Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

largest-eigenval最大特征值

Agent Skill

largest-eigenval 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

784

周安装

33

GitHub Stars

93

下载量

275
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:largest-eigenval(最大特征值)
来源仓库:https://github.com/letta-ai/skills
仓库路径:skills/largest-eigenval
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/letta-ai/skills --skill largest-eigenval
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/letta-ai/skills --skill largest-eigenval

简介

largest-eigenval 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 它可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 安装命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/letta-ai/skills --skill largest-eigenval。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,分类属于研究检索。

SKILL.md

Largest Eigenvalue Optimization

Overview

This skill provides guidance for optimizing numerical computations that need to outperform standard library implementations like numpy or scipy. The primary focus is on finding the largest eigenvalue of small dense matrices, but the principles apply broadly to numerical optimization tasks.

When to Use This Skill

  • Optimizing eigenvalue computations to beat numpy.linalg.eig performance
  • Performance-critical numerical linear algebra on small dense matrices (2x2 to ~100x100)
  • Tasks requiring Cython extensions that call LAPACK directly
  • Any numerical optimization where Python wrapper overhead is the bottleneck

Critical First Step: Profile Before Optimizing

Before attempting any optimization, understand where time is actually spent.

  1. Profile the reference implementation to identify the bottleneck:

- Is time spent in the algorithm itself (LAPACK routines)? - Or is time spent in Python wrapper overhead (input validation, memory allocation, type checking)?

  1. For small matrices, Python overhead often dominates:

- numpy.linalg.eig is already calling optimized LAPACK (dgeev/zgeev) - The actual LAPACK computation is microseconds for small matrices - Wrapper overhead can be 2-10x the actual computation time

  1. Profile command example: import cProfile cProfile.run('for _ in range(10000): numpy.linalg.eig(matrix)')

Approach Decision Tree

Is the matrix small (< 100x100)?
├── YES: Python overhead likely dominates
│   ├── Consider: Cython calling LAPACK directly
│   ├── Consider: Reducing input validation overhead
│   └── AVOID: Iterative methods (power iteration, Arnoldi)
│         - Startup costs dominate for small matrices
│         - JIT compilation overhead (Numba) adds latency
│
└── NO: Algorithm choice matters more
    ├── For sparse matrices: scipy.sparse.linalg.eigs (Arnoldi)
    ├── For only dominant eigenvalue: Power iteration
    └── For full spectrum: Direct LAPACK via numpy

Recommended Approaches (In Order)

Approach 1: Cython + Direct LAPACK (Recommended for Small Matrices)

Why it works: Eliminates Python overhead while using the same optimized LAPACK routines.

Implementation steps:

  1. Create a Cython extension (.pyx file)
  2. Use cython.cdivision(True) and cython.boundscheck(False) for speed
  3. Call LAPACK dgeev/zgeev directly via scipy.linalg.cython_lapack
  4. Manage memory with numpy arrays, pass pointers to LAPACK
  5. Build with a setup.py using Cython.Build

Key optimizations:

  • Skip input validation (assume well-formed input)
  • Pre-allocate output arrays
  • Use typed memoryviews for array access
  • Minimize Python object creation

Approach 2: scipy.linalg.eig with check_finite=False

Why it helps: Skips the NaN/Inf checking that adds overhead.

Limitation: Still has more Python overhead than Cython approach.

from scipy.linalg import eig
eigenvalues, eigenvectors = eig(matrix, check_finite=False)

Approach 3: Specialized Algorithms (Only for Specific Cases)

Power Iteration: Only if you need just the dominant eigenvalue AND matrix is large.

  • Converges slowly for matrices with similar-magnitude eigenvalues
  • Each iteration is cheap, but many iterations needed
  • Overhead dominates for small matrices

scipy.sparse.linalg.eigs: Only for large sparse matrices.

  • Arnoldi iteration has significant startup cost
  • Designed for matrices too large to factorize directly
  • Overkill for dense matrices under 1000x1000

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Pitfall 1: Using Iterative Methods for Small Matrices

Power iteration and Arnoldi methods have per-iteration overhead that compounds. For a 5x5 matrix, direct factorization is always faster.

Pitfall 2: Assuming Numba Will Be Faster

Numba's JIT compilation adds latency on first call. Even with caching, Numba functions have more overhead than pure C extensions for microsecond-scale operations.

Pitfall 3: Changing Algorithms When Overhead is the Problem

If numpy.linalg.eig spends 80% of time in Python wrappers and 20% in LAPACK, a "better algorithm" won't help. Reduce wrapper overhead instead.

Pitfall 4: Not Testing Complex Eigenvalues

Real matrices can have complex eigenvalues (e.g., rotation matrices). Always verify the solution handles complex results correctly.

Pitfall 5: Ignoring the "Largest" Definition

"Largest eigenvalue" typically means largest magnitude (absolute value), which may be negative or complex. Verify the dominance criterion.

Verification Strategy

Correctness Tests

  1. Eigenvalue equation: Verify A @ eigenvec ≈ eigenval * eigenvec (within numerical tolerance)
  2. Complex eigenvalues: Test with rotation matrices and skew-symmetric matrices
  3. Edge cases: 2x2 matrices, identity matrix, diagonal matrices

Dominance Tests

  1. Compare found eigenvalue against all eigenvalues from numpy.linalg.eig
  2. Verify it has the largest magnitude
  3. Test matrices where dominant eigenvalue is:

- Positive real - Negative real - Complex - Part of a complex conjugate pair

Performance Tests

  1. Benchmark against reference implementation (numpy.linalg.eig)
  2. Test across all required matrix sizes
  3. Run multiple iterations to account for variance
  4. Verify consistent speedup, not just average speedup

Test Infrastructure

Create a comprehensive test suite once rather than ad-hoc verification:

def verify_eigenvalue(matrix, eigenval, eigenvec, rtol=1e-10):
    """Verify eigenvalue equation A @ v = lambda * v"""
    lhs = matrix @ eigenvec
    rhs = eigenval * eigenvec
    return np.allclose(lhs, rhs, rtol=rtol)

def verify_dominance(matrix, eigenval):
    """Verify this is the largest magnitude eigenvalue"""
    all_eigenvals = np.linalg.eig(matrix)[0]
    max_magnitude = np.max(np.abs(all_eigenvals))
    return np.isclose(np.abs(eigenval), max_magnitude)

Build and Deployment

Cython Build Setup

# setup.py
from setuptools import setup
from Cython.Build import cythonize
import numpy as np

setup(
    ext_modules=cythonize("eigen_fast.pyx"),
    include_dirs=[np.get_include()]
)

Graceful Fallback

Always provide a fallback to numpy if the optimized module fails to import:

try:
    from .eigen_fast import largest_eigenvalue
except ImportError:
    def largest_eigenvalue(matrix):
        eigenvalues, eigenvectors = np.linalg.eig(matrix)
        idx = np.argmax(np.abs(eigenvalues))
        return eigenvalues[idx], eigenvectors[:, idx]

Summary Checklist

Before implementing:

  • Profile the reference implementation
  • Identify whether bottleneck is algorithm or overhead
  • Choose approach based on matrix size and sparsity

During implementation:

  • For small dense matrices: Use Cython + direct LAPACK
  • Handle complex eigenvalues correctly
  • Implement graceful fallback

During verification:

  • Test eigenvalue equation correctness
  • Test dominance (largest magnitude)
  • Test complex eigenvalue cases
  • Benchmark performance across all matrix sizes
  • Verify consistent speedup

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

26.82%
按下载量换算74

Gemini CLI

24.2%
按下载量换算67

Codex

19.22%
按下载量换算53

Antigravity

12.32%
按下载量换算34

OpenCode

7.96%
按下载量换算22

windsurf

3.57%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills