Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

health-score-monitor健康评分监测器

Agent Skill

health-score-monitor 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,138

周安装

90

GitHub Stars

85

下载量

749
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:health-score-monitor(健康评分监测器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
仓库路径:skills/health-score-monitor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill health-score-monitor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill health-score-monitor

简介

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 和 Pull Request 协作信息。

  • 适合围绕代码变更、仓库状态或协作事项进行整理。
  • 可结合项目上下文理解技术细节和开发流程。
  • 使用前需确认权限和操作边界,避免越权访问。
  • health-score-monitor 属于待分类类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Health Score Monitor

Build systematic customer health monitoring with composite scores, trend tracking, and automated alerting for proactive customer success.

When to Use This Skill

  • Designing health score frameworks
  • Setting up monitoring dashboards
  • Creating alert thresholds
  • Analyzing health trends across portfolio
  • Optimizing existing health models

Methodology Foundation

Based on Gainsight Health Score Design and Totango Customer Success metrics, focusing on:

  • Multi-dimensional scoring
  • Leading vs lagging indicators
  • Score normalization
  • Trend analysis
  • Alert prioritization

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Designs scoring frameworkDimension weights
Calculates composite scoresAlert thresholds
Identifies trending patternsIntervention triggers
Suggests monitoring cadenceResource allocation
Recommends improvementsBusiness rule exceptions

What This Skill Does

  1. Framework design - Multi-factor health model
  2. Score calculation - Weighted composite scores
  3. Trend analysis - Direction and velocity
  4. Alert rules - When to notify teams
  5. Portfolio view - Aggregate health visibility

How to Use

Design a health score monitor for my customer portfolio:

Business Context:
- Product type: [SaaS/Platform/Service]
- Contract model: [Annual/Monthly/Multi-year]
- Key value metric: [What shows customer success?]
- CSM:Account ratio: [1:X]

Available Data Points:
- Product: [List usage metrics available]
- Support: [List support metrics available]
- Financial: [List financial signals]
- Relationship: [List engagement data]

Current Challenges:
- [What's not working with current approach?]

Instructions

Step 1: Define Health Dimensions

Standard 4-Pillar Model:

DimensionWeightWhat It Answers
Product30-40%Are they using it?
Support15-25%Are they happy?
Financial20-25%Are they paying/growing?
Relationship20-25%Are we connected?

Adjust weights based on your business:

  • High-touch: Increase Relationship
  • Usage-based pricing: Increase Product
  • Support-intensive: Increase Support

Step 2: Select Metrics per Dimension

Product Health Metrics:

MetricTypeScoring
DAU/MAULeading% of benchmark
Feature adoptionLeading% features used
Time in productLeadingMinutes vs avg
Key feature usageLeadingYes/No or frequency
Usage trendLeadingUp/Flat/Down

Support Health Metrics:

MetricTypeScoring
CSAT scoreLagging1-5 scale
Ticket volumeLeadingvs baseline
EscalationsLeadingCount (negative)
Response sentimentLeadingPositive/Neutral/Negative
Time to resolutionLaggingvs SLA

Financial Health Metrics:

MetricTypeScoring
Payment statusLaggingCurrent/Late
ExpansionLeadingPipeline/Discussion
Contract typeLaggingMulti-year bonus
Renewal dateContextDays remaining
ARR trendLaggingGrowth/Flat/Decline

Relationship Health Metrics:

MetricTypeScoring
Champion engagedLeadingActive/Passive/None
Exec sponsorLeadingYes/No
NPS/CSATLaggingScore
QBR attendanceLeadingRegular/Sporadic/None
Last touchLeadingDays since contact

Step 3: Create Scoring Rules

Example Scoring Matrix:

Product Score (0-100):
+30: DAU/MAU > 70%
+20: DAU/MAU 50-70%
+10: DAU/MAU 30-50%
+0:  DAU/MAU < 30%

+25: Feature adoption > 60%
+15: Feature adoption 40-60%
+5:  Feature adoption < 40%

+20: Usage trending up
+10: Usage stable
-10: Usage trending down

+15: Key feature used weekly
+5:  Key feature used monthly
-10: Key feature abandoned

Max: 100 (or normalize)

Step 4: Set Alert Thresholds

ConditionAlert LevelAction
Score drops >15 pts🔴 CriticalImmediate CSM review
Score below 40🟠 HighIntervention required
Score 40-60🟡 MediumProactive outreach
Renewal <60 days + <60 score🔴 CriticalSave plan
Usage drop >30% WoW🟡 MediumCheck-in call

Step 5: Define Monitoring Cadence

ActivityFrequencyOwner
Score refreshDaily/WeeklyAutomated
Alert reviewDailyCSM
Portfolio reviewWeeklyCS Manager
Model calibrationQuarterlyCS Ops

Examples

Example 1: SaaS Health Score Design

Input:

Design health score for our B2B SaaS platform:

Business Context:
- Product: Project management software
- Contract: Annual, avg $50K
- Value metric: Projects completed, team adoption
- CSM ratio: 1:40

Available Data:
- Product: Logins, projects created, tasks completed, integrations used
- Support: Zendesk tickets, CSAT, NPS
- Financial: ARR, payment status, expansion pipeline
- Relationship: Meeting attendance, email engagement

Challenges:
- Too many "yellow" accounts, can't prioritize
- Alerts are noisy, CSMs ignoring them

Output:

## Health Score Framework: Project Management SaaS

### Design Principles

Given 1:40 ratio and "alert fatigue" issue:
1. **Prioritize leading indicators** - Catch issues early
2. **Reduce noise** - Tighter alert thresholds
3. **Enable triage** - Clear Red/Yellow/Green actions

---

### Scoring Model

#### Dimension Weights
| Dimension | Weight | Rationale |
|-----------|--------|-----------|
| Product | 40% | Usage = value realization |
| Support | 15% | Lower touch model |
| Financial | 25% | Contract health critical |
| Relationship | 20% | Moderate touch needed |

---

#### Product Score (40 points max)

| Metric | Criteria | Points |
|--------|----------|--------|
| **Weekly Active Users** | | |
| | >70% of seats | 12 |
| | 50-70% | 8 |
| | 30-50% | 4 |
| | <30% | 0 |
| **Projects Created (monthly)** | | |
| | >5 per user | 10 |
| | 2-5 per user | 6 |
| | <2 per user | 2 |
| **Tasks Completed** | | |
| | >80% completion rate | 8 |
| | 50-80% | 5 |
| | <50% | 0 |
| **Integrations** | | |
| | 2+ active | 6 |
| | 1 active | 3 |
| | None | 0 |
| **Usage Trend** | | |
| | Increasing | 4 |
| | Stable | 2 |
| | Declining | -4 |

---

#### Support Score (15 points max)

| Metric | Criteria | Points |
|--------|----------|--------|
| **CSAT** | | |
| | >4.5 | 6 |
| | 4.0-4.5 | 4 |
| | 3.5-4.0 | 2 |
| | <3.5 | 0 |
| **Ticket Volume** | | |
| | Below baseline | 5 |
| | At baseline | 3 |
| | 2x+ baseline | 0 |
| **Escalations** | | |
| | None (90 days) | 4 |
| | Resolved | 2 |
| | Open | -4 |

---

#### Financial Score (25 points max)

| Metric | Criteria | Points |
|--------|----------|--------|
| **Payment Status** | | |
| | Current | 10 |
| | 30 days late | 5 |
| | 60+ days | 0 |
| **Expansion** | | |
| | Closed this year | 8 |
| | In discussion | 5 |
| | No opportunity | 2 |
| **Contract Type** | | |
| | Multi-year | 7 |
| | Annual | 4 |
| | Month-to-month | 0 |

---

#### Relationship Score (20 points max)

| Metric | Criteria | Points |
|--------|----------|--------|
| **Champion Status** | | |
| | Active advocate | 8 |
| | Engaged | 5 |
| | Passive | 2 |
| | Gone/None | 0 |
| **NPS** | | |
| | 9-10 (Promoter) | 6 |
| | 7-8 (Passive) | 4 |
| | 0-6 (Detractor) | 0 |
| **Last Touch** | | |
| | <30 days | 6 |
| | 30-60 days | 4 |
| | 60-90 days | 2 |
| | >90 days | 0 |

---

### Health Bands

| Score | Status | Count Target | CSM Action |
|-------|--------|--------------|------------|
| 80-100 | 🟢 Healthy | 60% | Quarterly touch, expansion |
| 60-79 | 🟡 Monitor | 25% | Monthly touch, watch trends |
| 40-59 | 🟠 At Risk | 12% | Bi-weekly, intervention plan |
| 0-39 | 🔴 Critical | 3% | Weekly, executive escalation |

**Target Distribution** at 1:40 ratio:
- 24 Healthy (quarterly = 8 touches/month)
- 10 Monitor (monthly = 10 touches)
- 5 At Risk (bi-weekly = 10 touches)
- 1 Critical (weekly = 4 touches)
- **Total: 32 touch points/month** (manageable)

---

### Alert Rules (Noise Reduction)

**Only Alert When:**

| Alert | Condition | Frequency |
|-------|-----------|-----------|
| 🔴 Critical New | Score drops below 40 | Immediate |
| 🔴 Renewal Risk | Score <60 AND renewal <60 days | Immediate |
| 🟠 Score Drop | Drops >15 points in 7 days | Daily digest |
| 🟡 Watch | Usage down >30% WoW | Weekly digest |

**Suppress Alerts For:**
- Accounts <30 days old (onboarding)
- Accounts in active implementation
- Known seasonal low periods
- Manual "snooze" by CSM

---

### Dashboard Views

**Portfolio Summary:**

┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ My Portfolio: 40 accounts │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 🟢 24 (60%) │ 🟡 10 (25%) │ │ 🟠 5 (12%) │ 🔴 1 (3%) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ ⚠️ 3 accounts dropped this week │ │ 📈 5 accounts improved │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘

**Account Drill-Down:**

┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Account: TechCorp | Score: 62 🟡 │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Product: 28/40 ████████░░ │ │ Support: 12/15 █████████░ │ │ Financial: 14/25 ██████░░░░ │ │ Relationship: 8/20 ████░░░░░░ │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Trend: ↘️ -8 pts (30 days) │ │ Renewal: 90 days │ │ Action: Schedule check-in │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘

Example 2: Health Trend Analysis

Input:

Analyze health trends for my portfolio:

Q4 Scores:
- Oct: 23 Green, 12 Yellow, 4 Orange, 1 Red
- Nov: 20 Green, 14 Yellow, 5 Orange, 1 Red
- Dec: 18 Green, 13 Yellow, 7 Orange, 2 Red

Also:
- 3 accounts churned in Q4
- 2 expansions closed
- NPS survey: 42 average (was 48)

Output:

## Q4 Health Trend Analysis

### Portfolio Drift Summary

| Status | Oct | Nov | Dec | Change |
|--------|-----|-----|-----|--------|
| 🟢 Green | 23 (58%) | 20 (50%) | 18 (45%) | ↘️ -13% |
| 🟡 Yellow | 12 (30%) | 14 (35%) | 13 (33%) | → +3% |
| 🟠 Orange | 4 (10%) | 5 (13%) | 7 (18%) | ↗️ +8% |
| 🔴 Red | 1 (2%) | 1 (2%) | 2 (5%) | ↗️ +3% |

**Trend: ⚠️ Deteriorating**
- 5 accounts moved from Green to lower status
- Orange/Red grew from 12% to 23%
- Portfolio health declining month-over-month

---

### Churn Correlation

| Churned Account | Last Score | Days at Red |
|-----------------|------------|-------------|
| Account A | 28 | 45 days |
| Account B | 35 | 30 days |
| Account C | 41 | 22 days |

**Insight**: All churned accounts were Red/Orange for 20+ days
**Action**: Accounts at Orange >14 days need intervention

---

### Key Drivers of Decline

**Analyzing accounts that dropped:**

| Factor | Accounts Affected | Avg Point Drop |
|--------|-------------------|----------------|
| Usage decline | 8 | -12 pts |
| Champion change | 3 | -18 pts |
| Support issues | 4 | -8 pts |
| Payment delays | 2 | -6 pts |

**Primary Driver**: Usage decline (likely seasonal + holiday)

---

### NPS Correlation

| NPS Segment | Avg Health Score | Q4 Change |
|-------------|------------------|-----------|
| Promoters (9-10) | 78 | -3 |
| Passives (7-8) | 58 | -6 |
| Detractors (0-6) | 38 | -10 |

**Insight**: Detractor scores dropping fastest
**Action**: Prioritize intervention for Detractors

---

### Q1 Recommendations

**Immediate (Week 1):**
1. Save plan for 2 Red accounts
2. Intervention for 7 Orange accounts
3. Outreach to 3 champion-change accounts

**Short-term (Month 1):**
1. Re-engagement campaign for low-usage accounts
2. Proactive support reach-out to ticket-heavy accounts
3. NPS follow-up calls with Detractors

**Strategic (Quarter):**
1. Investigate seasonal patterns (plan for Q4 2026)
2. Champion backup program implementation
3. Revisit Orange threshold (too many?)

---

### Target for Q1

| Status | Dec | Q1 Target | Delta |
|--------|-----|-----------|-------|
| 🟢 Green | 18 | 22 | +4 |
| 🟡 Yellow | 13 | 14 | +1 |
| 🟠 Orange | 7 | 3 | -4 |
| 🔴 Red | 2 | 1 | -1 |

**Success = Move 5 accounts up at least one tier**

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Designing health frameworks
  • Calculating composite scores
  • Identifying trends and patterns
  • Setting alert thresholds

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Access your actual data
  • Implement in your systems
  • Know your specific business rules
  • Replace data engineering

When to Escalate to Human

  • Threshold decisions
  • Weight calibration based on churn data
  • Alert rule tuning
  • Cross-functional alignment

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "How should I weight these dimensions differently for enterprise vs SMB?"
  • "What metrics should I add for a usage-based pricing model?"
  • "Create alert rules that reduce noise by 50%."
  • "Design a health score for a high-touch services business."

References

  • Gainsight Health Score Best Practices
  • Totango Customer Health Methodology
  • ChurnZero Scoring Framework
  • Customer Success Benchmarks

Related Skills

  • churn-prediction - Deeper churn analysis
  • account-health - RevOps perspective
  • expansion-signals - Growth focus

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: Customer Success
  • Complexity: Advanced
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 2-4 hours for framework design
  • Prerequisites: Data availability assessment

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.96%
按下载量换算254

Claude

31.66%
按下载量换算237

Cursor

20.51%
按下载量换算154

Gemini CLI

9.45%
按下载量换算71

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills