Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

definition-of-done完成的定义

Agent Skill

definition-of-done 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

396

周安装

16

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

124
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:definition-of-done(完成的定义)
来源仓库:https://github.com/validkeys/sherpy
仓库路径:skills/definition-of-done
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/validkeys/sherpy --skill definition-of-done
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/validkeys/sherpy --skill definition-of-done

简介

用于增强milestones.yaml中的验收标准,弥合计划与完成之间的认知鸿沟。

  • 基于需求自动生成exit_checklist,确保每个里程碑有明确退出条件。
  • 要求输入来自implementation-planner的基准文件,添加可选字段扩展。
  • 适用于敏捷交付与质量门禁设置,提升交付确定性。
  • definition-of-done 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Definition of Done

Enhances existing milestones.yaml with detailed acceptance criteria for each milestone. Bridges the gap between "the plan says we're building X" and "we know for certain that X is done." Adds optional acceptance_criteria and exit_checklist fields to each milestone, derived directly from requirements — not generic checklists.

Prerequisites

  • {base_directory}/implementation/milestones.yaml (output from /implementation-planner)

- Must contain milestone definitions with id, name, description, success_criteria - Skill will add optional acceptance_criteria and exit_checklist fields

  • {base_directory}/requirements/business-requirements.yaml (output from /business-requirements-interview)
  • Optional: {base_directory}/requirements/technical-requirements.yaml for NFR-derived gates

Usage

/definition-of-done [base-directory]

If no directory is provided, auto-detect by looking for implementation/milestones.yaml in the current directory.

If not found, prompt the user: "Where are your planning artifacts located?"

Wait for the user to provide a path before proceeding. Store as base_directory.

Process

Step 1: Determine Base Directory and Load Artifacts

If no directory parameter was provided, check if implementation/milestones.yaml exists in the current directory.

  • If found, use current directory as base_directory
  • If not found, prompt: "Where are your planning artifacts located?" and wait for user response

Once base_directory is determined:

Read {base_directory}/implementation/milestones.yaml and extract each milestone's id, name, description, and any deliverables or tasks references.

Read {base_directory}/requirements/business-requirements.yaml and map each functional requirement to the milestone(s) most likely to deliver it. Use the milestone name and description to make this determination — do not guess at task-level details.

If {base_directory}/requirements/technical-requirements.yaml exists, read it to extract non-functional requirements (performance targets, security requirements, test coverage thresholds).

Step 2: Derive Acceptance Criteria per Milestone

For each milestone, generate criteria in five categories:

1. Functional Criteria Specific, observable behaviors that must be true when the milestone is done. Derive these from the business requirements mapped to this milestone. Each criterion must be:

  • Verifiable without ambiguity ("users can log in with email and password" ✓ vs "login works" ✗)
  • Tied to a requirement ID where possible
  • Written as "Given/When/Then" or declarative present tense

2. Non-Functional Criteria Performance, security, reliability, or accessibility requirements that apply to this milestone's output. Pull from technical-requirements.yaml NFRs if present. Only include NFRs that are *testable at this milestone's scope* — do not apply system-wide SLAs to early foundational milestones.

3. Testing Requirements What test coverage must exist before this milestone is considered done:

  • Unit test coverage for new modules/functions introduced
  • Integration tests for any new service boundaries crossed
  • E2E scenarios for any user-facing flows delivered
  • Regression: confirm no existing tests are broken

4. Documentation Requirements What documentation artifacts are expected from this milestone:

  • Inline code comments for complex logic
  • API documentation for any new endpoints
  • README updates if setup/usage changes
  • Architecture diagram updates if structure changes

5. Exit Checklist A short, concrete checklist used at code review / milestone sign-off. This is the quick reference — summarize the above into yes/no checks.

Step 3: Identify Cross-Milestone Gates

If any requirement spans multiple milestones (e.g., "end-to-end encryption" requires work in m1, m3, and m5), note it as a cross-milestone gate: the full requirement is only verifiable at the *last* milestone that contributes to it. Add a cross_milestone_note to each intermediate milestone.

Step 4: Update milestones.yaml with Acceptance Criteria

Read the existing {base_directory}/implementation/milestones.yaml file completely.

For each milestone in the milestones array, add two optional fields:

  1. acceptance_criteria object with five categories:
acceptance_criteria:
  functional:
    - criterion: "[verifiable statement]"
      requirement_ref: "BR-FUNC-001"
  non_functional:
    - criterion: "[measurable threshold]"
      requirement_ref: "NFR-PERF-002"
  testing:
    unit: "[coverage expectation]"
    integration: "[test expectations or N/A]"
    e2e: "[E2E expectations or N/A]"
    regression: "All existing tests pass"
  documentation:
    - "[specific artifact]"
  cross_milestone_notes:
    - "[spanning requirement note]"  # if applicable
  1. exit_checklist array with 3-10 binary checks:
exit_checklist:
  - "[ ] [Functional check with requirement ref]"
  - "[ ] All tests pass (≥X% coverage)"
  - "[ ] [Documentation check]"
  - "[ ] PR approved by at least one reviewer"

Important: Preserve all existing fields in milestones.yaml:

  • version, project, generated, business_requirements, technical_requirements
  • meta section with ordering_strategy and ordering_rationale
  • All existing milestone fields: id, name, description, dependencies, estimated_duration, tasks_file, success_criteria
  • Optional project_metadata if present

Write the enhanced milestones.yaml back to {base_directory}/implementation/milestones.yaml.

Backup Strategy: Before overwriting, create backup at {base_directory}/implementation/milestones.yaml.backup with timestamp.

Step 5: Gap Analysis

Report inline after updating milestones.yaml:

## Definition of Done Enhancement Complete

**Project:** [name]
**Milestones Enhanced:** [n]/[n]
**Functional Requirements Mapped:** [n]/[n]

**Acceptance Criteria Added:**
- Functional: [n] criteria across [n] milestones
- Non-Functional: [n] NFR criteria
- Testing: [n] milestones with test requirements
- Documentation: [n] milestones with doc requirements

**Criteria Quality:**
[✓ / ✗] All functional criteria are verifiable (no vague language)
[✓ / ✗] NFR criteria tied to specific thresholds (not just "must be fast")
[✓ / ✗] Every milestone has at least one testing requirement
[✓ / ✗] Cross-milestone requirements identified

**Unmapped Requirements:** [none / list requirements not tied to any milestone]

**Updated File:** implementation/milestones.yaml
**Backup Created:** implementation/milestones.yaml.backup.[timestamp]

**Recommendations:** [none / list]

Output Format

Enhanced milestones.yaml Structure

This skill adds two optional fields to each milestone in the existing milestones.yaml:

Before enhancement:

milestones:
  - id: m1
    name: "User Authentication"
    description: |
      Build authentication system...
    dependencies: [m0]
    estimated_duration: "5-6 hours"
    tasks_file: milestone-m1.tasks.yaml
    success_criteria:
      - "Users can sign up and log in"
      - "Password security meets requirements"

After enhancement:

milestones:
  - id: m1
    name: "User Authentication"
    description: |
      Build authentication system...
    dependencies: [m0]
    estimated_duration: "5-6 hours"
    tasks_file: milestone-m1.tasks.yaml
    success_criteria:
      - "Users can sign up and log in"
      - "Password security meets requirements"

    # NEW: Detailed acceptance criteria added by /definition-of-done
    acceptance_criteria:
      functional:
        - criterion: "Users can create account with email and password"
          requirement_ref: BR-FUNC-001
        - criterion: "Users can log in and receive JWT token valid for 24h"
          requirement_ref: BR-FUNC-002
      non_functional:
        - criterion: "Passwords hashed using bcrypt with cost factor ≥12"
          requirement_ref: NFR-SEC-001
        - criterion: "/auth/login responds within 300ms for 95% of requests"
          requirement_ref: NFR-PERF-001
      testing:
        unit: "≥85% coverage for auth service and JWT utilities"
        integration: "Test auth service ↔ user database interaction"
        e2e: "Happy path: signup → login → protected access → logout"
        regression: "All existing tests pass"
      documentation:
        - "API documentation for /auth/signup, /auth/login, /auth/logout"
        - "Authentication flow diagram"
      cross_milestone_notes:
        - "Role-based access control foundation in m1, full RBAC at m2"

    # NEW: Exit checklist added by /definition-of-done
    exit_checklist:
      - "[ ] Users can sign up and log in (BR-FUNC-001, BR-FUNC-002)"
      - "[ ] Password security meets requirements (bcrypt ≥12, NFR-SEC-001)"
      - "[ ] All unit tests pass with ≥85% coverage"
      - "[ ] Integration tests cover auth ↔ database"
      - "[ ] E2E test covers full signup → login flow"
      - "[ ] API documentation complete"
      - "[ ] PR approved by at least one reviewer"

Preserved Fields

The skill preserves all existing milestones.yaml content:

  • Root metadata: version, project, generated, business_requirements, technical_requirements
  • meta section: ordering_strategy, ordering_rationale
  • All milestone fields: id, name, description, dependencies, estimated_duration, tasks_file, success_criteria
  • Optional sections: overview, project_metadata, risks_and_mitigation

Backup File

A timestamped backup is created before modification:

  • Location: {base_directory}/implementation/milestones.yaml.backup.YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS
  • Contains: Complete original milestones.yaml before enhancement

Example

See /docs/specifications/milestones/example.yaml for milestone m1 with complete acceptance_criteria and exit_checklist.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.3%
按下载量换算41

Claude

30.49%
按下载量换算38

Cursor

17.19%
按下载量换算21

Gemini CLI

9.1%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills