Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

new新的

Agent Skill

new 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

291

周安装

12

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

95
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:new(新的)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kelvinz/cobb
仓库路径:skills/new
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kelvinz/cobb --skill new
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kelvinz/cobb --skill new

简介

new 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。

  • 适用于需要跟踪和管理代码协作流程的场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否涉及联网或文件操作。
  • new 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

new

Create or update tasks/todo.md as the source of truth for what the project is and what features will be built.


Guardrails

  • Do not implement code.
  • Do not write individual feature PRDs (use plan for that).
  • Keep features "PRD-sized": one feature = one PRD. If it spans >2 subsystems, >1 UI surface + backend, or >~1 day of work, split it.
  • Prefer a stable todo.md structure; edit in place rather than rewriting.
  • Write tasks/todo.md so a junior dev (or another AI) can pick it up without extra context.
  • Do not use Markdown tables (use checklists + bullets).
  • Do not check feature boxes unless the PRD actually exists (typically updated by plan).
  • Treat memory capture as built-in: if durable decisions are made, update tasks/memory.md in this step instead of deferring to a separate memory pass.

Workflow

  1. Determine intent:

- New project → initialise tasks/todo.md. - Add/update features → edit the existing tasks/todo.md.

  1. If tasks/memory.md exists, skim relevant sections (project, key decisions, notes / gotchas) so you don't conflict with prior decisions.
  2. Ask clarifying questions only when needed (use A/B/C/D options).
  3. Update tasks/todo.md using the template below:

- New project: write a crisp Project section + propose an initial prioritised feature list, ordered by priority (highest first). - Add/update: add, merge, re-scope, and/or re-order features. - If adding a new Type: fix item and the user didn't specify placement, explicitly ask if it should move up the list (priority is determined by list order).

  1. Ensure each feature has clear in-scope vs out-of-scope boundaries and dependencies (if any).
  2. Evaluate memory-worthy outcomes and update tasks/memory.md inline when needed:

- project definition changes - scope boundaries or constraints that affect future features - priority decisions with durable rationale

  1. Reply with updated file paths and a short change summary (what you added/changed).

Clarifying Questions (Only If Needed)

Ask up to ~7 high-value questions. Keep them answerable via 1A, 2C, 3B.

Focus on ambiguity around:

  • target user + primary use case
  • the problem + desired outcome
  • constraints (platforms, timeline, integrations)
  • success metrics / how we know it worked
  • scope boundaries (what's explicitly in vs out)
  • priority order (what should be done first)
  • whether an item should be Type: feat vs fix vs chore (and where it should sit in priority order)
  • dependencies between features (by ID)

Example question format

1. What are we doing right now?
   A. Start a brand new project
   B. Add new features to an existing plan
   C. Refine/re-scope existing planned features
   D. Other: [describe]

tasks/todo.md Template (Markdown)

If tasks/todo.md does not exist, create it with this structure (fill in details; keep it concise).

# TODO: <Project name>

## Project
- **One-liner**: …
- **Target users**: …
- **Problem**: …
- **Success metrics**: …
- **Constraints** (optional): …
- **Non-goals**: …

## Features

Checkbox meaning: unchecked = PRD not written yet; checked = PRD exists; checked + ~~strikethrough~~ = completed (PRD archived).
Leave unchecked until a PRD exists.
Feature completion is determined by PRDs being archived to `tasks/archive/` and recorded in `tasks/memory.md`; strikethrough here is a derived marker applied during `commit` finalise.

### Features (priority order)
- Higher in the list = higher priority.
- [ ] f-01: <feature name>
  - Type: feat | fix | chore
  - Outcome: <user-visible outcome>
  - In scope: <what ships>
  - Out of scope: <what does not ship>
  - Dependencies: <none> | f-02, f-10

- [ ] f-02: <feature name>
  - Type: feat | fix | chore
  - Outcome: <user-visible outcome>
  - In scope: <what ships>
  - Out of scope: <what does not ship>
  - Dependencies: <none> | f-01

## Open Questions (project-wide only; per-feature questions go under each feature entry)
- Q-1: …

Update Rules (When tasks/todo.md Exists)

  • Preserve existing content and wording unless the user asks to change it.
  • Avoid duplicates: if a new feature overlaps an existing one, merge or propose a rename instead of adding a second item.
  • Keep IDs stable; IDs must be globally unique within tasks/todo.md.
  • When adding a new feature, use the next ID as (max existing f-##) + 1 (never reuse old IDs).
  • If duplicate IDs already exist, resolve by renumbering the newer/less-referenced item(s) and updating any Dependencies: references.
  • Keep the list prioritised top-to-bottom; if placement is unclear, ask where to insert (or add to the bottom).
  • If a feature depends on another feature, ensure the dependency is listed above it (or explicitly confirm the ordering).
  • Keep checkbox meaning consistent: checked means "PRD exists".
  • Ensure each feature entry includes:

- a type (feat/fix/chore) - a clear user-visible outcome - in scope / out of scope boundaries - dependencies by ID (if any)


Feature Writing Guidelines

  • Prefer feature names as verb phrases (e.g., "Invite teammates", "Export CSV").
  • For fix items, name them clearly (e.g., "Fix ") and set Type: fix. Include minimal bug info:

- Current behaviour: … - Expected behaviour: … - Repro steps (if known): …

  • For chores, keep them crisp and outcome-oriented (e.g., "Chore: remove dead code") and set Type: chore.
  • Ensure each feature has a crisp outcome (what changes for the user).
  • Avoid implementation tasks ("refactor", "set up DB") unless they are truly user-facing requirements.
  • If a feature is too large, split by user goal or workflow step until each item could reasonably become a single PRD.

Output

  • Create or reuse tasks/.
  • Create or update tasks/todo.md.
  • After updating, suggest the next feature to spec with plan (by ID/name): highest priority unchecked feature (checked = PRD exists).
  • When a PRD is created via plan, ensure the matching feature checkbox is checked in tasks/todo.md.
  • If you made a durable project decision (scope boundary, constraint, key choice), update tasks/memory.md in the same run.
  • End with a short status block:

- Files changed: list of created/updated files - Key decisions: any assumptions or choices made (if any) - Next step: recommended next skill or action


Quality Checklist

Before finalising tasks/todo.md:

  • Project section explains what the project is and who it serves.
  • Feature list is prioritised and reasonably sized (avoid 30 "must-haves").
  • Feature IDs are unique and stable (no duplicates).
  • No feature is checked unless its PRD exists.
  • Each feature has a Type: (feat / fix / chore).
  • Each feature has a user-visible outcome and explicit scope boundaries.
  • Dependencies (if any) reference valid feature IDs.
  • Duplicates/overlaps are merged or clearly distinguished.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.16%
按下载量换算34

Claude

28.9%
按下载量换算27

Cursor

17.24%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

8.92%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills