Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发敏感数据clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

intercom-docs对讲文档

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

3,794

周安装

155

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,228
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:intercom-docs(对讲文档)
来源仓库:https://github.com/georgelewi5/intercom-docs
安装命令:
openclaw skills install intercom-docs
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install intercom-docs

简介

对讲文档技能专门优化 Intercom 帮助中心内容的撰写与审核流程。

  • 适用于维护产品支持文档、FAQ 更新及知识库结构梳理。
  • 保持术语一致性与链接有效性,提升用户自助服务体验。
  • 涉及公司内部知识资产,需遵循信息分级与访问权限策略。
  • 建议定期同步最新产品变更,避免过时信息误导用户。intercom-docs 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
intercom
description
Create, update, improve, and review Intercom help-center and support documentation. Use when writing new Intercom articles, revising existing docs, auditing a help center for gaps, turning product or codebase context into customer-facing documentation, or working with Intercom workspace content via the Intercom API using a private workspace access token.

intercom

Create and maintain Intercom documentation that is clear, accurate, concise, and useful.

Scope

Use this skill for:

  • drafting new Intercom help articles
  • improving existing articles for clarity, structure, and consistency
  • converting product, support, and codebase knowledge into user-facing documentation
  • reviewing documentation gaps, duplication, stale content, and missing troubleshooting guidance
  • interacting with Intercom workspace content via the Intercom API when a private workspace access token is available

Core workflow

  1. Identify the audience: end user, admin, internal support, or mixed.
  2. Confirm the source of truth: product behavior, code, support knowledge, screenshots, existing docs, or direct guidance.
  3. State uncertainty clearly instead of inventing behavior.
  4. Prefer improving existing documentation over creating duplicates.
  5. Write for task completion first: strong headings, short paragraphs, numbered steps, concise troubleshooting.
  6. If an Intercom API token is available, inspect current content before proposing replacements.

Writing rules

  • Write for someone trying to complete a task quickly.
  • Prefer concrete steps over abstract explanation.
  • Use simple language and avoid marketing fluff.
  • Keep terminology consistent with the product UI and existing docs.
  • Call out prerequisites, permissions, limitations, and common failure cases.
  • If behavior is inferred from code, mark it as needing verification when appropriate.
  • Default to short, scannable sections rather than dense prose.

Recommended article structure

Use this structure when it fits:

  1. Title
  2. Short summary of what the article helps with
  3. Who this is for / prerequisites
  4. Step-by-step instructions
  5. Expected result
  6. Troubleshooting / common issues
  7. Related articles or next steps

Review checklist

When reviewing an existing Intercom article or help center area, check for:

  • outdated UI labels or navigation paths
  • unclear audience or prerequisites
  • missing permissions/role requirements
  • missing edge cases or limitations
  • weak troubleshooting coverage
  • duplicate or overlapping articles
  • inconsistent terminology across related docs
  • too much implementation detail for end users

Common doc tasks

Draft a new article

When asked to create a new Intercom doc:

  • define the user problem the article solves
  • choose a clear task-based title
  • write only the context needed to complete the task
  • include exact steps and expected outcomes
  • add edge cases and troubleshooting when relevant

Update an existing article

When asked to revise docs:

  • preserve the original intent if still valid
  • remove stale steps and outdated UI references
  • tighten wording and improve scanability
  • keep terminology and formatting consistent with neighboring docs
  • note any product ambiguity that should be verified

Turn code/product context into docs

When the source material is code, tickets, or notes:

  • extract actual user-visible behavior
  • ignore implementation detail unless it affects setup, troubleshooting, limits, or expected outcomes
  • translate technical behavior into user-facing language
  • separate confirmed behavior from assumptions

Gap review

When reviewing an Intercom knowledge base:

  • identify missing onboarding docs
  • identify missing troubleshooting articles
  • identify duplicate or overlapping articles
  • identify confusing naming or inconsistent terminology
  • suggest the smallest useful set of changes first

Intercom API usage

Use the Intercom API only when an access token for the user's own workspace is available.

Authentication

Intercom private workspace access uses a bearer token in the Authorization header.

Example:

curl -s https://api.intercom.io/help_center/collections \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer <access_token>' \
  -H 'Accept: application/json'

Notes:

  • Treat the access token like a password.
  • Do not write the token into docs, commits, or skill files.
  • Prefer read-only inspection first, then propose changes before writing.
  • For public third-party apps, Intercom expects OAuth rather than asking users for access tokens.

API-first doc review workflow

If an Intercom access token is available:

  1. List current help-center collections and articles.
  2. Sample the relevant article bodies before rewriting.
  3. Identify stale content, overlap, and missing coverage.
  4. Draft the improved content.
  5. Show the proposed delta clearly before applying changes unless the user explicitly asks for direct updates.

Minimum output when reviewing live Intercom docs

Provide:

  • article or collection reviewed
  • what is working
  • what is unclear/outdated/missing
  • proposed improved title if needed
  • proposed revised body
  • assumptions / items to verify

Output preference

Unless asked otherwise, provide:

  • a suggested article title
  • the article body in publishable markdown/plain text
  • a short review summary
  • a short note listing assumptions or items to verify

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

86.64%
按下载量换算1,064

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills