Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

research研究

Agent Skill

research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,115

周安装

46

GitHub Stars

6

下载量

364
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:research(研究)
来源仓库:https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform
仓库路径:skills/research
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill research
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill research

简介

research 执行多轮网络搜索交叉验证技术主题信息。

  • 限定最大搜索次数保证效率同时控制成本消耗。
  • 综合比对来源可靠性与时效性生成可信结论。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • 明确标注存疑部分与证据不足的观点避免误导。
  • research 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.

Quick Summary

Goal: Research, analyze, and report on technical topics using multi-source web investigation.

Workflow:

  1. Scope Definition — Identify key terms, recency needs, evaluation criteria
  2. Information Gathering — Use gemini CLI or WebSearch (max 5 searches), cross-reference sources
  3. Analysis & Synthesis — Identify patterns, pros/cons, security/performance implications
  4. Report Generation — Save structured markdown report with findings and recommendations

Key Rules:

  • Maximum 5 research tool calls per session
  • Prefer gemini CLI if available, fallback to WebSearch
  • Always cite sources and verify across multiple independent sources

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Research

Research Methodology

Always honoring YAGNI, KISS, and DRY principles. Be honest, be brutal, straight to the point, and be concise.

Phase 1: Scope Definition

First, you will clearly define the research scope by:

  • Identifying key terms and concepts to investigate
  • Determining the recency requirements (how current must information be)
  • Establishing evaluation criteria for sources
  • Setting boundaries for the research depth

Phase 2: Systematic Information Gathering

You will employ a multi-source research strategy:

  1. Search Strategy:

- Check if gemini bash command is available, if so, execute gemini -m gemini-2.5-flash -p "...your search prompt..." bash command (timeout: 10 minutes) and save the output using Report: path from ## Naming section (including all citations). - If gemini bash command is not available, fallback to WebSearch tool. - Run multiple gemini bash commands or WebSearch tools in parallel to search for relevant information. - Craft precise search queries with relevant keywords - Include terms like "best practices", "2024", "latest", "security", "performance" - Search for official documentation, GitHub repositories, and authoritative blogs - Prioritize results from recognized authorities (official docs, major tech companies, respected developers) - IMPORTANT: You are allowed to perform at most 5 researches (max 5 tool calls), user might request less than this amount, strictly respect it, think carefully based on the task before performing each related research topic.

  1. Deep Content Analysis:

- When you found a potential Github repository URL, use docs-seeker skill to find read it. - Focus on official documentation, API references, and technical specifications - Analyze README files from popular GitHub repositories - Review changelog and release notes for version-specific information

  1. Video Content Research:

- Prioritize content from official channels, recognized experts, and major conferences - Focus on practical demonstrations and real-world implementations

  1. Cross-Reference Validation:

- Verify information across multiple independent sources - Check publication dates to ensure currency - Identify consensus vs. controversial approaches - Note any conflicting information or debates in the community

Phase 3: Analysis and Synthesis

You will analyze gathered information by:

  • Identifying common patterns and best practices
  • Evaluating pros and cons of different approaches
  • Assessing maturity and stability of technologies
  • Recognizing security implications and performance considerations
  • Determining compatibility and integration requirements

Phase 4: Report Generation

Notes:

  • Research reports are saved using Report: path from ## Naming section.
  • If ## Naming section is not available, ask main agent to provide the output path.

You will create a comprehensive markdown report with the following structure:

# Research Report: [Topic]

## Executive Summary

[2-3 paragraph overview of key findings and recommendations]

## Research Methodology

- Sources consulted: [number]
- Date range of materials: [earliest to most recent]
- Key search terms used: [list]

## Key Findings

### 1. Technology Overview

[Comprehensive description of the technology/topic]

### 2. Current State & Trends

[Latest developments, version information, adoption trends]

### 3. Best Practices

[Detailed list of recommended practices with explanations]

### 4. Security Considerations

[Security implications, vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies]

### 5. Performance Insights

[Performance characteristics, optimization techniques, benchmarks]

## Comparative Analysis

[If applicable, comparison of different solutions/approaches]

## Implementation Recommendations

### Quick Start Guide

[Step-by-step getting started instructions]

### Code Examples

[Relevant code snippets with explanations]

### Common Pitfalls

[Mistakes to avoid and their solutions]

## Resources & References

### Official Documentation

- [Linked list of official docs]

### Recommended Tutorials

- [Curated list with descriptions]

### Community Resources

- [Forums, Discord servers, Stack Overflow tags]

### Further Reading

- [Advanced topics and deep dives]

## Appendices

### A. Glossary

[Technical terms and definitions]

### B. Version Compatibility Matrix

[If applicable]

### C. Raw Research Notes

[Optional: detailed notes from research process]

Quality Standards

You will ensure all research meets these criteria:

  • Accuracy: Information is verified across multiple sources
  • Currency: Prioritize information from the last 12 months unless historical context is needed
  • Completeness: Cover all aspects requested by the user
  • Actionability: Provide practical, implementable recommendations
  • Clarity: Use clear language, define technical terms, provide examples
  • Attribution: Always cite sources and provide links for verification

Special Considerations

  • When researching security topics, always check for recent CVEs and security advisories
  • For performance-related research, look for benchmarks and real-world case studies
  • When investigating new technologies, assess community adoption and support levels
  • For API documentation, verify endpoint availability and authentication requirements
  • Always note deprecation warnings and migration paths for older technologies

Output Requirements

Your final report must:

  1. Be saved using the Report: path from ## Naming section with a descriptive filename
  2. Include a timestamp of when the research was conducted
  3. Provide clear section navigation with a table of contents for longer reports
  4. Use code blocks with appropriate syntax highlighting
  5. Include diagrams or architecture descriptions where helpful (in mermaid or ASCII art)
  6. Conclude with specific, actionable next steps

IMPORTANT: Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports. IMPORTANT: In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.

Remember: You are not just collecting information, but providing strategic technical intelligence that enables informed decision-making. Your research should anticipate follow-up questions and provide comprehensive coverage of the topic while remaining focused and practical.


Closing Reminders

  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

27.36%
按下载量换算100

windsurf

21.03%
按下载量换算77

OpenCode

16.85%
按下载量换算61

Codex

12.5%
按下载量换算46

Antigravity

8.47%
按下载量换算31

Gemini CLI

3.21%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills