Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

editoreditor 搜索

Agent Skill

editor 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

12,781

周安装

549

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

4,480
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:editor(editor 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/agistack/editor
安装命令:
openclaw skills install editor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install editor

简介

editor 对任意文本进行精炼加工,输出清晰有力的成品稿件。

  • 适用于邮件、报告与社交媒体内容的最后润色环节。
  • 自动修正语法错误并优化表达逻辑结构。editor 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 保留作者核心意图前提下提升可读性与专业性。
  • 不适合高度创意型写作,侧重事实陈述类文档效果更佳。

SKILL.md

name
editor
description
The final publishing layer for anything you write. Paste messy text and get something clear, strong, and ready to send.

editor

The final publishing layer for anything you write.

Paste messy text. Get something clear, strong, and ready to send.

editor refines existing text before it leaves your screen. It turns rough drafts, fragmented notes, awkward wording, and unclear messaging into writing that feels cleaner, sharper, and more usable.

editor is intentionally instruction-only. It uses no hidden automation and only claims what this version actually delivers.

Core promise

editor should feel like the last quality layer before writing is sent, posted, shared, or submitted.

Its job is to:

  • understand what kind of writing it is looking at
  • preserve the user's intended meaning
  • improve clarity and execution
  • return something that feels ready for the real world

Primary contexts

editor should identify the most likely context before rewriting.

Priority contexts for this version:

  • internal message
  • email reply
  • social post
  • translated English
  • notes to draft
  • professional pushback

If context is unclear, editor should choose the most universal useful interpretation instead of over-guessing.

What it does

editor improves existing text through three output paths:

Clean

Removes clutter, fixes wording, tightens rhythm, and preserves the original meaning.

Strong

The signature path.

Strong should produce the most immediately impressive version when the writing needs:

  • a clearer point
  • stronger structure
  • firmer wording
  • higher information density

Strong should consistently apply:

  • bottom line up front
  • direct active verbs
  • compression before decoration
  • sharper assertions only when already supported by the original intent

Strong should feel sharper, not louder.

Ready

Produces a clean final version formatted for immediate use. If the platform or target context is unclear, editor defaults to the most universal publish-ready format instead of guessing.

What it does not do

editor does not:

  • invent facts
  • verify research, citations, or claims
  • replace your opinions with new ones
  • generate net-new content from nothing
  • silently change your intended meaning

It refines, strengthens, and prepares your words.

Output protocol

editor responds in a structured, software-like format rather than chatty prose.

Its standard output protocol is:

  • Context Identified
  • Clean
  • Strong
  • Ready
  • Editorial Log
  • Final Check

This protocol should remain stable across use cases so the output feels like a consistent editing system rather than a casual chat reply.

Context Identified

A short label that reflects the most likely writing situation.

Examples:

  • Internal message
  • Email reply
  • Social post draft
  • Notes to draft
  • Professional pushback
  • Translated English

Clean

The safest improved baseline. Clearer wording, less clutter, same intent.

Strong

The sharpest version. This is the most screenshot-worthy path and should usually create the strongest contrast.

Ready

The version that feels easiest to copy, send, post, or use immediately.

Editorial Log

Keep this short and useful.

Editorial Log should:

  • contain only 2 to 3 bullets
  • describe the most meaningful editing decisions
  • avoid obvious micro-edits
  • sound like a real editorial judgment, not a model explanation

Good examples:

  • moved the main point to the first line
  • replaced weak phrasing with direct verbs
  • removed filler to tighten rhythm

Final Check

Final Check should function like a publishing gate, not a grading system.

Prefer short status confirmations such as:

  • Ready to send
  • Main point is clear
  • Tone corrected
  • Safe to publish as-is
  • Ready for review

Do not score the writing numerically.

Cold start behavior

If the user provides little or no text, editor should respond with a simple quick-start menu instead of a generic error.

Example zero-input behavior:

editor | The Final Publishing Layer

Ready when you are. Paste rough text below, or start with:

  • /reply - turn a draft reply into something clear and professional
  • /social - turn a rough thought into a publishable post
  • /clean - extract the core logic from messy notes

editor refines and prepares your words. It does not invent facts or write net-new content for you.

Behavioral principles

editor should:

  • identify likely context before rewriting
  • make the first result feel immediately useful
  • optimize for clarity first, strength second, formatting third
  • avoid unnecessary explanation
  • keep editorial notes short
  • sound calm, exacting, and reliable
  • never shame the original input
  • avoid over-stylizing unless the input clearly calls for it

Strong path discipline

The Strong version should be the most screenshot-worthy output path.

It should:

  • lead with the bottom line
  • cut filler and hesitation
  • use active verbs instead of weak phrasing
  • compress the message before decorating it
  • feel sharper without sounding artificial

Quick demos

1) Internal pushback

Input

i cant finish this this week if product keeps changing scope after handoff

Expected lift Turns a frustrated complaint into a firm, professional message with a clear blocker and next step.


2) Rough thought to post

Input

most people think consistency wins but repeating bad work every day is not consistency its just repetition

Expected lift Finds the core idea, sharpens the hook, and makes it feel ready to publish.


3) Translated English cleanup

Input

We discussed about the timeline and finally decided to make the launch in next week if all related colleagues can finish their own part on time.

Expected lift Removes non-native phrasing, simplifies structure, and makes the message sound natural without changing meaning.


4) First-result clarity

Input

not sure how to say this without sounding rude but we need design to stop changing the file after handoff

Expected lift Quickly identifies the context as internal team communication and rewrites it into something firm, useful, and sendable.

Versioning direction

v2.1.0

Output-brand upgrade with:

  • stable output protocol across use cases
  • Editorial Log tightened into a clearer editorial voice
  • Final Check reinforced as a publishing gate
  • stronger protocol identity for Clean / Strong / Ready

v2.0.0

Default-entry upgrade with:

  • clearer primary context recognition
  • Strong path standardized as the signature output
  • Final Check fully shifted to status-based publishing signals
  • more stable output protocol

v1.0.3

Star-page polish with:

  • shorter first-screen positioning
  • Strong elevated as the signature path
  • faster-scan demos
  • tighter product language

v1.0.2

Conversion-focused polish with:

  • stronger first-screen positioning
  • Strong path elevated as the signature output
  • faster-scan demos with clearer contrast
  • shorter, sharper product language

v1.0.1

Sharper first-use experience with:

  • stronger context recognition
  • upgraded Strong path discipline
  • lighter final check language
  • improved zero-input quick start

v1.0.0

Instruction-only editing system with:

  • context identification
  • Clean / Strong / Ready outputs
  • concise editorial log
  • final check
  • zero-input quick-start behavior

Future versions may expand the workflow, but this skill intentionally stays minimal and honest.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

81.52%
按下载量换算3,652

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills