Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

fp-pragmatic务实的

Agent Skill

fp-pragmatic 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

456

周安装

19

GitHub Stars

35,698

下载量

152
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:fp-pragmatic(务实的)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
仓库路径:skills/fp-pragmatic
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill fp-pragmatic
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill fp-pragmatic

简介

fp-pragmatic 提供实用函数式编程指导,平衡抽象与可读性。

  • 适用于超过三个操作步骤时使用管道(pipe)组织数据流转。
  • 对可选链推荐 Option 类型,失败操作则使用 Either 包装。
  • 当 FP 写法损害团队理解时应回归简单命令式实现。
  • 需根据实际场景选择最合适的范式,避免过度工程化。

SKILL.md

Pragmatic Functional Programming

Read this first. This guide cuts through the academic jargon and shows you what actually matters. No category theory. No abstract nonsense. Just patterns that make your code better.

When to Use

  • You want a pragmatic starting point for fp-ts or functional programming in TypeScript.
  • The task is exploratory or educational and needs an 80/20 view of what is actually worth adopting.
  • You need guidance on when FP helps and when it is better to keep code simple.

The Golden Rule

If functional programming makes your code harder to read, don't use it.

FP is a tool, not a religion. Use it when it helps. Skip it when it doesn't.


The 80/20 of FP

These five patterns give you most of the benefits. Master these before exploring anything else.

1. Pipe: Chain Operations Clearly

Instead of nesting function calls or creating intermediate variables, chain operations in reading order.

import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'

// Before: Hard to read (inside-out)
const result = format(validate(parse(input)))

// Before: Too many variables
const parsed = parse(input)
const validated = validate(parsed)
const result = format(validated)

// After: Clear, linear flow
const result = pipe(
  input,
  parse,
  validate,
  format
)

When to use pipe:

  • 3+ transformations on the same data
  • You find yourself naming throwaway variables
  • Logic reads better top-to-bottom

When to skip pipe:

  • Just 1-2 operations (direct call is fine)
  • The operations don't naturally chain

2. Option: Handle Missing Values Without null Checks

Stop writing if (x!== null && x!== undefined) everywhere.

import * as O from 'fp-ts/Option'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'

// Before: Defensive null checking
function getUserCity(user: User | null): string {
  if (user === null) return 'Unknown'
  if (user.address === null) return 'Unknown'
  if (user.address.city === null) return 'Unknown'
  return user.address.city
}

// After: Chain through potential missing values
const getUserCity = (user: User | null): string =>
  pipe(
    O.fromNullable(user),
    O.flatMap(u => O.fromNullable(u.address)),
    O.flatMap(a => O.fromNullable(a.city)),
    O.getOrElse(() => 'Unknown')
  )

Plain language translation:

  • O.fromNullable(x) = "wrap this value, treating null/undefined as 'nothing'"
  • O.flatMap(fn) = "if we have something, apply this function"
  • O.getOrElse(() => default) = "unwrap, or use this default if nothing"

3. Either: Make Errors Explicit

Stop throwing exceptions for expected failures. Return errors as values.

import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'

// Before: Hidden failure mode
function parseAge(input: string): number {
  const age = parseInt(input, 10)
  if (isNaN(age)) throw new Error('Invalid age')
  if (age < 0) throw new Error('Age cannot be negative')
  return age
}

// After: Errors are visible in the type
function parseAge(input: string): E.Either<string, number> {
  const age = parseInt(input, 10)
  if (isNaN(age)) return E.left('Invalid age')
  if (age < 0) return E.left('Age cannot be negative')
  return E.right(age)
}

// Using it
const result = parseAge(userInput)
if (E.isRight(result)) {
  console.log(`Age is ${result.right}`)
} else {
  console.log(`Error: ${result.left}`)
}

Plain language translation:

  • E.right(value) = "success with this value"
  • E.left(error) = "failure with this error"
  • E.isRight(x) = "did it succeed?"

4. Map: Transform Without Unpacking

Transform values inside containers without extracting them first.

import * as O from 'fp-ts/Option'
import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either'
import * as A from 'fp-ts/Array'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'

// Transform inside Option
const maybeUser: O.Option<User> = O.some({ name: 'Alice', age: 30 })
const maybeName: O.Option<string> = pipe(
  maybeUser,
  O.map(user => user.name)
)

// Transform inside Either
const result: E.Either<Error, number> = E.right(5)
const doubled: E.Either<Error, number> = pipe(
  result,
  E.map(n => n * 2)
)

// Transform arrays (same concept!)
const numbers = [1, 2, 3]
const doubled = pipe(
  numbers,
  A.map(n => n * 2)
)

5. FlatMap: Chain Operations That Might Fail

When each step might fail, chain them together.

import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'

const parseJSON = (s: string): E.Either<string, unknown> =>
  E.tryCatch(() => JSON.parse(s), () => 'Invalid JSON')

const extractEmail = (data: unknown): E.Either<string, string> => {
  if (typeof data === 'object' && data !== null && 'email' in data) {
    return E.right((data as { email: string }).email)
  }
  return E.left('No email field')
}

const validateEmail = (email: string): E.Either<string, string> =>
  email.includes('@') ? E.right(email) : E.left('Invalid email format')

// Chain all steps - if any fails, the whole thing fails
const getValidEmail = (input: string): E.Either<string, string> =>
  pipe(
    parseJSON(input),
    E.flatMap(extractEmail),
    E.flatMap(validateEmail)
  )

// Success path: Right('user@example.com')
// Any failure: Left('specific error message')

Plain language: flatMap means "if this succeeded, try the next thing"


When NOT to Use FP

Functional programming is not always the answer. Here's when to keep it simple.

Simple Null Checks

// Just use optional chaining - it's built into the language
const city = user?.address?.city ?? 'Unknown'

// DON'T overcomplicate it
const city = pipe(
  O.fromNullable(user),
  O.flatMap(u => O.fromNullable(u.address)),
  O.flatMap(a => O.fromNullable(a.city)),
  O.getOrElse(() => 'Unknown')
)

Simple Loops

// A for loop is fine when you need early exit or complex logic
function findFirst(items: Item[], predicate: (i: Item) => boolean): Item | null {
  for (const item of items) {
    if (predicate(item)) return item
  }
  return null
}

// DON'T force FP when it doesn't help
const result = pipe(
  items,
  A.findFirst(predicate),
  O.toNullable
)

Performance-Critical Code

// For hot paths, imperative is faster (no intermediate arrays)
function sumLarge(numbers: number[]): number {
  let sum = 0
  for (let i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++) {
    sum += numbers[i]
  }
  return sum
}

// fp-ts creates intermediate structures
const sum = pipe(numbers, A.reduce(0, (acc, n) => acc + n))

When Your Team Doesn't Know FP

If you're the only one who can read the code, it's not good code.

// If your team knows this pattern
async function getUser(id: string): Promise<User | null> {
  try {
    const response = await fetch(`/api/users/${id}`)
    if (!response.ok) return null
    return await response.json()
  } catch {
    return null
  }
}

// Don't force this on them
const getUser = (id: string): TE.TaskEither<Error, User> =>
  pipe(
    TE.tryCatch(() => fetch(`/api/users/${id}`), E.toError),
    TE.flatMap(r => r.ok ? TE.right(r) : TE.left(new Error('Not found'))),
    TE.flatMap(r => TE.tryCatch(() => r.json(), E.toError))
  )

Quick Wins: Easy Changes That Improve Code Today

1. Replace Nested Ternaries with pipe + fold

// Before: Nested ternary nightmare
const message = user === null
  ? 'No user'
  : user.isAdmin
    ? `Admin: ${user.name}`
    : `User: ${user.name}`

// After: Clear case handling
const message = pipe(
  O.fromNullable(user),
  O.fold(
    () => 'No user',
    (u) => u.isAdmin ? `Admin: ${u.name}` : `User: ${u.name}`
  )
)

2. Replace try-catch with tryCatch

// Before: try-catch everywhere
let config
try {
  config = JSON.parse(rawConfig)
} catch {
  config = defaultConfig
}

// After: One-liner
const config = pipe(
  E.tryCatch(() => JSON.parse(rawConfig), () => 'parse error'),
  E.getOrElse(() => defaultConfig)
)

3. Replace undefined Returns with Option

// Before: Caller might forget to check
function findUser(id: string): User | undefined {
  return users.find(u => u.id === id)
}

// After: Type forces caller to handle missing case
function findUser(id: string): O.Option<User> {
  return O.fromNullable(users.find(u => u.id === id))
}

4. Replace Error Strings with Typed Errors

// Before: Just strings
function validate(data: unknown): E.Either<string, User> {
  // ...
  return E.left('validation failed')
}

// After: Structured errors
type ValidationError = {
  field: string
  message: string
}

function validate(data: unknown): E.Either<ValidationError, User> {
  // ...
  return E.left({ field: 'email', message: 'Invalid format' })
}

5. Use const Assertions for Error Types

// Create specific error types without classes
const NotFound = (id: string) => ({ _tag: 'NotFound' as const, id })
const Unauthorized = { _tag: 'Unauthorized' as const }
const ValidationFailed = (errors: string[]) =>
  ({ _tag: 'ValidationFailed' as const, errors })

type AppError =
  | ReturnType<typeof NotFound>
  | typeof Unauthorized
  | ReturnType<typeof ValidationFailed>

// Now you can pattern match
const handleError = (error: AppError): string => {
  switch (error._tag) {
    case 'NotFound': return `Item ${error.id} not found`
    case 'Unauthorized': return 'Please log in'
    case 'ValidationFailed': return error.errors.join(', ')
  }
}

Common Refactors: Before and After

Callback Hell to Pipe

// Before
fetchUser(id, (user) => {
  if (!user) return handleNoUser()
  fetchPosts(user.id, (posts) => {
    if (!posts) return handleNoPosts()
    fetchComments(posts[0].id, (comments) => {
      render(user, posts, comments)
    })
  })
})

// After (with TaskEither for async)
import * as TE from 'fp-ts/TaskEither'

const loadData = (id: string) =>
  pipe(
    fetchUser(id),
    TE.flatMap(user => pipe(
      fetchPosts(user.id),
      TE.map(posts => ({ user, posts }))
    )),
    TE.flatMap(({ user, posts }) => pipe(
      fetchComments(posts[0].id),
      TE.map(comments => ({ user, posts, comments }))
    ))
  )

// Execute
const result = await loadData('123')()
pipe(
  result,
  E.fold(handleError, ({ user, posts, comments }) => render(user, posts, comments))
)

Multiple null Checks to Option Chain

// Before
function getManagerEmail(employee: Employee): string | null {
  if (!employee.department) return null
  if (!employee.department.manager) return null
  if (!employee.department.manager.email) return null
  return employee.department.manager.email
}

// After
const getManagerEmail = (employee: Employee): O.Option<string> =>
  pipe(
    O.fromNullable(employee.department),
    O.flatMap(d => O.fromNullable(d.manager)),
    O.flatMap(m => O.fromNullable(m.email))
  )

// Use it
pipe(
  getManagerEmail(employee),
  O.fold(
    () => sendToDefault(),
    (email) => sendTo(email)
  )
)

Validation with Multiple Checks

// Before: Throws on first error
function validateUser(data: unknown): User {
  if (!data || typeof data !== 'object') throw new Error('Must be object')
  const obj = data as Record<string, unknown>
  if (typeof obj.email !== 'string') throw new Error('Email required')
  if (!obj.email.includes('@')) throw new Error('Invalid email')
  if (typeof obj.age !== 'number') throw new Error('Age required')
  if (obj.age < 0) throw new Error('Age must be positive')
  return obj as User
}

// After: Returns first error, type-safe
const validateUser = (data: unknown): E.Either<string, User> =>
  pipe(
    E.Do,
    E.bind('obj', () =>
      typeof data === 'object' && data !== null
        ? E.right(data as Record<string, unknown>)
        : E.left('Must be object')
    ),
    E.bind('email', ({ obj }) =>
      typeof obj.email === 'string' && obj.email.includes('@')
        ? E.right(obj.email)
        : E.left('Valid email required')
    ),
    E.bind('age', ({ obj }) =>
      typeof obj.age === 'number' && obj.age >= 0
        ? E.right(obj.age)
        : E.left('Valid age required')
    ),
    E.map(({ email, age }) => ({ email, age }))
  )

Promise Chain to TaskEither

// Before
async function processOrder(orderId: string): Promise<Receipt> {
  const order = await fetchOrder(orderId)
  if (!order) throw new Error('Order not found')

  const validated = await validateOrder(order)
  if (!validated.success) throw new Error(validated.error)

  const payment = await processPayment(validated.order)
  if (!payment.success) throw new Error('Payment failed')

  return generateReceipt(payment)
}

// After
const processOrder = (orderId: string): TE.TaskEither<string, Receipt> =>
  pipe(
    fetchOrderTE(orderId),
    TE.flatMap(order =>
      order ? TE.right(order) : TE.left('Order not found')
    ),
    TE.flatMap(validateOrderTE),
    TE.flatMap(processPaymentTE),
    TE.map(generateReceipt)
  )

The Readability Rule

Before using any FP pattern, ask: "Would a junior developer understand this?"

Too Clever (Avoid)

const result = pipe(
  data,
  A.filter(flow(prop('status'), equals('active'))),
  A.map(flow(prop('value'), multiply(2))),
  A.reduce(monoid.concat, monoid.empty),
  O.fromPredicate(gt(threshold))
)

Just Right (Prefer)

const activeItems = data.filter(item => item.status === 'active')
const doubledValues = activeItems.map(item => item.value * 2)
const total = doubledValues.reduce((sum, val) => sum + val, 0)
const result = total > threshold ? O.some(total) : O.none

The Middle Ground (Often Best)

const result = pipe(
  data,
  A.filter(item => item.status === 'active'),
  A.map(item => item.value * 2),
  A.reduce(0, (sum, val) => sum + val),
  total => total > threshold ? O.some(total) : O.none
)

Cheat Sheet

What you wantPlain languagefp-ts
Handle null/undefined"Wrap this nullable"O.fromNullable(x)
Default for missing"Use this if nothing"O.getOrElse(() => default)
Transform if present"If something, change it"O.map(fn)
Chain nullable operations"If something, try this"O.flatMap(fn)
Return success"Worked, here's the value"E.right(value)
Return failure"Failed, here's why"E.left(error)
Wrap throwing function"Try this, catch errors"E.tryCatch(fn, onError)
Handle both cases"Do this for error, that for success"E.fold(onLeft, onRight)
Chain operations"Then do this, then that"pipe(x, fn1, fn2, fn3)

When to Level Up

Once comfortable with these patterns, explore:

  1. TaskEither - Async operations that can fail (replaces Promise + try/catch)
  2. Validation - Collect ALL errors instead of stopping at first
  3. Reader - Dependency injection without classes
  4. Do notation - Cleaner syntax for multiple bindings

But don't rush. The basics here will handle 80% of real-world scenarios. Get comfortable with these before adding more tools to your belt.


Summary

  1. Use pipe for 3+ operations
  2. Use Option for nullable chains
  3. Use Either for operations that can fail
  4. Use map to transform wrapped values
  5. Use flatMap to chain operations that might fail
  6. Skip FP when it hurts readability
  7. Keep it simple - if your team can't read it, it's not good code

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

适合场景

01

研究助手

02

事实核查

03

知识库问答

04

带来源的搜索总结

能力概览

能力 1

组合搜索和大模型调用

能力 2

支持多来源检索和总结

能力 3

强调引用来源和事实核查

能力 4

适合研究型 Agent 流程

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.82%
按下载量换算57

Claude

27.34%
按下载量换算42

Cursor

19.46%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

9.72%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills