Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

retrospective-facilitator回顾促进者

Agent Skill

retrospective-facilitator 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,836

周安装

177

GitHub Stars

3

下载量

1,669
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:retrospective-facilitator(回顾促进者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings
仓库路径:skills/retrospective-facilitator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings --skill 'Retrospective Facilitator'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings --skill 'Retrospective Facilitator'

简介

retrospective-facilitator 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。

  • 适用于根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息聚合与初步筛选的场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能触发联网或文件读写操作。
  • 建议结合原始 README 文档进一步验证具体功能和使用边界。

SKILL.md

Retrospective Facilitator

The Retrospective Facilitator skill helps teams conduct effective retrospectives that drive continuous improvement. It provides structured formats, facilitation techniques, and follow-through mechanisms to ensure retrospectives generate actionable insights rather than just venting sessions.

This skill excels at creating psychological safety, guiding productive discussions, synthesizing patterns from team feedback, facilitating prioritization of improvements, and ensuring action items are tracked and completed.

Retrospective Facilitator follows the Agile principle of continuous improvement: regularly reflect on what's working, what's not, and commit to specific improvements. The goal is learning and action, not blame or complaint.

Core Workflows

Workflow 1: Prepare for Retrospective

Before the meeting:

  1. Choose Retro Format

- Consider team mood and context - Vary format to keep it fresh (don't repeat same format every time) - Match format to situation: - Struggling team: Sailboat, Speed Car - Good velocity: Start/Stop/Continue, 4 L's - After incident: Timeline, Fishbone - New team: Hot Air Balloon, Mad/Sad/Glad - Prepare format-specific materials

  1. Review Data

- Sprint metrics (velocity, burndown) - Completed vs. committed work - Bug counts and quality metrics - Team happiness/satisfaction scores - Previous retro action items (were they done?)

  1. Set Up Space

- Book meeting room or set up virtual board (Miro, Mural, FigJam) - Prepare timers and collaboration tools - Create sections for chosen format - Ensure everyone can participate equally

  1. Remind Team

- Send reminder with time and location - Share retro format in advance - Ask team to come prepared with thoughts - Emphasize psychological safety and respect

Output: Prepared retro environment with chosen format and data review.

Workflow 2: Facilitate Retrospective Session

Time-box: 60 minutes for 2-week sprint

Phase 1: Set the Stage (5 min)

Purpose: Create safe space and focus attention

  1. Welcome team and state purpose
  2. Review retro norms:

- Vegas rule: What's said here, stays here - No blame, focus on learning - Everyone's input matters equally - Assume good intent

  1. Brief check-in: One word to describe sprint
  2. Review previous action items (were they done?)

Phase 2: Gather Data (15 min)

Purpose: Collect team's observations and feelings

  1. Introduce retro format and sections
  2. Silent writing (5-10 min):

- Each person adds sticky notes to board - Encourage specific examples, not generalizations - Quantity over quality at this stage

  1. Read and cluster (5 min):

- Quick readout of all items (no discussion yet) - Group similar themes together - Facilitator or team members can cluster

Formats include:

  • Start/Stop/Continue
  • Mad/Sad/Glad
  • 4 L's (Liked/Learned/Lacked/Longed For)
  • Sailboat (Wind/Anchor/Rocks/Island)
  • Plus/Delta
  • Timeline

Phase 3: Generate Insights (15 min)

Purpose: Find patterns and understand root causes

  1. Identify themes:

- Which clusters have most items? - What patterns emerge? - Any surprises or new insights?

  1. Discussion:

- Dive deeper into top 3-5 themes - Ask "why" to get to root causes (5 Whys technique) - Ensure all voices heard - Facilitator keeps discussion productive

  1. Vote on priorities (optional):

- Each person gets 3-5 votes - Vote on issues most important to address - Focuses improvement efforts

Phase 4: Decide What to Do (15 min)

Purpose: Commit to specific improvements

  1. Choose 1-3 improvements:

- Based on voting and discussion - Must be specific and actionable - Achievable within next sprint

  1. Create action items:

- For each improvement: - What specifically will we do? - Who will own it? - When will it be done? - How will we know it worked? - Use SMART criteria (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound)

  1. Commitment:

- Team agrees to action items - Add to sprint backlog or tracking system - Set reminder to check progress

Phase 5: Close (10 min)

Purpose: End on positive note and confirm next steps

  1. Summarize:

- Recap key insights - Confirm action items and owners - Appreciate participation and candor

  1. Retro the retro:

- Quick feedback: "On scale of 1-5, how useful was this retro?" - What worked well about this format? - What would improve future retros?

  1. Appreciations:

- Invite team to appreciate each other - Recognize contributions and efforts - End on positive, forward-looking note

Output: 1-3 concrete action items with owners and due dates.

Workflow 3: Follow Up on Action Items

During sprint:

  1. Add action items to sprint backlog
  2. Track in standup or project board
  3. Check progress mid-sprint
  4. Remove blockers if action items stuck

At next retro:

  1. Review previous action items first
  2. Celebrate completed items
  3. Discuss why any items weren't completed
  4. Decide: continue, discard, or modify incomplete items

Monthly:

  1. Review trend of action items completed vs. created
  2. Assess if improvements are having impact
  3. Adjust retro approach if low completion rate

Workflow 4: Handle Difficult Situations

Conflict or tension emerges:

  • Acknowledge the emotion
  • Remind team of retro norms
  • Refocus on learning, not blame
  • Park heated topics for separate discussion

Team is silent or disengaged:

  • Check in: "What's going on?"
  • Try different activity (e.g., timeline, drawing)
  • Make it safe: share your own observation first
  • Consider anonymous submission

Same issues appear every retro:

  • Acknowledge the pattern explicitly
  • Deeper root cause analysis
  • Escalate to management if team can't resolve
  • Question if previous action items were right approach

Blame or finger-pointing:

  • Reframe to system/process issue
  • "What conditions allowed this to happen?"
  • Shift focus to future: "How can we prevent this?"

Quick Reference

ActionCommand/Trigger
Run retrospective"facilitate retrospective"
Choose format"suggest retro format"
Review action items"check retro action items"
Retro template"create retro board for [format]"
Handle conflict"retro facilitation help"

Best Practices

  • Vary the format: Don't use same format every time; keeps it fresh and surfaces different insights
  • Psychological safety first: Without safety, you get polite agreement not honest feedback
  • Time-box strictly: Respect people's time; focused 60 min better than rambling 90 min
  • Review previous actions: If action items never get done, why create more?
  • 1-3 improvements max: Can't fix everything; focus creates momentum
  • Make it specific: "Better communication" is vague; "Daily standup by 10 AM" is actionable
  • No skipping: Regular cadence builds trust and habit; don't skip even if "nothing to discuss"
  • Rotate facilitator: Different facilitators bring fresh perspective and energy
  • Data not opinions: Use metrics to ground discussion in reality
  • Focus on learning: "What did we learn?" not "Who screwed up?"
  • Appreciate the good: Don't only focus on problems; recognize wins and strengths
  • Follow through: If action items are never completed, team stops trusting the process

Retro Formats

1. Start/Stop/Continue

Best for: General-purpose, works for any team

Categories:

  • Start: What should we start doing?
  • Stop: What should we stop doing?
  • Continue: What should we keep doing?

Facilitator tips:

  • "Continue" often forgotten; actively solicit positive practices
  • Look for items in "Start" that directly address items in "Stop"

2. Mad/Sad/Glad

Best for: High emotion, after difficult sprint

Categories:

  • Mad: What frustrated or angered us?
  • Sad: What disappointed us?
  • Glad: What made us happy?

Facilitator tips:

  • Validates emotions while channeling toward improvement
  • Ensure "Glad" gets equal attention; don't only focus on negative

3. 4 L's

Best for: Learning-focused teams, after new initiative

Categories:

  • Liked: What went well?
  • Learned: What did we learn?
  • Lacked: What was missing?
  • Longed For: What do we wish we had?

Facilitator tips:

  • "Learned" surfaces insights for knowledge sharing
  • "Longed For" uncovers team needs and aspirations

4. Sailboat

Best for: Strategic thinking, longer-term planning

Categories:

  • Island: Our goal
  • Wind: What's helping us move forward?
  • Anchor: What's holding us back?
  • Rocks: What risks are ahead?

Facilitator tips:

  • Start with Island (shared goal) for alignment
  • Visual metaphor helps creative thinking

5. Speed Car

Best for: Team moving fast but maybe recklessly

Categories:

  • Engine: What's driving us forward?
  • Parachute: What's slowing us down?
  • Bridge: What's helping us move forward?
  • Wall: What obstacles are in our way?

Facilitator tips:

  • Highlights both accelerators and decelerators
  • Good for discussing pace and sustainability

6. Plus/Delta

Best for: Simple, quick retros

Categories:

  • Plus (+): What went well?
  • Delta (Δ): What should we change?

Facilitator tips:

  • Fast and straightforward
  • Use when time is limited
  • Delta is less negative-sounding than "minus"

7. Timeline

Best for: After major event, incident, or complex sprint

Process:

  1. Draw timeline of sprint/event
  2. Each person adds significant moments
  3. Identify patterns and turning points
  4. Discuss what to learn and change

Facilitator tips:

  • Helps reconstruct complex situations
  • Reveals different perspectives on same events

8. Hot Air Balloon

Best for: New teams or after major changes

Categories:

  • Hot Air: What lifts us up? (strengths, opportunities)
  • Sandbags: What weighs us down? (challenges, obstacles)
  • Storm Clouds: What external threats exist?
  • Clear Skies: What opportunities lie ahead?

Facilitator tips:

  • Good for team building and shared vision
  • Balances internal and external factors

5 Whys Technique

Use for root cause analysis:

  1. State the problem
  2. Ask "Why did this happen?" → Answer
  3. Ask "Why did [answer] happen?" → Answer
  4. Repeat 3-5 times until root cause emerges
  5. Create action item addressing root cause

Example:

  • Problem: Tests failed in production
  • Why? → Code wasn't tested in staging
  • Why? → Staging environment was down
  • Why? → No monitoring to detect outage
  • Why? → We haven't prioritized infrastructure monitoring
  • Action: Implement infrastructure monitoring and alerts

Action Item Template

**Improvement**: [Brief description]

**Action**: [Specific thing we will do]
**Owner**: [Name of person responsible]
**Due Date**: [When will this be complete]
**Success Criteria**: [How we'll know it worked]

**Example**:
Improvement: Reduce context switching during sprint
Action: Implement "No meeting Thursdays" for deep work
Owner: Sarah (Engineering Manager)
Due Date: Start next sprint (Feb 15)
Success Criteria: Team reports 4+ hour uninterrupted work blocks on Thursdays

Facilitation Anti-Patterns

Avoid these common mistakes:

  • Facilitator dominating: Your job is to guide, not provide all answers
  • Skipping action items: Retro without actions is just venting
  • No follow-up: If actions never reviewed, team stops trying
  • Same format every time: Becomes stale and predictable
  • Letting discussions run over: Time-boxing shows respect
  • Not addressing elephants: Ignoring obvious issues kills trust
  • Making it personal: Focus on systems and processes, not people
  • Too many actions: 1-3 is realistic; 10 is overwhelming
  • Vague improvements: "Communicate better" isn't actionable
  • Skipping when busy: "No time for retro" signals improvement isn't valued

Psychological Safety Checklist

Before and during retro, ensure:

  • Team knows feedback is confidential
  • All voices are heard equally
  • Disagreement is welcome and safe
  • Blame and judgment are absent
  • Failures are treated as learning opportunities
  • Leadership models vulnerability and openness
  • Retaliating for honesty has consequences
  • Anonymous input is option if needed

Integration Points

  • Sprint Planner: Schedule retro at end of every sprint
  • Task Manager: Track retro action items as tasks
  • Project Planner: Feed learnings into future planning
  • Team Metrics: Use data to inform discussion
  • Knowledge Base: Document key learnings and patterns
  • Continuous Improvement: Trends across retros inform process changes

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.97%
按下载量换算584

Claude

27.27%
按下载量换算455

Cursor

18.48%
按下载量换算308

Gemini CLI

9.98%
按下载量换算167

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills