Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

database-design-patterns数据库设计模式

Agent Skill

用于辅助数据库表结构、查询语句、迁移脚本和数据维护任务。它适合让 Agent 分析 schema、编写 SQL、排查查询问题、整理索引或生成迁移建议。使用时需要明确数据库类型、连接环境和目标表,区分只读分析与写入变更;涉及删除、更新、迁移和批量导入时,应优先 dry-run、备份或事务保护,避免误操作。

总安装

1,523

周安装

61

GitHub Stars

98

下载量

493
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:database-design-patterns(数据库设计模式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills
仓库路径:skills/database-design-patterns
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill database-design-patterns
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill database-design-patterns

简介

database-design-patterns 指导关系型数据库的模式设计、索引策略与安全迁移。

  • 它平衡规范化与查询性能,支持软删除与多态关联等高级用法。
  • 适用于新建系统架构或重构遗留数据库结构。
  • 使用时需明确读写比例与访问热点以选择合适索引类型。
  • 涉及生产变更时应优先进行 dry-run 与备份验证。

SKILL.md

Database Design Patterns

Relational database schema design expert. Covers normalization decisions, index selection, migration safety, and connection pooling — the structural foundations that determine whether a database performs well at scale or becomes a maintenance burden.

When to Use

Use for:

  • Designing new schemas or refactoring existing ones
  • Deciding whether to normalize or denormalize for a specific query pattern
  • Choosing index types (B-tree, GIN, GiST, hash, partial, covering)
  • Planning migrations that must not break running production systems
  • Implementing soft deletes, polymorphic associations, or composite keys
  • Configuring PgBouncer or Prisma connection pools

NOT for:

  • Running EXPLAIN ANALYZE or reading query plans → use postgresql-optimization
  • Document model design (MongoDB, DynamoDB) → use a NoSQL skill
  • Database provisioning, replicas, or infrastructure → use a cloud/infra skill
  • ORM-specific code generation → use the relevant ORM skill

Normalize vs. Denormalize Decision Tree

flowchart TD
    A[New data or query performance problem?] --> B{New data design?}
    B -->|Yes| C[Start normalized: 3NF]
    B -->|No — query too slow| D{Measured with EXPLAIN?}
    D -->|No| E[Measure first. Never guess.]
    D -->|Yes — proven join bottleneck| F{Read-heavy or write-heavy?}
    F -->|Read-heavy, joins are the bottleneck| G[Controlled denormalization:\nmaterialized view or cached column]
    F -->|Write-heavy or balanced| H[Keep normalized.\nOptimize query or add index first.]
    C --> I{Any repeated groups in a row?}
    I -->|Yes| J[1NF: Move to child table]
    I -->|No| K{Non-key cols depend on part of PK?}
    K -->|Yes| L[2NF: Extract to separate table]
    K -->|No| M{Transitive dependencies?}
    M -->|Yes| N[3NF: Extract lookup table]
    M -->|No| O[Schema is 3NF — ship it]

The rule: Start at 3NF. Denormalize only after measuring, and only the specific join that is provably too slow. Never denormalize speculatively.


Index Selection Decision Tree

flowchart TD
    A[Which index type?] --> B{Data type and query pattern}
    B -->|Equality or range on scalar| C[B-tree — default choice]
    B -->|Full-text search, arrays, JSONB| D[GIN — inverted index]
    B -->|Geometric / PostGIS types| E[GiST — generalized search]
    B -->|Exact equality only, very high cardinality| F[Hash — rare, limited utility]
    C --> G{Subset of rows frequently queried?}
    G -->|Yes, e.g. status = 'active'| H[Partial index:\nWHERE status = 'active']
    G -->|No| I{Query selects only indexed columns?}
    I -->|Yes| J[Covering index:\nINCLUDE additional columns]
    I -->|No| K[Standard B-tree index]

Always index:

  • Every foreign key column (prevents full table scans on joins)
  • Columns that appear in WHERE, ORDER BY, or JOIN ON clauses in frequent queries
  • Composite indexes: put the most selective column first

Consult references/indexing-strategies.md when choosing between partial vs. covering indexes or tuning multi-column index column order.


Migration Safety Decision Tree

flowchart TD
    A[Schema change needed] --> B{Breaking change?}
    B -->|No: add nullable column, add index| C[Single migration, safe to run]
    B -->|Yes: rename column, change type, drop column| D[Expand-Contract pattern]
    D --> E[Phase 1 — Expand:\nAdd new column/table, keep old]
    E --> F[Deploy app: write to both old and new]
    F --> G[Backfill existing rows to new column]
    G --> H[Phase 2 — Contract:\nRemove old column once all reads use new]
    H --> I[Deploy app: read only from new]
    I --> J[Drop old column in final migration]
    C --> K{Large table?}
    K -->|Yes| L[CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY\nALTER TABLE with minimal lock]
    K -->|No| M[Standard migration]

Consult references/migration-patterns.md for expand-contract templates, lock timeout settings, and rollback strategies.


Normalization Reference

1NF — No Repeating Groups

Each column holds one value. No comma-separated lists in a column.

-- Bad: tags stored as CSV
CREATE TABLE articles (
  id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
  tags TEXT  -- "sql,indexing,performance"
);

-- Good: normalized to child table
CREATE TABLE article_tags (
  article_id INT REFERENCES articles(id),
  tag TEXT NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (article_id, tag)
);

2NF — No Partial Dependencies (composite PKs only)

Every non-key column depends on the whole primary key, not just part of it.

-- Bad: product_name depends only on product_id, not on (order_id, product_id)
CREATE TABLE order_items (
  order_id INT,
  product_id INT,
  product_name TEXT,  -- should be in products table
  quantity INT,
  PRIMARY KEY (order_id, product_id)
);

3NF — No Transitive Dependencies

Non-key columns depend only on the primary key, not on each other.

-- Bad: zip_code determines city/state (transitive)
CREATE TABLE users (
  id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
  zip_code TEXT,
  city TEXT,    -- derivable from zip_code
  state TEXT    -- derivable from zip_code
);

-- Good: extract lookup table
CREATE TABLE zip_codes (
  zip TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
  city TEXT,
  state TEXT
);

Key Design Decisions

Surrogate vs. Composite Keys

Use surrogate keys (serial/UUID) when:

  • The natural key is multi-column and would be repeated in child tables as FK
  • The natural key can change (email addresses, usernames)
  • The table will be referenced by many other tables

Use composite primary keys when:

  • The table is a pure join/association table with no additional attributes
  • The combination is truly stable and globally unique
-- Pure join table: composite PK is correct
CREATE TABLE user_roles (
  user_id INT REFERENCES users(id),
  role_id INT REFERENCES roles(id),
  PRIMARY KEY (user_id, role_id)
);

-- Association with attributes: add surrogate key
CREATE TABLE user_project_memberships (
  id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
  user_id INT REFERENCES users(id),
  project_id INT REFERENCES projects(id),
  joined_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW(),
  role TEXT
);

Soft Deletes

-- Pattern: deleted_at nullable timestamp
ALTER TABLE orders ADD COLUMN deleted_at TIMESTAMPTZ;

-- Partial index makes "active" queries fast
CREATE INDEX idx_orders_active ON orders (user_id, created_at)
WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;

-- View hides soft-deleted rows for application code
CREATE VIEW active_orders AS
  SELECT * FROM orders WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;

Warning: Soft deletes complicate unique constraints. A unique email column allows only one deleted user with that email. Use partial unique indexes:

CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_users_email_active ON users (email)
WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;

Polymorphic Associations

Two approaches — avoid the naive pattern:

-- Bad: nullable FK columns for each possible parent type
CREATE TABLE comments (
  id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
  post_id INT REFERENCES posts(id),      -- nullable
  article_id INT REFERENCES articles(id), -- nullable
  video_id INT REFERENCES videos(id),     -- nullable
  body TEXT
);

-- Good: separate association tables (referential integrity preserved)
CREATE TABLE post_comments (
  comment_id INT REFERENCES comments(id),
  post_id INT REFERENCES posts(id),
  PRIMARY KEY (comment_id, post_id)
);

-- Or: single-table inheritance with a type column + CHECK constraint
CREATE TABLE comments (
  id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
  parent_type TEXT NOT NULL CHECK (parent_type IN ('post', 'article', 'video')),
  parent_id INT NOT NULL,
  body TEXT
);
CREATE INDEX idx_comments_parent ON comments (parent_type, parent_id);

Connection Pooling

PgBouncer configuration for typical web applications:

[pgbouncer]
pool_mode = transaction        ; Best for short-lived web requests
max_client_conn = 1000         ; Total client connections pooler accepts
default_pool_size = 20         ; DB connections per database/user pair
server_idle_timeout = 600      ; Close idle server connections after 10 min

Prisma with PgBouncer — set pgbouncer=true in the connection URL:

DATABASE_URL="postgresql://user:pass@host:6432/db?pgbouncer=true&connection_limit=1"

Note: PgBouncer transaction mode does not support prepared statements, SET, or LISTEN/NOTIFY. Use session mode if your ORM requires prepared statements and pool size is manageable.


Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern: Premature Denormalization

Novice: "Joins are slow, so I'll copy data into the main table to avoid them."

Expert: Joins are fast when indexes exist. Copying data creates update anomalies — the same fact stored in two places that can diverge. The correct sequence is: normalize first, measure query time under real load, identify the specific join bottleneck with EXPLAIN ANALYZE, then consider a materialized view or a single cached denormalized column as a last resort.

Detection: Look for columns like user_name on an orders table alongside a user_id FK to a users table. If users.name can change, orders.user_name will drift.

LLM mistake: Training data contains many tutorials that denormalize early as a "performance optimization." These predate widespread index-aware ORMs and assume manual query writing.


Anti-Pattern: Missing Indexes on Foreign Keys

Novice: "The database will figure out how to join — I just need the FK constraint."

Expert: A foreign key constraint enforces referential integrity but creates no index. A JOIN orders ON orders.user_id = users.id with no index on orders.user_id causes a full sequential scan of the orders table for every user. On a table with millions of rows this is catastrophic.

Detection:

-- Find FK columns with no index (PostgreSQL)
SELECT
  tc.table_name,
  kcu.column_name
FROM information_schema.table_constraints tc
JOIN information_schema.key_column_usage kcu
  ON tc.constraint_name = kcu.constraint_name
LEFT JOIN pg_indexes pi
  ON pi.tablename = tc.table_name
  AND pi.indexdef LIKE '%' || kcu.column_name || '%'
WHERE tc.constraint_type = 'FOREIGN KEY'
  AND pi.indexname IS NULL;

Fix: Add an index on every FK column, always with CONCURRENTLY on a live table.


Anti-Pattern: SELECT * in Production Queries

Novice: "SELECT * is fine — the database only fetches what I need."

Expert: SELECT * fetches all columns including large TEXT, JSONB, and BYTEA columns you don't use. It prevents index-only scans (the query must hit the heap even if an index covers the query). It breaks when columns are added or reordered in ORMs that rely on positional column binding. Always name columns explicitly.

Detection: Search application code for SELECT * in any query that runs in a hot path. In ORMs, check if .findAll() or equivalent selects all columns by default and add explicit field selection.


References

  • references/indexing-strategies.md — Consult when choosing between B-tree, GIN, GiST, hash, partial, and covering indexes; includes index-only scan prerequisites and multi-column index ordering rules.
  • references/migration-patterns.md — Consult when planning zero-downtime migrations; covers expand-contract pattern, lock timeout settings, backfill chunking, and rollback strategies.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.74%
按下载量换算171

Claude

30.22%
按下载量换算149

Cursor

17.07%
按下载量换算84

Gemini CLI

8.77%
按下载量换算43

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills