Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索执行命令github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

flutter-debuggingFlutter 调试

Agent Skill

flutter-debugging 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

504

周安装

21

GitHub Stars

6

下载量

168
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:flutter-debugging(Flutter 调试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft
仓库路径:skills/flutter-debugging
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-debugging
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-debugging

简介

flutter-debugging 提供 Flutter 应用调试相关的信息检索与筛选功能,辅助定位问题根源。

  • 适用于在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速查找日志、异常或性能瓶颈资料。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,建议查看原始 README 以掌握调用方式。
  • 需注意该技能可能触发网络查询或本地文件读取,安装前应确认所需权限边界。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Systematic Flutter Debugging

Overview

Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Quick patches mask underlying issues.

Core principle: ALWAYS find root cause before attempting fixes. Symptom fixes are failure.

Announce at start: "I'm using the flutter-debugging skill to investigate this issue."

The Iron Law

NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST

If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose fixes.

When to Use

Use for ANY Flutter technical issue:

  • Widget build errors
  • State management bugs
  • Test failures
  • UI rendering issues
  • Navigation problems
  • API/network errors
  • Build failures
  • Platform-specific issues

Use this ESPECIALLY when:

  • "Just one quick fix" seems obvious
  • You've already tried multiple fixes
  • Previous fix didn't work
  • Under time pressure

Flutter Debugging Tools

1. Console Logging

// Basic logging (truncates long output)
print('Debug: $value');

// No truncation (preferred)
debugPrint('Debug: $value');

// Conditional debug logging
import 'package:flutter/foundation.dart';
if (kDebugMode) {
  debugPrint('Only in debug mode: $value');
}

// Developer log with tags
import 'dart:developer';
log('API response', name: 'NetworkService', error: e);

2. Flutter DevTools

# Open DevTools
flutter run --start-paused
# Then press 'd' or use DevTools button in IDE

DevTools Panels:

  • Widget Inspector: Widget tree, properties, layout
  • Performance: Timeline, frame rendering
  • Memory: Heap usage, leaks
  • Network: HTTP requests/responses
  • Logging: All logs in one place

3. Debug Widgets

// Show widget boundaries
debugPaintSizeEnabled = true;

// Show baseline alignments
debugPaintBaselinesEnabled = true;

// Show repaint regions
debugRepaintRainbowEnabled = true;

4. Breakpoints

// Programmatic breakpoint
import 'dart:developer';
debugger();

// Or use IDE breakpoints

The Four Phases

Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation

BEFORE attempting ANY fix:

1. Read Error Messages Carefully

════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
EXCEPTION CAUGHT BY WIDGETS LIBRARY
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
The following assertion was thrown building MyWidget:
'package:flutter/src/widgets/container.dart': Failed assertion: line 287
'child != null || decoration != null || constraints != null'
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Don't skip past errors! They often contain the exact solution.

2. Reproduce Consistently

# Hot reload to reproduce
r  # in terminal

# Hot restart (clears state)
R  # in terminal

# Full restart
flutter run
  • Can you trigger it reliably?
  • What are the exact steps?
  • Does Hot Reload vs Hot Restart matter?

3. Check Recent Changes

# What changed recently?
git diff

# Recent commits
git log --oneline -10

# Diff with specific commit
git diff HEAD~3

4. Add Diagnostic Logging

class MyWidget extends StatelessWidget {
  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    debugPrint('=== MyWidget.build() ===');
    debugPrint('context.mounted: ${context.mounted}');

    final state = context.watch<MyState>();
    debugPrint('state: $state');

    return Container(...);
  }
}

Phase 2: Pattern Analysis

1. Find Working Examples

# Search for similar working code
grep -r "similar_pattern" lib/
  • What works that's similar to what's broken?
  • Compare widget structure, state management

2. Compare Against References

// Reference: Working widget
class WorkingWidget extends StatelessWidget {
  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    return BlocBuilder<WorkingBloc, WorkingState>(
      builder: (context, state) => ...,
    );
  }
}

// Broken: My widget
class BrokenWidget extends StatelessWidget {
  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    // What's different?
    return BlocBuilder<MyBloc, MyState>(
      builder: (context, state) => ...,
    );
  }
}

3. Identify Differences

List every difference, however small:

  • Widget type
  • State provider location
  • BuildContext usage
  • Lifecycle methods

Phase 3: Hypothesis and Testing

1. Form Single Hypothesis

State clearly:

"I think the issue is [X] because [Y]"

Example:

"I think the build error is because the BLoC is not provided above this widget in the widget tree"

2. Test Minimally

Make the SMALLEST possible change:

// Before (broken)
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
  final bloc = context.read<MyBloc>();
  return ...;
}

// After (testing hypothesis)
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
  debugPrint('Looking for MyBloc...');
  try {
    final bloc = context.read<MyBloc>();
    debugPrint('Found: $bloc');
  } catch (e) {
    debugPrint('Error: $e');
  }
  return ...;
}

3. Verify Before Continuing

  • Did it work? → Phase 4
  • Didn't work? → Form NEW hypothesis
  • DON'T add more fixes on top

Phase 4: Implementation

1. Create Test Case (Optional based on priority)

For Repository/DataSource issues (Priority 1):

test('should return user when API succeeds', () async {
  // Arrange
  when(mockApi.getUser(any)).thenAnswer((_) async => userModel);

  // Act
  final result = await repository.getUser('123');

  // Assert
  expect(result, equals(userEntity));
});

2. Implement Single Fix

ONE change at a time:

// Fix the root cause identified in Phase 3
class MyWidget extends StatelessWidget {
  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    return BlocProvider(
      create: (_) => getIt<MyBloc>(),
      child: BlocBuilder<MyBloc, MyState>(...),
    );
  }
}

3. Verify Fix

# Run analysis
flutter analyze

# Run tests
flutter test

# Manual verification
flutter run
# Test the specific scenario

4. If Fix Doesn't Work

  • Count: How many fixes have you tried?
  • If < 3: Return to Phase 1, re-analyze
  • If ≥ 3: STOP and question the architecture

Common Flutter Issues & Root Causes

SymptomCommon Root Cause
"No ancestor found"Provider/BLoC not in widget tree above
"setState after dispose"Async operation completing after widget disposed
"RenderBox not laid out"Unbounded constraints (Column in Column, etc.)
"Null check operator"Variable not initialized or API returned null
"Build during build"setState called during build phase
"Ticker not disposed"Missing with TickerProviderStateMixin or dispose

Red Flags - STOP and Follow Process

If you catch yourself thinking:

  • "Quick fix for now"
  • "Just wrap it in a try-catch"
  • "Add a null check here"
  • "Just add a Container around it"
  • "Maybe just hot restart"
  • "It's probably a state issue, let me reset"

ALL of these mean: STOP. Return to Phase 1.

REQUIRED SUB-SKILL

After fixing the bug, you MUST invoke: → flutter-craft:flutter-verification

Verify the fix with flutter analyze, flutter test, and manual testing.

Quick Reference

PhaseFlutter ActivitiesSuccess Criteria
1. Root CauseRead error, reproduce, add debugPrintUnderstand WHAT and WHY
2. PatternFind working widgets, compareIdentify differences
3. HypothesisForm theory, minimal testConfirmed or new hypothesis
4. ImplementationCreate test (priority-based), fix, verifyBug resolved, analysis clean

Real-World Impact

  • Systematic approach: 15-30 minutes to fix
  • Random fixes approach: 2-3 hours of thrashing
  • First-time fix rate: 95% vs 40%
  • New bugs introduced: Near zero vs common

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.97%
按下载量换算59

Claude

30.89%
按下载量换算52

Cursor

18.94%
按下载量换算32

Gemini CLI

9.99%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-debugging 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills