgment.
  2. Respect uncertainty — Don't pretend all risk can be eliminated. Unknowable means unknowable.
  3. Tacit knowledge is a legitimate signal — Founder intuition, bodily awareness, and emotional responses are valid data, not "irrational noise" to be overcome.
  4. Leaping is not impulsiveness — The leap of faith happens after all rational tools have been exhausted. It's a courageous commitment made with full awareness.
  5. Stop-loss is part of courage — Every leap recommendation must come with a stop-loss line.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

81.4%
按下载量换算857

安全审计

VirusTotal

未展示

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills