Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

holistic-testing-pact整体测试协议

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

1,548

周安装

62

GitHub Stars

329

下载量

501
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:holistic-testing-pact(整体测试协议)
来源仓库:https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
仓库路径:skills/holistic-testing-pact
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill holistic-testing-pact
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill holistic-testing-pact

简介

holistic-testing-pact 用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。

  • 适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。
  • 使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑。
  • 涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Holistic Testing Model with PACT Principles

<default_to_action> When designing test strategies or building quality into teams:

  1. APPLY PACT principles: Proactive (test before bugs), Autonomous (teams own quality), Collaborative (whole-team responsibility), Targeted (risk-focused)
  2. IDENTIFY quadrant focus: Technology-facing (unit, integration, performance) or Business-facing (acceptance, exploratory, usability)
  3. SELECT agents based on PACT dimension and testing quadrant
  4. IMPLEMENT feedback loops that catch issues in minutes, not days
  5. MEASURE outcomes (bug escape rate, release confidence) not activities (test count)

Quick PACT Application:

  • Proactive → Design testability into architecture, risk analysis during refinement
  • Autonomous → Devs run tests locally, CI pipeline with no manual gates
  • Collaborative → Three Amigos, QE pairs with dev, shared test ownership
  • Targeted → Risk-based planning, focus on critical flows, kill valueless tests

Critical Success Factors:

  • Quality is a whole-team responsibility, not a QA phase
  • QA as enablers (build infrastructure, coach), not gatekeepers
  • Fast feedback during development, not after </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

When to Use

  • Designing comprehensive test strategies
  • Building quality culture in teams
  • Choosing testing approach for new projects
  • Evolving from sequential QA to concurrent quality

PACT Principles

PrincipleFocusAnti-Pattern
ProactiveTest before code, design testabilityWaiting for bugs to find you
AutonomousTeams deploy when readyQA as manual gatekeepers
CollaborativeWhole-team quality thinkingQA works in isolation
TargetedRisk-based, high-value testsExhaustive checkbox testing

Holistic Testing Quadrants

QuadrantPurposeExamples
Tech + SupportFast feedbackUnit, component, integration tests
Tech + CritiqueFind limitsPerformance, security, chaos
Business + SupportShared understandingBDD, acceptance tests
Business + CritiqueDiscover unknownsExploratory, usability, A/B

Agent Selection by PACT + Quadrant

PACT DimensionAgents
Proactive + Techqe-test-generator, qe-requirements-validator
Autonomous + Techqe-test-executor, qe-coverage-analyzer
Collaborativeqe-fleet-commander (orchestration)
Targetedqe-regression-risk-analyzer, qe-quality-gate

PACT in Practice

Proactive: Test Before Bugs

// During API design, ask: "How will we know if this times out under load?"
// Build observability from start
await Task("Risk Analysis", {
  phase: 'refinement',
  question: 'What could go wrong and how will we know?'
}, "qe-requirements-validator");

Autonomous: Teams Own Quality

  • Developers run full test suite locally
  • CI fails fast with clear diagnostics
  • No manual deployment approvals
  • Self-service test environments

Collaborative: Whole-Team Thinking

  • QE attends planning and refinement
  • Three Amigos for every user story
  • Shared ownership of test code
  • Ensemble testing for complex scenarios

Targeted: Test What Matters

// E-commerce checkout? Test thoroughly.
// Admin panel used twice a month? Lighter touch.
await Task("Risk-Based Planning", {
  critical: ['checkout', 'payment'],
  light: ['admin-panel', 'settings']
}, "qe-regression-risk-analyzer");

Evolution from Traditional

Old Way (Sequential)Holistic + PACT (Concurrent)
Dev writes → QA tests → bugs found → fixesTeam discusses what to build and how to test
Slow feedback, finger-pointingFast feedback, shared ownership
Quality as gatekeepingQuality as enabler
QA on critical pathQA builds infrastructure, coaches

Success Signals

  • Features deploy multiple times per day
  • Bug escape rate trending down
  • Team discusses quality naturally
  • Developers write tests without being told
  • Releases are boring (in a good way)

Agent Coordination Hints

Memory Namespace

aqe/holistic-testing/
├── pact-assessment/*     - PACT maturity analysis
├── quadrant-coverage/*   - Coverage per quadrant
├── team-metrics/*        - Quality ownership metrics
└── feedback-loops/*      - Cycle time data

Fleet Coordination

const holisticFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
  strategy: 'holistic-testing',
  pact: { proactive: true, autonomous: true, collaborative: true, targeted: true },
  agents: [
    'qe-fleet-commander',       // Orchestration
    'qe-test-generator',        // Tech quadrant
    'qe-requirements-validator', // Business quadrant
    'qe-quality-analyzer'       // Metrics
  ],
  topology: 'mesh'
});

Related Skills


Remember

PACT = Proactive + Autonomous + Collaborative + Targeted

Quality is built in, not tested in. Teams own quality. QA enables, doesn't gate. Test what matters, skip what doesn't. Measure outcomes, not activities.

With Agents: Agents analyze PACT maturity, recommend quadrant coverage, and coordinate whole-team quality. Use agents to scale holistic thinking while maintaining human judgment.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

26.8%
按下载量换算134

Antigravity

22.28%
按下载量换算112

windsurf

17.89%
按下载量换算90

github-copilot

13.45%
按下载量换算67

Codex

8.66%
按下载量换算43

trae

3.76%
按下载量换算19

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills