Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

knowledge-synthesis知识综合

Agent Skill

knowledge-synthesis 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

321

周安装

13

GitHub Stars

6

下载量

101
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:knowledge-synthesis(知识综合)
来源仓库:https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform
仓库路径:skills/knowledge-synthesis
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill knowledge-synthesis
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill knowledge-synthesis

简介

knowledge-synthesis 专注于多源信息整合与知识提炼,辅助构建系统化认知框架。

  • 适合处理复杂研究任务时对分散信息的归纳与关联分析。
  • 强调证据引用与不确定性声明,避免将推测当作事实输出。
  • 安装时应注意其可能调用外部工具或执行系统命令的风险。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting.
Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.
AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task: - Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal. - Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing. - Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain. - Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips — not just happy path. - When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer — never patch symptom site. - Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code. - Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks. - Holistic-first debugging — resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis. - Surgical changes — apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly. - Surface ambiguity before coding — don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.

Quick Summary

Goal: Synthesize evidence base into final structured report using enforced template.

Workflow:

  1. Load evidence — Read evidence base from deep-research
  2. Load template — Read enforced template from.claude/templates/
  3. Synthesize — Write report following template structure
  4. Citation check — Verify every claim has citation
  5. Confidence summary — Aggregate scores, flag gaps

Key Rules:

  • MUST ATTENTION use enforced template structure — all sections required
  • Every factual claim inline-cited: [N] referencing source table
  • Knowledge gaps section mandatory

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Knowledge Synthesis

Step 1: Load Evidence

Read .claude/tmp/_evidence-{slug}.md and .claude/tmp/_sources-{slug}.md.

Inventory:

  • Total findings with confidence scores
  • Unresolved discrepancies
  • Remaining gaps

Step 2: Load Template

Read the enforced template: .claude/templates/research-report-template.md

Every section in the template MUST ATTENTION appear in the final report.

Step 3: Synthesize Report

Write to docs/knowledge/research/{slug}.md:

For each template section:

  1. Map relevant findings from evidence base
  2. Write content with inline citations [N]
  3. Declare confidence per finding
  4. Note cross-cutting patterns and contradictions in Analysis section

Step 4: Citation Audit

Verify:

  • Every factual claim has at least one [N] citation
  • Every source in the Sources table is referenced at least once
  • No orphan citations (referencing non-existent source)

Step 5: Confidence Summary

Calculate overall report confidence:

  • Average of all finding confidence scores
  • Weight by finding importance
  • Flag any <60% findings prominently

Output

Final report: docs/knowledge/research/{descriptive-slug}.md

Clean up working files from .claude/tmp/ after successful synthesis.


Closing Reminders

  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality
  • MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact.
  • MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.44%
按下载量换算35

Claude

31.24%
按下载量换算32

Cursor

21.38%
按下载量换算22

Gemini CLI

9.68%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills