Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

fullstack-feature全栈功能

Agent Skill

fullstack-feature 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,247

周安装

53

GitHub Stars

6

下载量

437
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:fullstack-feature(全栈功能)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mgd34msu/goodvibes-plugin
仓库路径:skills/fullstack-feature
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mgd34msu/goodvibes-plugin --skill fullstack-feature
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mgd34msu/goodvibes-plugin --skill fullstack-feature

简介

fullstack-feature 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中整理仓库状态和协作事项。

  • 适用于需要跟踪项目进度或管理协作流程的场景。
  • 通过安装命令从指定仓库添加技能,可结合原始 README 核验用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发不必要的数据操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Resources

scripts/
  validate-feature-workflow.sh
references/
  phase-templates.md

Fullstack Feature Orchestration

This skill defines the end-to-end workflow for implementing complete features that span multiple layers of the stack. It orchestrates specialized agents through 7 distinct phases, from requirements clarification through delivery.

When to Use This Skill

Use fullstack-feature when the user requests:

  • A complete feature that requires database, API, and UI changes
  • End-to-end implementation with testing and review
  • A new user-facing capability that touches multiple components
  • Anything described as: "build X", "add X feature", "implement X capability"

Do NOT use this skill for:

  • Single-layer changes (just API, just UI)
  • Bug fixes (use bugfix or hotfix skills)
  • Code review only (use review-scoring skill)
  • Refactoring without new functionality

Overview

The fullstack feature workflow consists of 7 phases:

  1. Understand - Clarify requirements, load skills, identify affected layers
  2. Foundation (sequential) - Database schema/migrations, type generation
  3. Core Implementation (parallel) - API endpoints, UI components, state management
  4. Integration (sequential) - Wire UI to API, state to UI, verify data flow
  5. Quality (parallel) - Tests, security check, accessibility check
  6. Review (runtime-driven) - WRFC chains from prior phases complete via runtime <gv> directives
  7. Commit + Log - Triggered when runtime issues complete directives; git commit, update memory/logs, report to user

Runtime Engine and WRFC Chains

The runtime engine automatically creates a WRFC (Work-Review-Fix-Complete) chain for each work agent. When an agent completes its work and emits a <gv> tag, the runtime:

  1. Evaluates the output against the configured score_threshold (default: 9.5 from goodvibes.json)
  2. Issues directives to the orchestrator via system messages
  3. Orchestrator executes those directives mechanically

Directive types:

{"action":"spawn","wid":"wrfc_xxx","type":"reviewer","task":"Review the code..."}
{"action":"spawn","wid":"wrfc_xxx","type":"engineer","task":"Fix the issues..."}
{"action":"complete","wid":"wrfc_xxx"}
{"action":"escalate","wid":"wrfc_xxx","reason":"Max fix attempts reached"}

Directive compliance rules (absolute):

  1. Immediate: Execute directives the moment they arrive. NEVER defer, queue, or delay.
  2. First: Execute directives BEFORE any other action. No intervening tool calls, no additional agent spawns, no user messages first.
  3. Autonomy ends: Once the first directive arrives for a WRFC chain, the orchestrator has no further judgment over that chain. Only directives drive it.
  4. Runtime supersedes: Runtime workflow logic ALWAYS supersedes orchestrator judgment. If a directive says review, review. If it says complete, complete.

The orchestrator does NOT manually spawn reviewers or fix agents. These come exclusively from runtime directives.

Phase 1: Understand

Purpose

Ensure you have complete clarity on what to build before spawning work agents. This phase prevents wasted effort from misunderstandings.

Steps

  1. Clarify requirements with the user:

- What is the exact functionality requested? - Who are the users and what are their goals? - What are the acceptance criteria (how do we know it's done)? - Are there specific constraints (performance, accessibility, browser support)? - Are there existing patterns to follow or avoid?

  1. Identify affected layers:

- Database: New tables/columns? Migrations? - API: New endpoints? Modify existing? - Types: New type definitions? - UI: New components? Modify existing? - State: New state management? - Tests: Unit, integration, e2e?

  1. Load relevant outcome skills:

- Backend: trpc, prisma, postgresql, clerk, nextauth, graphql, rest-api-design - Frontend: nextjs, react, tailwindcss, shadcn-ui, framer-motion - Protocol: gather-plan-apply, review-scoring, goodvibes-memory

  1. Check goodvibes memory:

- .goodvibes/memory/decisions.json - Architectural choices - .goodvibes/memory/patterns.json - Coding patterns - .goodvibes/memory/failures.json - Past failures to avoid

  1. Create implementation plan:

- Decompose feature into sub-tasks - Identify dependencies between sub-tasks - Estimate scope (how many files/components) - Map sub-tasks to phases (Foundation, Core, Integration)

Output

At the end of Phase 1, you must have:

  • Requirements document (in memory/current-task.md)
  • Affected layers list (database, API, UI, tests)
  • Implementation plan (decomposed sub-tasks with dependencies)
  • Loaded skills (relevant outcome skills available)

Mode-Specific Behavior

Vibecoding: Confirm with user before proceeding to Phase 2. Justvibes: Auto-proceed if requirements are clear. (Pause for clarification if ambiguous.)

Phase 2: Foundation (Sequential)

Purpose

Establish the data model and type foundation before building any upstream code. This ensures type safety and consistency across layers.

Steps

  1. Database schema (if required):

- Spawn database agent to design schema - Create migration files - Run migrations (dev environment) - Verify migration success

  1. Type generation (if using Prisma/Drizzle/etc):

- Run ORM type generation command - Verify types are generated - Commit generated types (if necessary)

  1. Shared type definitions (if not using ORM):

- Create src/types/[...].ts files - Define entities, DTOs, request/response types - Export from barrel index.ts

Agent Instructions

Database agent:

Protocol skills (required for all agents): gather-plan-apply, precision-mastery, error-recovery, goodvibes-memory

  • Use gather-plan-apply protocol
  • Follow existing schema patterns (check memory/decisions.json)
  • Add appropriate indexes for query performance
  • Add foreign key constraints
  • Use timestamps (createdAt, updatedAt)
  • Test migration before completing

Engineer agent (type generation):

Protocol skills (required for all agents): gather-plan-apply, precision-mastery, error-recovery, goodvibes-memory

  • Run type generation command
  • Verify types are correct (spot check generated code)
  • Run tsc to confirm no type errors

Clear Definition of Done

  • Database schema exists, migrations applied
  • Types generated and exported
  • npm run typecheck passes
  • All files committed

Mode-Specific Behavior

Vibecoding: Checkpoint after this phase. Commit with message checkpoint: foundation - schema and types. Justvibes: Auto-proceed to Phase 3.

Phase 3: Core Implementation (Parallel)

Purpose

Implement the main functionality across API and UI layers in parallel. This maximizes throughput and minimizes wait time.

Sub-Phases

These sub-phases run in parallel:

  1. API endpoints (API agent)
  2. UI components (UI agent)
  3. State management (State agent)

Agent Instructions

API agent:

Protocol skills (required for all agents): gather-plan-apply, precision-mastery, error-recovery, goodvibes-memory

  • Implement endpoints using existing patterns (check decisions.json for API style)
  • Add input validation (use Zod or similar)
  • Add error handling
  • Add authentication/authorization checks
  • Use ORM for database access
  • Add logging at appropriate levels
  • Use gather-plan-apply protocol

UI agent:

Protocol skills (required for all agents): gather-plan-apply, precision-mastery, error-recovery, goodvibes-memory

  • Create components using existing patterns (check decisions.json for UI libraries)
  • Follow accessibility best practices (ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation)
  • Implement responsive design
  • Add loading and error states
  • Optimize performance (useMemo, useCallback)
  • Use gather-plan-apply protocol

State agent:

Protocol skills (required for all agents): gather-plan-apply, precision-mastery, error-recovery, goodvibes-memory

  • Implement state management using existing patterns (Zustand, Redux, etc)
  • Define state shape and actions
  • Add selectors for derived state
  • Add persistence if required (localStorage, sessionStorage)
  • Use gather-plan-apply protocol

Clear Definition of Done

  • All API endpoints implemented and validated
  • All UI components created
  • State management implemented
  • npm run typecheck passes
  • npm run lint passes
  • All files committed

Mode-Specific Behavior

Vibecoding: Checkpoint after this phase. Commit with message checkpoint: core implementation. Justvibes: Auto-proceed to Phase 4.

Phase 4: Integration (Sequential)

Purpose

Connect UI to API, wire state to UI, and verify data flows end-to-end. This phase must be sequential because it depends on Phase 3 completion.

Steps

  1. Wire UI to API:

- Add API client calls to components - Handle loading states during API calls - Handle error states from API - Display API responses in UI

  1. Wire state to UI:

- Connect state management to components - Use selectors to access state - Dispatch actions on user interactions - Verify UI updates when state changes

  1. End-to-end verification:

- Manually test data flow: UI -> API -> Database -> API -> UI - Confirm loading states appear - Confirm error states appear on failure - Confirm success states appear on success

  1. Fix integration issues:

- Fix type mismatches between UI and API - Fix data mapping issues - Fix state synchronization issues

Agent Instructions

Integration agent:

Protocol skills (required for all agents): gather-plan-apply, precision-mastery, error-recovery, goodvibes-memory

  • Read both API and UI code to understand interfaces
  • Add API client calls in correct lifecycle hooks (useEffect, event handlers)
  • Ensure error handling is present
  • Ensure loading states are displayed
  • Test each integration point manually
  • Use gather-plan-apply protocol

Clear Definition of Done

  • UI components can call API endpoints
  • Data flows from UI -> API -> DB -> API -> UI
  • State works correctly
  • Loading states display
  • Error states display
  • npm run typecheck passes
  • All files committed

Mode-Specific Behavior

Vibecoding: Checkpoint after this phase. Commit with message checkpoint: integration. Justvibes: Auto-proceed to Phase 5.

Phase 5: Quality (Parallel)

Purpose

Verify the implementation meets quality standards across multiple dimensions. These checks run in parallel. Each spawned agent will have its own WRFC chain managed by the runtime engine.

Sub-Phases

These sub-phases run in parallel:

  1. Tests (Tester agent)
  2. Security check (Security agent)
  3. Accessibility check (A11y agent)

Agent Instructions

Tester agent:

Protocol skills (required for all agents): gather-plan-apply, precision-mastery, error-recovery, goodvibes-memory

  • Write unit tests for API endpoints
  • Write component tests for UI
  • Write integration tests for data flow
  • Target >=80% coverage for new code
  • Test both happy path and edge cases
  • Use gather-plan-apply protocol

Security agent:

Protocol skills (required for all agents): gather-plan-apply, precision-mastery, error-recovery, goodvibes-memory

  • Check for input validation on all endpoints
  • Check for authentication/authorization checks
  • Check for SQL injection vulnerabilities
  • Check for XSS vulnerabilities
  • Check for exposed secrets
  • Check for CORS configuration
  • Use gather-plan-apply protocol

A11y agent:

Protocol skills (required for all agents): gather-plan-apply, precision-mastery, error-recovery, goodvibes-memory

  • Check for ARIA attributes on interactive elements
  • Check for keyboard navigation support
  • Check for color contrast (WCAG AA)
  • Check for focus indicators
  • Check for alt text on images
  • Use gather-plan-apply protocol

Clear Definition of Done

  • Tests written and passing
  • Security check complete (no critical issues)
  • Accessibility check complete (no critical issues)
  • All files committed

Mode-Specific Behavior

Vibecoding: Checkpoint after this phase. Commit with message checkpoint: quality checks. Justvibes: Auto-proceed; runtime handles review cycles.

Phase 6: Review (Runtime-Driven)

Purpose

Ensure all code meets production standards through systematic review and fix. The runtime engine manages this phase automatically via <gv> directives.

How It Works

The orchestrator does NOT manually spawn reviewers. Instead:

  1. Each work agent from Phases 2-5 completes and emits a <gv> tag
  2. The runtime engine evaluates the output and issues directives:

- If review is needed: {"action":"spawn","type":"reviewer","task":"..."} - If fixes are needed after review: {"action":"spawn","type":"engineer","task":"Fix:..."} - If the score meets score_threshold (configured in goodvibes.json): {"action":"complete"} - If max_fix_attempts is exhausted: {"action":"escalate","reason":"..."}

  1. The orchestrator executes each directive immediately and mechanically

Orchestrator Behavior

  • On spawn directive: spawn the specified agent with the provided task prompt
  • On complete directive: mark the chain done, proceed to Phase 7 when all chains complete
  • On escalate directive: report to user with the escalation reason; do not attempt to fix the chain manually

Clear Definition of Done

  • All WRFC chains have received complete directives from the runtime
  • No chains are pending escalation resolution

Mode-Specific Behavior

Both vibecoding and justvibes modes follow directives identically. The runtime engine determines when review cycles end. The orchestrator has no mode-specific behavior in this phase beyond executing directives.

Phase 7: Commit + Log

Purpose

Finalize the feature by committing to git and updating project memory. This phase is triggered when the runtime issues complete directives for all WRFC chains from Phases 2-5.

Steps

  1. Create git commit:

- Stage all new/modified files - Write clear commit message (follow existing conventions) - Include Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> - Commit

  1. Update goodvibes memory:

- Add to .goodvibes/memory/patterns.json (if new patterns emerged) - Add to .goodvibes/memory/decisions.json (if new decisions made) - Use goodvibes-memory skill

  1. Update goodvibes logs:

- Log feature completion to .goodvibes/logs/tasks.jsonl - Include feature name, files changed, final score - Use goodvibes-memory skill

  1. Report to user:

- Summarize what was built - List files created/modified - List commit SHA - Provide next steps (if any)

Clear Definition of Done

  • All files committed to git
  • Memory updated
  • Logs updated
  • User report provided

Mode-Specific Behavior

Vibecoding: Confirm commit message with user before committing. Justvibes: Auto-commit with generated message.

Mode-Specific Behavior

Vibecoding Mode

Vibecoding mode is collaborative. The orchestrator:

  • Confirms after Phase 1 (Understand) before proceeding
  • Checkpoints after Phases 2, 3, 4, 5 (creates git commits)
  • Confirms commit message before final commit in Phase 7
  • Pauses for approval if uncertainties arise

Once agents are spawned, the runtime engine drives WRFC chains automatically. The orchestrator executes directives mechanically regardless of mode.

Checkpoint commit messages:

  • checkpoint: foundation - schema and types
  • checkpoint: core implementation
  • checkpoint: integration
  • checkpoint: quality checks

Justvibes Mode

Justvibes mode is autonomous. The orchestrator:

  • Auto-proceeds through all phases without user input
  • Pauses only if requirements are ambiguous or critical decisions are needed
  • Auto-commits in Phase 7 (generates commit message)

The runtime engine manages all WRFC cycles in both modes identically.

Agent Orchestration Patterns

Sequential Phases

Phases 2, 4, 7 must be sequential:

  • Phase 2 (Foundation): Must complete before Phase 3 because API/UI code depends on types
  • Phase 4 (Integration): Must come after Phase 3 because it connects API+UI
  • Phase 7 (Commit+Log): Must be last; triggered by complete directives for all chains

Parallel Phases

Phases 3 and 5 spawn multiple agents in parallel:

  • Phase 3 (Core): API agent, UI agent, State agent run in parallel
  • Phase 5 (Quality): Tester agent, Security agent, A11y agent run in parallel

All agents in a parallel phase must receive complete directives before proceeding to the next phase.

Agent Communication

Agents should NOT communicate directly. Instead:

  • Agents write results to filesystem
  • Orchestrator reads agent outputs
  • Orchestrator passes relevant info to next agents

Integration with Other Protocols

Gather-Plan-Apply (GPA)

All work agents must follow the GPA loop:

  1. Discover: Use discover tool to run parallel grep/glob/symbol queries
  2. Plan: Identify files to create/modify, order of operations, batch opportunities
  3. Batch: Group operations into batched precision_engine calls
  4. Loop: Return to discovery if assumptions change

See gather-plan-apply skill for details.

Review-Scoring (WRFC)

The runtime engine uses the review-scoring rubric internally when spawning reviewers. The orchestrator does not score code directly. Review thresholds are configured in goodvibes.json (score_threshold, max_fix_attempts).

See review-scoring skill for details on what the reviewer agent does.

Goodvibes Memory

Use goodvibes-memory skill to:

  • Read .goodvibes/memory/{decisions,patterns,failures}.json in Phase 1
  • Write to .goodvibes/logs/tasks.jsonl in Phase 7
  • Update memory files with new patterns/decisions in Phase 7

Common Pitfalls

Starting Implementation Too Early

Do not spawn work agents until Phase 1 is complete. Clarify requirements first.

Parallelizing Sequential Phases

Do not run Phases 2 and 3 in parallel. Phase 3 depends on Phase 2 types.

Skipping Quality Phase

Do not skip Phase 5. Tests are not optional. Security is not optional.

Manually Scheduling Reviewers

Do not add reviewer tasks to Phase 6 manually. The runtime engine issues reviewer spawn directives automatically when each work agent completes. Manual scheduling bypasses the runtime's threshold enforcement.

Deferring Directives

Do not defer, reorder, or skip <gv> directives. Execute them immediately as the first action when received.

Committing Without All Chains Complete

Do not commit in Phase 7 until all WRFC chains have received complete directives. Partial completions are not done.

Forgetting to Update Memory

Do not skip memory updates in Phase 7. Future agents rely on this context.

Validation

Use scripts/validate-feature-workflow.sh to verify your orchestration follows this workflow. See references/phase-templates.md for detailed templates and examples.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.12%
按下载量换算153

Claude

27.68%
按下载量换算121

Cursor

18.61%
按下载量换算81

Gemini CLI

8.6%
按下载量换算38

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills