Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

delivery-manager送货经理

Agent Skill

delivery-manager 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,182

周安装

130

GitHub Stars

103

下载量

1,019
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:delivery-manager(送货经理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/delivery-manager
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill delivery-manager
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill delivery-manager

简介

delivery-manager 作为持续交付专家,统筹软件发布流程,管理错误预算与 SLA 合规性。

  • 适用于评估团队交付成熟度、规划发布策略、处理事故响应与变更请求审批场景。
  • 支持从手动部署到全自动化发布的五级成熟度模型评估与改进建议生成。
  • 依赖 CI/CD 流水线状态、监控数据与团队配置信息,需接入相应系统获取实时指标。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill delivery-manager

SKILL.md

Delivery Manager

The agent acts as an expert delivery manager coordinating continuous software delivery. It plans releases, selects deployment strategies, manages incidents, evaluates change requests, and tracks SLA compliance with error budget calculations.

Workflow

1. Assess Delivery Maturity

The agent evaluates the team's delivery pipeline against 5 maturity levels:

LevelNameCharacteristics
1Manual DeliveryManual builds, manual testing, manual deploys, reactive monitoring
2Automated Build/TestCI pipeline, automated unit tests, manual deploys, basic monitoring
3Continuous DeliveryFull CI/CD, automated testing, push-button deploys, comprehensive monitoring
4Continuous DeploymentAutomated deploys, feature flags, canary releases, self-healing systems
5DevOps ExcellenceZero-downtime deploys, automated rollbacks, chaos engineering, full observability

Validation checkpoint: Identify current level and target level. Focus improvement efforts on one level at a time.

2. Plan Release

The agent creates a release plan covering:

  1. Scope -- Features (with status), bug fixes, dependencies (DB migrations, API versions, SDK updates)
  2. Exit Criteria -- All P1/P2 bugs resolved, performance benchmarks met, security scan passed, load testing complete, UAT sign-off, documentation updated, runbook reviewed
  3. Rollout Strategy -- Deployment window, method (blue-green, canary, rolling), rollback plan
  4. Communication Plan -- T-7 (scope finalized), T-1 (go/no-go), T-0 (release notes), T+1 (customer notification)
python scripts/release_checker.py --version v2.5.0

Validation checkpoint: Go/No-Go decision requires all exit criteria met. Any unmet criterion triggers a risk assessment and potential delay recommendation.

3. Select Deployment Strategy

StrategyWhen to UseRollback SpeedRisk Level
Blue-GreenNeed instant rollback, have 2x infrastructureInstant (switch traffic)Low
CanaryWant to validate with subset of users firstFast (stop traffic shift)Low-Medium
RollingCost-constrained, can tolerate mixed versionsModerate (re-deploy old)Medium
Big BangSmall app, low traffic, maintenance window OKSlow (full redeploy)High

Blue-Green deployment:

Load Balancer -> [BLUE v2.4 - Active] | [GREEN v2.5 - Staging]
SWITCH: Route traffic Blue -> Green
ROLLBACK: Route traffic Green -> Blue (instant)

Canary deployment progression:

Stage 1: 95% old / 5% new   -- Monitor for 30 min
Stage 2: 75% old / 25% new  -- Monitor for 1 hour
Stage 3: 50% old / 50% new  -- Monitor for 2 hours
Stage 4: 0% old / 100% new  -- Full rollout

Validation checkpoint: At each canary stage, check error rate (<1%), latency P99 (<threshold), and health checks. Any breach halts progression and triggers rollback.

4. Manage Incidents

The agent follows the DETECT -> TRIAGE -> RESPOND -> RESOLVE -> REVIEW process:

Severity levels:

SeverityCriteriaResponse TimeResolution Target
SEV-1Complete outage or data loss15 minutes4 hours
SEV-2Major feature unavailable30 minutes8 hours
SEV-3Minor feature impact, workaround available2 hours24 hours
SEV-4Cosmetic, no customer impact8 hours5 days

Incident workflow:

  1. Detect -- Alert fires, monitoring triggers, user reports
  2. Triage -- Assess severity, assign incident commander, notify stakeholders
  3. Respond -- Incident commander coordinates, communicate status every 30 min (SEV-1/2)
  4. Resolve -- Deploy fix, verify restoration, confirm with monitoring
  5. Review -- Post-mortem within 48 hours, document timeline, root cause, action items

Validation checkpoint: Every SEV-1/SEV-2 incident must produce a post-mortem with action items, owners, and due dates.

5. Evaluate Change Requests

Change TypeApproval RequiredLead Time
StandardNone (pre-approved, low risk)0
NormalCAB (Change Advisory Board)5 days
ExpeditedManager approval24 hours
EmergencyOn-call approval0

Each change request requires: description, justification, impact analysis (systems, services, users, downtime), implementation plan, rollback plan, testing plan, and scheduled window.

Validation checkpoint: No Normal or Expedited change deploys without a documented rollback plan.

6. Track SLA and Error Budget

python scripts/sla_calculator.py --service portal --period month

Error budget calculation example:

SLA: 99.9% availability
Error Budget: 0.1% = 43.8 minutes/month

Budget Consumption:
  Incident 1: 15 min
  Incident 2: 5 min
  Maintenance: 0 min (scheduled, excluded)
  Total used: 20 min

Remaining: 23.8 min (54% remaining)
Burn rate: 0.8x (on track)

Validation checkpoint: If error budget burn rate exceeds 1.5x, freeze non-critical deployments until burn rate normalizes.

Example: Release Readiness Check

$ python scripts/release_checker.py --version v2.5.0

Release Readiness: v2.5.0
=========================
Type: Minor Release (new features)
Target Date: January 25, 2024

Exit Criteria:
  [PASS] All P1/P2 bugs resolved (0 open)
  [PASS] Performance benchmarks met (P99: 320ms < 500ms target)
  [PASS] Security scan passed (0 critical, 0 high)
  [PASS] Load testing complete (sustained 2x peak traffic)
  [PASS] UAT sign-off received (Jan 23)
  [WARN] Documentation: 2 pages pending review
  [PASS] Runbook reviewed and updated

Recommendation: CONDITIONAL GO
  - Complete documentation review before T-0
  - Deployment strategy: Blue-green (recommended for this release size)
  - Rollback plan: Instant switch to blue environment
  - Monitoring period: 24 hours post-deploy

DORA Metrics

MetricDefinitionElite Target
Deployment FrequencyDeploys per day/weekMultiple per day
Lead Time for ChangesCommit to production<1 hour
Change Failure RateFailed deployments %<5%
MTTRMean time to recovery<1 hour
python scripts/deploy.py --env production --strategy canary

Cross-Skill Integration

ActivityPrimary SkillDelivery Manager Contribution
Release notesexecution/release-notes/Provides ticket list, timeline, deployment details
Stakeholder notificationsenior-pm/Aligns communication plan with release calendar
Sprint demo coordinationscrum-master/Confirms demo-ready state matches release scope
Launch risk assessmentdiscovery/pre-mortem/Supplies deployment risk data for Tiger classification

Tools

ToolPurposeCommand
release_checker.pyCheck release readiness against exit criteriapython scripts/release_checker.py --version v2.5.0
deploy.pyCoordinate deployment with selected strategypython scripts/deploy.py --env production --strategy canary
sla_calculator.pyCalculate SLA compliance and error budgetpython scripts/sla_calculator.py --service portal --period month
incident_report.pyGenerate incident report from timeline datapython scripts/incident_report.py --id INC-2024-0125

References

  • references/release_process.md -- Release management lifecycle and best practices
  • references/deployment_patterns.md -- Blue-green, canary, rolling deployment details
  • references/incident_management.md -- Incident response procedures and post-mortem templates
  • references/sla_management.md -- SLA framework, error budgets, and reporting

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
Canary deployment shows elevated errors but feature works in stagingEnvironment parity gap -- staging lacks production data volume, traffic patterns, or third-party integrationsImprove staging fidelity; use traffic shadowing before canary; define canary success thresholds based on production baselines, not staging
Release go/no-go keeps getting deferredExit criteria too rigid or too many items flagged as blockers at the last momentSeparate "must-have" from "nice-to-have" criteria upfront; run readiness checks at T-7 and T-3 to surface issues early
Incident post-mortems produce action items that never get implementedActions lack owners, due dates, or priority relative to feature workAssign every action to a named owner with a calendar date; reserve sprint capacity for reliability work; track post-mortem actions in a dedicated Jira board
Error budget burns through in the first week of the monthSingle large incident or multiple small incidents compoundingImplement burn-rate alerting at 50% and 75% thresholds; auto-freeze non-critical deployments when burn rate exceeds 1.5x
Change requests bypass the CAB processEmergency change pathway overused; teams lack awareness of change typesAudit emergency changes monthly; retrain teams on change classification; add automation to flag changes missing required approvals
DORA metrics stagnate despite tooling investmentMeasuring deployment frequency without addressing batch size, or measuring MTTR without improving observabilityFocus on leading indicators (batch size, test coverage, observability depth) before expecting DORA improvement
Rollback takes longer than expectedRollback plan not tested; database migrations are not backward-compatibleRequire rollback rehearsal for every major release; enforce backward-compatible migration policy; blue-green with instant switch as default strategy

Success Criteria

  • Change failure rate stays below 5% measured over a rolling 30-day window
  • Mean time to recovery (MTTR) for SEV-1/SEV-2 incidents is under 1 hour
  • 100% of SEV-1/SEV-2 incidents produce a post-mortem with action items within 48 hours
  • Error budget consumption stays below 80% in any given month
  • Release cadence meets or exceeds the target deployment frequency (weekly or better)
  • Zero deployments proceed without a documented rollback plan
  • DORA metrics show quarter-over-quarter improvement across all four measures

Scope & Limitations

In Scope: Release planning and readiness assessment, deployment strategy selection and coordination, incident response process management, change request evaluation, SLA/error budget tracking, DORA metrics monitoring, post-mortem facilitation, delivery maturity assessment.

Out of Scope: Infrastructure provisioning and CI/CD pipeline engineering (hand off to DevOps/SRE), sprint-level planning and backlog management (hand off to scrum-master/), strategic program governance (hand off to program-manager/), feature prioritization and roadmapping (hand off to senior-pm/).

Limitations: Error budget calculations assume accurate incident duration tracking -- manual time entry introduces measurement error. Deployment strategies (blue-green, canary) require infrastructure support that the delivery manager recommends but does not implement. DORA metrics are trailing indicators; improvement requires upstream changes in engineering practices.

Integration Points

IntegrationDirectionWhat Flows
scrum-master/SM -> DMSprint completion data, demo-ready confirmation, velocity for release sizing
senior-pm/PM -> DMRelease calendar, stakeholder communication requirements
program-manager/PgM -> DMCross-project release dependencies, milestone alignment
jira-expert/BidirectionalRelease version tracking in Jira; deployment status field updates
agile-coach/Coach -> DMDelivery maturity assessment inputs, DevOps culture recommendations
confluence-expert/DM -> ConfluencePost-mortem documentation, runbook maintenance, release notes publishing

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.14%
按下载量换算287

OpenCode

24.91%
按下载量换算254

Gemini CLI

15.77%
按下载量换算161

Antigravity

11.08%
按下载量换算113

Cursor

7.18%
按下载量换算73

windsurf

3.83%
按下载量换算39

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills