Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
运维和基础设施敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

github-workflow-automationGitHub 工作流自动化

Agent Skill

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request、分支、提交和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。它适合让 Agent 查询项目状态、整理变更、辅助创建或检查协作事项,并把仓库中的信息转成可执行的下一步。使用时需要区分只读查询和写入操作;涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue、推送分支或访问私有仓库时,应确认 token 权限、目标仓库范围和用户授权。

总安装

190

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

67
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:github-workflow-automation(GitHub 工作流自动化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jpropato/siba
仓库路径:skills/github-workflow-automation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jpropato/siba --skill github-workflow-automation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jpropato/siba --skill github-workflow-automation

简介

github-workflow-automation 围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、PR 等协作信息提供辅助能力,适合整理项目状态与变更事项。

  • 可用于查询项目进展、生成协作建议或执行自动化操作。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装并使用该技能。
  • 涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue 或推送分支时应确认 token 权限与仓库范围。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

🔧 GitHub Workflow Automation

Patterns for automating GitHub workflows with AI assistance, inspired by Gemini CLI and modern DevOps practices.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Automating PR reviews with AI
  • Setting up issue triage automation
  • Creating GitHub Actions workflows
  • Integrating AI into CI/CD pipelines
  • Automating Git operations (rebases, cherry-picks)

1. Automated PR Review

1.1 PR Review Action

# .github/workflows/ai-review.yml
name: AI Code Review

on:
  pull_request:
    types: [opened, synchronize]

jobs:
  review:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      contents: read
      pull-requests: write

    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0

      - name: Get changed files
        id: changed
        run: |
          files=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
          echo "files<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
          echo "$files" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
          echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

      - name: Get diff
        id: diff
        run: |
          diff=$(git diff origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
          echo "diff<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
          echo "$diff" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
          echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

      - name: AI Review
        uses: actions/github-script@v7
        with:
          script: |
            const { Anthropic } = require('@anthropic-ai/sdk');
            const client = new Anthropic({ apiKey: process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY });

            const response = await client.messages.create({
              model: "claude-3-sonnet-20240229",
              max_tokens: 4096,
              messages: [{
                role: "user",
                content: `Review this PR diff and provide feedback:

                Changed files: ${{ steps.changed.outputs.files }}

                Diff:
                ${{ steps.diff.outputs.diff }}

                Provide:
                1. Summary of changes
                2. Potential issues or bugs
                3. Suggestions for improvement
                4. Security concerns if any

                Format as GitHub markdown.`
              }]
            });

            await github.rest.pulls.createReview({
              owner: context.repo.owner,
              repo: context.repo.repo,
              pull_number: context.issue.number,
              body: response.content[0].text,
              event: 'COMMENT'
            });
        env:
          ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

1.2 Review Comment Patterns

# AI Review Structure

## 📋 Summary

Brief description of what this PR does.

## ✅ What looks good

- Well-structured code
- Good test coverage
- Clear naming conventions

## ⚠️ Potential Issues

1. **Line 42**: Possible null pointer exception

// Current user.profile.name; // Suggested user?.profile?.name ?? "Unknown";

  1. Line 78: Consider error handling // Add try-catch or.catch()

💡 Suggestions

  • Consider extracting the validation logic into a separate function
  • Add JSDoc comments for public methods

🔒 Security Notes

  • No sensitive data exposure detected
  • API key handling looks correct
### 1.3 Focused Reviews

Review only specific file types

  • name: Filter code files

run: | files=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD | \ grep -E '\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx|py|go)$' || true) echo "code_files=$files" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

Review with context

  • name: AI Review with context

run: | # Include relevant context files context="" for file in ${{ steps.changed.outputs.files }}; do if [[ -f "$file" ]]; then context+="=== $file ===\n$(cat $file)\n\n" fi done

# Send to AI with full file context


---

## 2. Issue Triage Automation

### 2.1 Auto-label Issues

.github/workflows/issue-triage.yml

name: Issue Triage

on: issues: types: [opened]

jobs: triage: runs-on: ubuntu-latest permissions: issues: write

steps: - name: Analyze issue uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | const issue = context.payload.issue;

// Call AI to analyze const analysis = await analyzeIssue(issue.title, issue.body);

// Apply labels const labels = [];

if (analysis.type === 'bug') { labels.push('bug'); if (analysis.severity === 'high') labels.push('priority: high'); } else if (analysis.type === 'feature') { labels.push('enhancement'); } else if (analysis.type === 'question') { labels.push('question'); }

if (analysis.area) { labels.push(area: ${analysis.area}); }

await github.rest.issues.addLabels({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: issue.number, labels: labels });

// Add initial response if (analysis.type === 'bug' && !analysis.hasReproSteps) { await github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: issue.number, body: `Thanks for reporting this issue!

To help us investigate, could you please provide:

  • Steps to reproduce the issue
  • Expected behavior
  • Actual behavior
  • Environment (OS, version, etc.)

This will help us resolve your issue faster. 🙏` }); }


### 2.2 Issue Analysis Prompt

const TRIAGE_PROMPT = ` Analyze this GitHub issue and classify it:

Title: {title} Body: {body}

Return JSON with: { "type": "bug" | "feature" | "question" | "docs" | "other", "severity": "low" | "medium" | "high" | "critical", "area": "frontend" | "backend" | "api" | "docs" | "ci" | "other", "summary": "one-line summary", "hasReproSteps": boolean, "isFirstContribution": boolean, "suggestedLabels": ["label1", "label2"], "suggestedAssignees": ["username"] // based on area expertise } `;


### 2.3 Stale Issue Management

.github/workflows/stale.yml

name: Manage Stale Issues

on: schedule: - cron: "0 0 * * *" # Daily

jobs: stale: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/stale@v9 with: stale-issue-message: | This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.

If this issue is still relevant: - Add a comment with an update - Remove the stale label

Thank you for your contributions! 🙏

stale-pr-message: | This PR has been automatically marked as stale. Please update it or it will be closed in 14 days.

days-before-stale: 60 days-before-close: 14 stale-issue-label: "stale" stale-pr-label: "stale" exempt-issue-labels: "pinned,security,in-progress" exempt-pr-labels: "pinned,security"


---

## 3. CI/CD Integration

### 3.1 Smart Test Selection

.github/workflows/smart-tests.yml

name: Smart Test Selection

on: pull_request:

jobs: analyze: runs-on: ubuntu-latest outputs: test_suites: ${{ steps.analyze.outputs.suites }}

steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0

- name: Analyze changes id: analyze run: | # Get changed files changed=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)

# Determine which test suites to run suites="[]"

if echo "$changed" | grep -q "^src/api/"; then suites=$(echo $suites | jq '. + ["api"]') fi

if echo "$changed" | grep -q "^src/frontend/"; then suites=$(echo $suites | jq '. + ["frontend"]') fi

if echo "$changed" | grep -q "^src/database/"; then suites=$(echo $suites | jq '. + ["database", "api"]') fi

# If nothing specific, run all if [ "$suites" = "[]" ]; then suites='["all"]' fi

echo "suites=$suites" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

test: needs: analyze runs-on: ubuntu-latest strategy: matrix: suite: ${{ fromJson(needs.analyze.outputs.test_suites) }}

steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4

- name: Run tests run: | if [ "${{ matrix.suite }}" = "all" ]; then npm test else npm test -- --suite ${{ matrix.suite }} fi


### 3.2 Deployment with AI Validation

.github/workflows/deploy.yml

name: Deploy with AI Validation

on: push: branches: [main]

jobs: validate: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4

- name: Get deployment changes id: changes run: | # Get commits since last deployment last_deploy=$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0 2>/dev/null || echo "") if [ -n "$last_deploy" ]; then changes=$(git log --oneline $last_deploy..HEAD) else changes=$(git log --oneline -10) fi echo "changes<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT echo "$changes" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

- name: AI Risk Assessment id: assess uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | // Analyze changes for deployment risk const prompt = ` Analyze these changes for deployment risk:

${process.env.CHANGES}

Return JSON: { "riskLevel": "low" | "medium" | "high", "concerns": ["concern1", "concern2"], "recommendations": ["rec1", "rec2"], "requiresManualApproval": boolean } `;

// Call AI and parse response const analysis = await callAI(prompt);

if (analysis.riskLevel === 'high') { core.setFailed('High-risk deployment detected. Manual review required.'); }

return analysis; env: CHANGES: ${{ steps.changes.outputs.changes }}

deploy: needs: validate runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: production steps: - name: Deploy run: | echo "Deploying to production..." # Deployment commands here


### 3.3 Rollback Automation

.github/workflows/rollback.yml

name: Automated Rollback

on: workflow_dispatch: inputs: reason: description: "Reason for rollback" required: true

jobs: rollback: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0

- name: Find last stable version id: stable run: | # Find last successful deployment stable=$(git tag -l 'v*' --sort=-version:refname | head -1) echo "version=$stable" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

- name: Rollback run: | git checkout ${{ steps.stable.outputs.version }} # Deploy stable version npm run deploy

- name: Notify team uses: slackapi/slack-github-action@v1 with: payload: | { "text": "🔄 Production rolled back to ${{ steps.stable.outputs.version }}", "blocks": [ { "type": "section", "text": { "type": "mrkdwn", "text": "*Rollback executed*\n• Version: ${{ steps.stable.outputs.version }}\n• Reason: ${{ inputs.reason }}\n• Triggered by: ${{ github.actor }}" } } ] }


---

## 4. Git Operations

### 4.1 Automated Rebasing

.github/workflows/auto-rebase.yml

name: Auto Rebase

on: issue_comment: types: [created]

jobs: rebase: if: github.event.issue.pull_request && contains(github.event.comment.body, '/rebase') runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0 token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

- name: Setup Git run: | git config user.name "github-actions[bot]" git config user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com"

- name: Rebase PR run: | # Fetch PR branch gh pr checkout ${{ github.event.issue.number }}

# Rebase onto main git fetch origin main git rebase origin/main

# Force push git push --force-with-lease env: GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

- name: Comment result uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: context.issue.number, body: '✅ Successfully rebased onto main!' })


### 4.2 Smart Cherry-Pick

// AI-assisted cherry-pick that handles conflicts async function smartCherryPick(commitHash: string, targetBranch: string) { // Get commit info const commitInfo = await exec(git show ${commitHash} --stat);

// Check for potential conflicts const targetDiff = await exec( git diff ${targetBranch}...HEAD -- ${affectedFiles} );

// AI analysis const analysis = await ai.analyze(` I need to cherry-pick this commit to ${targetBranch}:

${commitInfo}

Current state of affected files on ${targetBranch}: ${targetDiff}

Will there be conflicts? If so, suggest resolution strategy. `);

if (analysis.willConflict) { // Create branch for manual resolution await exec( git checkout -b cherry-pick-${commitHash.slice(0, 7)} ${targetBranch} ); const result = await exec(git cherry-pick ${commitHash}, { allowFail: true, });

if (result.failed) { // AI-assisted conflict resolution const conflicts = await getConflicts(); for (const conflict of conflicts) { const resolution = await ai.resolveConflict(conflict); await applyResolution(conflict.file, resolution); } } } else { await exec(git checkout ${targetBranch}); await exec(git cherry-pick ${commitHash}); } }


### 4.3 Branch Cleanup

.github/workflows/branch-cleanup.yml

name: Branch Cleanup

on: schedule: - cron: '0 0 * * 0' # Weekly workflow_dispatch:

jobs: cleanup: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0

- name: Find stale branches id: stale run: | # Branches not updated in 30 days stale=$(git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/remotes/origin \ --format='%(refname:short) %(committerdate:relative)' | \ grep -E '[3-9][0-9]+ days|[0-9]+ months|[0-9]+ years' | \ grep -v 'origin/main\|origin/develop' | \ cut -d' ' -f1 | sed 's|origin/||')

echo "branches<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT echo "$stale" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

- name: Create cleanup PR if: steps.stale.outputs.branches != '' uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | const branches = ${{ steps.stale.outputs.branches }}.split('\n').filter(Boolean);

const body = `## 🧹 Stale Branch Cleanup

The following branches haven't been updated in over 30 days:

${branches.map(b => - \${b}\``).join('\n')}

Actions:

  • [ ] Review each branch
  • [ ] Delete branches that are no longer needed
  • Comment \/keep branch-name\ to preserve specific branches

`;

await github.rest.issues.create({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, title: 'Stale Branch Cleanup', body: body, labels: ['housekeeping'] });


---

## 5. On-Demand Assistance

### 5.1 @mention Bot

.github/workflows/mention-bot.yml

name: AI Mention Bot

on: issue_comment: types: [created] pull_request_review_comment: types: [created]

jobs: respond: if: contains(github.event.comment.body, '@ai-helper') runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4

- name: Extract question id: question run: | # Extract text after @ai-helper question=$(echo "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" | sed 's/.*@ai-helper//') echo "question=$question" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

- name: Get context id: context run: | if [ "${{ github.event.issue.pull_request }}" != "" ]; then # It's a PR - get diff gh pr diff ${{ github.event.issue.number }} > context.txt else # It's an issue - get description gh issue view ${{ github.event.issue.number }} --json body -q .body > context.txt fi echo "context=$(cat context.txt)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT env: GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

- name: AI Response uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | const response = await ai.chat(` Context: ${process.env.CONTEXT}

Question: ${process.env.QUESTION}

Provide a helpful, specific answer. Include code examples if relevant. `);

await github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: context.issue.number, body: response }); env: CONTEXT: ${{ steps.context.outputs.context }} QUESTION: ${{ steps.question.outputs.question }}


### 5.2 Command Patterns

Available Commands

CommandDescription
@ai-helper explainExplain the code in this PR
@ai-helper reviewRequest AI code review
@ai-helper fixSuggest fixes for issues
@ai-helper testGenerate test cases
@ai-helper docsGenerate documentation
/rebaseRebase PR onto main
/updateUpdate PR branch from main
/approveMark as approved by bot
/label bugAdd 'bug' label
/assign @userAssign to user

---

## 6. Repository Configuration

### 6.1 CODEOWNERS

.github/CODEOWNERS

Global owners

  • @org/core-team

Frontend

/src/frontend/ @org/frontend-team *.tsx @org/frontend-team *.css @org/frontend-team

Backend

/src/api/ @org/backend-team /src/database/ @org/backend-team

Infrastructure

/.github/ @org/devops-team /terraform/ @org/devops-team Dockerfile @org/devops-team

Docs

/docs/ @org/docs-team *.md @org/docs-team

Security-sensitive

/src/auth/ @org/security-team /src/crypto/ @org/security-team


### 6.2 Branch Protection

Set up via GitHub API

  • name: Configure branch protection

uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | await github.rest.repos.updateBranchProtection({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, branch: 'main', required_status_checks: { strict: true, contexts: ['test', 'lint', 'ai-review'] }, enforce_admins: true, required_pull_request_reviews: { required_approving_review_count: 1, require_code_owner_reviews: true, dismiss_stale_reviews: true }, restrictions: null, required_linear_history: true, allow_force_pushes: false, allow_deletions: false });


---

## Best Practices

### Security

- Store API keys in GitHub Secrets
- Use minimal permissions in workflows
- Validate all inputs
- Don't expose sensitive data in logs

### Performance

- Cache dependencies
- Use matrix builds for parallel testing
- Skip unnecessary jobs with path filters
- Use self-hosted runners for heavy workloads

### Reliability

- Add timeouts to jobs
- Handle rate limits gracefully
- Implement retry logic
- Have rollback procedures

---

## Resources

- [Gemini CLI GitHub Action](https://github.com/google-github-actions/run-gemini-cli)
- [GitHub Actions Documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/actions)
- [GitHub REST API](https://docs.github.com/en/rest)
- [CODEOWNERS Syntax](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-code-owners)

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

26.6%
按下载量换算18

Antigravity

21.54%
按下载量换算14

Codex

17.42%
按下载量换算12

windsurf

12.86%
按下载量换算9

Gemini CLI

8.51%
按下载量换算6

OpenCode

3.58%
按下载量换算2

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills