Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

email-verification电子邮件验证

Agent Skill

email-verification 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

509

周安装

21

GitHub Stars

93

下载量

166
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:email-verification(电子邮件验证)
来源仓库:https://github.com/extruct-ai/gtm-skills
仓库路径:skills/email-verification
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/extruct-ai/gtm-skills --skill email-verification
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/extruct-ai/gtm-skills --skill email-verification

简介

email-verification 在发送前校验联系人邮箱状态,防止无效地址导致投递失败。

  • 支持多种验证服务商接入,灵活适配不同规模企业的需求。
  • 输出清洗后的 CSV 文件供后续 campaign 使用,保障送达率。
  • 需提前获取服务商 API 密钥并在安全环境下存储使用。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Email Verification

Validate emails before sending. Sits between email-generation and campaign-sending:

email-generation → email-verification → campaign-sending

Environment

Provider selection and credentials are handled in Step 0 of the workflow.

Inputs

InputRequiredSource
Contact CSV with email columnyesFrom email-generation output or any CSV
Sequencer campaign IDsnoFrom campaign-sending — only if cleaning uploaded leads

Workflow

Step 0: Confirm provider and learn API

  1. Ask the user which email verification provider they want to use.
  2. Fetch or read the provider's API documentation and identify:

- Credit check endpoint - Single email validation endpoint - Required input fields and authentication method - Rate limits and request constraints - Response format (status, sub_status) - Status values and which to keep vs remove

  1. Ask for their API credentials and confirm access

Step 1: Check API access and credits

  1. Call the provider's credit check endpoint
  2. Count unique emails in the input CSV
  3. If credits < unique emails, warn the user and ask whether to proceed with partial validation or stop

Step 2: Extract and deduplicate emails

  1. Read the input CSV, auto-detect the email column (common names: email, Email, email_address)
  2. Build a set of unique email addresses
  3. Skip rows with empty/missing email
  4. Report: {N} unique emails to validate, {M} rows without email skipped

Step 3: Validate emails

For each unique email, call the provider's validation endpoint:

  • Respect the provider's rate limits (from Step 0)
  • Print progress every 50 emails
  • Store results as {email: {status, sub_status}}
  • On error (timeout, JSON parse failure), mark as unknown

Step 4: Categorize and report

Group results by the provider's status values. Use the status mapping identified in Step 0 to determine which emails to keep and which to remove.

General guidance (confirm against provider docs):

ActionTypical statuses
Keepvalid, catch-all (flag in report)
Removeinvalid, do_not_mail, abuse, unknown, spamtrap

Present summary table with counts per status, then list all emails to remove with their status and sub_status.

Step 5: Output cleaned CSV

  1. Filter the original CSV: keep only rows where email status maps to "keep"
  2. Write cleaned CSV to same directory as input, named {original_name}_verified.csv
  3. Save full validation results to {original_name}_verification_results.json for reference
  4. Report: {kept} emails kept, {removed} removed, {catch_all} catch-all (flagged)

Step 6: Clean from sequencer (optional)

If the user provides sequencer campaign IDs:

  1. Ask which sequencer they use (Instantly, etc.) and read its API docs from skills/campaign-sending/references/
  2. For each removed email, call the sequencer's lead deletion endpoint
  3. Respect rate limits
  4. Report: {N} leads removed from sequencer

If no campaigns are provided, skip this step and note that the user should remove bad emails manually or re-upload with the cleaned CSV.

Output

FileContents
*_verified.csvCleaned CSV with only valid emails
*_verification_results.jsonFull validation results for all emails
Console reportSummary table + list of removed emails

API References

Provider API docs are fetched or read during Step 0. No pre-configured provider docs are bundled — add them to references/ as needed.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.54%
按下载量换算62

Claude

28.17%
按下载量换算47

Cursor

19.29%
按下载量换算32

Gemini CLI

9.41%
按下载量换算16

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills