Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

context-engineering情境工程

Agent Skill

context-engineering 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,983

周安装

81

GitHub Stars

85

下载量

635
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:context-engineering(情境工程)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
仓库路径:skills/context-engineering
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill context-engineering
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill context-engineering

简介

context-engineering 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。
  • 建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

SKILL.md

Context Engineering

Overview

Core principle: Context is a finite resource with diminishing returns. Find the smallest high-signal token set, not the largest.

200K tokens is shared space: system prompt + conversation history + your processing. As context grows, performance degrades predictably.

When to Use

  • Session > 30 minutes or 50k+ tokens
  • Instructions being ignored or forgotten
  • Repeated clarifications needed
  • Planning multi-agent workflows
  • Preparing handoffs between sessions

Quick Reference

ProblemSymptomFix
Lost-in-middleMid-conversation instructions ignoredMove critical info to start/end
Context poisoningErrors compounding, hallucinations referencedSummarize and reset
Context distractionIrrelevant info degrading performancePrune aggressively
Context confusionConflicting guidance causing inconsistencyConsolidate instructions

Degradation Patterns

1. Lost-in-Middle Effect

Information in context middle gets 10-40% lower recall than edges.

[START - High attention]
  ↓
[MIDDLE - Low attention zone]  ← Instructions here get ignored
  ↓
[END - High attention]

Fix: Strategic placement

  • Critical instructions → START (system prompt, first user message)
  • Recent decisions → END (last few messages)
  • Reference material → MIDDLE (acceptable for lookup, not instructions)

2. Context Poisoning

Early hallucination gets referenced → compounds → becomes "fact".

Symptoms:

  • Confident statements contradicting earlier facts
  • "As we discussed..." referencing things never said
  • Circular reasoning citing own previous errors

Fix: Checkpoint and summarize

Every 10-15 exchanges, create explicit checkpoint:

"Let me summarize what we've established:
1. [Verified fact]
2. [Verified fact]
3. [Decision made]

Continuing from here..."

3. Context Distraction

Irrelevant tokens compete for attention budget.

Symptoms:

  • Responses reference unrelated earlier topics
  • Focus drifts from current task
  • Unnecessary caveats about old context

Fix: Aggressive pruning

  • Use /clear + summary for fresh context
  • In multi-agent: give subagents ONLY relevant context
  • Remove resolved discussions from active consideration

4. Context Confusion

Multiple conflicting instructions create inconsistent behavior.

Symptoms:

  • Alternating between approaches
  • "On one hand... on the other hand..." hedging
  • Ignoring some instructions to satisfy others

Fix: Consolidate

Before: "Use TypeScript" (message 3) + "Keep it simple" (message 12) + "Add types everywhere" (message 27)

After: "TypeScript with practical typing - types where they help, skip where obvious"

Optimization Techniques

Compaction

When approaching limits, summarize context sections:

## Session Summary (compacted)

**Goal:** [One sentence]
**Decisions made:**
- [Decision 1]
- [Decision 2]
**Current state:** [What's done, what's next]
**Key constraints:** [Still-active requirements]

---
[Continue with fresh context]

Observation Masking

Replace verbose tool outputs with compact references:

Before: [500 lines of file content in context]
After: "Read src/app/page.tsx - React component with Hero, About, FAQ sections"

Context Partitioning (Multi-Agent)

Isolate subtasks in separate agents with clean contexts:

Main Agent (orchestrator):
  - High-level plan
  - Synthesis of results

Subagent 1 (search):        Subagent 2 (implement):
  - Only search context       - Only implementation context
  - Returns summary           - Returns code

Rule: Subagents get task + minimum required context, NOT full conversation history.

Practical Workflow

For Long Sessions (>1 hour)

digraph context_management {
  "Every 15-20 min" [shape=diamond];
  "Context healthy?" [shape=diamond];
  "Continue" [shape=box];
  "Create checkpoint summary" [shape=box];
  "Consider /clear + summary" [shape=box];

  "Every 15-20 min" -> "Context healthy?";
  "Context healthy?" -> "Continue" [label="yes"];
  "Context healthy?" -> "Create checkpoint summary" [label="degrading"];
  "Create checkpoint summary" -> "Consider /clear + summary";
}

Health check questions:

  • Are recent instructions being followed?
  • Is focus staying on current task?
  • Are responses becoming vague or hedgy?

For Handoffs (/save-session)

Capture for next session:

  1. Goal state - What were we trying to achieve?
  2. Current state - What's done, what's broken?
  3. Key decisions - Why did we choose X over Y?
  4. Active constraints - What rules still apply?
  5. Next steps - Where to pick up?

For Subagents

## Subagent Prompt Template

**Task:** [Specific deliverable]
**Context:** [ONLY what's needed - 50-200 words max]
**Constraints:** [Hard requirements]
**Output format:** [What to return]

[Do NOT include: conversation history, resolved discussions, unrelated files]

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy it failsBetter approach
"Include everything just in case"Dilutes attention, causes distractionInclude only what's needed NOW
Repeating instructions every messageWastes tokens, implies they weren't heardTrust system prompt, reinforce only when ignored
Long file dumps without summaryLost-in-middle effectRead → summarize → reference summary
Keeping resolved threads activeContext confusionSummarize resolution, move on

Token Budget Guidelines

Context sizeExpected qualityAction
< 20kOptimalContinue normally
20-50kGoodMonitor for degradation
50-100kDegradingActive management needed
100-150kPoorSummarize and reset soon
> 150kCriticalReset with checkpoint

Key Insight

"The goal isn't to use all 200K tokens. It's to use the fewest tokens that achieve your outcome."

Informativity over exhaustiveness. Include what matters for current decisions, exclude everything else, and design systems that access additional information on demand.


What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude handlesYou provide
Monitoring context healthDecision to reset or continue
Creating checkpoint summariesValidation that summary is accurate
Pruning irrelevant contentJudgment on what's still needed
Structuring subagent promptsStrategic task decomposition
Detecting degradation patternsTiming of interventions

Skill Boundaries

This skill excels for:

  • Long sessions (>30 min, >50k tokens)
  • Multi-agent workflows with handoffs
  • Complex projects spanning multiple sessions
  • Debugging "forgotten instruction" issues

This skill is NOT ideal for:

  • Short, focused interactions → Not needed
  • Single-turn queries → Overhead unnecessary
  • Tasks with naturally bounded context → Already constrained

Skill Metadata

name: context-engineering
category: meta
version: 2.0
author: GUIA
source_expert: Anthropic research, NeoLabHQ context-engineering-kit
difficulty: advanced
mode: centaur
tags: [context, tokens, memory, multi-agent, handoff, optimization]
created: 2026-02-03
updated: 2026-02-03

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.63%
按下载量换算220

Claude

28.14%
按下载量换算179

Cursor

20.08%
按下载量换算128

Gemini CLI

10.45%
按下载量换算66

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills