Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

glossaryglossary 搜索

Agent Skill

glossary 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

198

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

9

下载量

62
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:glossary(glossary 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code
仓库路径:skills/glossary
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill glossary
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill glossary

简介

用于处理 GitHub 仓库和代码协作信息。

  • 适合围绕仓库状态或代码变更进行整理。
  • 可结合来源仓库继续核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限和维护状态。glossary 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 注意是否会触发联网或文件读写。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

AppSec Glossary -- Security Term Reference

Quick-reference dictionary for security terms, acronyms, vulnerability classes, and framework categories. Returns concise definitions with cross-framework mappings and concrete examples.

Unlike /appsec:explain which provides deep educational content, glossary is a fast lookup -- a few sentences per term, not a full lesson.

This skill runs entirely in the main agent context. It does NOT dispatch subagents.

Supported Modes

Detect the user's intent from their message:

IntentMode
Single term ("what is IDOR", "define XSS")Single Term Lookup
Comparison ("CSRF vs SSRF", "XSS vs injection")Term Comparison
"security glossary", "list all terms"Full Glossary

Single Term Lookup

For a single term, output:

<TERM> (<full expansion if acronym>)

Definition: <2-3 sentence plain-language definition>

Framework Mappings:
  OWASP:   <category, e.g., A03:2021 Injection>
  STRIDE:  <letter(s), e.g., T (Tampering)>
  CWE:     <CWE-ID, e.g., CWE-89>
  MITRE:   <technique, e.g., T1190>

Example: <1-2 sentence concrete attack scenario>

Related: <2-3 related terms>

Term Registry

Use these framework reference files to resolve mappings:

Read the relevant reference file(s) to populate the mappings accurately. Do NOT guess mappings -- if a term does not appear in a framework, omit that mapping rather than fabricating one.

Common Terms

This is not exhaustive. Handle any security term the user asks about using general security knowledge plus the framework references above.

Vulnerability classes: IDOR, XSS, CSRF, SSRF, SQLi, RCE, LFI, RFI, XXE, SSTI, ReDoS, CRLF, HPP, clickjacking, open redirect, mass assignment, insecure deserialization, broken authentication, path traversal, command injection, log injection, race condition, TOCTOU, privilege escalation, session fixation, session hijacking, credential stuffing, brute force, directory traversal

Framework terms: OWASP, STRIDE, PASTA, LINDDUN, DREAD, CVSS, CWE, CVE, MITRE ATT&CK, SANS Top 25, NIST, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA

Security concepts: defense in depth, least privilege, zero trust, separation of concerns, input validation, output encoding, parameterized queries, prepared statements, CSP, CORS, SOP, HSTS, certificate pinning, mTLS, JWT, OAuth, OIDC, SAML, RBAC, ABAC, ACL, MFA, 2FA, TOTP, FIDO2, WebAuthn, salted hash, key derivation, envelope encryption, secret rotation, audit trail

Term Comparison

When the user asks to compare two or more terms, output a side-by-side table:

<TERM_A> vs <TERM_B>

| Aspect      | <TERM_A>                | <TERM_B>                |
|-------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|
| Full Name   | ...                     | ...                     |
| What It Is  | ...                     | ...                     |
| Attack Type | ...                     | ...                     |
| Target      | ...                     | ...                     |
| OWASP       | ...                     | ...                     |
| CWE         | ...                     | ...                     |
| Example     | ...                     | ...                     |

Key Difference: <one sentence explaining the core distinction>

Full Glossary

When the user asks for a full glossary, output an alphabetically sorted table of the most important terms. Limit to 30-40 entries to keep it scannable. Group by category:

APPSEC GLOSSARY

--- Vulnerability Classes ---
| Term   | Definition (brief)              | OWASP  | CWE     |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|---------|
| CSRF   | Cross-site request forgery ...  | A01    | CWE-352 |
| IDOR   | Insecure direct object ref ...  | A01    | CWE-639 |
| ...    | ...                             | ...    | ...     |

--- Frameworks & Standards ---
| Term       | What It Is                           |
|------------|--------------------------------------|
| OWASP      | Open Worldwide Application Security  |
| STRIDE     | Threat modeling framework (6 cats)   |
| ...        | ...                                  |

--- Security Concepts ---
| Term              | Definition (brief)                     |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Defense in Depth  | Multiple layers of security controls   |
| Least Privilege   | Minimum necessary access               |
| ...               | ...                                    |

Presentation Rules

  • Keep definitions SHORT. This is a glossary, not an encyclopedia. Two to three sentences maximum per definition.
  • Always include at least one framework mapping when one exists.
  • Always include a concrete example -- "An attacker can..." not abstract descriptions.
  • For acronyms, always expand them on first use.
  • If the user asks about a term not in the registry, provide a definition from general security knowledge and note which frameworks it relates to.
  • After any lookup, offer: "Want to learn more? Try /appsec:explain <term> for an in-depth walkthrough."

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.82%
按下载量换算22

Claude

33.9%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

19.22%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

8.83%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills