Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

event-follow-up-analyzer事件跟踪分析器

Agent Skill

event-follow-up-analyzer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,788

周安装

148

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

2,249
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:event-follow-up-analyzer(事件跟踪分析器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sixtysecondsapp/use60
仓库路径:skills/event-follow-up-analyzer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sixtysecondsapp/use60 --skill 'Event Follow-Up Analyzer'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sixtysecondsapp/use60 --skill 'Event Follow-Up Analyzer'

简介

event-follow-up-analyzer 分析会后跟进的最佳实践与执行细节,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中提升 B2B 销售线索转化率时使用。

  • 它强调速度与个性化,提供邮件模板、提醒机制和 ROI 衡量方法。
  • 使用时应在活动结束后立即启动跟进流程,并根据角色与需求定制沟通内容。
  • 安装前应整合 CRM 系统,确保联系人信息与历史交互记录可被有效调用。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Available Context & Tools

@_platform-references/org-variables.md @_platform-references/capabilities.md

Event Follow-Up Analyzer

Why Post-Event Follow-Up is Critical

Events are the highest-ROI lead generation channel in B2B sales -- but only if the follow-up is executed well. The data is stark:

  • 48% of event leads go completely cold within 5 days without any follow-up (Bizzabo, 2023). Nearly half of the leads you paid thousands to acquire evaporate because nobody sends an email.
  • The first rep to follow up wins 78% of the time (InsideSales.com / XANT). Speed is the single strongest predictor of event lead conversion.
  • Personalized follow-ups convert 4.5x better than generic "great meeting you" emails (HubSpot event marketing study). Referencing a specific conversation or topic discussed at the event is the minimum bar.
  • Only 20% of event leads receive follow-up within 24 hours (Marketo). The other 80% either get delayed batch emails or nothing at all.
  • Events generate 3x the pipeline of cold outbound -- but only when follow-up happens within 48 hours (SiriusDecisions). After 48 hours, event leads perform barely better than cold leads.

The math is simple: if you spend $10K on an event and meet 50 prospects, each lead cost $200. Every lead that goes cold without follow-up is $200 burned. This skill ensures zero waste.

The Follow-Up Timeline: When Minutes Matter

The Golden Window: 0-24 Hours Post-Event

This is when the event is freshest in everyone's mind. Connections feel warm. Context is vivid. Brain research shows that episodic memory (remembering specific interactions) decays exponentially -- what someone remembers clearly on Day 1, they struggle to recall by Day 3.

Target: Top-priority leads get personalized follow-up within 24 hours of the event ending.

The Silver Window: 24-48 Hours Post-Event

Still warm, but cooling. Most competitors haven't followed up yet (only 20% follow up within 24h), so you still have a differentiation window. The prospect still remembers the event but is back in their normal workflow.

Target: All warm leads get follow-up by hour 48.

The Bronze Window: 48-72 Hours Post-Event

The event is becoming a memory. The prospect has had 2-3 normal workdays since. Your follow-up needs a stronger hook than "great meeting you at [event]" because the emotional warmth has faded.

Target: Remaining nurture leads get follow-up by hour 72.

The Dead Zone: 5+ Days Post-Event

After 5 days, event context is nearly gone. A follow-up referencing the event feels stale. At this point, you're essentially doing cold outreach with slightly better context. Still worth doing, but the conversion rate drops dramatically.

Target: If you haven't followed up by Day 5, shift to a standard outreach approach. Mention the event briefly but lead with value.

Lead Prioritization Framework

See references/engagement-signals.md for the complete engagement signal scoring framework with signal weights, CRM multipliers, tier assignment logic, and worked examples.

Not all event contacts are equal. Prioritize based on engagement signals, not just job titles.

The Engagement Signal Hierarchy

Signals are ranked by strength of buying intent. Higher-ranked signals indicate a more engaged, more interested lead.

Tier 1: Active Engagement Signals (HOT -- follow up within 24 hours)

SignalWhy It MattersWeight
Asked a specific question about ${company_name}'s product/serviceShows active evaluation, not passive attendance10
Requested a demo, meeting, or follow-up during the eventExplicit buying intent -- they asked YOU10
Visited your booth and spent 5+ minutes in conversationInvested time = invested interest9
Exchanged contact details and asked you to reach outGave permission and expressed desire9
Mentioned a specific problem ${company_name}'s product solvesPain is present and top-of-mind8
Referenced budget, timeline, or decision processThey're thinking about buying, not just browsing8

Tier 2: Moderate Engagement Signals (WARM -- follow up within 48 hours)

SignalWhy It MattersWeight
Attended your session/talk/workshopChose to spend time on your topic6
Stopped by your booth and picked up materialsLow-effort engagement but still intentional5
Connected with you on LinkedIn during/after the eventSocial signal of interest5
Mentioned they use a competitor's productPotential switch opportunity5
Expressed interest in a related topic (not directly ${company_name}'s product)Adjacent interest, needs nurturing4
Their company fits your ICP (industry, size, tech stack)Good fit even without explicit engagement4

Tier 3: Passive Signals (NURTURE -- follow up within 72 hours)

SignalWhy It MattersWeight
Attended the same event (general)Shared context, minimal engagement2
Appeared on the attendee list but no interactionMay not have visited your booth2
Works at a target account but didn't engageAccount-level interest, person-level unknown3
Downloaded event materials or recordings after the factPost-event engagement, but not live3

Scoring Methodology

Sum the weights of all applicable signals for each contact:

Total ScorePriority LevelFollow-Up Timing
15+HOTWithin 24 hours, personalized email + phone call
8-14WARMWithin 48 hours, personalized email
4-7NURTUREWithin 72 hours, batch personalized email
1-3LOWWithin 1 week, add to nurture sequence

Existing CRM Data Multipliers

Cross-reference event contacts against CRM data. Existing relationships amplify priority:

CRM StatusMultiplierRationale
Existing open deal2.0xEvent interaction provides new touchpoint for an active opportunity
Previous customer (churned)1.5xEvent re-engagement could signal win-back opportunity
Contact at target account1.5xNew entry point into a strategic account
In CRM but no deal1.2xExisting awareness, event provides re-engagement hook
Not in CRM1.0xNet new lead, standard scoring

Organization Context Integration

Use the Organization Context to make follow-ups feel like they come from ${company_name}, not a generic sales tool:

  • Brand voice: Match the organization's communication style when drafting emails. A consultative brand sounds different from a direct, challenger-style brand.
  • Value propositions: Reference specific ${company_name} value propositions from the Organization Context in bridge statements and CTAs.
  • Case studies: When a prospect's industry or challenge maps to an available case study in the Organization Context, use it as the value-add resource in follow-ups.
  • Differentiators: Use competitive differentiators from the Organization Context to craft stronger hooks, especially for prospects who mentioned competitor products at the event.

Personalization Methodology: The "Event Bridge" Technique

Generic follow-ups fail. Personalized follow-ups succeed. The "Event Bridge" technique connects three elements:

[Specific Event Moment] --> [Their Business Context] --> [Your Value Proposition]

Step 1: Reference the Specific Interaction

Do NOT write: "Great meeting you at [Event]!" DO write: "I enjoyed our conversation about [specific topic] at [Event]."

The more specific the reference, the stronger the connection. Specificity proves you were paying attention and that this is not a mass email.

Good references:

  • A question they asked during a session
  • A problem they described at your booth
  • A specific comment they made about their current tools
  • A mutual connection you discovered
  • Something they said about their team, goals, or challenges

If you didn't interact directly:

  • Reference their session attendance: "I saw you attended the session on [topic]"
  • Reference shared context: "As someone in [their role/industry], the session on [topic] likely resonated"
  • Reference event content: "The keynote on [topic] highlighted challenges that [their company] is probably navigating"

Step 2: Bridge to Their Business Context

Connect the event interaction to their specific business situation. This requires CRM data or research.

Bridge examples:

  • "You mentioned your team is evaluating new [category] tools -- that aligns with what we've been seeing across [their industry]"
  • "Given [their company]'s growth to [employee count] employees, the scaling challenges discussed in the [session] must feel very real"
  • "With [their company]'s recent [funding round / product launch / expansion], the timing for ${company_name}'s [value prop from Organization Context] seems particularly relevant"

Step 3: Offer Concrete Value

End with a specific, low-friction next step. Not "let me know if you want to chat" -- that puts the burden on them.

Strong CTAs:

  • "I put together a [case study / benchmark report / comparison guide] that addresses exactly what we discussed. Would it be helpful if I sent it over?"
  • "We helped [similar company] solve the exact challenge you described. I'd love to walk you through the 15-minute version -- would [day/time] work?"
  • "Based on our conversation, I think [specific feature/approach] could save your team [quantified time/money]. Want me to put together a quick analysis?"

Multi-Channel Follow-Up Strategy

Channel Selection by Lead Priority and Context

PriorityPrimary ChannelSecondary ChannelTiming
HOTPersonalized emailPhone call same dayEmail within 24h, call within 4h of email
HOTLinkedIn message (if connected at event)Email + phoneLinkedIn within 12h, email within 24h
WARMPersonalized emailLinkedIn connection requestEmail within 48h, LinkedIn within 24h of email
NURTUREBatch personalized emailLinkedIn connection requestEmail within 72h
LOWAdd to nurture sequence--Sequence starts within 1 week

Channel-Specific Best Practices

Email Follow-Up

  • Subject line: Reference the event and be specific. "[Event Name] follow-up: [specific topic you discussed]"
  • Length: 3-5 sentences max for the first email. Respect inbox fatigue post-event (everyone is catching up).
  • Timing: Tuesday-Thursday, 8-10 AM in the prospect's timezone. Avoid Monday (inbox overload) and Friday (low engagement).
  • One CTA only: Do not ask them to read a case study AND book a meeting AND connect on LinkedIn. Pick one.

LinkedIn Follow-Up

  • Connection request note: Reference the event. "Hi [Name], enjoyed our chat about [topic] at [Event]. Would love to stay connected."
  • After connection: Wait 24 hours, then send a message with value (not a pitch). Share a relevant article, insight, or resource.
  • Engage with their content: Before sending a message, like or comment on one of their recent posts. This puts your name in front of them organically.

Phone Follow-Up (HOT leads only)

  • Timing: 24-48 hours after the email, or same day for the hottest leads.
  • Opening: "Hi [Name], this is [Your Name] from ${company_name}. We spoke at [Event] about [topic]. I wanted to follow up on our conversation."
  • Duration: Keep it under 5 minutes unless they want to go deeper. The goal is to schedule a proper meeting, not have the meeting on the phone.
  • Voicemail: If no answer, leave a 30-second voicemail referencing the event interaction and follow up with an email referencing the voicemail.

Email Templates by Engagement Level

Consult references/followup-templates.md for the full template library with 3 variants per tier, LinkedIn connection request templates, speaker follow-up templates, booth visitor templates, and virtual event templates.

HOT Lead Template (Specific Interaction)

Subject: [Event Name] -- following up on [specific topic]

Hi [First Name],

I really enjoyed our conversation at [Event] about [specific topic/challenge they mentioned]. [One sentence showing you listened and remember the detail.]

[Bridge to value: how ${company_name}'s product/service addresses what they described. Reference relevant value propositions from the Organization Context.]

I put together [specific deliverable] based on what we discussed. [Would it be helpful to walk through it in a quick 15-minute call? / Would you like me to send it over?]

[Suggest two specific time slots, or offer to send a calendar link.]

Best,
[Your Name]
[Title] | [Company]

WARM Lead Template (Session Attendance or Brief Interaction)

Subject: After [Event Name] -- [relevant insight or resource]

Hi [First Name],

Great connecting at [Event]! [Reference to specific moment -- session they attended, brief chat, or shared experience.]

[One insight or takeaway from the event that's relevant to their role/company.] I think this is particularly relevant for [their company] given [specific business context from CRM or research].

I've attached [resource: guide, case study, benchmark data] that digs deeper into this topic. [If they find it useful, suggest a natural next step.]

Would a quick 15-minute chat next week be worth your time to discuss how ${company_name} is helping [similar companies] with this?

Best,
[Your Name]

NURTURE Lead Template (Minimal Interaction, Batch-Personalized)

Subject: [Event Name] recap + [relevant resource]

Hi [First Name],

I hope you enjoyed [Event Name] as much as I did. [Reference a keynote, popular session, or event theme that they likely attended.]

One thing that stood out was [insight related to their industry or role]. At ${company_name}, we've been working on [brief, relevant capability] to help [target persona] with exactly this challenge.

I thought you might find this [resource] interesting: [link to content piece, recording, or guide].

If [topic] is on your radar, I'd love to compare notes. Feel free to grab a time here: [calendar link].

Best,
[Your Name]

Batch vs. Individual Follow-Up Decision Framework

With a large event attendee list, you cannot personalize every email to the same depth. Use this framework to decide how to allocate effort.

The 20/30/50 Rule

  • Top 20% (HOT leads): Fully individualized follow-up. Write each email from scratch. Include specific references to your conversation. Call them.
  • Middle 30% (WARM leads): Semi-personalized. Use a template but customize the opening line, the bridge, and the CTA based on their role and company.
  • Bottom 50% (NURTURE leads): Batch-personalized. Use a single template with merge fields for name, company, and event-specific references. Add to a nurture sequence.

Batch Personalization Techniques

Even batch emails should feel personal. Use these merge strategies:

Merge FieldSourceExample
{first_name}Contact record"Hi Sarah"
{company}Contact record"for Acme Corp"
{role_type}Title parsing"as a VP of Sales" or "as a marketing leader"
{industry_challenge}Industry lookup"managing pipeline velocity in SaaS"
{event_session}Session attendance data"the session on AI in sales"
{similar_company}ICP matching"companies like [similar customer]"

When to Switch from Batch to Individual

Escalate a nurture lead to individual treatment when:

  • They reply to the batch email (any reply = human response required)
  • They click through and engage with content (3+ page views or download)
  • They connect on LinkedIn in response to your outreach
  • CRM data reveals they're at a target account with an active opportunity
  • A colleague reports a separate interaction with the same person/company

Data Gathering (via execute_action)

  1. Fetch contact records: execute_action("get_contact", {id: contact_id}) for each attendee -- get CRM data, deal associations, activity history
  2. Fetch related deals: execute_action("get_deal", {name: company_name}) for each attendee's company -- check for open opportunities
  3. Fetch company status: execute_action("get_company_status", {company_name}) -- relationship health, recent activity
  4. Fetch recent activities: Check for prior touchpoints with each contact in the last 90 days
  5. Cross-reference attendee list: Match event attendees against CRM contacts to identify net-new vs. existing

Output Contract

Return a SkillResult with:

  • data.event_summary: Object with:

- event_name: Name of the event - event_date: Date of the event - total_attendees: Total number of contacts analyzed - priority_breakdown: {hot: count, warm: count, nurture: count, low: count} - existing_crm_contacts: Count of attendees already in CRM - new_contacts: Count of net-new contacts - days_since_event: Number of days elapsed since the event (urgency indicator) - follow_up_urgency: "critical" (0-24h), "high" (24-48h), "moderate" (48-72h), "low" (72h+)

  • data.priority_leads: Array of lead objects, sorted by priority score descending:

- contact_id: string (CRM ID if exists, null if new) - name: string - title: string - company: string - email: string - priority: "hot" | "warm" | "nurture" | "low" - score: number (raw engagement score) - engagement_signals: string[] (specific interactions observed) - crm_status: "existing_deal" | "existing_contact" | "target_account" | "new" - existing_deal: {name, stage, amount} | null - reason: string (1-sentence explanation of why they're prioritized at this level) - recommended_channel: "email" | "linkedin" | "phone" | "sequence" - recommended_timing: "today" | "tomorrow" | "this_week" | "next_week"

  • data.followup_recommendations: Array of action objects:

- contact_id: string - contact_name: string - action_type: "personalized_email" | "phone_call" | "linkedin_message" | "linkedin_connect" | "add_to_sequence" | "schedule_meeting" - timing: "within_24h" | "within_48h" | "within_72h" | "within_1_week" - channel: "email" | "phone" | "linkedin" - personalization_hook: string (specific reference to use in outreach) - suggested_message: string (draft message text) - cta: string (specific call-to-action to include)

  • data.email_drafts: Array of draft email objects for all HOT and WARM leads:

- contact_id: string - to: string (contact email) - subject: string - body: string (full email body with personalization) - priority: "hot" | "warm" - template_type: "individual" | "semi_personalized" | "batch" - personalization_elements: string[] (what was personalized and why)

  • data.batch_sequence: Object for nurture leads:

- sequence_name: Suggested name for the nurture sequence - template: Email template with merge fields - contacts: Array of contact IDs to add - cadence: Suggested send timing (e.g., "Day 1, Day 4, Day 8")

  • references: Links to CRM records, event details, related deals

Quality Checklist

Before returning the analysis, verify:

  • Every HOT lead has a fully personalized email draft. No templates, no merge fields -- written specifically for that person.
  • Every email references the specific event. Generic follow-ups with no event context are unacceptable.
  • Personalization hooks are specific. "Great meeting you" is not personalization. "Your question about integrating with Salesforce CPQ" is.
  • Timing recommendations account for days since event. If the event was 3 days ago, "within 72 hours" is already past. Adjust to "today" or "ASAP."
  • CRM cross-reference was performed. Every contact was checked against CRM. Existing deals and relationships are surfaced.
  • Priority scoring is justified. Each lead's priority has a clear reason based on engagement signals, not just job title.
  • Email drafts have one CTA only. No emails asking for multiple actions. One clear next step.
  • Subject lines are specific. No generic "[Event] follow-up" subjects. Include a topic or hook.
  • Phone follow-up is reserved for HOT leads only. Do not recommend calling WARM or NURTURE leads -- it is too aggressive for their engagement level.
  • Batch sequence is provided for NURTURE leads. These leads should not be forgotten, but they also should not receive the same effort as HOT leads.
  • Net-new contacts are flagged for CRM creation. If a contact from the event is not in CRM, recommend creating a record.
  • Email tone aligns with ${company_name} brand voice from Organization Context.
  • Value propositions and case studies from Organization Context are referenced in bridge statements where they naturally fit the prospect's industry or challenge.

Error Handling

No attendee list provided

Ask the user: "Can you share the attendee list or tell me who you met at the event?" If they describe interactions verbally, extract contacts from the description and create the analysis. If no list is available, offer to search CRM for contacts associated with the event or contacts at companies known to have attended.

Event was more than 7 days ago

Flag urgency: "This event was [X] days ago. Standard follow-up windows have passed. Adjusting strategy for late follow-up." Modify recommendations:

  • Do NOT reference the event as the primary hook (too stale)
  • Lead with value or a relevant insight instead
  • Mention the event briefly as context, not as the opening
  • Increase emphasis on content/resource sharing over meeting requests

Contact has no email address

For contacts without email:

  1. Check CRM for the email
  2. Check if the contact's company domain is known (suggest finding the email via company email pattern)
  3. Recommend LinkedIn as the primary channel instead
  4. Flag: "Email not found for [Name]. Recommend LinkedIn outreach or finding email via [company domain]."

Contact is already in an active deal

Do NOT send a generic event follow-up to someone with an active deal. Instead:

  • Flag the existing deal and its stage
  • Recommend using the event interaction as a touchpoint in the existing deal's context
  • Suggest a follow-up that references both the event and the deal: "Great seeing you at [Event]. Wanted to touch base on [deal topic] as well."

Very large attendee list (100+ contacts)

For large lists, do not analyze every contact individually. Instead:

  1. Cross-reference against CRM to identify known contacts (prioritize these)
  2. Filter by ICP criteria (title, company size, industry)
  3. Analyze the top 30 in detail
  4. Provide batch recommendations for the rest
  5. Flag: "Analyzed [X] contacts in detail, with batch recommendations for the remaining [Y]."

Multiple events in a short period

If the user has attended multiple events recently, ensure follow-up references the correct event for each contact. Cross-reference to avoid sending duplicate follow-ups to someone met at multiple events.

Attendee was a speaker or panelist

Speakers and panelists require a different approach. They are high-status contacts who receive many follow-ups post-event. Differentiate by:

  • Referencing a specific point from their talk (not just "great session")
  • Asking a thoughtful follow-up question about their topic
  • Offering genuine value (not just pitching)
  • Being concise -- speakers get more post-event email than anyone

Event was virtual (webinar, online summit)

Virtual events generate different engagement signals. Adjust the hierarchy:

  • Session attendance duration replaces "booth visit time"
  • Chat messages and Q&A participation replace in-person conversation
  • Polls and interactive responses are engagement signals
  • Post-event recording views replace follow-up booth visits

Guidelines

  • Speed is everything. The single most important variable in event follow-up is speed. Prioritize getting follow-ups out fast over making them perfect.
  • Personalization beats polish. A slightly rough email that references a specific conversation converts better than a perfectly polished generic template.
  • One CTA per email. Decision fatigue is real, especially post-event when prospects are catching up on work.
  • Reference the event, don't rely on it. The event is context, not the value proposition. ${company_name}'s product/service value should stand on its own.
  • Track everything in CRM. Every follow-up sent should be logged. Every response should update the contact status. Do not let event leads fall into a tracking black hole.
  • Plan the follow-up sequence before the event ends. The best reps draft their follow-up emails during the event while context is freshest. This skill should enable that speed.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.63%
按下载量换算756

Claude

26.9%
按下载量换算605

Cursor

20.04%
按下载量换算451

Gemini CLI

9.59%
按下载量换算216

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills