Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

competitive-analysis竞争分析

Agent Skill

competitive-analysis 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

192

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

4

下载量

64
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:competitive-analysis(竞争分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/flight505/claude-project-planner
仓库路径:skills/competitive-analysis
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/flight505/claude-project-planner --skill competitive-analysis
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/flight505/claude-project-planner --skill competitive-analysis

简介

competitive-analysis 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合快速定位候选结果。

  • 适用于关键词搜索、任务场景匹配或来源线索筛选等研究检索场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写操作。
  • 建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

SKILL.md

Competitive Analysis

Overview

Competitive analysis is a systematic process for understanding the market landscape, identifying competitors, and finding differentiation opportunities. Research existing solutions, analyze their strengths and weaknesses, understand market positioning, and inform product strategy with evidence-based insights.

When to Use This Skill

This skill should be used when:

  • Researching competitors before starting a new project
  • Analyzing market positioning and differentiation opportunities
  • Understanding feature landscapes across competing products
  • Identifying market gaps and opportunities
  • Creating competitive analysis documents for stakeholders
  • Informing product strategy and roadmap decisions

Visual Enhancement with Project Diagrams

When documenting competitive analysis, always include visualizations.

Use the project-diagrams skill to generate:

  • Competitive positioning maps (2x2 matrices)
  • Feature comparison charts
  • Market segment diagrams
  • SWOT analysis visualizations
  • Competitor landscape maps
python .claude/skills/project-diagrams/scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram description" -o diagrams/output.png

Competitive Analysis Framework

Analysis Components

ComponentPurposeKey Questions
Market OverviewUnderstand the marketWhat is the market size? Who are the players?
Competitor ProfilesDeep dive on competitorsWhat do they do? How are they positioned?
Feature AnalysisCompare capabilitiesWhat features exist? What's missing?
Positioning AnalysisUnderstand market positionsWhere do competitors position themselves?
Differentiation StrategyFind your angleHow can we be different and better?

Research Process

Phase 1: Market Discovery

Identify the market landscape:

  1. Define the market category

- What problem space are we in? - What are adjacent categories? - How do customers describe this space?

  1. Search for competitors

- Use research-lookup to find existing solutions - Search product directories (G2, Capterra, Product Hunt) - Review industry reports and analyst coverage - Search for "[category] alternatives" and "[competitor] vs"

  1. Categorize competitors Category Description Priority Direct Same problem, same solution approach High Indirect Same problem, different solution Medium Potential Could enter this space easily Monitor Substitute Alternative ways to solve the problem Awareness

Phase 2: Competitor Profiling

For each significant competitor, research:

competitor_profile:
  name: "Competitor Name"
  website: "https://..."
  category: "direct | indirect | potential | substitute"
  priority: "primary | secondary | tertiary"

  company_info:
    founded: YYYY
    headquarters: "City, Country"
    funding: "Series X / Public / Bootstrapped"
    employees: "Range"
    valuation_revenue: "If known"

  product:
    description: "What they do in 1-2 sentences"
    target_market: "Who they serve"
    positioning: "How they position themselves"
    pricing:
      model: "SaaS / Usage / One-time / Freemium"
      tiers: ["Free", "Pro: $X/mo", "Enterprise: Custom"]

  strengths:
    - "Key strength 1"
    - "Key strength 2"

  weaknesses:
    - "Key weakness 1"
    - "Key weakness 2"

  market_presence:
    estimated_customers: "If known"
    notable_customers: ["Company A", "Company B"]
    geographic_focus: "Global / Regional"

  technology:
    platform: "Web / Mobile / Desktop / API"
    tech_stack: "If known"
    integrations: ["Integration 1", "Integration 2"]

  recent_developments:
    - date: "YYYY-MM"
      event: "What happened"

  sources:
    - "URL where information was found"

Phase 3: Feature Analysis

Create a feature comparison matrix:

feature_comparison:
  categories:
    - name: "Core Features"
      features:
        - name: "Feature A"
          description: "What this feature does"
          importance: "critical | important | nice_to_have"
          competitors:
            "Competitor 1": "full | partial | none"
            "Competitor 2": "full | partial | none"
            "Our Plan": "full | partial | none | future"

        - name: "Feature B"
          # ...

    - name: "Advanced Features"
      features:
        # ...

    - name: "Platform & Integration"
      features:
        # ...

Feature rating definitions:

  • Full: Complete implementation
  • Partial: Limited or basic implementation
  • None: Not offered
  • Future: Planned for our product

Phase 4: Positioning Analysis

Map competitors on positioning dimensions:

Common positioning axes:

  • Price (Low ↔ High)
  • Complexity (Simple ↔ Advanced)
  • Target Market (SMB ↔ Enterprise)
  • Focus (Generalist ↔ Specialist)
  • Approach (Self-serve ↔ High-touch)

Positioning Map:

                    High Price
                        │
          ┌─────────────┼─────────────┐
          │ Premium     │ Enterprise  │
          │ [Comp C]    │ [Comp A]    │
          │             │             │
Simple ───┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─── Advanced
          │             │             │
          │ Budget      │ Power User  │
          │ [Comp D]    │ [Comp B]    │
          └─────────────┼─────────────┘
                        │
                    Low Price

Identify white space:

  • Where are there gaps in the map?
  • Which positions are crowded?
  • Where could we uniquely position?

Phase 5: SWOT Analysis

For each major competitor:

swot_analysis:
  competitor: "Competitor Name"

  strengths:
    - factor: "Strong brand recognition"
      impact: "high"
      evidence: "Top-of-mind in category, high search volume"

    - factor: "Extensive integrations"
      impact: "medium"
      evidence: "500+ integrations listed"

  weaknesses:
    - factor: "Complex pricing"
      impact: "medium"
      evidence: "Frequent complaints in reviews about unexpected costs"

    - factor: "Poor mobile experience"
      impact: "high"
      evidence: "2.5 star app store rating"

  opportunities:
    - factor: "Underserved SMB segment"
      impact: "high"
      evidence: "Pricing starts at $50/user, reviews mention 'too expensive for small teams'"

  threats:
    - factor: "Strong network effects"
      impact: "high"
      evidence: "Viral adoption within organizations"

Aggregate into market SWOT:

  • Industry-wide strengths and weaknesses
  • Market opportunities
  • Competitive threats

Phase 6: Differentiation Strategy

Identify differentiation opportunities:

  1. Feature Gaps

- What do customers want that no one offers? - What's done poorly by everyone? - What new capabilities are becoming possible?

  1. Market Segment Gaps

- Which customer segments are underserved? - Where is pricing misaligned with value? - Which use cases are ignored?

  1. Experience Gaps

- Where is UX frustrating? - What's overly complex? - Where can we simplify?

  1. Technology Gaps

- What's outdated? - What new tech enables better solutions? - Where is performance lacking?

Differentiation Strategy Options:

StrategyWhen to UseRisk
Cost LeadershipCan sustainably be cheaperRace to bottom
DifferentiationClear unique valueHard to communicate
Focus (Niche)Specific segment underservedLimited market
InnovationNew approach is possibleExecution risk
ExperienceCan be significantly better UXEasily copied

Output Templates

Competitive Analysis Report

# Competitive Analysis: [Market Category]

## Executive Summary
- Market overview (2-3 sentences)
- Number of competitors analyzed
- Key insights (3-5 bullets)
- Recommended positioning

## Market Overview
### Market Size and Growth
[TAM, SAM, SOM if available]

### Market Segments
[Key customer segments and their characteristics]

### Market Trends
[Important trends affecting the market]

## Competitor Landscape

### Primary Competitors
[Detailed profiles of direct competitors]

### Secondary Competitors
[Brief profiles of indirect competitors]

### Competitive Positioning Map
[Visual representation of market positions]

## Feature Comparison
[Feature matrix comparing capabilities]

## Analysis and Insights

### Market Opportunities
[Where gaps exist]

### Competitive Threats
[What to watch out for]

### Differentiation Opportunities
[How to stand out]

## Recommended Strategy
[Positioning recommendation with rationale]

## Appendix
- Detailed competitor profiles
- Data sources
- Feature comparison data

Competitor Profile Template

# Competitor Profile: [Name]

## Overview
**Website:** [URL]
**Category:** Direct / Indirect
**Founded:** [Year]
**Funding:** [Amount or status]
**Employees:** [Range]

## Product Description
[What they do and who they serve]

## Pricing
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|------|-------|--------------|
| | | |

## Strengths
- [Strength 1]
- [Strength 2]

## Weaknesses
- [Weakness 1]
- [Weakness 2]

## Key Features
[List of notable features]

## Customer Reviews Summary
**Positive themes:**
- [Theme 1]

**Negative themes:**
- [Theme 1]

## Recent News
- [Date]: [Event]

## Sources
- [URL 1]
- [URL 2]

Research Best Practices

Do's

  • Use multiple sources (don't rely on competitor's marketing alone)
  • Include customer reviews (G2, Capterra, Reddit, Twitter)
  • Look for recent news and funding announcements
  • Document all sources for credibility
  • Update analysis regularly (market changes)
  • Talk to actual users when possible

Don'ts

  • Don't just copy competitor marketing claims
  • Don't ignore indirect competitors
  • Don't assume feature lists equal actual capabilities
  • Don't skip pricing research
  • Don't make analysis too long (focus on insights)
  • Don't let analysis replace customer research

Finding Information

Product information:

  • Company websites and blogs
  • Press releases and news
  • Crunchbase, PitchBook for funding
  • LinkedIn for employee counts

Customer sentiment:

  • G2, Capterra, TrustRadius reviews
  • Reddit discussions
  • Twitter mentions
  • App store reviews

Market data:

  • Industry analyst reports
  • Market research firms
  • Trade publications
  • SEC filings (public companies)

Feature details:

  • Product documentation
  • Help centers
  • YouTube demos
  • Free trials

Quality Checklist

Before completing competitive analysis:

  • Market clearly defined
  • All major competitors identified
  • At least 3 direct competitors profiled
  • Feature comparison completed
  • Positioning map created
  • Strengths and weaknesses documented
  • Differentiation opportunities identified
  • All sources cited
  • Analysis is actionable (not just descriptive)
  • Insights support product strategy decisions

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

32.84%
按下载量换算21

Claude

30.76%
按下载量换算20

Cursor

17.72%
按下载量换算11

Gemini CLI

9.93%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills