Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

findingfinding 搜索

Agent Skill

finding 用于处理浏览器自动化、网页检查和页面信息提取,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要让 Agent 打开页面、读取网页或验证前端流程时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

188

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

66
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:finding(finding 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/crawlio-app/crawlio-plugin
仓库路径:skills/finding
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/crawlio-app/crawlio-plugin --skill finding
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/crawlio-app/crawlio-plugin --skill finding

简介

用于处理浏览器自动化、网页检查和页面信息提取。

  • 适合让 Agent 打开页面、读取内容或验证前端流程。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。
  • finding 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

finding

Create and query curated findings in Crawlio's observation log. Findings are agent-created insights backed by observation evidence.

When to Use

Use this skill when the user wants to:

  • Record an insight or issue discovered during analysis
  • Create an evidence-backed finding that persists across sessions
  • Review previously created findings for a site

Creating Findings

Findings are the agent's judgment layer on top of raw observations. A good finding:

  1. Has a clear, descriptive title
  2. References specific observation IDs as evidence
  3. Includes a synthesis explaining the pattern or issue

Workflow

  1. Query observations to identify patterns:
get_observations({ host: "example.com", source: "extension", limit: 50 })
  1. Identify the pattern — look for recurring issues, framework signals, error patterns, or notable behaviors.
  2. Create the finding with evidence:
create_finding({
  title: "Mixed content: HTTP images on HTTPS page",
  url: "https://example.com",
  evidence: ["obs_a3f7b2c1", "obs_b4e8c3d2"],
  synthesis: "Homepage loads 3 images over HTTP despite serving over HTTPS. Network observations show requests to http://cdn.example.com/img/ which should use HTTPS. This triggers mixed content warnings in Chrome and may cause images to be blocked in strict mode.",
  confidence: "high",
  category: "security"
})

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
titlestringYesShort, descriptive title
urlstringNoURL this finding relates to
evidence[string]NoArray of observation IDs (obs_xxx)
synthesisstringNoDetailed explanation
confidencestringNohigh, medium, low, or none
categorystringNoDimension (e.g. performance, security, framework)

Finding Quality Checklist

  • Title: Is it specific? "Mixed content on homepage" > "Issue found"
  • Evidence: Do the observation IDs actually support the claim?
  • Synthesis: Does it explain *why* this matters, not just *what* was observed?
  • URL: Is it scoped to the right page or left empty for site-wide findings?

Querying Findings

All Findings

get_findings({})

Findings for a Specific Host

get_findings({ host: "example.com" })

Recent Findings

get_findings({ limit: 10 })

Finding Categories

When creating findings, consider these common categories:

CategoryExample Title
Performance"Render-blocking scripts delay FCP by 2.3s"
Security"Mixed content: HTTP resources on HTTPS page"
SEO"Missing meta descriptions on 12 pages"
Framework"Next.js App Router with ISR detected"
Errors"3 JavaScript errors on product pages"
Structure"Orphaned pages not linked from navigation"
Accessibility"Missing alt attributes on hero images"

Evidence Chain

The full evidence chain workflow:

  1. analyze_page → returns evidenceId
  2. create_finding → reference the evidenceId in the evidence array
  3. get_observation → verify the evidence entry exists and supports the finding

Tips

  • Create findings as you analyze, not all at the end — they persist across sessions
  • Reference multiple observation IDs when a finding draws from several data points
  • Use synthesis to explain the *impact*, not just restate the observation
  • Findings with evidence chains are much more useful than findings without
  • Use confidence to signal how strongly the evidence supports the claim
  • Use category to enable filtering by dimension (performance, security, SEO, etc.)

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.93%
按下载量换算24

Claude

29.46%
按下载量换算19

Cursor

17.89%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

9.08%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills