Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

design-documentation设计文档

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

2,424

周安装

70

GitHub Stars

636

下载量

792
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:design-documentation(设计文档)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jasonkneen/kiro
仓库路径:skills/design-documentation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jasonkneen/kiro --skill design-documentation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jasonkneen/kiro --skill design-documentation

简介

用于创建系统级技术蓝图,衔接需求与实现之间的设计决策。

  • 适合记录架构选择、组件交互及复杂集成场景下的设计逻辑。
  • 提供标准模板和结构化框架,确保文档覆盖关键维度和评审要点。
  • 需基于已批准的需求阶段开展工作,避免在未对齐目标时推进细节设计。
  • design-documentation 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Design Documentation

Create technical blueprints that bridge requirements and implementation. This skill teaches how to document architecture decisions, component design, and system interactions.

When to Use This Skill

Use design documentation when:

  • Requirements phase is complete and approved
  • You need to plan technical implementation
  • Multiple developers will work on the feature
  • Architecture decisions need documentation
  • The feature involves complex integrations

Design Document Structure

Standard Template

# Design Document: [Feature Name]

## Overview
[High-level summary of the feature and approach]

## Architecture
[System architecture and component overview]

## Components and Interfaces
[Detailed component descriptions and interactions]

## Data Models
[Data structures and relationships]

## Error Handling
[Error scenarios and response strategies]

## Testing Strategy
[Testing approach and quality assurance]

Step-by-Step Process

Step 1: Requirements Analysis

Before designing, ensure you understand:

  • All functional requirements
  • Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability)
  • Constraints (technology stack, timeline, resources)
  • Integration points with existing systems

Analysis Questions:

  • What does the system need to do?
  • What are the performance expectations?
  • What existing code/systems does this touch?
  • What are the security requirements?
  • What could go wrong?

Step 2: Research and Context Building

Identify areas needing research:

  • Technology choices and alternatives
  • Third-party integrations and APIs
  • Best practices for similar systems
  • Security and compliance considerations

Research Documentation:

## Research Findings

### [Topic]
**Sources:** [Links/references]
**Key Insights:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
**Impact on Design:** [How this affects our approach]

Step 3: Define System Architecture

Document the high-level structure:

## Architecture

### System Overview
[How the overall system works]

### Component Architecture
[Major components and their responsibilities]

### Data Flow
[How information moves through the system]

### Technology Decisions
[Key technology choices and rationale]

Architecture Diagram (Mermaid):

graph TD
    A[Client] --> B[API Gateway]
    B --> C[Auth Service]
    B --> D[Feature Service]
    D --> E[Database]
    D --> F[Cache]

Step 4: Design Components and Interfaces

For each major component:

## Components and Interfaces

### [Component Name]
**Purpose:** [What this component does]

**Responsibilities:**
- [Responsibility 1]
- [Responsibility 2]

**Interfaces:**
- Input: [What it receives]
- Output: [What it produces]
- Dependencies: [What it requires]

**API Definition:**

interface ComponentName { method(input: InputType): Promise<OutputType>; }

Step 5: Define Data Models

Document all data structures:

## Data Models

### [Entity Name]
**Purpose:** [What this entity represents]

**Properties:**
| Field | Type | Required | Description |
|-------|------|----------|-------------|
| id | string | Yes | Unique identifier |
| name | string | Yes | Display name |
| createdAt | Date | Yes | Creation timestamp |

**Validation Rules:**
- [Rule 1]
- [Rule 2]

**Relationships:**
- [Relationship to other entities]

**Example:**

{ "id": "abc123", "name": "Example", "createdAt": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z" }

Step 6: Plan Error Handling

Document error scenarios:

## Error Handling

### Error Categories
1. **Validation Errors:** Invalid user input
2. **Authentication Errors:** Unauthorized access
3. **External Service Errors:** Third-party failures
4. **System Errors:** Internal failures

### Error Response Strategy

| Error Type | HTTP Code | User Message | System Action |
|------------|-----------|--------------|---------------|
| Validation | 400 | Specific field error | Log, return details |
| Auth | 401 | "Please log in" | Redirect to login |
| Not Found | 404 | "Resource not found" | Log, return error |
| Server | 500 | "Something went wrong" | Log, alert, retry |

### Recovery Mechanisms
- [Retry strategies]
- [Fallback behaviors]
- [Circuit breaker patterns]

Step 7: Define Testing Strategy

## Testing Strategy

### Unit Testing
- **Coverage Target:** 80%+
- **Focus Areas:** [Critical business logic]
- **Mocking Strategy:** [What to mock]

### Integration Testing
- **Scope:** [Component interactions to test]
- **Environment:** [Test environment setup]
- **Data Strategy:** [Test data approach]

### End-to-End Testing
- **Critical Paths:** [User journeys to test]
- **Tools:** [Testing tools]

### Performance Testing
- **Load Targets:** [Expected load]
- **Benchmarks:** [Performance requirements]

Decision Documentation

Document key decisions using this template:

### Decision: [Brief Title]

**Context:** [Situation requiring a decision]

**Options Considered:**

**Option 1: [Name]**
- Pros: [Benefits]
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
- Effort: [Low/Medium/High]

**Option 2: [Name]**
- Pros: [Benefits]
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
- Effort: [Low/Medium/High]

**Decision:** [Chosen option]

**Rationale:** [Why this option was selected]

**Implications:** [What this means for implementation]

Common Design Decisions

API Design

### Decision: API Architecture

**Options:**
1. **REST API** - Standard HTTP methods, well-understood
2. **GraphQL** - Flexible queries, single endpoint
3. **RPC-style** - Direct operation mapping

**Decision:** REST API
**Rationale:** Standard CRUD operations, team familiarity, good tooling support

Data Storage

### Decision: Database Choice

**Options:**
1. **PostgreSQL** - ACID compliance, complex queries
2. **MongoDB** - Schema flexibility, horizontal scaling
3. **Redis** - High performance, limited queries

**Decision:** PostgreSQL with JSON columns
**Rationale:** Data consistency needs + flexibility for user preferences

Authentication

### Decision: Authentication Strategy

**Options:**
1. **Session-based** - Server-controlled, simple
2. **JWT tokens** - Stateless, scalable
3. **OAuth 2.0** - External provider, no password management

**Decision:** JWT with refresh token rotation
**Rationale:** Scalability requirements, API-first architecture

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing design:

Completeness:

  • All requirements addressed in design
  • Major system components defined
  • Data models cover all entities
  • Error handling covers expected failures
  • Testing strategy addresses all layers

Clarity:

  • Design decisions clearly explained
  • Component responsibilities well-defined
  • Interfaces between components specified
  • Technical choices include rationale

Feasibility:

  • Design is technically achievable
  • Performance requirements can be met
  • Security requirements addressed
  • Implementation complexity reasonable

Traceability:

  • Design elements map to requirements
  • All requirements covered by design
  • Testing validates requirement fulfillment

Common Pitfalls

  1. Over-Engineering: Design for current requirements, not hypothetical futures
  2. Under-Specified Interfaces: Define clear component boundaries
  3. Ignoring Non-Functional Requirements: Address performance, security, scalability
  4. Technology-First Design: Let requirements drive technology choices
  5. Insufficient Error Handling: Plan for failures, not just happy paths

Example: User Profile Design

# Design Document: User Profile Management

## Overview
Enable users to view and edit their profile information, including personal details, preferences, and profile picture.

## Architecture

### Component Architecture

┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │ Client │────▶│ Profile API │────▶│ Database │ └─────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └─────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌──────────────┐ │ Image Store │ └──────────────┘

### Technology Stack
- API: Node.js with Express
- Database: PostgreSQL
- Image Storage: S3-compatible object storage
- Cache: Redis for session data

## Components

### ProfileService
**Purpose:** Manage user profile CRUD operations

**Interface:**

interface ProfileService { getProfile(userId: string): Promise<UserProfile>; updateProfile(userId: string, data: ProfileUpdate): Promise<UserProfile>; uploadAvatar(userId: string, image: File): Promise<string>; deleteAvatar(userId: string): Promise<void>; }


## Data Models

### UserProfile

| Field | Type | Required | Validation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| id | UUID | Yes | Auto-generated |
| email | string | Yes | Valid email format |
| displayName | string | Yes | 2-50 characters |
| bio | string | No | Max 500 characters |
| avatarUrl | string | No | Valid URL |
| preferences | JSON | No | Valid JSON object |
| updatedAt | timestamp | Yes | Auto-updated |

## Error Handling

| Scenario | Response | Action |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Profile not found | 404 | Return error message |
| Invalid update data | 400 | Return validation errors |
| Image too large | 413 | Return size limit error |
| Unauthorized | 401 | Redirect to login |

## Testing Strategy

- Unit tests for validation logic
- Integration tests for API endpoints
- E2E test for profile edit flow

Next Steps

After completing design:

  1. Get design review and approval
  2. Move to Task Planning phase
  3. Break design into implementation tasks
  4. Begin systematic implementation

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

30.4%
按下载量换算241

OpenCode

23.31%
按下载量换算185

Codex

17.2%
按下载量换算136

Gemini CLI

12.89%
按下载量换算102

windsurf

8.12%
按下载量换算64

Antigravity

3.31%
按下载量换算26

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills