doc-sys-autopilot
Purpose
Automated System Requirements (SYS) generation pipeline that processes ADR architecture decisions to generate comprehensive system requirements documents with functional requirements, quality attributes, and REQ-Ready scoring.
Layer: 6 (System Requirements)
Upstream: BRD (Layer 1), PRD (Layer 2), EARS (Layer 3), BDD (Layer 4), ADR (Layer 5)
Downstream Artifacts: REQ (Layer 7)
Input Contract (IPLAN-004 Standard)
- Supported modes:
- --ref <path> - --prompt "<text>" - --iplan <path|IPLAN-NNN>
- Precedence:
--iplan > --ref > --prompt - IPLAN resolution order:
1. Use explicit file path when it exists 2. Resolve work_plans/IPLAN-NNN*.md 3. Resolve governance/plans/IPLAN-NNN*.md 4. If multiple matches exist, fail with disambiguation request
- Merge conflict rule:
- Objective/scope conflicts between primary and supplemental sources are blocking and require user clarification.
Input Contract (IPLAN-004 Standard)
- Supported modes:
- --ref <path> - --prompt "<text>" - --iplan <path|IPLAN-NNN>
- Precedence:
--iplan > --ref > --prompt - IPLAN resolution order:
1. Use explicit file path when it exists 2. Resolve work_plans/IPLAN-NNN*.md 3. Resolve governance/plans/IPLAN-NNN*.md 4. If multiple matches exist, fail with disambiguation request
- Merge conflict rule:
- Objective/scope conflicts between primary and supplemental sources are blocking and require user clarification.
Skill Dependencies
This autopilot orchestrates the following skills:
| Skill | Purpose | Phase |
|---|---|---|
doc-naming | Element ID format (SYS.NN.xxxx), threshold tags, legacy pattern detection | All Phases |
doc-sys | SYS creation rules, 5-part structure, quality attribute categories | Phase 3: SYS Generation |
quality-advisor | Real-time quality feedback during SYS generation | Phase 3: SYS Generation |
doc-sys-validator | Validate SYS structure, content, REQ-Ready score | Phase 4: SYS Validation |
doc-sys-reviewer | Content review, link validation, quality scoring | Phase 5: Review |
doc-sys-fixer | Apply fixes from review report, create missing files | Phase 5: Fix |
Delegation Principle: The autopilot orchestrates workflow but delegates:
- SYS structure/content rules ->
doc-sysskill - Real-time quality feedback ->
quality-advisorskill - SYS validation logic ->
doc-sys-validatorskill - Content review and scoring ->
doc-sys-reviewerskill - Issue resolution and fixes ->
doc-sys-fixerskill - Element ID standards ->
doc-namingskill
Document Type Contract (MANDATORY)
When generating SYS document instances, the autopilot MUST:
- Read
instance_document_typefrom template:
- Source: ai_dev_ssd_flow/06_SYS/SYS-MVP-TEMPLATE.yaml - Field: metadata.instance_document_type: "sys-document"
- Set
document_typein generated document frontmatter:custom_fields: document_type: sys-document # NOT "template" artifact_type: SYS layer: 6 - Validation: Generated documents MUST have
document_type: sys-document
- Templates have document_type: template - Instances have document_type: sys-document - Schema validates both values
Error Handling: If instance_document_type is missing from template, default to sys-document.
Smart Document Detection
The autopilot automatically determines the action based on the input document type.
Input Type Recognition
| Input | Detected As | Action |
|---|---|---|
SYS-NN | Self type | Review existing SYS document |
ADR-NN | Upstream type | Generate if missing, review if exists |
Detection Algorithm
1. Parse input: Extract TYPE and NN from "{TYPE}-{NN}"
2. Determine action:
- IF TYPE == "SYS": Review Mode
- ELSE IF TYPE == "ADR": Generate/Find Mode
- ELSE: Error (invalid type for this autopilot)
3. For Generate/Find Mode:
- Check: Does SYS-{NN} exist in docs/06_SYS/?
- IF exists: Switch to Review Mode for SYS-{NN}
- ELSE: Proceed with Generation from ADR-{NN}File Existence Check
# Check for nested folder structure (mandatory)
ls docs/06_SYS/SYS-{NN}_*/Examples
# Review mode (same type - SYS input)
/doc-sys-autopilot SYS-01 # Reviews existing SYS-01
# Generate/Find mode (upstream type - ADR input)
/doc-sys-autopilot ADR-01 # Generates SYS-01 if missing, or reviews existing SYS-01
# Multiple inputs
/doc-sys-autopilot ADR-01,ADR-02 # Generates/reviews SYS-01 and SYS-02
/doc-sys-autopilot SYS-01,SYS-02 # Reviews SYS-01 and SYS-02Action Determination Output
Input: ADR-01
├── Detected Type: ADR (upstream)
├── Expected SYS: SYS-01
├── SYS Exists: Yes → docs/06_SYS/SYS-01_f1_iam/
└── Action: REVIEW MODE - Running doc-sys-reviewer on SYS-01
Input: ADR-05
├── Detected Type: ADR (upstream)
├── Expected SYS: SYS-05
├── SYS Exists: No
└── Action: GENERATE MODE - Creating SYS-05 from ADR-05
Input: SYS-03
├── Detected Type: SYS (self)
└── Action: REVIEW MODE - Running doc-sys-reviewer on SYS-03When to Use This Skill
Use doc-sys-autopilot when:
- ADR documents are complete with SYS-Ready score >= 90%
- Need to generate system requirements from architecture decisions
- Want automated functional requirement and quality attribute generation
- Ensuring consistent SYS quality across the project
- Automating SYS generation in CI/CD pipelines
Do NOT use when:
- Manually creating a single SYS with extensive customization (use
doc-sysdirectly) - ADR documents are incomplete or have SYS-Ready score < 90%
- Editing specific SYS sections (use
doc-sysfor guidance) - Validating existing SYS only (use
doc-sys-validator)
Workflow Overview
flowchart TD
subgraph Phase1["Phase 1: ADR Analysis"]
A[Start] --> B[Read ADR Documents]
B --> C[Extract Architecture Decisions]
C --> D[Identify System Constraints]
D --> E[Catalog Technical Requirements]
end
subgraph Phase2["Phase 2: SYS Readiness Check"]
E --> F[Check ADR SYS-Ready Scores]
F --> G{All ADRs >= 90%?}
G -->|No| H[Flag ADRs Below Threshold]
H --> I[Report Missing Elements]
I --> J[Abort or Continue with Warnings]
G -->|Yes| K[Mark ADRs Ready for SYS]
end
subgraph Phase3["Phase 3: SYS Generation"]
K --> L{Next ADR Topic}
L --> M[Load SYS Template]
M --> N[Generate Document Control]
N --> O[Generate Functional Requirements]
O --> P[Generate Quality Attributes]
P --> Q[Generate Interface Specifications]
Q --> R[quality-advisor: Real-time Feedback]
R --> S[Generate Remaining Sections]
S --> T[Add Cumulative Tags]
T --> U[Write SYS Files]
end
subgraph Phase4["Phase 4: SYS Validation"]
U --> V[Run doc-sys-validator]
V --> W{REQ-Ready >= 90%?}
W -->|No| X[Auto-Fix SYS Issues]
X --> Y[Re-validate SYS]
Y --> W
W -->|Yes| Z[Mark SYS Validated]
end
subgraph Phase5["Phase 5: Review & Fix Cycle"]
Z --> ZA[Run doc-sys-reviewer]
ZA --> ZB{Score >= 90?}
ZB -->|No| ZC[Run doc-sys-fixer]
ZC --> ZD{Iteration < Max?}
ZD -->|Yes| ZA
ZD -->|No| ZE[Flag Manual Review]
ZB -->|Yes| ZF[Verify Quality Checks]
ZE --> ZF
ZF --> AA{More ADR Topics?}
AA -->|Yes| L
AA -->|No| AB[Check All SYS Complete]
AB --> AC[Verify Cross-SYS Consistency]
AC --> AD[Update Traceability Matrix]
AD --> AE[Generate Summary Report]
end
AE --> AF[Complete]Detailed Workflow
Phase 1: ADR Analysis
Analyze ADR documents to extract architecture decisions and system constraints.
Input Sources:
| Priority | Source | Location | Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ADR Documents | docs/05_ADR/ADR-NN_{slug}.md | Architecture Decisions |
| 2 | ADR-00 Technology Stack | docs/05_ADR/ADR-00_technology_stack.md | Approved Technologies |
| 3 | BRD Section 7.2 | docs/01_BRD/BRD-NN_{slug}/ | Architecture Decision Requirements |
| 4 | PRD Section 18 | docs/02_PRD/PRD-NN_{slug}/ | Architecture Decision Requirements |
Analysis Process:
# Locate ADR documents
find docs/05_ADR/ -name "ADR-*.md" -type f | sort
# Check for SYS-Ready scores in ADRs
grep -E "SYS-Ready.*Score" docs/05_ADR/ADR-*.mdRequired ADR Content per Topic:
| ADR | Topic Category | Key Content for SYS |
|---|---|---|
| ADR-01 | Infrastructure | Compute, networking, scaling constraints |
| ADR-02 | Data Architecture | Storage, data flow, persistence requirements |
| ADR-03 | Integration | API patterns, messaging, protocol requirements |
| ADR-04 | Security | Authentication, authorization, encryption requirements |
| ADR-05 | Observability | Logging, monitoring, alerting requirements |
| ADR-06 | AI/ML | Model requirements, inference constraints |
| ADR-07 | Technology Selection | Framework, language, tool constraints |
Output: System requirements catalog with ADR-derived constraints and technical requirements.
Phase 2: SYS Readiness Check
Validate that all ADR documents meet the SYS-Ready threshold before proceeding.
Skill Delegation: Element ID validation follows rules indoc-namingskill. See:.claude/skills/doc-naming/SKILL.mdfor element type codes.
SYS-Ready Score Requirements:
| Criteria | Weight | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Decision Completeness | 30% | Context/Decision/Consequences/Alternatives documented |
| Architecture Clarity | 35% | Mermaid diagrams, component responsibilities |
| Implementation Readiness | 20% | Complexity assessment, dependencies, rollback strategies |
| Verification Approach | 15% | Testing strategy, success metrics, operational readiness |
Minimum Score: 90%
ADR to SYS Mapping:
| ADR Document | SYS Document | System Domain |
|---|---|---|
| ADR-01 | SYS-01 | Infrastructure System |
| ADR-02 | SYS-02 | Data Management System |
| ADR-03 | SYS-03 | Integration System |
| ADR-04 | SYS-04 | Security System |
| ADR-05 | SYS-05 | Observability System |
| ADR-06 | SYS-06 | AI/ML System |
| ADR-07 | SYS-07 | Technology Platform |
Readiness Check Process:
def check_adr_readiness(adr_list: list) -> dict:
"""
Check SYS-Ready scores for all ADR documents.
Returns:
dict with 'ready' (list of ADRs >= 90%)
and 'not_ready' (list of ADRs < 90% with issues)
"""
ready = []
not_ready = []
for adr in adr_list:
score = extract_sys_ready_score(adr)
if score >= 90:
ready.append(adr)
else:
not_ready.append({
'adr': adr,
'score': score,
'issues': identify_missing_elements(adr)
})
return {'ready': ready, 'not_ready': not_ready}Phase 3: SYS Generation
Generate SYS documents with functional requirements and quality attributes.
Skill Delegation: This phase follows rules defined indoc-sysskill. See:.claude/skills/doc-sys/SKILL.mdfor complete SYS creation guidance. Quality Guidance: Usesquality-advisorskill for real-time feedback during generation. See:.claude/skills/quality-advisor/SKILL.mdfor quality monitoring.
Generation Process:
- Reserve SYS ID:
# Check for next available ID ls docs/06_SYS/SYS-*.md 2>/dev/null | \ grep -oP 'SYS-\K\d+' | sort -n | tail -1 # Increment for new SYS - Load SYS Template:
- Primary:
ai_dev_ssd_flow/06_SYS/SYS-MVP-TEMPLATE.md - Rules:
ai_dev_ssd_flow/06_SYS/SYS-MVP-TEMPLATE.md
- Generate Document Control Section: Field Value Project Name From BRD Document Version 0.1.0 Date Created Current date (YYYY-MM-DD) Last Updated Current date (YYYY-MM-DD) Document Owner From ADR stakeholder analysis Prepared By AI Assistant Status Draft (or In Review if ADR Accepted) EARS-Ready Score From upstream EARS REQ-Ready Score Calculated after generation
- Generate Functional Requirements (Part 2 - Section 4): From ADR Decision and Implementation sections: Element ID Requirement Priority Source Verification SYS.01.0101 The system shall... Must Have ADR-01.Decision Integration Test SYS.01.0102 The system shall... Should Have ADR-01.Impl Unit Test Element Type Codes (per
doc-namingskill): Element Type Code Example Functional Requirement 01 SYS.02.0101 Quality Attribute 02 SYS.02.0201 Use Case 11 SYS.02.1101 System Requirement 26 SYS.02.2601 - Generate Quality Attributes (Part 2 - Section 5): From ADR Consequences and Implementation sections: Required Categories: Category Source Metrics Performance ADR latency/throughput targets p50/p95/p99, TPS Reliability ADR availability/recovery Uptime %, MTBF, MTTR Scalability ADR scaling decisions Concurrent users, data volume Security ADR-04 Security ADR Auth latency, encryption Observability ADR-05 Observability ADR Log retention, alert thresholds Maintainability ADR deployment decisions Deploy frequency, coverage Quality Attribute Format:
| ID | Category | Attribute | Target | Measurement | Source | |----|----------|-----------|--------|-------------|--------| | SYS.01.0201 | Performance | API Response Time | p95 < 100ms | APM Monitoring | @threshold: PRD.01.perf.api.p95_latency | | SYS.01.0202 | Reliability | Availability | 99.9% | Uptime Monitoring | @threshold: PRD.01.sla.uptime.target | - Generate Interface Specifications (Part 3 - Section 6): From ADR Integration decisions:
- External APIs (CTR-ready) - Internal interfaces - Data exchange protocols - Message formats
- Real-Time Quality Feedback (via
quality-advisorskill):
- Monitor section completion as content is generated - Detect anti-patterns (AP-001 to AP-017) during creation - Validate element ID format compliance (SYS.NN.xxxx) - Check for placeholder text ([TBD], TODO, XXX) - Verify Mermaid diagram presence (recommended for SYS) - Validate @threshold tag usage for quantitative values - Flag issues early to reduce post-generation rework
- Generate Remaining Sections:
- Section 7: Data Management Requirements - Section 8: Testing and Validation Requirements - Section 9: Deployment and Operations Requirements - Section 10: Compliance and Regulatory Requirements - Section 11: Acceptance Criteria - Section 12: Risk Assessment - Section 13: Traceability - Section 14: Implementation Notes
- Add Cumulative Tags (Section 13): Layer 6 Required Tags (5 tags):
## Traceability **Required Tags** (Cumulative Tagging Hierarchy - Layer 6): @brd: BRD.01.0103 @prd: PRD.01.0702, PRD.01.0715 @ears: EARS.01.2501, EARS.01.2502 @bdd: BDD.01.1401 @adr: ADR-01, ADR-04 - File Output (ALWAYS use nested folder): Nested Folder Rule: ALL SYS use nested folders (
SYS-NN_{slug}/) regardless of size. This keeps companion files (review reports, fix reports, drift cache) organized with their parent document.
- Monolithic (<20k tokens): docs/06_SYS/SYS-NN_{slug}/SYS-NN_{slug}.md - Sectioned (≥20k tokens): docs/06_SYS/SYS-NN_{slug}/SYS-NN.0_index.md, SYS-NN.1_core.md, etc. - Modular (v2.0): docs/06_SYS/SYS-NN_{slug}/SYS-NN.MM_{capability}.md - Master Index (always): docs/06_SYS/SYS-00_index.md (create or update)
Modular Splitting Pattern (v2.0)
Per-Capability Decomposition
For complex SYS documents, split into atomic files per functional capability:
docs/06_SYS/SYS-01_f1_iam/
├── SYS-01.00_index.md # Index with REQ-Ready score
├── SYS-01.01_authentication.md # Auth capabilities
├── SYS-01.02_authorization.md # Authz capabilities
├── SYS-01.03_session_management.md # Session handling
├── SYS-01.04_audit_logging.md # Audit requirements
└── SYS-01.05_mfa_integration.md # MFA requirementsModular File Structure
Each modular SYS file contains:
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| Header | YAML frontmatter with parent reference |
| Functional Requirements | Capability-specific FRs (SYS.NN.01.SS) |
| Quality Attributes | Capability-specific QAs (SYS.NN.02.SS) |
| Interface Specifications | APIs for this capability |
| External Dependencies | Capability-specific dependencies |
| Traceability | Capability-level tags |
Modular SYS Template
---
parent_doc: SYS-01
capability_id: SYS-01.01
capability_name: Authentication
version: 1.0.0
status: Draft
---
# SYS-01.01: Authentication
## Functional Requirements
| ID | Requirement | Priority | Source | Verification |
|----|-------------|----------|--------|--------------|
| SYS.01.0101 | The system SHALL authenticate users via JWT | Must Have | ADR-01 | Integration Test |
| SYS.01.0102 | The system SHALL validate tokens within @threshold:PRD.01.perf.auth.p95_latency | Must Have | ADR-01 | Performance Test |
## Quality Attributes
| ID | Category | Attribute | Target | Measurement |
|----|----------|-----------|--------|-------------|
| SYS.01.0201 | Performance | Auth latency | p95 < @threshold:PRD.01.perf.auth.p95_latency | APM |
| SYS.01.0202 | Reliability | Auth availability | @threshold:PRD.01.sla.auth.uptime | Uptime Monitor |
## External Dependencies
| Dependency | Type | Fallback Strategy | Timeout |
|------------|------|-------------------|---------|
| GCP Identity Platform | Infrastructure | Local JWT validation cache | @threshold:PRD.01.timeout.idp.max |
| Redis Session Store | Data | In-memory session cache | @threshold:PRD.01.timeout.redis.max |
## Traceability
@brd: BRD.01.0201
@prd: PRD.01.0701
@ears: EARS.01.2501
@bdd: BDD.01.1401
@adr: ADR-01External Dependencies Table (v2.0)
Required Format
All SYS documents MUST include an External Dependencies table with fallback strategy:
| Column | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Dependency | Yes | Service/system name |
| Type | Yes | infrastructure/data/integration/security/observability |
| Fallback Strategy | Yes | What happens when dependency fails |
| Timeout | Yes | @threshold reference for timeout value |
| Health Check | No | Health check endpoint/method |
| Circuit Breaker | No | Circuit breaker configuration |
Example External Dependencies Table
## External Dependencies
| Dependency | Type | Fallback Strategy | Timeout | Health Check |
|------------|------|-------------------|---------|--------------|
| GCP Identity Platform | infrastructure | JWT validation cache; fallback to local auth | @threshold:PRD.01.timeout.idp.max | /health/ready |
| Cloud SQL (PostgreSQL) | data | Read replica; local cache | @threshold:PRD.01.timeout.db.max | TCP check |
| Redis Cache | data | In-memory cache; proceed without | @threshold:PRD.01.timeout.cache.max | PING |
| Cloud Pub/Sub | integration | Retry with backoff; local queue | @threshold:PRD.01.timeout.pubsub.max | List topics |
| Cloud Secret Manager | security | Cached secrets; fail-safe defaults | @threshold:PRD.01.timeout.secrets.max | Access check |
| Cloud Monitoring | observability | Local metrics buffer; log to stdout | @threshold:PRD.01.timeout.monitoring.max | Write test |Fallback Strategy Guidelines
| Dependency Type | Recommended Fallback Patterns |
|---|---|
| Authentication Provider | JWT cache, local validation, graceful degradation |
| Database | Read replica, cache, retry with backoff |
| Cache | In-memory cache, proceed without cache |
| Message Queue | Local queue, retry with backoff, dead letter |
| Secrets Manager | Cached secrets, environment variables |
| Monitoring | Local buffer, stdout logging, fire-and-forget |
6-Category REQ-Ready Scoring (v2.0)
Scoring Breakdown
| Category | Weight | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Decomposition | 25% | System boundaries, FR categories, dependencies |
| Quality Attributes | 20% | All 6 QA categories with @threshold references |
| Interface Specifications | 20% | External APIs, internal interfaces, protocols |
| Data Management | 15% | Data schemas, storage requirements, migrations |
| Testing Requirements | 10% | Test categories, coverage targets, test data |
| Traceability | 10% | All 5 cumulative tags, ADR alignment |
Score Display Format
REQ-Ready Score: ✅ 94% (Target: ≥90%)
Category Breakdown:
├── Functional Decomposition: 24/25 ✅
├── Quality Attributes: 20/20 ✅
├── Interface Specifications: 18/20 🟡
├── Data Management: 14/15 ✅
├── Testing Requirements: 9/10 ✅
└── Traceability: 10/10 ✅
External Dependencies:
├── Dependencies Documented: ✅ 6/6
├── Fallback Strategies: ✅ 6/6
└── Threshold References: ✅ 12/12Visual Indicators
| Icon | Score Range | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ | >= 90% | Target met |
| 🟡 | 85-89% | Near threshold, review recommended |
| ❌ | < 85% | Below threshold, must improve |
Phase 4: SYS Validation
After SYS generation, validate structure and REQ-Ready score.
Skill Delegation: This phase uses validation rules fromdoc-sys-validatorskill. See:.claude/skills/doc-sys-validator/SKILL.mdfor complete validation rules.
Validation Command:
python ai_dev_ssd_flow/06_SYS/scripts/validate_sys.py docs/06_SYS/SYS-NN_{slug}/SYS-NN_{slug}.md --verboseValidation Checks (14 Total for v2.0):
| Check | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| CHECK 1 | Error | Required Document Control Fields (9 fields) |
| CHECK 2 | Error | ADR Compliance Validation |
| CHECK 3 | Error | REQ-Ready Score Validation (format, threshold) |
| CHECK 4 | Error | Quality Attribute Quantification |
| CHECK 5 | Warning | System Boundaries |
| CHECK 6 | Warning | Interface Specifications (CTR-ready) |
| CHECK 7 | Warning | Upstream Traceability |
| CHECK 8 | Error | Element ID Format Compliance (unified 3-segment) |
| SYS-E040 | Error | External Dependencies table present |
| SYS-E041 | Error | Fallback Strategy column in dependencies |
| SYS-E042 | Error | 6-Category REQ-Ready scoring breakdown |
| SYS-E043 | Warning | Modular file structure (if >25KB) |
| SYS-E044 | Error | @threshold references for all numeric values |
| SYS-E045 | Warning | Health Check endpoints documented |
REQ-Ready Scoring Criteria (100%):
| Category | Weight | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Requirements Decomposition Clarity | 35% | System boundaries, functional decomposition, dependencies, ADR alignment |
| Quality Attributes Quantification | 30% | Performance percentiles, reliability SLAs, security compliance, scalability metrics |
| Interface Specifications | 20% | External APIs (CTR-ready), internal interfaces, data exchange protocols |
| Implementation Readiness | 15% | Testing requirements, deployment/ops, monitoring/observability |
Minimum Score: 90%
Auto-Fix Actions:
| Issue | Auto-Fix Action |
|---|---|
| Invalid element ID format | Convert to SYS.NN.xxxx format |
| Missing traceability section | Insert from template |
| Missing Document Control fields | Add placeholder fields |
| Legacy patterns (FR-XXX, QA-XXX, SR-XXX) | Convert to unified format |
| Missing REQ-Ready Score | Calculate and insert |
| Missing @threshold tags | Add template references |
| Hardcoded numeric values | Replace with @threshold references |
Validation Loop:
LOOP (max 3 iterations):
1. Run doc-sys-validator
2. IF errors found: Apply auto-fixes
3. IF warnings found: Review and address if critical
4. IF REQ-Ready Score < 90%: Enhance sections
5. IF clean: Mark VALIDATED, proceed
6. IF max iterations: Log issues, flag for manual reviewPhase 5: Audit & Fix Cycle (v2.1)
Iterative review and fix cycle to ensure SYS quality before completion.
flowchart TD
A[Phase 5 Start] --> B[Run doc-sys-audit]
B --> C[Generate Combined Audit Report]
C --> D{Review Score >= 90?}
D -->|Yes| E[PASS - Proceed to Final Checks]
D -->|No| F{Iteration < Max?}
F -->|Yes| G[Run doc-sys-fixer]
G --> H[Apply Fixes]
H --> I[Generate Fix Report]
I --> J[Increment Iteration]
J --> B
F -->|No| K[Flag for Manual Review]
K --> L[Generate Final Report with Remaining Issues]
L --> E5.1 Initial Audit
Run doc-sys-audit to identify issues.
/doc-sys-audit SYS-NNOutput: SYS-NN.A_audit_report_v001.md (legacy-compatible reviewer report may still exist)
5.2 Fix Cycle
If review score < 90%, invoke doc-sys-fixer.
/doc-sys-fixer SYS-NN --revalidateFix Categories:
| Category | Fixes Applied |
|---|---|
| Missing Files | Create glossary, reference docs |
| Broken Links | Update paths, create targets |
| Element IDs | Convert legacy patterns (FR-XXX, QA-XXX, SR-XXX), fix invalid type codes |
| Content | Replace template placeholders, update dates |
| References | Update traceability tags, @threshold references |
| Dependencies | Add missing fallback strategies, timeout values |
Output: SYS-NN.F_fix_report_v001.md
5.3 Re-Audit
After fixes, automatically re-run audit.
/doc-sys-audit SYS-NNOutput: SYS-NN.A_audit_report_v002.md
5.4 Iteration Control
| Parameter | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
max_iterations | 3 | Maximum fix-review cycles |
target_score | 90 | Minimum passing score |
stop_on_manual | false | Stop if only manual issues remain |
Iteration Example:
Iteration 1:
Review v001: Score 86 (3 errors, 5 warnings)
Fix v001: Fixed 6 issues, updated 2 tables
Iteration 2:
Review v002: Score 93 (0 errors, 3 warnings)
Status: PASS (score >= 90)5.5 Quality Checks (Post-Fix)
After passing the fix cycle:
- All SYS Complete:
- All ADR-derived system domains addressed - Each SYS has REQ-Ready score >= 90% - No placeholder text remaining - All @threshold tags reference valid registry entries
- Cross-SYS Consistency:
- No conflicting requirements between SYS documents - Quality attribute targets align across systems - Interface specifications are compatible - Dependencies between SYS documented
- Traceability Matrix Update:
# Update SYS-00_TRACEABILITY_MATRIX.md
python ai_dev_ssd_flow/scripts/update_traceability_matrix.py --type SYS --matrix docs/06_SYS/SYS-00_TRACEABILITY_MATRIX.md
4. **REQ-Ready Report**:REQ-Ready Score Breakdown
Functional Decomposition: 24/25 (System boundaries clear) Quality Attributes: 20/20 (All 6 categories present) Interface Specifications: 19/20 (CTR-ready) Data Management: 14/15 (Schemas documented) Testing Requirements: 9/10 (Coverage targets) Traceability: 10/10 (All 5 tags present)
Total REQ-Ready Score: 96/100 (Target: >= 90) Status: READY FOR REQ GENERATION
5. **Summary Report Generation**:SYS Generation Summary
Total SYS Generated: 7
Status Distribution: Approved: 5 In Review: 2 Draft: 0
REQ-Ready Scores: SYS-01 (Infrastructure): 95% SYS-02 (Data Architecture): 92% SYS-03 (Integration): 94% SYS-04 (Security): 96% SYS-05 (Observability): 91% SYS-06 (AI/ML): 90% SYS-07 (Technology): 93%
Average REQ-Ready Score: 93%
Next Steps: 1. Review In Review SYS documents for stakeholder approval 2. Run doc-req-autopilot to decompose SYS into atomic REQ
---
## Execution Modes
### Single SYS Mode
Generate one SYS from a specific ADR.
Example: Generate SYS-01 from ADR-01
/doc-sys-autopilot ADR-01
Output:
Analyzing ADR-01 (Infrastructure)...
SYS-Ready Score: 94% (PASS)
Generating SYS-01_infrastructure.md...
REQ-Ready Score: 92%
Complete.
### Batch Mode (All ADRs)
Generate all SYS from ADR documents.
Example: Generate all SYS from ADR directory
/doc-sys-autopilot all
Output:
Scanning ADR directory...
Found 7 ADR documents:
ADR-01 (Infrastructure) - SYS-Ready: 94%
ADR-02 (Data Architecture) - SYS-Ready: 92%
ADR-03 (Integration) - SYS-Ready: 91%
ADR-04 (Security) - SYS-Ready: 95%
ADR-05 (Observability) - SYS-Ready: 90%
ADR-06 (AI/ML) - SYS-Ready: 91%
ADR-07 (Technology) - SYS-Ready: 93%
#
Generating SYS documents...
[================> ] 5/7 Complete
### Dry Run Mode
Preview SYS generation plan without creating files.
/doc-sys-autopilot all --dry-run
Output:
SYS Generation Plan (Dry Run)
============================
Source: ADR documents
#
Planned SYS:
1. SYS-01 (Infrastructure) - Full generation
2. SYS-02 (Data Architecture) - Full generation
3. SYS-03 (Integration) - Full generation
4. SYS-04 (Security) - Full generation
5. SYS-05 (Observability) - Full generation
6. SYS-06 (AI/ML) - Full generation
7. SYS-07 (Technology) - Full generation
#
No files will be created in dry-run mode.
### Review Mode (v2.1)
Validate existing SYS documents and generate a quality report without modification.
**Purpose**: Audit existing SYS documents for compliance, quality scores, and identify issues.
**Command**:
Review single SYS document
/doc-sys-audit SYS-01
Review all SYS documents (run per document in docs/06_SYS/)
/doc-sys-audit SYS-NN
**Review Process**:
flowchart TD A[Input: Existing SYS] --> B[Load SYS Documents] B --> C[Run Validation Checks] C --> D[Calculate REQ-Ready Score] D --> E[Check 6-Category Breakdown] E --> F[Validate External Dependencies] F --> G[Identify Issues] G --> H{Generate Report} H --> I[Fixable Issues List] H --> J[Manual Review Items] H --> K[Score Breakdown] I --> L[Output: Review Report] J --> L K --> L
**Review Report Structure**:
SYS Review Report: SYS-01_f1_iam
Summary
- REQ-Ready Score: 87% 🟡
- Total Issues: 14
- Auto-Fixable: 10
- Manual Review: 4
6-Category Score Breakdown
| Category | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Decomposition | 23/25 | 🟡 |
| Quality Attributes | 18/20 | 🟡 |
| Interface Specifications | 18/20 | 🟡 |
| Data Management | 14/15 | ✅ |
| Testing Requirements | 8/10 | 🟡 |
| Traceability | 10/10 | ✅ |
External Dependencies Check
| Check | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Dependencies Table Present | ✅ | 6 dependencies documented |
| Fallback Strategies | ❌ | 2 dependencies missing fallback |
| Timeout Thresholds | 🟡 | 4 hardcoded values found |
| Health Check Endpoints | ❌ | 3 dependencies missing health check |
v2.0 Compliance
| Check | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Modular Structure | ✅ | Per-capability split (5 files) |
| 6-Category Scoring | 🟡 | Missing testing requirements detail |
| @threshold References | ❌ | 8 hardcoded numeric values |
| Fallback Strategy Column | ❌ | Missing in 2 dependencies |
| Visual Score Indicators | ✅ | Present in index |
Auto-Fixable Issues
| # | Issue | Location | Fix Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hardcoded timeout value | SYS-01.01:L45 | Replace with @threshold:PRD.01.timeout.auth |
| 2 | Missing fallback strategy | SYS-01.03:L78 | Add fallback column |
| 3 | Legacy element ID | SYS-01.02:L23 | Convert FR-001 to SYS.01.0101 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
Manual Review Required
| # | Issue | Location | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Incomplete quality attribute | SYS-01.02:L102 | Domain knowledge needed |
| 2 | Missing interface specification | SYS-01.03 | API design decision required |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
Recommendations
- Run fix mode to address 10 auto-fixable issues
- Review 4 items requiring manual attention
- Add missing external dependency fallback strategies
**Review Configuration**:
review_mode: enabled: true checks: - structure_validation # Document control, sections - element_id_compliance # SYS.NN.xxxx format - threshold_references # @threshold format and validity - external_dependencies # Table, fallback, timeouts - quality_attributes # 6 categories present - cumulative_tags # 5 upstream tags - score_calculation # REQ-Ready score - modular_structure # If >25KB output: format: markdown # markdown, json, html include_line_numbers: true include_fix_suggestions: true thresholds: pass: 90 warning: 85 fail: 0
### Fix Mode (v2.1)
Auto-repair existing SYS documents while preserving manual content.
**Purpose**: Apply automated fixes to SYS documents to improve quality scores and compliance.
**Command**:
Fix single SYS document
/doc-sys-fixer SYS-01
Fix with revalidation
/doc-sys-fixer SYS-01 --revalidate
Fix specific issue types only
/doc-sys-fixer SYS-01 --fix-types "element_ids,references,content"
Dry-run fix (preview changes)
/doc-sys-fixer SYS-01 --dry-run
**Fix Process**:
flowchart TD A[Input: Existing SYS] --> B[Run Review Mode] B --> C[Identify Fixable Issues] C --> D{Backup Enabled?} D -->|Yes| E[Create Backup] D -->|No| F[Skip Backup] E --> G[Apply Fixes by Category] F --> G
subgraph FixCategories["Fix Categories"] G --> H[Element ID Fixes] G --> I[Threshold Fixes] G --> J[Dependencies Fixes] G --> K[Structure Fixes] G --> L[Traceability Fixes] end
H --> M[Preserve Manual Content] I --> M J --> M K --> M L --> M
M --> N[Re-validate] N --> O{Score Improved?} O -->|Yes| P[Generate Fix Report] O -->|No| Q[Log Warnings] Q --> P P --> R[Output: Fixed SYS + Report]
**Fix Categories and Actions**:
| Category | Issue | Auto-Fix Action | Preserves Content |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **Element IDs** | Legacy FR-XXX format | Convert to SYS.NN.01.SS | ✅ |
| **Element IDs** | Legacy QA-XXX format | Convert to SYS.NN.02.SS | ✅ |
| **Element IDs** | Invalid segment count | Restructure to 3-segment | ✅ |
| **Thresholds** | Hardcoded numeric values | Replace with @threshold:PRD.NN.xxx | ✅ |
| **Thresholds** | Invalid threshold format | Convert to @threshold:PRD.NN.category.field | ✅ |
| **Dependencies** | Missing fallback column | Add Fallback Strategy column | ✅ |
| **Dependencies** | Missing timeout @threshold | Add @threshold reference | ✅ |
| **Dependencies** | Missing health check | Add placeholder health check | ✅ |
| **Structure** | Missing REQ-Ready score | Calculate and insert | ✅ |
| **Structure** | Missing 6-category breakdown | Add breakdown table | ✅ |
| **Structure** | Missing traceability section | Insert from template | ✅ |
| **Traceability** | Missing cumulative tags | Add with placeholder references | ✅ |
| **Traceability** | Incomplete @adr reference | Link to source ADR | ✅ |
**Content Preservation Rules**:
1. **Never delete** existing functional requirements
2. **Never modify** quality attribute targets
3. **Never change** interface specification content
4. **Only add** missing columns and metadata
5. **Only replace** hardcoded values with threshold references
6. **Backup first** if `--backup` flag is set
**Fix Report Structure**:
SYS Fix Report: SYS-01_f1_iam
Summary
- Before REQ-Ready Score: 87% 🟡
- After REQ-Ready Score: 94% ✅
- Issues Fixed: 10
- Issues Remaining: 4 (manual review required)
Fixes Applied
| # | Issue | Location | Fix Applied |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Legacy element ID | SYS-01.01:L23 | Converted FR-001 → SYS.01.0101 |
| 2 | Hardcoded timeout | SYS-01.02:L45 | Replaced with @threshold:PRD.01.timeout.auth |
| 3 | Missing fallback | SYS-01.03:L78 | Added "JWT cache; local validation" |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
Files Modified
- docs/06_SYS/SYS-01_f1_iam/SYS-01.00_index.md
- docs/06_SYS/SYS-01_f1_iam/SYS-01.01_authentication.md
- docs/06_SYS/SYS-01_f1_iam/SYS-01.02_authorization.md
- docs/06_SYS/SYS-01_f1_iam/SYS-01.03_session_management.md
Backup Location
- tmp/backup/SYS-01_f1_iam_20260209_143022/
Remaining Issues (Manual Review)
| # | Issue | Location | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Incomplete QA target | SYS-01.02:L102 | Domain expertise needed |
| 2 | Missing interface spec | SYS-01.03 | API design decision |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
6-Category Score Impact
| Category | Before | After | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Decomposition | 23/25 | 25/25 | +2 |
| Quality Attributes | 18/20 | 19/20 | +1 |
| Interface Specifications | 18/20 | 19/20 | +1 |
| Data Management | 14/15 | 14/15 | 0 |
| Testing Requirements | 8/10 | 9/10 | +1 |
| Traceability | 10/10 | 10/10 | 0 |
Next Steps
- Review manually flagged items
- Re-run validation to confirm score
- Commit changes if satisfied
**Fix Configuration**:
fix_mode: enabled: true backup: enabled: true location: "tmp/backup/" retention_days: 7
fix_categories: element_ids: true # Legacy ID conversion thresholds: true # @threshold references dependencies: true # External dependencies table structure: true # Document sections traceability: true # Cumulative tags
preservation: functional_requirements: true # Never modify FR content quality_attributes: true # Never modify QA targets interface_specs: true # Never modify interface content comments: true # Preserve user comments
validation: re_validate_after_fix: true require_score_improvement: false max_fix_iterations: 3
element_id_migration: FR_XXX_to_SYS_NN_xxxx: true # FR-001 → SYS.01.0101 QA_XXX_to_SYS_NN_02_SS: true # QA-001 → SYS.01.0201 SR_XXX_to_SYS_NN_26_SS: true # SR-001 → SYS.01.2601
**Command Line Options (Review/Fix)**:
| Option | Mode | Default | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `--mode review` | Review | - | Run review mode only |
| `--mode fix` | Fix | - | Run fix mode |
| `--output-report` | Both | auto | Report output path |
| `--backup` | Fix | true | Create backup before fixing |
| `--fix-types` | Fix | all | Comma-separated fix categories |
| `--dry-run` | Fix | false | Preview fixes without applying |
| `--preserve-all` | Fix | false | Extra cautious preservation |
| `--min-score-gain` | Fix | 0 | Minimum score improvement required |
---
## Output Artifacts
### Generated Files
**All SYS use nested folders** (`SYS-NN_{slug}/`) regardless of size. Document sectioning (monolithic vs sectioned) depends only on document size (>20k tokens = sectioned).
| File | Purpose | Location |
| --- | --- | --- |
| SYS-NN_{slug}/ | SYS folder (ALWAYS created) | `docs/06_SYS/` |
| SYS-NN_{slug}.md | Main SYS document (monolithic <20k tokens) | `docs/06_SYS/SYS-NN_{slug}/` |
| SYS-NN.0_index.md | Section index (sectioned ≥20k tokens) | `docs/06_SYS/SYS-NN_{slug}/` |
| SYS-NN.S_{section}.md | Section files (sectioned ≥20k tokens) | `docs/06_SYS/SYS-NN_{slug}/` |
| SYS-NN.A_audit_report_v{VVV}.md | Combined audit report (preferred) | `docs/06_SYS/SYS-NN_{slug}/` |
| SYS-NN.R_review_report_v{VVV}.md | Review report | `docs/06_SYS/SYS-NN_{slug}/` |
| SYS-NN.F_fix_report_v{VVV}.md | Fix report | `docs/06_SYS/SYS-NN_{slug}/` |
| .drift_cache.json | Drift detection cache | `docs/06_SYS/SYS-NN_{slug}/` |
### Validation Reports
| Report | Purpose | Location |
| --- | --- | --- |
| sys_validation_report.json | Validation results | `tmp/` |
| req_ready_scores.json | REQ-Ready breakdown | `tmp/` |
| sys_autopilot_log.md | Execution log | `tmp/` |
---
## Error Handling
### Error Categories
| Category | Handling | Example |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ADR SYS-Ready < 90% | Abort with message | ADR-01 score at 85% |
| ADR Not Found | Skip or abort | ADR-08 does not exist |
| Validation Failure | Auto-fix, retry | Missing required section |
| REQ-Ready Below 90% | Enhance sections, retry | Score at 88% |
| Max Retries Exceeded | Flag for manual review | Persistent validation errors |
### Recovery Actions
def handle_error(error_type: str, context: dict) -> Action: match error_type: case "ADR_SYS_READY_LOW": return Action.ABORT_WITH_MESSAGE case "ADR_NOT_FOUND": return Action.SKIP_OR_ABORT case "VALIDATION_FAILURE": if context["retry_count"] < 3: return Action.AUTO_FIX_RETRY return Action.FLAG_MANUAL_REVIEW case "REQ_READY_LOW": return Action.ENHANCE_SECTIONS case _: return Action.FLAG_MANUAL_REVIEW
---
## Configuration
### Default Configuration
config/sys_autopilot.yaml
sys_autopilot: version: "2.0"
scoring: sys_ready_min: 90 # ADR threshold req_ready_min: 90 # SYS output threshold strict_mode: false # NEW: Visual score indicators score_display: pass_icon: "✅" # >= 90% warning_icon: "🟡" # 85-89% fail_icon: "❌" # < 85% # NEW: 6-category scoring weights scoring_weights: functional_decomposition: 25 quality_attributes: 20 interface_specifications: 20 data_management: 15 testing_requirements: 10 traceability: 10
execution: max_parallel: 3 # HARD LIMIT - do not exceed chunk_size: 3 # Documents per chunk pause_between_chunks: true auto_fix: true continue_on_error: false timeout_per_adr: 180 # seconds
output: structure: auto # auto, monolithic, sectioned, modular size_threshold_kb: 25 report_format: markdown # NEW: Modular splitting options modular_splitting: enabled: true strategy: per_capability # per_capability, per_section max_file_size_kb: 50
validation: skip_validation: false fix_iterations_max: 3 require_threshold_tags: true # NEW: Enhanced validation checks require_external_dependencies: true require_fallback_strategy: true require_6_category_coverage: true
quality_attributes: require_performance: true require_reliability: true require_security: true require_scalability: false require_observability: true require_maintainability: false
# NEW: External Dependencies Configuration external_dependencies: require_table: true require_fallback: true categories: - infrastructure # GCP, AWS, Azure - data # Databases, caches - integration # APIs, message queues - security # Identity providers - observability # Monitoring, logging
### Command Line Options
| Option | Default | Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `--min-sys-ready` | 90 | Minimum ADR SYS-Ready score |
| `--min-req-ready` | 90 | Minimum SYS REQ-Ready score |
| `--no-auto-fix` | false | Disable auto-fix (manual only) |
| `--continue-on-error` | false | Continue if one ADR fails |
| `--dry-run` | false | Preview execution plan only |
| `--output-format` | auto | Force monolithic or sectioned output |
| `--skip-validation` | false | Skip validation phase |
---
## Context Management
### Chunked Parallel Execution (MANDATORY)
**CRITICAL**: To prevent conversation context overflow errors ("Prompt is too long", "Conversation too long"), all autopilot operations MUST follow chunked execution rules:
**Chunk Size Limit**: Maximum 3 documents per chunk
**Chunking Rules**:
1. **Chunk Formation**: Group ADR-derived SYS documents into chunks of maximum 3 at a time
2. **Sequential Chunk Processing**: Process one chunk at a time, completing all documents in a chunk before starting the next
3. **Context Pause**: After completing each chunk, provide a summary and pause for user acknowledgment
4. **Progress Tracking**: Display chunk progress (e.g., "Chunk 2/3: Processing SYS-04, SYS-05, SYS-06...")
**Why Chunking is Required**:
- Prevents "Conversation too long" errors during batch processing
- Allows context compaction between chunks
- Enables recovery from failures without losing all progress
- Provides natural checkpoints for user review
**Execution Pattern**:
For SYS batch of 7 ADR-derived documents: Chunk 1: SYS-01, SYS-02, SYS-03 → Complete → Summary [Context compaction opportunity] Chunk 2: SYS-04, SYS-05, SYS-06 → Complete → Summary [Context compaction opportunity] Chunk 3: SYS-07 → Complete → Summary
**Chunk Completion Template**:
Chunk N/M Complete
Generated:
- SYS-XX (Infrastructure): REQ-Ready Score 94%
- SYS-YY (Data Architecture): REQ-Ready Score 92%
- SYS-ZZ (Integration): REQ-Ready Score 95%
Proceeding to next chunk...
---
## Integration Points
### Pre-Execution Hooks
Hook: pre_sys_generation
Runs before SYS generation starts
./hooks/pre_sys_generation.sh
Example: Verify ADR SYS-Ready scores
for adr in docs/05_ADR/ADR-*.md; do score=$(grep -oP 'SYS-Ready.*\K\d+' "$adr") if [ "$score" -lt 90 ]; then echo "ERROR: $adr SYS-Ready score below 90%" exit 1 fi done
### Post-Execution Hooks
Hook: post_sys_generation
Runs after SYS generation completes
./hooks/post_sys_generation.sh
Example: Trigger REQ autopilot for validated SYS
if [ "$ALL_SYS_VALIDATED" = "true" ]; then /doc-req-autopilot all fi
### CI/CD Integration
.github/workflows/sys_autopilot.yml
name: SYS Autopilot
on: push: paths: - 'docs/05_ADR/**/ADR-*.md'
jobs: generate-sys: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Run SYS Autopilot run: | /doc-sys-autopilot all
- name: Upload Validation Report uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: sys-validation path: tmp/sys_validation_report.json
---
## Quality Gates
### Phase Gates
| Phase | Gate | Criteria |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Phase 1 | ADR Gate | ADR documents exist with architecture decisions |
| Phase 2 | Readiness Gate | All ADRs have SYS-Ready score >= 90% |
| Phase 3 | Generation Gate | All 5 parts generated per system |
| Phase 4 | Validation Gate | REQ-Ready Score >= 90% |
| Phase 5 | Review Gate | No blocking issues remaining |
### Blocking vs Non-Blocking
| Issue Type | Blocking | Action |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Missing Functional Requirements | Yes | Must fix before proceeding |
| Missing Quality Attributes | Yes | Must fix before proceeding |
| REQ-Ready Score < 90% | Yes | Must enhance sections |
| Invalid element ID format | Yes | Must convert to unified format |
| Missing @threshold tags | Yes | Must add registry references |
| Hardcoded numeric values | Yes | Must replace with @threshold |
| Missing optional section | No | Log warning, continue |
| Style/formatting issues | No | Auto-fix, continue |
---
## Related Resources
- **SYS Creation Skill**: `.claude/skills/doc-sys/SKILL.md`
- **SYS Validator Skill**: `.claude/skills/doc-sys-validator/SKILL.md`
- **Quality Advisor Skill**: `.claude/skills/quality-advisor/SKILL.md`
- **Naming Standards Skill**: `.claude/skills/doc-naming/SKILL.md`
- **SYS Audit Skill**: `.claude/skills/doc-sys-audit/SKILL.md`
- **SYS Template**: `ai_dev_ssd_flow/06_SYS/SYS-MVP-TEMPLATE.md`
- **SYS Creation Rules**: `ai_dev_ssd_flow/06_SYS/SYS-MVP-TEMPLATE.md`
- **SYS Validation Rules**: `ai_dev_ssd_flow/06_SYS/SYS_MVP_SCHEMA.yaml`
- **ADR Autopilot Skill**: `.claude/skills/doc-adr-autopilot/SKILL.md`
---
## Quick Reference
| Input | Output | Key Metric |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ADR Documents | SYS-01 to SYS-07 | REQ-Ready >= 90% |
**Usage**:
/doc-sys-autopilot <ADR-ID|all> [OPTIONS]
**Common Commands**:
Generate all SYS from ADRs
/doc-sys-autopilot all
Generate single SYS from specific ADR
/doc-sys-autopilot ADR-01
Preview only
/doc-sys-autopilot all --dry-run
Resume after failure
/doc-sys-autopilot resume
**ADR to SYS Mapping**:
| ADR | SYS | System Domain |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ADR-01 | SYS-01 | Infrastructure |
| ADR-02 | SYS-02 | Data Architecture |
| ADR-03 | SYS-03 | Integration |
| ADR-04 | SYS-04 | Security |
| ADR-05 | SYS-05 | Observability |
| ADR-06 | SYS-06 | AI/ML |
| ADR-07 | SYS-07 | Technology Selection |
**Element ID Codes (SYS.NN.xxxx)**:
| Type | Code | Example |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Functional Requirement | 01 | SYS.02.0101 |
| Quality Attribute | 02 | SYS.02.0201 |
| Use Case | 11 | SYS.02.1101 |
| System Requirement | 26 | SYS.02.2601 |
**Cumulative Tags Required** (Layer 6 - 5 tags):
@brd: BRD.NN.xxxx @prd: PRD.NN.xxxx @ears: EARS.NN.xxxx @bdd: BDD.NN.xxxx @adr: ADR-NN
---
## Review Document Standards (v2.2)
**IMPORTANT**: Review reports generated by this autopilot are formal project documents.
See: `.claude/skills/REVIEW_DOCUMENT_STANDARDS.md` for complete standards.
### Quick Reference
| Requirement | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Storage Location | Same folder as reviewed SYS |
| File Name | `SYS-NN.A_audit_report_vNNN.md` (preferred), `SYS-NN.R_review_report_vNNN.md` (legacy) |
| YAML Frontmatter | MANDATORY - see shared standards |
| Parent Reference | MANDATORY - link to SYS document |
**Example Location**:
docs/06_SYS/ ├── SYS-03_f3_observability/ │ ├── SYS-03_f3_observability.md │ ├── SYS-03.A_audit_report_v001.md # ← Preferred report stored here │ └── SYS-03.R_review_report_v001.md # ← Legacy-compatible reviewer report
---
## Version History
| Version | Date | Changes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2.5 | 2026-02-27 | Migrated frontmatter to `metadata`; normalized SYS MVP references to `ai_dev_ssd_flow`; replaced non-existent direct script examples with skill invocation flow; aligned report contracts to prefer `SYS-NN.A_audit_report_vNNN.md` with legacy reviewer compatibility |
| 2.4 | 2026-02-11 | **Smart Document Detection**: Added automatic document type recognition; Self-type input (SYS-NN) triggers review mode; Upstream-type input (ADR-NN) triggers generate-if-missing or find-and-review; Updated input patterns table with type-based actions |
| 2.3 | 2026-02-10 | **Review & Fix Cycle**: Replaced Phase 5 with iterative Review -> Fix cycle using `doc-sys-reviewer` and `doc-sys-fixer`; Added `doc-sys-fixer` skill dependency; Phase 5 now includes flowchart, iteration control, and quality checks sections (5.1-5.5) |
| 2.2 | 2026-02-10 | Added Review Document Standards: review reports stored alongside reviewed documents with YAML frontmatter and parent references |
| 2.1 | 2026-02-09 | Added Review Mode for validating existing SYS documents without modification; Added Fix Mode for auto-repairing SYS documents while preserving manual content; Added fix categories (element_ids, thresholds, dependencies, structure, traceability); Added content preservation rules; Added backup functionality for fix operations; Added review/fix report generation with 6-category score impact; Added element ID migration support (FR_XXX, QA_XXX, SR_XXX to unified format) |
| 2.0 | 2026-02-09 | Added modular splitting pattern with per-capability decomposition; Added External Dependencies table with fallback strategy requirement; Added 6-category REQ-Ready scoring with weighted breakdown; Added visual score indicators (✅/🟡/❌); Added validation rules SYS-E040 to SYS-E045 for new features; Added modular SYS template for atomic files; Added fallback strategy guidelines by dependency type |
| 1.0 | 2026-02-08 | Initial skill creation with 5-phase workflow; Integrated doc-naming, doc-sys, doc-sys-validator, quality-advisor skills; Added ADR to SYS mapping; Functional requirements and quality attributes generation; REQ-Ready scoring |