Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

competitive-analysis竞争分析

Agent Skill

competitive-analysis 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

136,781

周安装

5,480

GitHub Stars

10

下载量

44,278
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:competitive-analysis(竞争分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jk-0001/competitive-analysis
安装命令:
openclaw skills install competitive-analysis
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install competitive-analysis

简介

对个体创业者企业进行深入的竞争分析。在详细了解竞争对手、寻找可利用的差距、了解竞争对手的策略、对自己的产品进行基准测试或决定如何在该领域进行定位时使用。比市场研究中的广泛景观图更深入——这是对特定竞争对手的集中剖析。触发“分析我的竞争对手”、“竞争分析”、“谁是我的竞争对手”、“深入了解竞争对手”、“我如何击败竞争对手”、“竞争格局”、“与竞争对手进行比较”。

SKILL.md

name
competitive-analysis
description
Perform a deep competitive analysis for a solopreneur business. Use when mapping competitors in detail, finding exploitable gaps, understanding competitor strategy, benchmarking your own offering, or deciding how to position against the field. Goes deeper than the broad landscape mapping in market-research — this is focused dissection of specific competitors. Trigger on "analyze my competitors", "competitive analysis", "who are my competitors", "competitor deep-dive", "how do I beat the competition", "competitive landscape", "benchmark against competitors".

Competitive Analysis

Overview

Shallow competitive research (checking a few websites) is not enough. This playbook gives you a systematic way to dissect competitors across strategy, product, pricing, marketing, operations, and reviews — then synthesise findings into exploitable gaps and a positioning wedge.


Step 1: Identify and Tier Your Competitors

Not all competitors are equal. Categorize them before diving in.

Direct competitors: Solve the exact same problem for the exact same customer. These are your primary benchmarks.

Indirect competitors: Solve a related problem or serve the same customer with a different solution. These matter because your customer is choosing between ALL of them (including doing nothing).

Aspirational competitors: Not in your niche yet, but could be. Larger or more established players who might expand into your space. Monitor these — they reveal what "winning at scale" looks like.

Identify 3-5 direct, 2-3 indirect, and 1-2 aspirational. You don't need to deep-dive all of them — focus your deepest analysis on your top 3 direct competitors.


Step 2: Intelligence Gathering Framework

For each competitor you're deep-diving, collect data across these six layers:

Layer 1: Strategy & Positioning

  • What is their stated mission or tagline?
  • Who do they say they're for? (Check homepage, about page, marketing copy)
  • What problem do they claim to solve?
  • What is their core differentiator? (The one thing they lean hardest on)
  • Who do they NOT serve? (The gaps in their positioning = your opportunity)

Layer 2: Product & Features

  • What does their product actually do? (Use their product page, feature list, docs)
  • What is their product's complexity level? (Simple tool vs. full platform)
  • What are their key technical strengths?
  • What's missing from their product that users would want? (See Layer 5 — Reviews)
  • What's their integration ecosystem like?

Layer 3: Pricing & Business Model

  • What pricing tiers do they offer?
  • What's included at each tier?
  • Do they offer a free tier or free trial? What's the conversion funnel?
  • What's their pricing psychology? (Per-user, per-usage, flat-rate, freemium?)
  • Where are the pricing gaps? (Too expensive for small users? No mid-tier option?)

Layer 4: Marketing & Distribution

  • How do they acquire customers? (Check: SEO — use Ahrefs/Ubersuggest free; Paid ads — use Google Ads Transparency Center or Facebook Ad Library; Content — check their blog, YouTube, social)
  • What channels are they strongest on?
  • What channels are they ignoring? (Your opening)
  • What is their content strategy? (Blog topics reveal what they think customers care about)
  • Do they have a referral or partner program?

Layer 5: Customer Reviews (Critical Layer)

This is where you find gold. Read 20+ reviews per competitor across:

  • G2, Capterra, Trustpilot
  • App Store / Google Play (if applicable)
  • Reddit threads mentioning the product
  • Twitter/X mentions

Categorize every complaint you find:

  • Feature gaps (things users want but don't have)
  • UX/experience frustrations (things that are clunky or confusing)
  • Pricing complaints (things users think are overpriced or unfair)
  • Support complaints (things the company handles poorly)
  • Onboarding complaints (things that are hard to get started with)

Also note what users praise most — these are the table stakes you must match.

Layer 6: Company Health & Trajectory

  • When was the company founded? How old is it?
  • Is it funded? How much? By whom? (Crunchbase)
  • Headcount trend on LinkedIn — growing, stable, or shrinking?
  • Recent news, blog posts, or product announcements — what direction are they moving?
  • Are they expanding into new markets or doubling down?

Step 3: Build a Comparison Matrix

After gathering data, create a side-by-side matrix. Columns = competitors (+ your planned offering). Rows = the dimensions that matter most to your target customer.

Pick 8-12 rows that are decision-relevant. Examples:

  • Price (monthly, annual)
  • Ease of setup (1-5 scale based on reviews)
  • Key feature A
  • Key feature B
  • Integration with [popular tool]
  • Free tier available?
  • Customer support quality
  • Speed / performance
  • Customization depth

Fill in each cell with what you know. Leave gaps where you genuinely don't know — gaps in your knowledge are research tasks, not guesses.


Step 4: Synthesize Into Exploitable Gaps

From your matrix and review analysis, identify your top 3 exploitable gaps. A gap is exploitable when ALL of these are true:

  1. Multiple competitors share the weakness — it's not just one player being sloppy; it's a structural blind spot in the market.
  2. Customers actually complain about it — you have review evidence that real people care.
  3. You can solve it — given your skills, budget, and timeline as a solopreneur.
  4. It's not table stakes — if everyone does it, you can't win by doing it too. The gap must be something competitors skip or do poorly.

For each exploitable gap, write:

  • What the gap is
  • Evidence (specific complaints or data)
  • How you would solve it
  • Why competitors likely aren't solving it (too niche for them? Requires a different business model? Conflicts with their strategy?)

Step 5: Define Your Competitive Wedge

Your "wedge" is the single, sharp angle you enter the market on. It's not "we're better at everything." It's "we are the only option that does [specific thing] for [specific person]."

Wedge formula:

"The only [product category] that [does specific thing] for [specific customer type]."

Examples:

  • "The only project management tool built specifically for solo consultants managing client work."
  • "The only email marketing platform with AI-generated subject line A/B testing built into the free tier."

Test your wedge:

  • Would a target customer immediately understand why this is different?
  • Is this wedge defensible for at least 6-12 months before a competitor copies it?
  • Can you build and deliver on this wedge solo?

Step 6: Ongoing Competitive Monitoring

Competition doesn't stop once you launch. Set up a lightweight monitoring routine:

  • Weekly (5 min): Check Google Alerts for top 2-3 competitor names. Scan for new features, pricing changes, funding news.
  • Monthly (30 min): Re-read 5-10 new reviews on G2/Capterra for your competitors. Are new complaints emerging?
  • Quarterly (2 hours): Re-run the comparison matrix. Have gaps closed? Have new gaps opened? Has a new competitor appeared?

Pitfalls

  • Copying a competitor's strategy instead of finding gaps. Copying loses on price and polish against incumbents.
  • Obsessing over one well-funded competitor and ignoring the small players who actually serve your niche.
  • Reading only positive reviews. Negative reviews are 10x more valuable for finding gaps.
  • Forgetting that "doing nothing" is always a competitor. Some customers will stick with their manual workaround rather than switch.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

98.86%
按下载量换算43,773

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills