Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问clear审计异常

goodvibes-codebase-reviewGoodvibes 代码库审查

Agent Skill

goodvibes-codebase-review 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

888

周安装

37

GitHub Stars

6

下载量

296
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:goodvibes-codebase-review(Goodvibes 代码库审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mgd34msu/goodvibes-plugin
仓库路径:skills/goodvibes-codebase-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mgd34msu/goodvibes-plugin --skill goodvibes-codebase-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mgd34msu/goodvibes-plugin --skill goodvibes-codebase-review

简介

goodvibes-codebase-review 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用该技能。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能触发联网或文件读写操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Goodvibes Codebase Review & Remediation

Systematic codebase analysis with parallelized remediation using goodvibes agents.

CRITICAL: Be objective & completely honest. No sugar coating, EVER.

  • Honest Review: Honest reviews yield better results. Never consider emotions or feelings in your assessments.

Filesystem Boundaries

CRITICAL: Write-local, read-global.

  • WRITE/EDIT/CREATE: ONLY within the current working directory and its subdirectories. This is the project root. All changes must be git-trackable.
  • READ: Can read any file anywhere for context (node_modules, global configs, other projects for reference, etc.)
  • NEVER WRITE to: parent directories, home directory, system files, other projects, anything outside project root.

The working directory when you were spawned IS the project root. Stay within it for all modifications.

MCP Tool Checklist (MANDATORY)

STOP. Before doing ANYTHING, complete this checklist.

CRITICAL PREREQUISITE: You MUST call mcp-cli info <server>/<tool> BEFORE ANY mcp-cli call <server>/<tool>. This is a BLOCKING REQUIREMENT.

Task Start

# ALWAYS check schema first
mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/detect_stack
mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_registry-engine/recommend_skills
mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/project_issues

# Then make the calls
mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/detect_stack '{}'
mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_registry-engine/recommend_skills '{"task":"codebase review quality audit"}'
mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/project_issues '{}'

Review Phase

# Check schemas first
mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/find_circular_deps
mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/scan_for_secrets
mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/analyze_dependencies
mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/find_dead_code
mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/get_test_coverage

# Then execute
mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/find_circular_deps '{}'
mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/scan_for_secrets '{}'
mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/analyze_dependencies '{}'
mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/find_dead_code '{}'
mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/get_test_coverage '{}'

Before Every Edit

# Check schemas
mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/scan_patterns
mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/find_tests_for_file
mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/validate_edits_preview

# Execute
mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/scan_patterns '{}'
mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/find_tests_for_file '{"file":"path/to/file.ts"}'
mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/validate_edits_preview '{}'

After Every Edit

# Check schema
mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/project_issues

# Execute
mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/project_issues '{}'

THE LAW: If a goodvibes MCP tool can do it, USE THE TOOL. No exceptions.


Precision Tools (MANDATORY)

CRITICAL: Use precision tools, NOT system tools.

Instead OfUseWhy
Readprecision_readExtract modes, line ranges, outline/symbols
Grepprecision_grepOutput modes, batch queries, context control
Globprecision_globOutput modes, filters, preview
Editprecision_editAtomic transactions, validation, hints
Writeprecision_writeAtomic, templates, validation
Bashprecision_execBatch commands, expectations, output control

Precision Tool Patterns

# Find files with pattern (minimal output)
precision_grep:
  queries:
    - pattern: "TODO|FIXME|HACK"
      glob: "src/**/*.ts"
  output:
    mode: files_only

# Read file structure without content
precision_read:
  files: ["src/index.ts", "src/app.ts"]
  extract: outline
  output:
    mode: minimal

# Batch edit multiple files atomically
precision_edit:
  edits:
    - file: "src/api.ts"
      find: "const API_URL = 'http://localhost'"
      replace: "const API_URL = process.env.API_URL"
    - file: "src/config.ts"
      find: "debug: true"
      replace: "debug: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production'"
  transaction:
    mode: atomic
    rollback_on_fail: true
  output:
    mode: minimal

# Execute commands with expectations
precision_exec:
  commands:
    - cmd: "npm run typecheck"
      expect:
        exit_code: 0
    - cmd: "npm run lint"
      expect:
        exit_code: 0
  output:
    mode: minimal

Discovery -> Batch Workflow

CRITICAL: Always discover before batching.

The discover tool runs multiple queries in parallel to gather context before building a batch. This prevents wasted operations and ensures you target exactly the right files.

Discovery Tool Usage

# Run parallel discovery queries
discover:
  queries:
    - id: find_components
      type: glob
      patterns: ["src/components/**/*.tsx"]
    - id: find_api_routes
      type: glob
      patterns: ["src/api/**/*.ts", "src/app/api/**/*.ts"]
    - id: find_issues
      type: grep
      pattern: "TODO|FIXME|HACK"
      glob: "src/**/*.{ts,tsx}"
    - id: find_hooks
      type: symbols
      query: "use"
      kinds: ["function"]
  output_mode: files_only  # count_only | files_only | locations

Workflow Pattern

  1. Discover - Run queries to understand scope

- Use count_only first to gauge magnitude - Then files_only to get target list

  1. Plan - Build batch operations using discovery results

- Reference discovered files in batch operations - Scope work to exactly what was found

  1. Execute - Run batch with full context

Example: Feature Implementation

# Step 1: Discover current state
discover:
  queries:
    - id: existing_files
      type: glob
      patterns: ["src/features/auth/**/*.ts"]
    - id: existing_patterns
      type: grep
      pattern: "export (function|const|class)"
      glob: "src/features/**/*.ts"
  output_mode: files_only

# Step 2: Use results to build targeted batch
batch:
  id: implement-feature
  operations:
    read:
      - id: analyze
        type: files
        targets: "{{existing_files.files}}"  # From discovery
        extract: outline

Benefits:

  • Prevents blind operations on wrong files
  • Ensures consistent patterns across the codebase
  • Reduces token usage by targeting exactly what's needed
  • Enables informed decisions about implementation approach

Mode-Aware Behavior

Your behavior adapts based on the current mode:

vibecoding Mode

  • Communicate: Show progress, explain decisions, report results in detail
  • Ask: On ambiguity or risk, ask the user before proceeding
  • Checkpoint: Create checkpoints per batch
  • Output: Standard verbosity, show diffs

justvibes Mode

  • Silent: Minimal communication, log to .goodvibes/logs/activity.md
  • Autonomous: Make best-guess decisions, proceed with checkpoints on risk
  • Auto-chain: Continue to next logical batch automatically
  • Output: Minimal verbosity, no diffs

Workflow Overview

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                      CODEBASE REVIEW                        │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Phase 1: Review      │  Run MCP tools, analyze all code   │
│  Phase 2: Report      │  Generate codebase-review-report.md │
│  Phase 3: Plan        │  Create remediation-plan.md        │
│  Phase 4: Execute     │  WORK-REVIEW-FIX-CHECK (max 6)     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Phase 1: Codebase Review

MCP Tool Mapping

CategoryPrimary ToolsFallback
Qualityfind_dead_code, scan_patternsgrep for patterns
Architecturefind_circular_deps, get_api_surfacemanual analysis
Securityscan_for_secrets, check_permissionsgrep for patterns
Performanceget_prisma_operations, analyze_bundlenone
Documentationexplain_codebasefile scan
Testingget_test_coverage, find_tests_for_file, suggest_test_casesjest --coverage
Configread_config, env_auditenv file scan
Dependenciesanalyze_dependenciesnpm audit
Errorsparse_error_stack, explain_type_errortsc output
Stylescan_patterns, get_conventionseslint output

Review Checklist

Minimum per category:

  • 5 specific file:line findings OR explicit "no issues found"
  • Quantified measurements (counts, percentages, LOC)
  • Severity classification (critical/high/medium/low)

Phase 2: Master Report

Generate codebase-review-report.md:

# Codebase Review Report

**Project**: {name from detect_stack}
**Stack**: {technologies detected}
**Generated**: {ISO 8601 timestamp}
**Overall Score**: {X.X}/10

## Executive Summary

| Severity | Count | Description |
|----------|-------|-------------|
| 🔴 Critical | N | Issues requiring immediate attention |
| 🟠 High | N | Issues blocking production readiness |
| 🟡 Medium | N | Issues impacting maintainability |
| 🔵 Low | N | Minor improvements |

## Score Breakdown

| Category | Weight | Raw | Deductions | Score | Grade |
|----------|--------|-----|------------|-------|-------|
| Quality | 15% | 10 | -X.X | X.X | A-F |
| Architecture | 15% | 10 | -X.X | X.X | A-F |
| Security | 20% | 10 | -X.X | X.X | A-F |
| Performance | 10% | 10 | -X.X | X.X | A-F |
| Documentation | 5% | 10 | -X.X | X.X | A-F |
| Testing | 15% | 10 | -X.X | X.X | A-F |
| Config | 5% | 10 | -X.X | X.X | A-F |
| Dependencies | 5% | 10 | -X.X | X.X | A-F |
| Errors | 5% | 10 | -X.X | X.X | A-F |
| Style | 5% | 10 | -X.X | X.X | A-F |
| **TOTAL** | 100% | - | - | **X.X** | **X** |

## Score Calculation

{Show the math for each category deduction}

## Detailed Findings

### {Category Name}

#### Finding: {Title}

| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| **Severity** | critical\|high\|medium\|low |
| **Location** | `file:line` or `file:startLine-endLine` |
| **Measurement** | {exact number or percentage} |
| **Threshold** | {acceptable value} |
| **Impact** | {business/technical consequence} |
| **Points Deducted** | {-X.X from Category} |

**Evidence:**

{code snippet or tool output}

**Required Fix:**

{specific remediation code or steps}

---

{repeat for all findings}

## What's Working Well

{List genuinely good patterns found, with file references}

## Improvement Roadmap

| Phase | Focus | Expected Impact | New Score |
|-------|-------|-----------------|-----------|
| 1 | Critical fixes | +X.X points | X.X |
| 2 | High priority | +X.X points | X.X |
| 3 | Medium priority | +X.X points | X.X |
| 4 | Polish | +X.X points | X.X |

Phase 3: Remediation Plan

Generate remediation-plan.md:

# Remediation Plan

**Generated**: {timestamp}
**Total Tasks**: {N}
**Execution Strategy**: WORK-REVIEW-FIX-CHECK with parallel goodvibes agents (max 6 concurrent)

## Execution Rules

| Rule | Value |
|------|-------|
| Max concurrent agents | 6 |
| Agent type | goodvibes background |
| Context model | Fresh per task (no accumulation) |
| Tool priority | MCP tools > bash |
| Monitoring | Self-report via SubagentStop hook |
| Workflow | WORK → REVIEW → PASS/FAIL → (FIX → CHECK) |

## Task Definitions

### Wave 1: Critical [P0] - Execute Immediately

#### TASK-001: {Description}

| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| **Severity** | critical |
| **Target Files** | `file1.ts`, `file2.ts` |
| **Related Finding** | {reference to report finding} |
| **MCP Tools** | `tool1`, `tool2` |
| **Estimated Duration** | Xm |

**Context from Report:**

{relevant finding details}

---

{repeat for all tasks, grouped by wave}

### Wave 2: High [P1]

### Wave 3: Medium [P2]

### Wave 4: Low [P3]

## Dependency Graph

{Show task dependencies if any exist}

Phase 4: Parallel Agent Execution

WORK-REVIEW-FIX-CHECK Workflow

For each remediation task:

  WORK Agent ─────────────────────> REVIEW Agent
  (goodvibes:engineer)              (goodvibes:reviewer)
       │                                  │
       │                                  ├─> PASS ─> Commit ─> Update Log ─> Next Task
       │                                  │
       │                                  └─> FAIL ─> FIX Agent ─> CHECK Agent
                                                         │              │
                                                         │              ├─> PASS ─> Commit
                                                         │              │
                                                         └──────────────┴─> FAIL (loop)

Agent Role Mapping

PhaseAgentPurpose
WORKgoodvibes:engineerImplements remediation task
REVIEWgoodvibes:reviewerVerifies work quality (100% required)
FIXgoodvibes:engineerAddresses ALL review issues
CHECKgoodvibes:reviewerRe-verifies fixes

Waiting for Agents (CRITICAL)

NEVER use these to check agent status:

  • tail command on transcript files
  • TaskOutput tool
  • Any form of polling

INSTEAD, the orchestrator:

  1. Spawns agent with run_in_background: true
  2. Stops taking actions (turn ends)
  3. Receives SubagentStop hook notification when agent completes
  4. Hook message appears in context with status

Concurrency Rules

RuleValue
Max concurrent agents6
Agents per task1 (one agent works on a task at a time)
Completion requirement100% (not 99.9%)

WORK Agent Prompt Template

# Remediation Task: {TASK_ID}

## MCP Tool Checklist (MANDATORY)

**CRITICAL PREREQUISITE:** You MUST call `mcp-cli info <server>/<tool>` BEFORE ANY `mcp-cli call <server>/<tool>`.

Before ANY edit:

Check schemas first

mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/scan_patterns mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/find_tests_for_file

Then execute

mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/scan_patterns '{}' mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/find_tests_for_file '{"file":"{TARGET_FILE}"}'


After EVERY edit:

Check schema first

mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/project_issues

Then execute

mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/project_issues '{}'


## Assignment

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Task ID | {TASK_ID} |
| Severity | {SEVERITY} |
| Description | {DESCRIPTION} |
| Files | {FILE_LIST} |

## Context from Report

{FINDING_DETAILS}

## Instructions

1. Complete ONLY this assigned task
2. Use goodvibes MCP tools BEFORE bash
3. Use precision tools (precision_edit, precision_exec) for all operations
4. Run validation tools after every edit
5. If edit causes new errors, fix them before completing

## Tool Priority (MANDATORY)

1. First: Check `mcp-cli info` then `mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_*`
2. Second: Use precision tools (precision_edit, precision_read, etc.)
3. Only then: Fall back to standard tools if no MCP/precision tool exists

## Completion Report

When done, output:

{ "task_id": "{TASK_ID}", "status": "success|failed", "files_modified": ["file1.ts", "file2.ts"], "tests_passed": true|false, "type_check_passed": true|false, "notes": "Any relevant context" }


REVIEW Agent Prompt Template

# Review Task: {TASK_ID}

## MCP Tool Checklist (MANDATORY)

**CRITICAL PREREQUISITE:** You MUST call `mcp-cli info <server>/<tool>` BEFORE ANY `mcp-cli call <server>/<tool>`.

Check schemas first

mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/project_issues mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/scan_patterns mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/get_test_coverage

Then execute

mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/project_issues '{}' mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/scan_patterns '{}' mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/get_test_coverage '{}'


## Assignment

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Task ID | {TASK_ID} |
| Work Agent | {WORK_AGENT_ID} |
| Files Modified | {FILE_LIST} |

## Context from WORK Agent

{WORK_COMPLETION_REPORT}

## Review Criteria

| Criterion | Weight | Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Correctness | 30% | Does it solve the problem correctly? |
| Completeness | 25% | Are all aspects addressed? |
| Quality | 20% | Is the code clean, maintainable? |
| Safety | 15% | No new errors, security issues? |
| Tests | 10% | Tests pass, coverage maintained? |

## Review Process

1. Read all modified files
2. Run MCP validation tools
3. Check for:
  - Type errors
  - Test failures
  - Security issues
  - Code quality issues
  - Incomplete fixes
4. Calculate score based on criteria weights
5. Provide verdict

## Review Output

{ "task_id": "{TASK_ID}", "verdict": "PASS|FAIL", "score": 8.5, "issues": [ { "severity": "critical|major|minor", "file": "path/to/file.ts", "line": 47, "issue": "Description of the issue", "fix_guidance": "Specific guidance on how to fix" } ], "recommendation": "Details for FIX agent if FAIL" }


## Verdict Rules

- **PASS**: Score >= 8.0 AND no critical issues AND all criteria pass
- **FAIL**: Score < 8.0 OR any critical issue OR any criterion fails

**CRITICAL: Be honest. Better to catch issues now than in production.**

FIX Agent Prompt Template

# Fix Task: {TASK_ID} (Iteration {N})

## MCP Tool Checklist (MANDATORY)

**CRITICAL PREREQUISITE:** You MUST call `mcp-cli info <server>/<tool>` BEFORE ANY `mcp-cli call <server>/<tool>`.

Before ANY edit:

Check schemas first

mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/scan_patterns mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/find_tests_for_file

Then execute

mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/scan_patterns '{}' mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/find_tests_for_file '{"file":"{TARGET_FILE}"}'


After EVERY edit:

Check schema first

mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/project_issues

Then execute

mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/project_issues '{}'


## Review Feedback

{ISSUES_FROM_REVIEW}

## Instructions

1. Address EVERY issue from the review - no skipping
2. Follow the `fix_guidance` provided for each issue
3. Use precision tools for all operations
4. Run validation after each fix
5. If you cannot fix an issue, document WHY and mark as blocked

## Completion Report

{ "task_id": "{TASK_ID}", "iteration": {N}, "status": "success|blocked", "issues_addressed": N, "issues_remaining": N, "blocked_issues": [ { "issue": "Description", "reason": "Why it cannot be fixed" } ], "notes": "Any relevant context" }


CHECK Agent Prompt Template

# Check Task: {TASK_ID} (Verification Round {N})

## MCP Tool Checklist (MANDATORY)

**CRITICAL PREREQUISITE:** You MUST call `mcp-cli info <server>/<tool>` BEFORE ANY `mcp-cli call <server>/<tool>`.

Check schemas first

mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/project_issues mcp-cli info plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/scan_patterns

Then execute

mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_project-engine/project_issues '{}' mcp-cli call plugin_goodvibes_analysis-engine/scan_patterns '{}'


## Assignment

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Task ID | {TASK_ID} |
| FIX Agent | {FIX_AGENT_ID} |
| Iteration | {N} |

## Previous Issues

{ISSUES_TO_VERIFY}

## Context from FIX Agent

{FIX_COMPLETION_REPORT}

## Verification Process

1. Read all modified files
2. Run MCP validation tools
3. Verify each previous issue is resolved
4. Check for new issues introduced by fixes
5. Provide verdict

## Verdict Output

{ "task_id": "{TASK_ID}", "iteration": {N}, "verdict": "PASS|FAIL", "resolved_issues": N, "unresolved_issues": [ { "issue": "Description", "status": "still_present|new_issue" } ], "recommendation": "Next action if FAIL" }


## Verdict Rules

- **PASS**: ALL previous issues resolved AND no new critical issues
- **FAIL**: ANY issue unresolved OR new critical issues found

**If FAIL after 3 iterations, escalate to human review.**

Commit Protocol

After REVIEW or CHECK verdict is PASS, create commit:


fix({CATEGORY}): {TASK_ID} - {SHORT_DESCRIPTION}

{DETAILED_DESCRIPTION}

## Changes

- {FILE_1}: {WHAT_CHANGED}
- {FILE_2}: {WHAT_CHANGED}

## Review

- Reviewed by: REVIEW agent
- Score: {SCORE}/10
- Iterations: {FIX_ITERATIONS}

Task-ID: {TASK_ID} Severity: {SEVERITY} Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 [noreply@anthropic.com](https://github.com/mgd34msu/goodvibes-plugin/blob/HEAD/plugins/goodvibes/skills/goodvibes-codebase-review/mailto:noreply@anthropic.com)

Completion Cleanup

After ALL remediation tasks have passed review and been committed, archive the output files:

Archive Location: .goodvibes/completed/

Archive Commands:

# Run all commands together in a single shell session:
# Create archive directory if it doesn't exist
mkdir -p .goodvibes/completed

# Generate timestamp
TIMESTAMP=$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)

# Move and rename files
mv codebase-review-report.md .goodvibes/completed/code-review-${TIMESTAMP}.md
mv remediation-plan.md .goodvibes/completed/remediation-plan-${TIMESTAMP}.md
mv remediation-log.md .goodvibes/completed/remediation-log-${TIMESTAMP}.md

Archive Checklist:

  • All remediation tasks show status: completed in remediation-log.md
  • All commits pushed (if applicable)
  • Memory files updated (.goodvibes/memory/)
  • Archive directory created
  • Files moved with timestamp suffix

File Naming Convention:

OriginalArchived
codebase-review-report.mdcode-review-{YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS}.md
remediation-plan.mdremediation-plan-{YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS}.md
remediation-log.mdremediation-log-{YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS}.md

Why Archive:

  • Keeps project root clean
  • Preserves historical review data
  • Enables tracking of codebase health over time
  • Prevents confusion with future reviews

Completion Logging

Maintain remediation-log.md:

# Remediation Log

## Active Agents

| Task ID | Description | Agent | Phase | Started | Elapsed |
|---------|-------------|-------|-------|---------|---------|
| TASK-002 | Remove secrets | agent-abc | WORK | 10:05:00 | 5m |
| TASK-003 | Fix auth flow | agent-def | REVIEW | 10:08:00 | 2m |

## Completed Tasks

| Task ID | Description | Status | Duration | Iterations | Changes |
|---------|-------------|--------|----------|------------|---------|
| TASK-001 | Fix SQL injection | ✅ PASS | 15m32s | 1 | `api/users.ts` |

## Failed Tasks

| Task ID | Description | Status | Iterations | Reason | Retry? |
|---------|-------------|--------|------------|--------|--------|
| TASK-005 | Fix type errors | ❌ FAIL | 3 | Blocked by external dependency | No |

## Summary

- **Total Tasks**: N
- **Completed**: N (X%)
- **In Progress**: N
- **Failed**: N
- **Remaining**: N
- **Active Agents**: N/6

Output Artifacts

FilePurpose
codebase-review-report.mdComplete findings with quantified metrics and scores
remediation-plan.mdPrioritized task checklist by severity with context
remediation-log.mdReal-time execution tracking with WORK-REVIEW-FIX-CHECK status

Note: After all remediation tasks are completed, these files are archived to .goodvibes/completed/ with timestamp suffixes. See "Completion Cleanup" section for details.


Memory Integration

After review/remediation, update .goodvibes/memory/:

FileUpdate With
decisions.mdArchitectural decisions made during remediation
patterns.mdPatterns discovered or enforced
failures.mdFailed remediations with root cause analysis
preferences.mdTool preferences that worked well

Constraints

ConstraintValueRationale
Max concurrent agents6Resource management
Agent typegoodvibes backgroundTelemetry via hooks
Tasks per agent1Fresh context per task
Context inheritanceNonePrevent cross-contamination
Monitoring methodSelf-reportSubagentStop hook handles
Tool priorityMCP > precision > bashConsistency and telemetry
Review requirement100%Ensure quality before commit

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

25.38%
按下载量换算75

Cursor

22.72%
按下载量换算67

Codex

16.76%
按下载量换算50

Antigravity

12.66%
按下载量换算37

windsurf

8.22%
按下载量换算24

OpenCode

3.1%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills