doc-sys-reviewer（文档系统审阅者）

doc-sys-reviewer

Purpose

Comprehensive content review and quality assurance for System Requirements (SYS) documents. This skill performs deep content analysis beyond structural validation, checking requirement completeness, ADR alignment, quality attribute coverage, interface definitions, and identifying issues that require manual architectural review.

Layer: 6 (SYS Quality Assurance)

Upstream: SYS (from doc-sys-autopilot or doc-sys)

Downstream: None (final QA gate before REQ generation)

When to Use This Skill

Use doc-sys-reviewer when:

• After SYS Generation: Run immediately after doc-sys-autopilot completes
• Manual SYS Edits: After making manual changes to SYS
• Pre-REQ Check: Before running doc-req-autopilot
• Periodic Review: Regular quality checks on existing SYS
• Architecture Reviews: During system design reviews

Do NOT use when:

• SYS does not exist yet (use doc-sys or doc-sys-autopilot first)
• Need structural/schema validation only (use doc-sys-validator)
• Generating new SYS content (use doc-sys)

Skill vs Validator: Key Differences

Review Workflow

flowchart TD
    A[Input: SYS Path] --> B[Load SYS Files]
    B --> C{Single or Multiple?}

    C -->|Multiple| D[Load All SYS Files]
    C -->|Single| E[Load Single File]

    D --> F[Run Review Checks]
    E --> F

    subgraph Review["Review Checks"]
        F --> G[1. Functional Requirement Completeness]
        G --> H[2. ADR Alignment]
        H --> I[3. Quality Attribute Coverage]
        I --> J[4. Interface Definition Completeness]
      J --> J2[4a. System Diagram Contract Compliance]
      J2 --> K[5. Constraint Validation]
        K --> L[6. Placeholder Detection]
        L --> M[7. Naming Compliance]
        M --> N2[8. Upstream Drift Detection]
    end

    N2 --> N{Issues Found?}
    N -->|Yes| O[Categorize Issues]
    O --> P{Auto-Fixable?}
    P -->|Yes| Q[Apply Auto-Fixes]
    Q --> R[Re-run Affected Checks]
    P -->|No| S[Flag for Manual Review]
    R --> N
    S --> T[Generate Report]
    N -->|No| T
    T --> U[Calculate Review Score]
    U --> V{Score >= Threshold?}
    V -->|Yes| W[PASS]
    V -->|No| X[FAIL with Details]

Review Checks

0. Structure Compliance (BLOCKING)

Validates SYS follows the mandatory nested folder rule.

Nested Folder Rule: ALL SYS documents MUST be in nested folders.

Required Structure:

Error Codes:

This check is BLOCKING - SYS must pass structure validation before other checks proceed.

1. Functional Requirement Completeness

Validates all functional requirements are complete.

Scope:

• Each requirement has description
• Acceptance criteria defined
• Priority assigned
• Dependencies documented
• Rationale provided

Error Codes:

2. ADR Alignment

Validates SYS requirements trace to ADR decisions.

Scope:

• Requirements implement ADR decisions
• No conflicting requirements
• Technology choices consistent
• Architectural constraints honored

Error Codes:

3. Quality Attribute Coverage

Validates non-functional requirements coverage.

Scope:

• Performance requirements defined
• Security requirements present
• Reliability/availability specified
• Scalability addressed
• Maintainability considered

Error Codes:

4. Interface Definition Completeness

Validates system interfaces are well-defined.

Scope:

• External interfaces documented
• Internal interfaces defined
• Data formats specified
• Protocols identified
• Error handling defined

Error Codes:

4a. System Diagram Contract Compliance

Validates SYS bridge requirements defined by ai_dev_ssd_flow/DIAGRAM_STANDARDS.md and SYS quality-gate contracts.

Scope:

• Required System Diagram Contract subsection exists
• Required fields present: downstream_c4_l4_owner, required_sequence_paths, trust_boundaries
• Required tags present for bridge ownership: @diagram: c4-l4-ownership, @diagram: sequence-l4
• SYS contract references remain consistent with downstream SPEC ownership location

Error Codes:

5. Constraint Validation

Validates system constraints are reasonable.

Scope:

• Resource constraints realistic
• Time constraints achievable
• Budget constraints considered
• Technology constraints compatible

Error Codes:

6. Placeholder Detection

Identifies incomplete content requiring replacement.

Error Codes:

7. Naming Compliance

Validates element IDs follow doc-naming standards.

Scope:

• Element IDs use SYS.NN.xxxx format
• Element type codes valid for SYS (01, 05, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21)
• No legacy patterns (SR-NNN, SYS-NNN)

Error Codes:

8. Upstream Drift Detection (Mandatory Cache)

Detects when upstream ADR documents have been modified after the SYS was created or last updated.

The drift cache is mandatory. All drift detection operations require cache initialization and maintenance.

Purpose: Identifies stale SYS content that may not reflect current architecture decisions. When ADR documents change, the SYS may need updates to maintain alignment with architectural decisions.

Upstream Documents:

• ADR documents: Architecture Decision Records that SYS requirements must implement

Scope:

• @adr: tag targets (ADR document references)
• Traceability section upstream artifact links
• Any markdown links to ../05_ADR/
• Technology choice references that trace to ADR decisions

Drift Cache File (MANDATORY)

Location: docs/06_SYS/.drift_cache.json

Schema:

{
  "cache_version": "1.0",
  "created": "2026-02-10T17:00:00",
  "last_checked": "2026-02-10T17:00:00",
  "sys_documents": {
    "SYS-01_f1_iam.md": {
      "sys_hash": "sha256:abc123...",
      "last_updated": "2026-02-10T17:00:00",
      "upstream_refs": {
        "ADR-01_authentication_strategy.md": {
          "path": "../../05_ADR/ADR-01_authentication_strategy.md",
          "hash": "sha256:def456...",
          "checked": "2026-02-10T17:00:00",
          "status": "current"
        },
        "ADR-05_data_storage.md": {
          "path": "../../05_ADR/ADR-05_data_storage.md",
          "hash": "sha256:ghi789...",
          "checked": "2026-02-10T17:00:00",
          "status": "current"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Cache Status Values:

• current: Hash matches, no drift detected
• drifted: Hash mismatch, upstream modified
• missing: Upstream file not found
• new: New reference, not yet cached

Three-Phase Detection Algorithm

Phase 1: Cache Initialization

1. Check if .drift_cache.json exists
   - If missing → Create new cache file
   - If exists → Load and validate schema

2. For each SYS document:
   a. Extract all upstream references:
      - @adr: tags → [ADR document ID]
      - Links to ../05_ADR/ → [path]
      - Traceability table upstream artifacts → [path]
      - Technology choices → [related ADR]
   b. Resolve paths to absolute file paths
   c. Initialize upstream_refs entries if missing

Phase 2: Hash Comparison

1. For each upstream reference in cache:
   a. Read upstream file content
   b. Compute SHA-256 hash
   c. Compare to cached hash:
      - Match → status = "current"
      - Mismatch → status = "drifted", flag REV-D002
      - File missing → status = "missing", flag REV-D006

2. Detect new references not in cache:
   a. Add to upstream_refs with status = "new"
   b. Compute initial hash

Phase 3: Cache Update

1. Update last_checked timestamp
2. For each drifted reference:
   a. Store new hash
   b. Update checked timestamp
   c. Preserve previous hash for delta analysis
3. Write updated cache to disk
4. Generate drift report

Hash Calculation (MANDATORY BASH EXECUTION)

CRITICAL: You MUST execute actual bash commands to compute hashes. DO NOT write placeholder values.

Compute File Hash:

sha256sum <file_path> | cut -d' ' -f1

Store result as: "hash": "sha256:<64_hex_characters>"

REJECTED VALUES (re-compute immediately):

• sha256:verified_no_drift
• sha256:pending_verification
• Any value where hex portion!= 64 characters

Section Hash (for anchor-specific tracking):

sed -n '/^## Section Name/,/^## /p' <file_path> | head -n -1 | sha256sum | cut -d' ' -f1

Verification:

grep -oP '"hash":\s*"sha256:[0-9a-f]{64}"' .drift_cache.json

Error Codes

Report Output

## Upstream Drift Analysis

**Cache Status**: Loaded from docs/06_SYS/.drift_cache.json (last checked: 2026-02-10T17:00:00)

| Upstream Document | SYS Reference | Cached Hash | Current Hash | Status | Severity |
|-------------------|---------------|-------------|--------------|--------|----------|
| ADR-01_authentication_strategy.md | @adr Decision | sha256:abc123... | sha256:xyz789... | DRIFTED | Warning |
| ADR-05_data_storage.md | Traceability | sha256:def456... | sha256:def456... | Current | - |

**Drift Summary**:
- Total upstream references: 2
- Current: 1
- Drifted: 1
- Missing: 0

**Recommendation**: Review upstream ADR changes and update SYS if architecture decisions have changed.

Auto-Actions

• Initialize .drift_cache.json if missing (mandatory)
• Update cache with current hashes after review
• Add [DRIFT] marker to affected @adr tags (optional)
• Generate drift summary in review report
• Preserve hash history for trend analysis

Configuration

Review Score Calculation

Scoring Formula:

Total: Sum of all categories (max 100)

Thresholds:

• PASS: ≥ 90
• WARNING: 80-89
• FAIL: < 80

Command Usage

# Review specific SYS
/doc-sys-reviewer SYS-01

# Review SYS by path
/doc-sys-reviewer docs/06_SYS/SYS-01_f1_iam.md

# Review all SYS
/doc-sys-reviewer all

Output Report

Review reports are stored alongside the reviewed document per project standards.

Nested Folder Rule: ALL SYS use nested folders (SYS-NN_{slug}/) regardless of size. This ensures review reports, fix reports, and drift cache files are organized with their parent document.

File Naming: SYS-NN.R_review_report_vNNN.md

Location: Inside the SYS nested folder: docs/06_SYS/SYS-NN_{slug}/

Versioning Rules

1. First Review: Creates SYS-NN.R_review_report_v001.md
2. Subsequent Reviews: Auto-increments version (v002, v003, etc.)
3. Same-Day Reviews: Each review gets unique version number

Version Detection: Scans folder for existing SYS-NN.R_review_report_v*.md files and increments.

Example:

docs/06_SYS/SYS-01_f1_iam/
├── SYS-01_f1_iam.md
├── SYS-01.R_review_report_v001.md    # First review
├── SYS-01.R_review_report_v002.md    # After fixes
└── .drift_cache.json

Delta Reporting

When previous reviews exist, include score comparison in the report.

See REVIEW_DOCUMENT_STANDARDS.md for complete versioning requirements.

Integration with doc-sys-autopilot

This skill is invoked during Phase 5 of doc-sys-autopilot:

flowchart LR
    A[Phase 4: Validation] --> B[Phase 5: Final Review]
    B --> C{doc-sys-reviewer}
    C --> D[Phase 6: Continue]

Related Skills

Version History

Implementation Plan Consistency (IPLAN-004)

• Treat plan-derived outputs as valid source mode and verify intent preservation from implementation plan scope/objectives.
• Validate upstream autopilot precedence assumption: --iplan > --ref > --prompt.
• Flag objective/scope conflicts between plan context and artifact output as blocking issues requiring clarification.
• Do not introduce legacy fallback paths such as docs-v2.0/00_REF.