Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发执行命令github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

implementing-compliance实施合规

Agent Skill

implementing-compliance 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

612

周安装

25

GitHub Stars

350

下载量

196
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:implementing-compliance(实施合规)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components
仓库路径:skills/implementing-compliance
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill implementing-compliance
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill implementing-compliance

简介

implementing-compliance 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,协助整理仓库状态与变更事项。

  • 适用于围绕代码变更、协作流程或仓库状态进行信息组织与梳理的场景。
  • 支持基于 GitHub API 获取仓库信息与协作动态,便于生成变更摘要。
  • 安装命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill implementing-compliance。
  • 使用前需确认权限范围、维护状态,注意是否触发联网或文件读写操作。

SKILL.md

Compliance Frameworks

Implement continuous compliance with major regulatory frameworks through unified control mapping, policy-as-code enforcement, and automated evidence collection.

Purpose

Modern compliance is a continuous engineering discipline requiring technical implementation of security controls. This skill provides patterns for SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, PCI-DSS 4.0, and GDPR compliance using infrastructure-as-code, policy automation, and evidence collection. Focus on unified controls that satisfy multiple frameworks simultaneously to reduce implementation effort by 60-80%.

When to Use

Invoke when:

  • Building SaaS products requiring SOC 2 Type II for enterprise sales
  • Handling healthcare data (PHI) requiring HIPAA compliance
  • Processing payment cards requiring PCI-DSS validation
  • Serving EU residents and processing personal data under GDPR
  • Implementing security controls that satisfy multiple compliance frameworks
  • Automating compliance evidence collection and audit preparation
  • Enforcing compliance policies in CI/CD pipelines

Framework Selection

Tier 1: Trust & Security Certifications

SOC 2 Type II

  • Audience: SaaS vendors, cloud service providers
  • When required: Enterprise B2B sales, handling customer data
  • Timeline: 6-12 month observation period
  • 2025 updates: Monthly control testing, AI governance, 72-hour breach disclosure

ISO 27001

  • Audience: Global enterprises
  • When required: International business, government contracts
  • Timeline: 3-6 month certification, annual surveillance

Tier 2: Industry-Specific Regulations

HIPAA (Healthcare)

  • Audience: Healthcare providers, health tech handling PHI
  • When required: Processing Protected Health Information
  • 2025 focus: Zero Trust Architecture, EDR/XDR, AI assessments

PCI-DSS 4.0 (Payment Card Industry)

  • Audience: Merchants, payment processors
  • When required: Processing, storing, transmitting cardholder data
  • Effective: April 1, 2025 (mandatory)
  • Key changes: Client-side security, 12-char passwords, enhanced MFA

Tier 3: Privacy Regulations

GDPR (EU Privacy)

  • Audience: Organizations processing EU residents' data
  • When required: EU customers/users (extraterritorial)
  • 2025 updates: 48-hour breach reporting, 6% revenue fines, AI transparency

CCPA/CPRA (California Privacy)

  • Audience: Businesses serving California residents
  • When required: Revenue >$25M, or 100K+ CA residents, or 50%+ revenue from data sales

For detailed framework requirements, see references/soc2-controls.md, references/hipaa-safeguards.md, references/pci-dss-requirements.md, and references/gdpr-articles.md.

Universal Control Implementation

Unified Control Strategy

Implement controls once, map to multiple frameworks. Reduces effort by 60-80%.

Implementation Priority:

  1. Encryption (ENC-001, ENC-002): AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit
  2. Access Control (MFA-001, RBAC-001): MFA, RBAC, least privilege
  3. Audit Logging (LOG-001): Centralized, immutable, 7-year retention
  4. Monitoring (MON-001): SIEM, intrusion detection, alerting
  5. Incident Response (IR-001): Detection, escalation, breach notification

Control Categories

Identity & Access:

  • Multi-factor authentication for privileged access
  • Role-based access control with least privilege
  • Quarterly access reviews
  • Password policy: 12+ characters, complexity

Data Protection:

  • Encryption: AES-256 (rest), TLS 1.3 (transit)
  • Data classification and tagging
  • Retention policies aligned with regulations
  • Data minimization

Logging & Monitoring:

  • Centralized audit logging (all auth and data access)
  • 7-year retention (satisfies all frameworks)
  • Immutable storage (S3 Object Lock)
  • Real-time alerting

Network Security:

  • Network segmentation and VPC isolation
  • Firewalls with deny-by-default
  • Intrusion detection/prevention
  • Regular vulnerability scanning

Incident Response:

  • Documented incident response plan
  • Automated detection and alerting
  • Breach notification: HIPAA 60d, GDPR 48h, SOC 2 72h, PCI-DSS immediate

Business Continuity:

  • Automated backups with defined RPO/RTO
  • Multi-region disaster recovery
  • Regular failover testing

For complete control implementations, see references/control-mapping-matrix.md.

Compliance as Code

Policy Enforcement with OPA

Enforce compliance policies in CI/CD before infrastructure deployment.

Architecture:

Git Push → Terraform Plan → JSON → OPA Evaluation
                                    ├─► Pass → Deploy
                                    └─► Fail → Block

Example: Encryption Policy

Enforce encryption requirements (SOC 2 CC6.1, HIPAA §164.312(a)(2)(iv), PCI-DSS Req 3.4):

See examples/opa-policies/encryption.rego for complete implementation.

CI/CD Integration:

terraform plan -out=tfplan.binary
terraform show -json tfplan.binary > tfplan.json
opa eval --data policies/ --input tfplan.json 'data.compliance.main.deny'

For complete CI/CD patterns, see references/cicd-integration.md.

Static Analysis with Checkov

Scan IaC with built-in compliance framework support:

checkov -d ./terraform \
  --check SOC2 --check HIPAA --check PCI --check GDPR \
  --output cli --output json

Create custom policies for organization-specific requirements. See examples/checkov-policies/ for examples.

Automated Testing

Integrate compliance validation into test suites:

def test_s3_encrypted(terraform_plan):
    """SOC2:CC6.1, HIPAA:164.312(a)(2)(iv)"""
    buckets = get_resources(terraform_plan, "aws_s3_bucket")
    encrypted = get_encryption_configs(terraform_plan)
    assert all_buckets_encrypted(buckets, encrypted)

def test_opa_policies():
    result = subprocess.run(["opa", "eval", "--data", "policies/",
        "--input", "tfplan.json", "data.compliance.main.deny"])
    assert not json.loads(result.stdout)

For complete test patterns, see references/compliance-testing.md.

Technical Control Implementations

Encryption at Rest

Standards: AES-256, managed KMS, automatic rotation

AWS Example:

resource "aws_kms_key" "data" {
  enable_key_rotation = true
  tags = { Compliance = "ENC-001" }
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration" "data" {
  bucket = aws_s3_bucket.data.id
  rule {
    apply_server_side_encryption_by_default {
      sse_algorithm     = "aws:kms"
      kms_master_key_id = aws_kms_key.data.arn
    }
  }
}

resource "aws_db_instance" "main" {
  storage_encrypted = true
  kms_key_id       = aws_kms_key.data.arn
}

For complete encryption implementations including Azure and GCP, see references/encryption-implementations.md.

Encryption in Transit

Standards: TLS 1.3 (TLS 1.2 minimum), strong ciphers, HSTS

ALB Example:

resource "aws_lb_listener" "https" {
  port       = 443
  protocol   = "HTTPS"
  ssl_policy = "ELBSecurityPolicy-TLS13-1-2-2021-06"
}

Multi-Factor Authentication

Standards: TOTP, hardware tokens, biometric for privileged access

AWS IAM Enforcement:

resource "aws_iam_policy" "require_mfa" {
  policy = jsonencode({
    Statement = [{
      Effect = "Deny"
      NotAction = ["iam:CreateVirtualMFADevice", "iam:EnableMFADevice"]
      Resource = "*"
      Condition = {
        BoolIfExists = { "aws:MultiFactorAuthPresent" = "false" }
      }
    }]
  })
}

For application-level MFA (TOTP), see examples/mfa-implementation.py.

Role-Based Access Control

Standards: Least privilege, job function-based roles, quarterly reviews

Kubernetes Example:

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
  name: developer
  namespace: development
rules:
- apiGroups: ["", "apps"]
  resources: ["pods", "deployments", "services"]
  verbs: ["get", "list", "watch", "create", "update", "patch", "delete"]
- apiGroups: [""]
  resources: ["secrets"]
  verbs: ["get", "list"]  # Read-only

For complete RBAC patterns including AWS IAM and OPA policies, see references/access-control-patterns.md.

Audit Logging

Standards: Structured JSON, 7-year retention, immutable storage

Required Events: Authentication, authorization, data access, administrative actions, security events

Python Example:

class AuditLogger:
    def log_event(self, event_type, user_id, resource_type,
                  resource_id, action, result, ip_address):
        audit_event = {
            "timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat() + "Z",
            "event_type": event_type.value,
            "user_id": user_id,
            "action": action,
            "result": result,
            "resource": {"type": resource_type, "id": resource_id},
            "source": {"ip": ip_address}
        }
        self.logger.info(json.dumps(audit_event))

Log Retention:

resource "aws_cloudwatch_log_group" "audit" {
  retention_in_days = 2555  # 7 years
  kms_key_id        = aws_kms_key.logs.arn
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_object_lock_configuration" "audit" {
  bucket = aws_s3_bucket.audit_logs.id
  rule {
    default_retention { mode = "COMPLIANCE"; years = 7 }
  }
}

For complete audit logging patterns including HIPAA PHI access logging, see references/audit-logging-patterns.md.

Evidence Collection Automation

Continuous Monitoring

Automate evidence collection for continuous compliance validation.

Architecture:

AWS Config → EventBridge → Lambda → S3 (Evidence)
                                   → DynamoDB (Status)

Evidence Collection:

class EvidenceCollector:
    def collect_encryption_evidence(self):
        evidence = {
            "control_id": "ENC-001",
            "frameworks": ["SOC2-CC6.1", "HIPAA-164.312(a)(2)(iv)"],
            "timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
            "status": "PASS",
            "findings": []
        }
        # Check S3, RDS, EBS encryption status
        # Document findings
        return evidence

For complete evidence collector, see examples/evidence-collection/evidence_collector.py.

Audit Report Generation

Generate compliance reports automatically:

class AuditReportGenerator:
    def generate_soc2_report(self, start_date, end_date):
        controls = self.get_control_status("SOC2")
        return {
            "framework": "SOC 2 Type II",
            "compliance_score": self.calculate_score(controls),
            "trust_services_criteria": {...},
            "controls": self.format_controls(controls)
        }

For complete report generator, see examples/evidence-collection/report_generator.py.

Control Mapping Matrix

Unified control mapping across frameworks:

ControlSOC 2HIPAAPCI-DSSGDPRISO 27001
MFACC6.1§164.312(d)Req 8.3Art 32A.9.4.2
Encryption at RestCC6.1§164.312(a)(2)(iv)Req 3.4Art 32A.10.1.1
Encryption in TransitCC6.1§164.312(e)(1)Req 4.1Art 32A.13.1.1
Audit LoggingCC7.2§164.312(b)Req 10.2Art 30A.12.4.1
Access ReviewsCC6.1§164.308(a)(3)(ii)(C)Req 8.2.4Art 32A.9.2.5
Vulnerability ScanningCC7.1§164.308(a)(8)Req 11.2Art 32A.12.6.1
Incident ResponseCC7.3§164.308(a)(6)Req 12.10Art 33A.16.1.1

Strategy: Implement once with proper tagging, map to all applicable frameworks.

For complete control mapping with 45+ controls, see references/control-mapping-matrix.md.

Breach Notification Requirements

Framework-Specific Timelines:

  • HIPAA: 60 days to HHS and affected individuals
  • GDPR: 48 hours to supervisory authority (2025 update)
  • SOC 2: 72 hours to affected customers
  • PCI-DSS: Immediate to payment brands

Required Elements:

  • Description of incident and data involved
  • Estimated number of affected individuals
  • Steps taken to mitigate harm
  • Contact information for questions
  • Remediation actions and timeline

For incident response templates, see references/incident-response-templates.md.

Vendor Management

Business Associate Agreements (HIPAA):

  • Required for all vendors handling PHI
  • Specify permitted uses and disclosures
  • Require appropriate safeguards
  • Annual review and renewal

Data Processing Agreements (GDPR):

  • Required for all vendors processing personal data
  • Process only on controller instructions
  • Implement appropriate technical measures
  • Sub-processor approval required

Assessment Process:

  1. Risk classification by data access level
  2. Security questionnaire evaluation
  3. BAA/DPA execution
  4. SOC 2 report collection (≤90 days old)
  5. Annual re-assessment

For vendor management templates, see references/vendor-management.md.

Tools & Libraries

Policy as Code:

  • Open Policy Agent (OPA): General-purpose policy engine
  • Checkov: IaC security scanning with compliance frameworks
  • tfsec: Terraform security scanner
  • Trivy: Container and IaC scanner

Compliance Automation:

  • AWS Config: AWS resource compliance monitoring
  • Cloud Custodian: Multi-cloud compliance automation
  • Drata/Vanta/Secureframe: Continuous compliance platforms

For tool selection guidance, see references/tool-recommendations.md.

Integration with Other Skills

Related Skills:

  • security-hardening: Technical security control implementation
  • secret-management: Secrets handling per HIPAA/PCI-DSS
  • infrastructure-as-code: IaC implementing compliance controls
  • kubernetes-operations: K8s RBAC, network policies
  • building-ci-pipelines: Policy enforcement in CI/CD
  • siem-logging: Audit logging and monitoring
  • incident-management: Incident response procedures

Quick Reference

Implementation Checklist:

  • Identify applicable frameworks
  • Implement encryption (AES-256, TLS 1.3)
  • Configure MFA for privileged access
  • Implement RBAC with least privilege
  • Set up audit logging (7-year retention)
  • Configure security monitoring/alerting
  • Create incident response plan
  • Execute vendor agreements (BAAs, DPAs)
  • Implement policy-as-code (OPA, Checkov)
  • Automate evidence collection
  • Conduct quarterly access reviews
  • Perform annual risk assessments

Common Mistakes:

  • Treating compliance as one-time project vs continuous process
  • Implementing per-framework vs unified controls
  • Manual evidence collection vs automation
  • Insufficient log retention (<7 years)
  • Missing MFA enforcement
  • Not encrypting backups/logs
  • Inadequate vendor due diligence

References

Framework Details:

  • references/soc2-controls.md - SOC 2 TSC control catalog
  • references/hipaa-safeguards.md - HIPAA safeguards
  • references/pci-dss-requirements.md - PCI-DSS 4.0 requirements
  • references/gdpr-articles.md - GDPR key articles

Implementation Patterns:

  • references/control-mapping-matrix.md - Unified control mapping
  • references/encryption-implementations.md - Encryption patterns
  • references/access-control-patterns.md - MFA, RBAC implementations
  • references/audit-logging-patterns.md - Logging requirements
  • references/incident-response-templates.md - IR procedures

Automation:

  • references/cicd-integration.md - OPA/Checkov CI/CD integration
  • references/compliance-testing.md - Automated test patterns
  • references/vendor-management.md - Vendor assessment templates
  • references/tool-recommendations.md - Tool selection guide

Code Examples:

  • examples/opa-policies/ - OPA policy examples
  • examples/terraform/ - Terraform control implementations
  • examples/evidence-collection/ - Evidence automation
  • examples/mfa-implementation.py - TOTP MFA implementation

Consult qualified legal counsel and auditors for legal interpretation and audit preparation.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.41%
按下载量换算69

Claude

28.41%
按下载量换算56

Cursor

20.22%
按下载量换算40

Gemini CLI

9.26%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill implementing-compliance 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills