Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

flutter-verificationFlutter verification 命令行

Agent Skill

flutter-verification 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

399

周安装

16

GitHub Stars

6

下载量

129
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:flutter-verification(Flutter verification 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft
仓库路径:skills/flutter-verification
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-verification
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-verification

简介

flutter-verification 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Flutter Verification Before Completion

Overview

Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.

Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.

Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.

The Iron Law

NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

Flutter Verification Commands

1. Static Analysis (Always Required)

flutter analyze

Expected output:

Analyzing <project>...
No issues found!

If issues found:

Analyzing <project>...
   info • ... • lib/path/file.dart:42:10 • ...
   warning • ... • lib/path/file.dart:50:5 • ...

3 issues found. (1 warning, 2 hints)

2. Unit Tests (Priority 1 & 2)

# All tests
flutter test

# Specific feature tests
flutter test test/features/<feature>/

# Specific test file
flutter test test/features/<feature>/data/repositories/user_repository_test.dart

Expected output:

00:05 +12: All tests passed!

If tests fail:

00:03 +10 -2: Some tests failed.

3. Build Verification

# Android debug build
flutter build apk --debug

# iOS debug build (macOS only)
flutter build ios --debug --no-codesign

# Web build
flutter build web

Expected output:

✓ Built build/app/outputs/flutter-apk/app-debug.apk (XX.XMB)

4. Format Check (Optional)

dart format --set-exit-if-changed lib/

The Gate Function

BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - If NO: State actual status with evidence
   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying

Common Flutter Failures

ClaimRequiresNot Sufficient
"Code is clean"flutter analyze: No issues"I wrote correct code"
"Tests pass"flutter test: All passed"Should pass", "Looks correct"
"Build succeeds"flutter build: Built successfully"Analyze passed"
"Feature complete"All verification + requirements check"Tests pass"
"Bug fixed"Test original symptom + verify"Code changed"
"Widget works"Widget test or manual verification"Code looks right"

Red Flags - STOP

If you catch yourself thinking or saying:

  • "should work now"
  • "probably passes"
  • "looks correct"
  • "I'm confident"
  • "just this once"
  • "analyze passed, so build will work"
  • "the code is right"
  • ANY wording implying success without running verification

STOP. Run the verification command.

Verification Checklist

Before claiming completion:

### Verification Results

**Static Analysis:**

$ flutter analyze Analyzing flutter_app... No issues found!


✅ Passed

**Unit Tests:**

$ flutter test test/features/<feature>/ 00:05 +12: All tests passed!


✅ 12/12 passed

**Build:**

$ flutter build apk --debug ✓ Built build/app/outputs/flutter-apk/app-debug.apk


✅ Built successfully

**Ready to claim completion.**

Key Patterns

Static Analysis:


✅ [Run flutter analyze] [See: No issues found!] "Analysis passes" ❌ "Code looks clean" / "I wrote it correctly"

Tests:


✅ [Run flutter test] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass" ❌ "Should pass now" / "Tests look correct"

Build:


✅ [Run flutter build] [See: Built successfully] "Build passes" ❌ "Analyze passed" (analyze doesn't check build)

Feature completion:


✅ Re-read plan → Verify each requirement → Run all verifications → Report ❌ "Tests pass, feature complete"

Rationalization Prevention

ExcuseReality
"Should work now"RUN flutter analyze/test
"I'm confident"Confidence ≠ evidence
"Just this once"No exceptions
"Analyze passed"Analyze ≠ build ≠ test
"Code looks right"Verify independently
"I'm tired"Exhaustion ≠ excuse
"It's simple code"Simple code can still fail

Why This Matters

  • Trust: If you claim "tests pass" without running them, trust is broken
  • Time: False completion → redirect → rework wastes everyone's time
  • Quality: Unverified code may crash in production
  • Integrity: Honesty is a core value

When To Apply

ALWAYS before:

  • ANY variation of success/completion claims
  • ANY expression of satisfaction ("Done!", "Fixed!", "Works!")
  • Committing code
  • Creating PRs
  • Moving to next task
  • Reporting to user

The Bottom Line

No shortcuts for verification.

Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.

# Always run these before claiming completion:
flutter analyze
flutter test
flutter build apk --debug  # or appropriate build target

This is non-negotiable.


5. Visual Verification (Optional — Flutter Web)

UI 변경이 포함된 작업에서, design-polish 플러그인이 설치되어 있다면 시각적 검증을 수행합니다. 설치되어 있지 않으면 이 단계를 건너뜁니다 (SOFT_FAIL).

전제 조건

  • design-polish 플러그인 설치됨 (~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/design-polish 또는 ~/.claude/plugins/design-polish)
  • scripts/capture.cjs 존재
  • Node.js + npx 사용 가능

절차

  1. Flutter Web 빌드 flutter build web
  2. 빌드 결과 로컬 서빙 npx serve build/web -l 3000 & SERVER_PID=$!
  3. 스크린샷 + WCAG 체크 BASE_URL=http://localhost:3000 node <design-polish-path>/scripts/capture.cjs --wcag /
  4. 결과 확인

- .design-polish/health-score.json: 디자인 건강 점수 (0-100) - .design-polish/accessibility/wcag-report.json: WCAG 위반 사항 - .design-polish/screenshots/current-main.png: 현재 스크린샷

  1. 서버 종료 kill $SERVER_PID 2>/dev/null

판정 기준

결과조건액션
PASSWCAG 위반 0개, Health Score ≥ 60완료
WARNWCAG 위반 1-3개 (minor/moderate)개선 권장, 차단 아님
FAILWCAG critical 위반 존재수정 권장 (SOFT_FAIL: 차단하지 않음)
SKIPdesign-polish 미설치건너뜀

증거 기록

**Visual Verification:**
- Health Score: 85/100
- WCAG: 0 violations
- Screenshot: .design-polish/screenshots/current-main.png
✅ Visual check passed (or ⚠️ skipped / ⚠️ warnings found)

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.31%
按下载量换算44

Claude

31.29%
按下载量换算40

Cursor

18.35%
按下载量换算24

Gemini CLI

9.75%
按下载量换算13

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills