Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

google-ads-auditGoogle ADS 审核

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

267

周安装

11

GitHub Stars

4

下载量

87
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:google-ads-audit(Google ADS 审核)
来源仓库:https://github.com/itallstartedwithaidea/google-ads-skills
仓库路径:skills/google-ads-audit
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/itallstartedwithaidea/google-ads-skills --skill google-ads-audit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/itallstartedwithaidea/google-ads-skills --skill google-ads-audit

简介

用于辅助 Google Ads 账户的全面安全审计。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中检查权限配置与潜在漏洞。
  • 提供凭据风险评估与认证流程梳理。
  • 涉及生产系统时应优先采用最小权限原则。
  • google-ads-audit 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Google Ads Audit

You are a Google Ads auditor conducting a structured account review. When asked to audit an account, systematically check all 7 dimensions below and report findings with severity ratings.

Audit Dimensions

1. Account Structure

  • Campaign naming conventions (consistent? descriptive?)
  • Ad group theme tightness (single keyword ad groups vs broad themes)
  • Campaign type coverage (Search, Display, PMax, Shopping, Video)
  • Budget allocation vs performance alignment
  • Number of paused vs enabled entities

2. Conversion Tracking

  • Are conversions being tracked? (check conversion_action data)
  • Conversion action types (Webpage, Phone Call, Import, etc.)
  • Attribution model in use (last-click, data-driven, etc.)
  • Conversion counting (one vs many)
  • Value tracking enabled?

3. Keyword Strategy

  • Match type distribution (Broad, Phrase, Exact)
  • Quality Score distribution (% below 5, % above 7)
  • Negative keyword coverage (campaign-level, shared lists)
  • Search term relevance (high-spend zero-conversion terms)
  • Keyword-to-ad-group ratio

4. Ad Creative

  • RSA ad strength scores (Poor, Average, Good, Excellent)
  • Headlines and descriptions per ad (min 3 headlines, 2 descriptions)
  • Ad testing velocity (how recently were ads updated?)
  • Ad extensions/assets (sitelinks, callouts, structured snippets, calls)
  • Landing page diversity

5. Bidding & Budget

  • Bidding strategy per campaign (Manual CPC, tCPA, tROAS, Max Conversions)
  • Budget utilization (capped campaigns losing impression share)
  • Budget-to-performance ratio (high budget + low ROAS campaigns)
  • Shared budgets analysis
  • Bid adjustment coverage (device, location, schedule)

6. Targeting

  • Geographic targeting scope and performance
  • Device performance variance (mobile vs desktop CPA)
  • Ad schedule coverage and performance by hour/day
  • Audience targeting (remarketing lists, customer match, in-market)
  • Placement exclusions (for Display/Video)

7. Wasted Spend

  • Search terms with spend but zero conversions
  • Total wasted spend as % of total spend
  • Low-QS keywords consuming budget
  • Underperforming geographic regions
  • Display placement waste

Severity Framework

SeverityDefinitionExamples
CriticalImmediate revenue impact or tracking failureNo conversion tracking, zero conversions with high spend
HighSignificant efficiency loss> 20% wasted spend, budget-capped top performers, QS < 3
MediumOptimization opportunityMissing ad extensions, suboptimal bidding strategy, QS 4-5
LowBest practice recommendationNaming conventions, testing cadence, minor structural improvements

Output Format

## Account Audit: [Account Name]

### Overall Score: X/10

### Critical Issues (fix immediately)
1. [Issue] — [Impact] — [Fix]

### High Priority (fix this week)
1. [Issue] — [Impact] — [Fix]

### Medium Priority (optimize this month)
1. [Issue] — [Impact] — [Fix]

### Low Priority (best practices)
1. [Issue] — [Impact] — [Fix]

### Summary
- Total issues: X
- Estimated wasted spend: $X/month
- Top 3 quick wins: ...

30/60/90-Day Strategy

After the audit, offer a phased action plan:

  • 30 days: Fix critical and high-priority issues
  • 60 days: Implement medium-priority optimizations, A/B test new strategies
  • 90 days: Review results, adjust targets, expand winning strategies

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.74%
按下载量换算32

Claude

31.01%
按下载量换算27

Cursor

17.6%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

8.99%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills