Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

dt-obs-problemsdt obs 问题

Agent Skill

dt-obs-problems 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

6,360

周安装

265

GitHub Stars

59

下载量

2,120
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dt-obs-problems(dt obs 问题)
来源仓库:https://github.com/dynatrace/dynatrace-for-ai
仓库路径:skills/dt-obs-problems
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/dynatrace/dynatrace-for-ai --skill dt-obs-problems
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/dynatrace/dynatrace-for-ai --skill dt-obs-problems

简介

dt-obs-problems 分析 Dynatrace AI 检测到的系统问题和异常。

  • 适用于根因定位、影响范围评估和事件关联分析等排障场景。
  • 自动聚合相关告警事件,提供软件健康和韧性洞察。
  • 使用前需确认问题检测规则配置,注意误报和漏报的处理策略。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Problem Analysis Skill

Analyze Dynatrace AI-detected problems including root cause identification, impact assessment, and correlation with logs and metrics.

Overview

Dynatrace automatically detects anomalies, performance degradations, and failures across your environment, creating problems that aggregate related alert, warning and info-level events and provide root cause and impact insights.

What are Problems?

Problems are automatically detected, software and infrastructure health and resilience issues that:

  • Automatically correlate related alert, warning, and info-level events across services, infrastructure, frontend applications, and user sessions
  • Identify root causes using causal analysis of Smartscape dependencies
  • Assess business impact by tracking affected users and services
  • Reduce alert noise by grouping related symptoms into single problems that share the same root cause and impact
  • Track problem lifecycle from early detection through resolution

Event Kinds

The event.kind field (stable, permission) identifies the high-level event type:

event.kind valueDescription
DAVIS_EVENTDavis-detected infrastructure/application events
BIZ_EVENTBusiness events (ingested via API or captured from spans)
RUM_EVENTReal User Monitoring events
AUDIT_EVENTAdministrative/security audit events

event.provider (stable, permission) identifies the event source.

Problem Categories

Common event.category values:

CategoryDescriptionExample
AVAILABILITYInfrastructure or service unavailableWeb service returns no data, synthetic test actively fails, database connection lost
ERRORIncreased error rates beyond baselineAPI error rate jumped from 0.1% to 15%
SLOWDOWNPerformance degradationResponse time increased from 200ms to 5000ms
RESOURCEResource saturationContainer memory at 95%, causing OOM kills
CUSTOMCustom anomaly detectionsBusiness KPI (orders/minute) dropped below threshold

Problem Lifecycle

Detection → ACTIVE → Under Investigation → CLOSED
  • ACTIVE: Currently occurring issues requiring attention
  • CLOSED: Resolved issues used for historical analysis

Essential Fields

Common Field Name Mistakes

❌ WRONG✅ CORRECTDescription
titleevent.nameProblem title/description
statusevent.statusProblem lifecycle status
severityevent.categoryProblem type/category
startevent.startProblem start time

Correct Status Values

// ✅ CORRECT: Use these status values
fetch dt.davis.problems
| filter event.status == "ACTIVE"   // Currently occurring problems
//     or event.status == "CLOSED"  // Resolved problems
// ❌ INCORRECT: event.status == "OPEN" does not exist!
| limit 1

Key Fields Reference

fetch dt.davis.problems, from:now() - 1h
| filter not(dt.davis.is_duplicate)
| fields
    event.start,                          // Problem start timestamp
    event.end,                            // Problem end timestamp (if closed)
    display_id,                           // Human-readable problem ID (P-XXXXX)
    event.name,                           // Problem title
    event.description,                    // Detailed description
    event.category,                       // Problem type
    event.status,                         // ACTIVE or CLOSED
    dt.smartscape_source.id,              // The smartscape ID for the affected resource
    dt.davis.affected_users_count,        // Number of affected users
    smartscape.affected_entity.ids,        // Array of affected entity IDs
    dt.smartscape.service,                // Affected services (may be array)
    dt.davis.root_cause_entity,           // Entity identified as root cause
    root_cause_entity_id,                 // Root cause entity ID
    root_cause_entity_name,               // Human-readable root cause name
    dt.davis.is_duplicate,                // Whether duplicate detection
    dt.davis.is_rootcause                 // Root cause vs. symptom
| limit 10

Standard Query Pattern

Always start problem queries with this foundation:

fetch dt.davis.problems, from:now() - 2h
| filter not(dt.davis.is_duplicate) and event.status == "ACTIVE"
| fields event.start, display_id, event.name, event.category
| sort event.start desc
| limit 20

Key components:

  • fetch dt.davis.problems - The problems data source
  • not(dt.davis.is_duplicate) - Filter out duplicate detections
  • event.status == "ACTIVE" - Show only active problems
  • Time range - Always specify a reasonable window

Common Query Patterns

Active Problems by Category

fetch dt.davis.problems
| filter not(dt.davis.is_duplicate) and event.status == "ACTIVE"
| summarize problem_count = count(), by: {event.category}
| sort problem_count desc

High-Impact Active Problems (affecting many users)

fetch dt.davis.problems
| filter not(dt.davis.is_duplicate) and event.status == "ACTIVE"
| filter dt.davis.affected_users_count > 100
| fields event.start, display_id, event.name, dt.davis.affected_users_count, event.category
| sort dt.davis.affected_users_count desc

High-Impact Active Problems (affecting many smartscape entities)

fetch dt.davis.problems
| filter not(dt.davis.is_duplicate) and event.status == "ACTIVE"
| filter arraySize(affected_entity_ids) > 5
| fields event.start, display_id, event.name, affected_entity_ids, event.category, impacted_entity_count = arraySize(affected_entity_ids)
| sort impacted_entity_count desc

Specific Problem Details

fetch dt.davis.problems
| filter display_id == "P-XXXXXXXXXX"
| fields event.start, event.end, event.name, event.description, affected_entity_ids, dt.davis.affected_users_count, root_cause_entity_id, root_cause_entity_name

Service-Specific Problem History

fetch dt.davis.problems, from:now() - 7d
| filter not(dt.davis.is_duplicate)
| filter in(dt.entity.service, "SERVICE-XXXXXXXXX") or in(dt.smartscape.service, toSmartscapeId("SERVICE-XXXXXXXXX"))
| summarize problems = count(), by: {event.category, event.status}

Important: Entity Filter DO and DON'T

  • DO use array-safe filters and include both deprecated and Smartscape service fields when filtering by service ID: | filter in(dt.entity.service, "SERVICE-00E66996F1555897") or in(dt.smartscape.service, toSmartscapeId("SERVICE-00E66996F1555897"))
  • DON'T use scalar equality on service fields or only one field variant: // Wrong: not array-safe and misses Smartscape-only matches | filter dt.entity.service == "SERVICE-00E66996F1555897"

Root Cause Analysis Patterns

Basic Root Cause Query

fetch dt.davis.problems, from:now() - 24h
| filter not(dt.davis.is_duplicate) and event.status == "ACTIVE"
| fields
    display_id,
    event.name,
    event.description,
    root_cause_entity_id,
    root_cause_entity_name,
    smartscape.affected_entity.ids

Root Cause by Entity Type

Identify which entity types most frequently cause problems:

fetch dt.davis.problems, from:now() - 7d
| filter not(dt.davis.is_duplicate)
| filter isNotNull(root_cause_entity_id)
| summarize problem_count = count(), by:{root_cause_entity_name}
| sort problem_count desc
| limit 20

Affected entity is an AWS resource

fetch dt.davis.problems, from:now() - 24h
| filter not(dt.davis.is_duplicate) and event.status == "ACTIVE"
| filter matchesPhrase(arrayToString(smartscape.affected_entity.types, delimiter:","), "AWS_")

Infrastructure Root Cause with Service Impact

fetch dt.davis.problems, from:now() - 30m
| filter not(dt.davis.is_duplicate) and event.status == "ACTIVE"
| filter matchesPhrase(root_cause_entity_id, "HOST-")
| filter isNotNull(dt.smartscape.service)
| fields display_id, event.name, root_cause_entity_name, dt.smartscape.service

Problem Blast Radius

Calculate entity impact per root cause:

fetch dt.davis.problems, from:now() - 7d
| filter not(dt.davis.is_duplicate)
| filter isNotNull(root_cause_entity_id)
| fieldsAdd affected_count = arraySize(smartscape.affected_entity.ids)
| summarize
    avg_affected = avg(affected_count),
    max_affected = max(affected_count),
    problem_count = count(),
    by:{root_cause_entity_name}
| sort avg_affected desc

Recurring Root Causes

Identify entities repeatedly causing problems:

fetch dt.davis.problems, from:now() - 24h
| filter not(dt.davis.is_duplicate)
| filter isNotNull(root_cause_entity_id)
| summarize
    problem_count = count(),
    first_occurrence = min(event.start),
    last_occurrence = max(event.start),
    by:{root_cause_entity_id, root_cause_entity_name}
| filter problem_count > 3
| sort problem_count desc

Problem Trending and Pattern Analysis

Track problem trends over time, identify recurring issues, and analyze resolution performance.

Primary Files:

  • references/problem-trending.md - Timeseries analysis and pattern detection

Common Use Cases:

  • Active problems over time with makeTimeseries
  • Problem creation rate by category
  • Recurring problem detection by schedule
  • Resolution time trends and P95 duration analysis

Key Techniques:

  • makeTimeseries vs bin(): Choose the right approach for lifecycle spans vs discrete events
  • NULL handling: Use coalesce(event.end, now()) for active problems
  • Peak hours analysis: Identify when problems occur most frequently
  • Impact trending: Track user impact changes over time

See references/problem-trending.md for complete query patterns and best practices.

Best Practices

Essential Rules

  1. Always filter duplicates: Use not(dt.davis.is_duplicate) to avoid counting the same problem multiple times
  2. Use correct status values: "ACTIVE" or "CLOSED", never "OPEN"
  3. Specify time ranges: Always include time bounds to optimize performance
  4. Include display_id: Essential for problem identification and linking
  5. Test incrementally: Add one filter or field at a time when building queries
  6. Filter early: Apply not(dt.davis.is_duplicate) immediately after fetch

Query Development

  • Start simple: Begin with basic filtering, then add complexity
  • Test fields first: Run with | limit 1 to verify field names exist
  • Use meaningful time ranges: Too broad wastes resources, too narrow misses data
  • Document problem IDs: Always capture and store display_id for reference

Root Cause Verification

  • Always filter isNotNull(root_cause_entity_id) when required
  • Cross-reference events using dt.davis.event_ids
  • Consider time delays: root cause may appear in logs minutes before problem

Time Range Guidelines

// ✅ GOOD - Specific time range
fetch dt.davis.problems, from:now() - 4h
// ❌ BAD - Scans all historical data
fetch dt.davis.problems

Related Documentation

  • references/problem-trending.md: Problem trending and timeseries analysis patterns
  • references/problem-correlation.md: Correlating problems with logs and other telemetry
  • references/impact-analysis.md: Business and technical impact assessment
  • references/problem-merging.md: When and why DAVIS merges events into problems

Related Skills

  • dt-dql-essentials - Core DQL syntax and query structure for problem queries
  • dt-obs-logs - Correlate problems with application and infrastructure logs
  • dt-obs-tracing - Investigate problems through distributed trace analysis

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.37%
按下载量换算750

Claude

29.81%
按下载量换算632

Cursor

17.39%
按下载量换算369

Gemini CLI

8.21%
按下载量换算174

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills