Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索执行命令github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

implement-with-remote-feedback实施远程反馈

Agent Skill

implement-with-remote-feedback 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

194

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

63
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:implement-with-remote-feedback(实施远程反馈)
来源仓库:https://github.com/xalior/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/implement-with-remote-feedback
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/xalior/agent-skills --skill implement-with-remote-feedback
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/xalior/agent-skills --skill implement-with-remote-feedback

简介

implement-with-remote-feedback 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。

  • 适用于研究类任务,如查找技术方案、筛选参考资料或匹配开发需求。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令安装,需结合来源 README 核验具体用法。
  • 使用前建议确认权限范围和是否会触发联网或文件操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Implement with Remote Feedback

Execute a plan document into code, publishing every commit so the remote branch serves as the primary monitoring channel. The plan is your source of truth for WHAT to build and HOW to phase it. You are an implementer, not a designer.

Preflight

Locate the plan. The skill starts from a completed plan. If $ARGUMENTS points to an existing plan doc, use it. Otherwise glob docs/plans/plan_*.md and ask the user to pick one. If no plan exists, STOP and tell the user this skill requires a plan doc as input — do NOT invent scope or design from scratch.

Read the plan in full. Use the Read tool WITHOUT limit/offset. The plan IS your source of truth for scope, phases, and Success Criteria. Do not redefine them. If they need to change, say so and OFFER to switch back to /plan — never switch unilaterally.

Verify the working tree is clean. Run git status. If there are ANY uncommitted or untracked non-ignored changes, STOP and tell the user:

"Working tree is not clean. Please commit or stash your changes before starting."

Verify we are on main/master. If not, warn the user and ask whether to continue from the current branch or switch to main first.

Pull latest. git pull to ensure we're up to date.

Confirm the branch name with the user. The default is <type>/<slug>, where <slug> matches the plan's slug. Valid types:

  • feature/ — new functionality
  • bugfix/ — fixing a defect
  • spike/ — exploratory / research / prototype
  • refactor/ — restructuring without behaviour change
  • docs/ — documentation only
  • chore/ — maintenance, deps, tooling

Present the single default and ask the user to confirm or override. Do not enumerate alternatives beyond the type list above. Once confirmed, create and publish the branch:

git checkout -b <type>/<slug>
git push -u origin <type>/<slug>

The Doc

Create the implementation tracker at docs/plan_<slug>_implementation.md with this skeleton:

# Implementation: <title from plan>

**Status:** In Progress
**Branch:** `<type>/<slug>`
**Plan:** `<path to plan_<slug>.md>`

## Tasks

- [ ] Phase 1: <name>
- [ ] Phase 2: <name>

## Progress Log

## Decisions & Notes

## Blockers

## Commits

The tracker is a living document — update it continuously. It tells the story of the implementation to anyone reading the git log. The file on disk plus the remote branch are the persistence layer.

Commit AND push the tracker immediately with a message like chore: init implementation tracker for <slug>.

The Work

Execute the plan's phases in order. The stance is skepticism — if a Success Criterion isn't verifiable (Automated = a command to run; Manual = a specific thing to observe), it isn't done. NEVER mark a phase complete on vibes.

  • FOLLOW THE PLAN. Execute its phases in the order they're written. NEVER batch across phases, NEVER skip ahead, NEVER silently merge two phases.
  • HONOR THE APPROACH. If the plan specifies vertical slices (the default), each phase cuts end-to-end through the stack — e.g. DB → model → server → api → client lib → frontend, or whichever layers the feature touches. NEVER complete one layer across all features when the plan calls for slices. If the plan specifies something else, follow it as written.
  • INVESTIGATE BEFORE ASKING. Before questioning the user, read the plan, read referenced files in full, and look at the current code. Spawn research sub-agents in parallel when broad coverage is needed. Then ask only what investigation can't answer. NEVER ask the user about things you could have looked up.
  • READ REFERENCED MATERIALS IN FULL. The plan. Files named in Key Discoveries. Related code the plan references. Use the Read tool WITHOUT limit/offset. NEVER skim. NEVER summarise-and-move-on.
  • VERIFY, DO NOT ADOPT. Claims the user makes mid-implementation — about constraints, existing behaviour, intent in the plan — get verified before they change direction. Corrections to your own statements ALSO get verified. Spawn a sub-agent to verify where possible.
  • WAIT FOR ALL SUB-TASKS TO COMPLETE before acting on their findings. Be patient with sub-agents and vocal about them: say what you have spawned, and speak up when each one returns.
  • Update the tracker FIRST, then do the work. Mark the current task in progress, append a progress log entry with a timestamp. Then write the code.
  • Prefer Makefile targets for verification (make test, make lint, make -C <subproject> check). The plan's Success Criteria should name them; run what the plan names. If a needed target is missing, extend the Makefile as part of this phase.
  • Run ALL Automated Success Criteria before marking a phase complete. Every checkbox. No selective verification.
  • Pause for Manual Success Criteria. When a phase has Manual criteria, STOP after Automated checks pass and tell the user exactly what needs observing. Do NOT proceed to the next phase until they confirm.
  • Commit early, commit often, in small logical units. One reason per commit. If you touched 5 files for 3 reasons, that's 3 commits. Prefixes:

- feat: — new functionality - fix: — bug fix - wip: — partial work (always with context: wip: partial auth middleware, never just wip) - docs: — documentation - test: — tests only - refactor: — restructure without behaviour change - chore: — tooling, deps, maintenance

  • PUSH AFTER EVERY COMMIT. NO EXCEPTIONS. The remote branch IS the monitoring channel. git add <specific-files> git commit -m "<type>: <description>" git push
  • Update the tracker after each commit — tick off tasks, append progress, note decisions or blockers. Commit and push the tracker update too.
  • If blocked, record the blocker in the tracker, commit, push, then ask the user. Do NOT spin on a blocker silently.
  • When all phases are complete and all Success Criteria met, set the tracker's Status to Complete, make a final commit and push, and tell the user the branch is ready. Offer to open the PR.

Monitoring

Others can watch progress via:

git log --oneline origin/<type>/<slug>
git diff main..origin/<type>/<slug>

Or by reading docs/plan_<slug>_implementation.md on the remote branch.

Never

  • NEVER skip pushing. Every commit must be pushed immediately. The remote branch is the monitoring channel — a local-only commit defeats the entire purpose of this skill.
  • NEVER force push. History is sacred in this workflow.
  • NEVER amend pushed commits. Make a new commit instead.
  • Never redefine scope, phases, or Success Criteria. Those come from the plan. If they need to change, OFFER to switch back to /plan — never switch unilaterally, and never redefine in-place.
  • Never mark a phase complete without running its Automated criteria and obtaining user confirmation on its Manual criteria.
  • Never batch multiple phases into one commit or one chunk of work.
  • Never commit with vague messages. wip alone is not a commit message.
  • Never lead the user with unsolicited alternatives.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.78%
按下载量换算23

Claude

29.09%
按下载量换算18

Cursor

19.44%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

9.2%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/xalior/agent-skills --skill implement-with-remote-feedback 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills