Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

effect-deslopify-idiomatic效果 deslopify 惯用语

Agent Skill

effect-deslopify-idiomatic 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

269

周安装

11

GitHub Stars

4

下载量

86
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:effect-deslopify-idiomatic(效果 deslopify 惯用语)
来源仓库:https://github.com/artimath/effect-skills
仓库路径:skills/effect-deslopify-idiomatic
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/artimath/effect-skills --skill effect-deslopify-idiomatic
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/artimath/effect-skills --skill effect-deslopify-idiomatic

简介

effect-deslopify-idiomatic 对 Effect-TS 代码进行惯用语审计与修复,提升代码质量。

  • 需配合 effectts 与 sdd 技能共同使用以获取完整方法论支持。
  • 通过 GitHub 安装,使用 npx skills add 命令添加指定仓库的 skill/effect-deslopify-idiomatic 路径。
  • 目标是在保持行为稳定的前提下消除反模式。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Effect Deslopify (Idiomatic Remediation)

Systematic audit and remediation of Effect-TS code to library-grade idiomatic standards.

Companion skills (install separately): effectts (pattern reference), sdd (methodology). These provide the pattern reference and methodology this skill orchestrates.

Target

Apply to any Effect-TS codebase, package, or file path.

Mission

  • De-slopify the target
  • Make code library-grade idiomatic Effect
  • Keep behavior stable unless fixing a confirmed bug

Workflow

1. Audit (SDD Phases 1-4)

Run SDD audit mode across phases 1-4 on the target.

2. Gap Analysis

Produce a gap list covering:

  • Schema modeling (bare brands, missing constraints, manual mappers)
  • Service boundaries (wrong abstraction level, god services)
  • Error channels (silent swallowing, wrong error types)
  • Layer wiring (missing deps, provide vs provideMerge)
  • Purity violations (impure ops outside Effect tracking)
  • Exhaustiveness (switch instead of Match.exhaustive)
  • Test coverage (missing property tests, bun scripts)

3. Decide: Remediate or Rewrite

For each gap:

  • Remediate if architecture is sound and gaps are localized
  • Rewrite only if architecture is unsalvageable (majority of phases FAIL)

4. Implement Fixes

Implement highest-impact fixes. Priority order:

  1. Bugs (incorrect behavior, discarded Effect values)
  2. Schema constraints (bare brands, missing validation)
  3. Error modeling (Data.TaggedError -> Schema.TaggedError)
  4. Service patterns (Effect.fn, annotateLogs)
  5. Test gaps (property tests, vitest conversion)

5. Regression Tests

Add/keep regression tests for bug fixes (TDD: failing test first, then fix).

6. Verify Gates

Run all applicable gates:

  • Your project's typecheck command (e.g. npx tsc --noEmit or pnpm check)
  • npx effect-language-service quickfixes --project tsconfig.json (if configured)
  • Relevant test suites

Idiomatic Constraints

These are non-negotiable for library-grade Effect code:

ConstraintWhy
No as anyType escapes hide real errors
No silent catchAll error swallowingErrors must be logged or propagated
No raw fetch when typed client existsDuplicating URLs loses type safety
No ad-hoc mutable state in Effect pathsUse Ref for tracked state
Impure ops wrapped in Effect.sync / Effect APIsEffect must track all side effects
Match.exhaustive not switchCompile-time case coverage
Errors modeled explicitlySchema.TaggedError with typed channels
Effect.fn on all service methodsAutomatic tracing spans
Effect.annotateLogs per service moduleStructured observability
yield* new TaggedError() in generatorsNot Effect.fail(new TaggedError())

Before / After Examples

Bare Brand -> Constrained Brand

// BEFORE (sloppy): accepts empty strings, whitespace, anything
const UserId = Schema.String.pipe(Schema.brand("UserId"))

// AFTER (idiomatic): enforces domain invariants
const UserId = Schema.NonEmptyString.pipe(
  Schema.pattern(/^usr_[a-z0-9]+$/),
  Schema.brand("UserId")
)

Manual Tracing -> Effect.fn

// BEFORE (sloppy): manual withSpan, no argument capture
findById: (id: UserId) =>
  sql`SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${id}`.pipe(
    Effect.flatMap(rows => decode(rows[0])),
    Effect.withSpan("UserRepo.findById"),
  ),

// AFTER (idiomatic): Effect.fn captures args + creates span
findById: Effect.fn("UserRepo.findById")(function*(id: UserId) {
  const rows = yield* sql`SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${id}`
  if (rows.length === 0) return yield* new UserNotFound({ userId: id })
  return yield* Schema.decodeUnknown(User)(rows[0])
}),

Silent Error Swallowing -> Explicit Handling

// BEFORE (sloppy): error silently disappears
const result = yield* dangerousOp.pipe(
  Effect.catchAll(() => Effect.succeed(fallback))
)

// AFTER (idiomatic): error logged before fallback
const result = yield* dangerousOp.pipe(
  Effect.tapError((e) => Effect.logWarning("Falling back", { error: e })),
  Effect.catchAll(() => Effect.succeed(fallback))
)

Output

After running deslopify, report:

  • Changed files (with summary of what changed)
  • Anti-patterns removed (count by category)
  • Test/gate results (pass/fail)
  • Residual risks + follow-ups (anything not fixed in this pass)

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.51%
按下载量换算31

Claude

28.04%
按下载量换算24

Cursor

18.31%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

10.48%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills