Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

intakeintake 表格

Agent Skill

intake 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

8,160

周安装

340

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

2,720
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:intake(intake 表格)
来源仓库:https://github.com/projectsnowwork/intake
安装命令:
openclaw skills install intake
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install intake

简介

设计服务关系接收表格与入职工作流程,收集必要初始信息。

  • 适用于项目启动、客户对接或服务交付前的信息整理。
  • 可定制发现访谈模板和摘要生成逻辑。intake 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 安装命令:openclaw skills install intake,适用于 OpenClaw。
  • 表单设计应遵循隐私保护原则,避免过度索取敏感数据。

SKILL.md

name
intake
description
>

Intake

Intake is the system for collecting the right information, in the right order, with the right level of trust, before real work begins.

Trigger Conditions

Use this skill when the user needs to:

  • onboard a new client, patient, customer, tenant, student, or employee
  • design an intake form or discovery questionnaire
  • structure an onboarding workflow
  • gather requirements before providing a service
  • identify what information should be collected at the start of a relationship
  • improve an existing intake process that feels incomplete, bureaucratic, or low-conversion

Also trigger when the user says things like:

  • "I need an intake form"
  • "Help me onboard a new client"
  • "What should I ask before starting"
  • "I need a discovery process"
  • "How do I collect the right information upfront"

The Information You Wish You Had Asked

Every service relationship has a moment — usually six weeks in — where the provider thinks: I wish I had known that at the start.

The therapist who discovers the client has tried this approach twice before. The contractor who finds out the client had a bad experience with the last three contractors. The accountant who learns about the offshore account in month four. The coach who realizes the presenting goal is not the real goal.

Intake is not paperwork. It is the intelligence-gathering operation that determines whether the work that follows will be effective or expensive.

This skill builds intake systems that surface the information that matters — before the work begins.

Core Principle

People do not withhold important information because they are secretive. They withhold it because nobody asked the right question, or because the form felt like bureaucracy rather than care. The intake process that feels like a thoughtful conversation extracts more useful information than the intake process that feels like a legal requirement.

Design for the conversation. The information follows.

Default Outputs

Depending on the request, produce one or more of the following:

  1. Intake Form

A structured form with sections, field names, and question wording.

  1. Intake Interview Guide

A conversation-based script for live intake calls or first sessions.

  1. Intake Workflow

A step-by-step onboarding flow showing what is collected, when, and why.

  1. Intake Summary Template

A reusable template for summarizing what was learned during intake.

  1. Intake Audit

A diagnostic review of an existing intake process, including friction points, missing questions, over-collection, and compliance considerations.

Response Rules

When responding:

  • first identify the service type
  • separate administrative intake from discovery intake
  • avoid collecting information that will not be used
  • explain why sensitive questions are asked
  • prefer clarity and usability over comprehensiveness
  • flag privacy or regulatory issues without pretending to give legal, medical, or financial advice

Intake System Architecture

~~~python INTAKE_FRAMEWORK = { "information_layers": { "layer_1_administrative": { "purpose": "Legal, billing, and contact requirements", "examples": ["Full legal name", "Date of birth", "Contact information", "Insurance or billing details", "Emergency contact", "Consent and authorization signatures"], "format": "Form — this is genuinely administrative, forms are appropriate here" }, "layer_2_presenting": { "purpose": "Why they are here and what they want", "examples": ["Primary reason for seeking service", "What they hope to achieve", "What has already been tried", "Timeline and urgency"], "format": "Questionnaire with open-ended fields — not multiple choice" }, "layer_3_context": { "purpose": "The information that changes how you provide the service", "examples": ["Relevant history", "Previous experiences with similar services", "Factors that affect delivery", "Preferences and constraints", "What success looks like to them specifically"], "format": "Intake interview — conversation extracts what forms miss" }, "layer_4_relationship": { "purpose": "How to work with this person effectively", "examples": ["Communication preferences", "Decision-making style", "What they need from a provider relationship", "Previous experiences that shaped their expectations"], "format": "Discovery conversation — built into first session or call" } } } ~~~

Intake Form Design

~~~python FORM_DESIGN = { "principles": { "minimum_viable_intake": "Collect only what you will actually use — every field not used creates friction without return", "progressive_disclosure": "Administrative fields first, sensitive questions later — trust is built before vulnerability is requested", "open_fields_over_checkboxes": "Checkboxes tell you what you gave them to say. Open fields tell you what they actually think.", "explain_why": "A sentence explaining why you need sensitive information dramatically increases completion rate and accuracy" },

"question_design": { "weak": "Do you have any medical conditions? [ ] Yes [ ] No", "strong": "Please describe any physical conditions, injuries, or health factors that are relevant to our work together. This helps me tailor my approach from our first session.",

"weak_2": "What are your goals?", "strong_2": "If our work together goes exactly as you hope, what will be different in your life six months from now? Be as specific as you can." },

"completion_rate_factors": [ "Mobile-optimized — 60%+ of forms are completed on phone", "Progress indicator for multi-page forms", "Save and resume for longer forms", "Plain language — no jargon or clinical terminology", "Estimated completion time stated upfront", "Confirmation message that feels human not automated" ] } ~~~

The Intake Interview

~~~python INTAKE_INTERVIEW = { "structure": { "opening": { "purpose": "Establish safety and set expectations", "script": "Before we dive in, I want to explain how I use what you share with me. Everything you tell me today helps me [specific benefit]. There are no wrong answers — the more honest you can be, the better I can help you." }, "presenting": { "questions": ["What brings you here now — why today rather than six months ago", "What have you already tried, and what happened", "What would have to change for you to feel this was worth it"], "listen_for": "Gap between stated goal and real goal — they are often different" }, "history": { "questions": ["What is the relevant background I should know", "Have you worked with someone on this before — what was that like", "What has gotten in the way in the past"], "purpose": "Previous failed attempts contain more useful information than successes" }, "expectations": { "questions": ["What do you expect this process to look like", "What would make you want to stop working together", "What do you need from me that you have not always gotten"], "purpose": "Surface misaligned expectations before they become relationship problems" }, "closing": { "script": "Is there anything important that I have not asked about — something you came in hoping I would understand that we have not covered yet", "purpose": "This single question surfaces more useful information than most of the rest of the interview combined" } },

"active_listening_protocol": """ INTAKE_LISTENING = { "note_what_is_avoided": "Topics skirted or answered too quickly often matter most", "note_energy_shifts": "Where does engagement increase or decrease", "note_contradictions": "Between stated priorities and described behavior", "note_language": "Their exact words for their problem become your vocabulary", "do_not_solve_yet": "Intake is information gathering — resist the urge to help before you understand" } """ } ~~~

Intake by Service Type

~~~python SERVICE_SPECIFIC = { "healthcare_therapy": { "required": ["Chief complaint", "Medical history", "Medications and allergies", "Previous treatment", "Family history if relevant", "Consent and privacy acknowledgment"], "sensitive": "Trauma history, substance use, mental health history — ask with care, explain purpose, never require before trust is established" }, "legal": { "required": ["Matter description", "Relevant dates and deadlines", "Prior legal representation", "Documents in possession", "Desired outcome", "Budget and timeline expectations"], "conflict_check": "Run conflict check before intake interview — before sensitive information is shared" }, "financial_advisory": { "required": ["Current financial situation", "Income and assets", "Liabilities and obligations", "Risk tolerance", "Goals and timeline", "Previous advisory relationships"], "sensitive": "Financial shame is real — create psychological safety before asking for numbers" }, "coaching": { "required": ["Presenting goal", "Current situation", "Previous attempts", "Resources available", "Accountability preferences", "Definition of success"], "distinguish": "Presenting goal vs real goal vs root cause — coaching intake should surface all three" }, "creative_services": { "required": ["Project scope and deliverables", "Timeline and milestones", "Budget", "Decision-making process", "Brand guidelines", "Examples of work they love and hate — both equally important"], "critical": "Examples of work they hate prevent the most expensive revisions" } } ~~~

Information Management

~~~python INTAKE_DATA_MANAGEMENT = { "storage_principles": [ "Information collected for one purpose should not be used for another", "Sensitive information needs appropriate security — not in email threads", "Retention policy defined before collection begins", "Destruction process for data when relationship ends" ],

"usability": { "principle": "Intake information only has value if it is used", "system": "Review intake notes before every session — not just the first", "update": "Intake is not a one-time event — update as circumstances change", "transfer": "If client transfers to another provider, intake summary is the most valuable thing you can provide" },

"compliance_flags": { "healthcare": "HIPAA (US) or equivalent — specific requirements for PHI", "financial": "KYC and AML obligations for financial services", "general": "GDPR, CCPA, or applicable privacy regulation — get legal advice for your jurisdiction before collecting sensitive data" } } ~~~

Boundaries

This skill helps design intake systems, forms, interviews, and information workflows. It does not replace legal, medical, financial, privacy, or regulatory advice.

For regulated contexts, adapt outputs to the user's jurisdiction and consult a qualified professional before using the workflow in production.

Quality Check Before Delivering

  • [ ] Information layers separated — administrative, presenting, context, relationship
  • [ ] Form questions are open-ended not checkbox-dominated
  • [ ] Sensitive questions explained with purpose
  • [ ] Intake interview includes closing question — what have I not asked
  • [ ] Service type matched to specific intake requirements
  • [ ] Data storage and compliance flagged for sensitive service types
  • [ ] Review protocol built in — intake used throughout relationship not just at start

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

70.1%
按下载量换算1,907

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills