Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

k8s-hpa-cost-tuningKubernetes HPA cost tuning 搜索

Agent Skill

k8s-hpa-cost-tuning 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

333

周安装

14

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

116
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:k8s-hpa-cost-tuning(Kubernetes HPA cost tuning 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kikobeats/skills
仓库路径:skills/k8s-hpa-cost-tuning
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kikobeats/skills --skill k8s-hpa-cost-tuning
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kikobeats/skills --skill k8s-hpa-cost-tuning

简介

k8s-hpa-cost-tuning 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 适用于 Kubernetes HPA 成本优化相关的信息收集和资料整理场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和维护状态后再使用。
  • 安装前建议核实是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作,避免影响系统安全。
  • 具体用法请结合原始 README 文档进一步核验功能细节和使用限制。

SKILL.md

Kubernetes HPA Cost & Scale-Down Tuning

Mode selection (mandatory)

Declare a mode before executing this skill. All reasoning, thresholds, and recommendations depend on this choice.

mode = audit | incident

If no mode is provided, refuse to run and request clarification.

When to use

mode = audit — Periodic cost-savings audit

Run on a schedule (weekly or bi-weekly) to:

  • Detect over-reservation early
  • Validate that scale-down and node consolidation still work
  • Identify safe opportunities to reduce cluster cost

This mode assumes no active incident and prioritizes stability-preserving recommendations.

mode = incident — Post-incident scaling analysis

Run after a production incident or anomaly, attaching:

  • Production logs
  • HPA events
  • Scaling timelines

This mode focuses on:

  • Explaining *why* scaling behaved the way it did
  • Distinguishing traffic-driven vs configuration-driven incidents
  • Preventing recurrence without overcorrecting

This skill assumes Datadog for observability and standard Kubernetes HPA + Cluster Autoscaler.

Core mental model

Kubernetes scaling is a three-layer system:

  1. HPA decides *how many pods* (based on usage / requests)
  2. Scheduler decides *where pods go* (based on requests + constraints)
  3. Cluster Autoscaler decides *how many nodes exist* (only when nodes can empty)
Cost optimization only works if all three layers can move downward.

Key takeaway: HPA decides *quantity*, scheduler decides *placement*, autoscaler decides *cost*. Scale-up can be aggressive; scale-down must be possible. If replicas drop but nodes do not, the scheduler is the bottleneck.

Key Datadog metrics

The utility scripts query three metric families:

  • CPU used % — real utilization (kubernetes.cpu.usage.total / node.cpu_allocatable)
  • CPU requested % — reserved on paper (kubernetes.cpu.requests / node.cpu_allocatable)
  • Memory used vs requests — HPA-relevant ratio
CPU requested % must go down after scale-down for cost savings to be real. If memory usage stays above target, memory drives scale-up even when CPU is idle.

Scale-down as a first-class cost control

When scale-down is slow or blocked:

  • Replicas plateau
  • Pods remain evenly spread
  • Nodes never empty
  • Cluster Autoscaler cannot remove nodes

Result: permanent over-reservation.

Recommended HPA scale-down policy

scaleDown:
  stabilizationWindowSeconds: 60
  selectPolicy: Max
  policies:
    - type: Percent
      value: 50
      periodSeconds: 30

Effects: fast reaction once load drops, predictable replica collapse, low flapping risk.

Topology spread: critical cost lever

Topology spread must never prevent pod consolidation during scale-down.

Strict constraints block scheduler flexibility and freeze cluster size.

Anti-pattern (breaks cost optimization)

maxSkew: 1
whenUnsatisfiable: DoNotSchedule

Pods cannot collapse onto fewer nodes. Nodes never drain. Reserved CPU/memory never decreases.

Recommended default (cost-safe)

topologySpreadConstraints:
- topologyKey: kubernetes.io/hostname
  maxSkew: 2
  whenUnsatisfiable: ScheduleAnyway

Strong preference for spreading while allowing bin-packing during scale-down and enabling node removal.

Strict isolation (AZ-level only)

When hard guarantees are required:

topologySpreadConstraints:
- topologyKey: topology.kubernetes.io/zone
  maxSkew: 1
  whenUnsatisfiable: DoNotSchedule

Do not combine this with strict hostname-level spread.

Anti-affinity as a soft alternative

To avoid hot nodes without blocking scale-down:

podAntiAffinity:
  preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
  - weight: 100
    podAffinityTerm:
      topologyKey: kubernetes.io/hostname
      labelSelector:
        matchLabels:
          app: your-app

Anti-affinity is advisory and cost-safe.

Resource requests tuning

  • Over-requesting CPU = slower scale-down
  • Over-requesting memory = unexpected scale-ups

Practical defaults:

  • targetCPUUtilizationPercentage: 70
  • targetMemoryUtilizationPercentage: 75–80

Adjust one knob at a time.

Validation loop

Run weekly (or after changes):

  1. Check HPA current/target values
  2. Compare CPU used % vs CPU requested %
  3. Observe replica collapse after load drops
  4. Verify nodes drain and disappear
  5. Re-check latency, errors, OOMs

Quick validation commands

kubectl -n <namespace> get hpa <deployment>
kubectl -n <namespace> describe hpa <deployment>
kubectl -n <namespace> top pod --containers
kubectl top node
kubectl -n <namespace> get pods -o wide | sort -k7

Utility scripts

Both scripts require Datadog credentials:

export DD_API_KEY=...
export DD_APP_KEY=...
export DD_SITE=datadoghq.com   # optional, defaults to datadoghq.com

audit-metrics.mjs — Cost-savings discovery

Scan a cluster over a wide window (default 24 h) to find over-reservation and waste.

# Cluster-wide audit
node scripts/audit-metrics.mjs --cluster <cluster>

# With deployment deep-dive
node scripts/audit-metrics.mjs \
  --cluster <cluster> \
  --namespace <namespace> \
  --deployment <deployment>

Reports:

  • Cluster: CPU/memory used %, requested %, and waste % (requested minus used)
  • Deployment (when provided): CPU/memory usage vs requests, HPA replica range
  • Savings opportunities: actionable recommendations based on thresholds

incident-metrics.mjs — Post-incident analysis

Collect metrics for a narrow incident window and get a tuning recommendation.

node scripts/incident-metrics.mjs \
  --cluster <cluster> \
  --namespace <namespace> \
  --deployment <deployment> \
  --from <ISO8601> \
  --to <ISO8601>

Reports:

  • Cluster: CPU used % and requested % of allocatable
  • Deployment: CPU/memory usage vs requests, unavailable %
  • HPA: current / desired / max replicas
  • Capacity planning: required allocatable cores for 80 % and 70 % reservation ceilings
  • Tuning order: step-by-step recommendation (one knob at a time)

Interpretation notes

  • Keep limits.memory unchanged unless OOMKills or near-limit memory usage are confirmed
  • Use --out <path> to save full JSON for deeper analysis or diffing across runs
  • Run --help on either script for all options (relative windows, custom HPA name, pretty JSON)

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.37%
按下载量换算41

Claude

29.19%
按下载量换算34

Cursor

19.96%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

9.34%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills