Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

deepevaldeepeval 搜索

Agent Skill

deepeval 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,847

周安装

74

GitHub Stars

125

下载量

598
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:deepeval(deepeval 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sammcj/agentic-coding
仓库路径:skills/deepeval
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sammcj/agentic-coding --skill deepeval
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sammcj/agentic-coding --skill deepeval

简介

deepeval 是基于 pytest 的 LLM 应用测试框架,提供 50+ 种评估指标覆盖 RAG 与对话系统。

  • 适用于需要测试 LLM 应用性能、安全合规性与自定义标准的开发验证场景。
  • 支持多提供商集成与组件级追踪,通过 @observe 装饰器实现细粒度行为监控。
  • 使用前需配置 pytest 环境与目标 LLM 提供商凭证,注意 Python 3.9+ 版本要求。
  • deepeval 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

DeepEval

Overview

DeepEval is a pytest-based framework for testing LLM applications. It provides 50+ evaluation metrics covering RAG pipelines, conversational AI, agents, safety, and custom criteria. DeepEval integrates into development workflows through pytest, supports multiple LLM providers, and includes component-level tracing with the @observe decorator.

Repository: https://github.com/confident-ai/deepeval Documentation: https://deepeval.com

Installation

pip install -U deepeval

Requires Python 3.9+.

Quick Start

Basic pytest test

import pytest
from deepeval import assert_test
from deepeval.test_case import LLMTestCase
from deepeval.metrics import AnswerRelevancyMetric

def test_chatbot():
    metric = AnswerRelevancyMetric(threshold=0.7, model="athropic-claude-sonnet-4-5")
    test_case = LLMTestCase(
        input="What if these shoes don't fit?",
        actual_output="You have 30 days for full refund"
    )
    assert_test(test_case, [metric])

Run with: deepeval test run test_chatbot.py

Environment setup

DeepEval automatically loads .env.local then .env:

# .env
OPENAI_API_KEY="sk-..."

Core Workflows

RAG Evaluation

Evaluate both retrieval and generation phases:

from deepeval.metrics import (
    ContextualPrecisionMetric,
    ContextualRecallMetric,
    ContextualRelevancyMetric,
    AnswerRelevancyMetric,
    FaithfulnessMetric
)

# Retrieval metrics
contextual_precision = ContextualPrecisionMetric(threshold=0.7)
contextual_recall = ContextualRecallMetric(threshold=0.7)
contextual_relevancy = ContextualRelevancyMetric(threshold=0.7)

# Generation metrics
answer_relevancy = AnswerRelevancyMetric(threshold=0.7)
faithfulness = FaithfulnessMetric(threshold=0.8)

test_case = LLMTestCase(
    input="What are the side effects of aspirin?",
    actual_output="Common side effects include stomach upset and nausea.",
    expected_output="Aspirin side effects include gastrointestinal issues.",
    retrieval_context=[
        "Aspirin common side effects: stomach upset, nausea, vomiting.",
        "Serious aspirin side effects: gastrointestinal bleeding.",
    ]
)

evaluate(test_cases=[test_case], metrics=[
    contextual_precision, contextual_recall, contextual_relevancy,
    answer_relevancy, faithfulness
])

Component-level tracing:

from deepeval.tracing import observe, update_current_span

@observe(metrics=[contextual_relevancy])
def retriever(query: str):
    chunks = your_vector_db.search(query)
    update_current_span(
        test_case=LLMTestCase(input=query, retrieval_context=chunks)
    )
    return chunks

@observe(metrics=[answer_relevancy, faithfulness])
def generator(query: str, chunks: list):
    response = your_llm.generate(query, chunks)
    update_current_span(
        test_case=LLMTestCase(
            input=query,
            actual_output=response,
            retrieval_context=chunks
        )
    )
    return response

@observe
def rag_pipeline(query: str):
    chunks = retriever(query)
    return generator(query, chunks)

Conversational AI Evaluation

Test multi-turn dialogues:

from deepeval.test_case import Turn, ConversationalTestCase
from deepeval.metrics import (
    RoleAdherenceMetric,
    KnowledgeRetentionMetric,
    ConversationCompletenessMetric,
    TurnRelevancyMetric
)

convo_test_case = ConversationalTestCase(
    chatbot_role="professional, empathetic medical assistant",
    turns=[
        Turn(role="user", content="I have a persistent cough"),
        Turn(role="assistant", content="How long have you had this cough?"),
        Turn(role="user", content="About a week now"),
        Turn(role="assistant", content="A week-long cough should be evaluated.")
    ]
)

metrics = [
    RoleAdherenceMetric(threshold=0.7),
    KnowledgeRetentionMetric(threshold=0.7),
    ConversationCompletenessMetric(threshold=0.6),
    TurnRelevancyMetric(threshold=0.7)
]

evaluate(test_cases=[convo_test_case], metrics=metrics)

Agent Evaluation

Test tool usage and task completion:

from deepeval.test_case import ToolCall
from deepeval.metrics import (
    TaskCompletionMetric,
    ToolUseMetric,
    ArgumentCorrectnessMetric
)

agent_test_case = ConversationalTestCase(
    turns=[
        Turn(role="user", content="When did Trump first raise tariffs?"),
        Turn(
            role="assistant",
            content="Let me search for that information.",
            tools_called=[
                ToolCall(
                    name="WebSearch",
                    arguments={"query": "Trump first raised tariffs year"}
                )
            ]
        ),
        Turn(role="assistant", content="Trump first raised tariffs in 2018.")
    ]
)

evaluate(
    test_cases=[agent_test_case],
    metrics=[
        TaskCompletionMetric(threshold=0.7),
        ToolUseMetric(threshold=0.7),
        ArgumentCorrectnessMetric(threshold=0.7)
    ]
)

Safety Evaluation

Check for harmful content:

from deepeval.metrics import (
    ToxicityMetric,
    BiasMetric,
    PIILeakageMetric,
    HallucinationMetric
)

def safety_gate(output: str, input: str) -> tuple[bool, list]:
    """Returns (passed, reasons) tuple"""
    test_case = LLMTestCase(input=input, actual_output=output)

    safety_metrics = [
        ToxicityMetric(threshold=0.5),
        BiasMetric(threshold=0.5),
        PIILeakageMetric(threshold=0.5)
    ]

    failures = []
    for metric in safety_metrics:
        metric.measure(test_case)
        if not metric.is_successful():
            failures.append(f"{metric.name}: {metric.reason}")

    return len(failures) == 0, failures

Metric Selection Guide

RAG Metrics

Retrieval Phase:

  • ContextualPrecisionMetric - Relevant chunks ranked higher than irrelevant ones
  • ContextualRecallMetric - All necessary information retrieved
  • ContextualRelevancyMetric - Retrieved chunks relevant to input

Generation Phase:

  • AnswerRelevancyMetric - Output addresses the input query
  • FaithfulnessMetric - Output grounded in retrieval context

Conversational Metrics

  • TurnRelevancyMetric - Each turn relevant to conversation
  • KnowledgeRetentionMetric - Information retained across turns
  • ConversationCompletenessMetric - All aspects addressed
  • RoleAdherenceMetric - Chatbot maintains assigned role
  • TopicAdherenceMetric - Conversation stays on topic

Agent Metrics

  • TaskCompletionMetric - Task successfully completed
  • ToolUseMetric - Correct tools selected
  • ArgumentCorrectnessMetric - Tool arguments correct
  • MCPUseMetric - MCP correctly used

Safety Metrics

  • ToxicityMetric - Harmful content detection
  • BiasMetric - Biased outputs identification
  • HallucinationMetric - Fabricated information
  • PIILeakageMetric - Personal information leakage

Custom Metrics

G-Eval (LLM-based):

from deepeval.metrics import GEval
from deepeval.test_case import LLMTestCaseParams

custom_metric = GEval(
    name="Professional Tone",
    criteria="Determine if response maintains professional, empathetic tone",
    evaluation_params=[LLMTestCaseParams.ACTUAL_OUTPUT],
    threshold=0.7,
    model="anthropic-claude-sonnet-4-5"
)

BaseMetric subclass:

See references/custom_metrics.md for complete guide on creating custom metrics with BaseMetric subclassing and deterministic scorers (ROUGE, BLEU, BERTScore).

Configuration

LLM Provider Setup

DeepEval supports OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, AWS Bedrock, and 100+ providers via LiteLLM. Anthropic models are preferred.

CLI configuration (global):

deepeval set-azure-openai --openai-endpoint=... --openai-api-key=... --deployment-name=...
deepeval set-ollama deepseek-r1:1.5b

Python configuration (per-metric):

from deepeval.models import AnthropicModel, OllamaModel

anthropic_model = AnthropicModel(
    model_id=settings.anthropic_model_id,
    client_args={"api_key": settings.anthropic_api_key},
    temperature=settings.agent_temperature
)

metric = AnswerRelevancyMetric(model=anthropic_model)

See references/model_providers.md for complete provider configuration guide.

Performance Optimisation

Async mode is enabled by default. Configure with AsyncConfig and CacheConfig:

from deepeval import evaluate, AsyncConfig, CacheConfig

evaluate(
    test_cases=[...],
    metrics=[...],
    async_config=AsyncConfig(
        run_async=True,
        max_concurrent=20,    # Reduce if rate limited
        throttle_value=0      # Delay between test cases (seconds)
    ),
    cache_config=CacheConfig(
        use_cache=True,       # Read from cache
        write_cache=True      # Write to cache
    )
)

CLI parallelisation:

deepeval test run -n 4 -c -i  # 4 processes, cached, ignore errors

Best practices:

  • Limit to 5 metrics maximum (2-3 generic + 1-2 custom)
  • Use the latest available Anthropic Claude Sonnet or Haiku models
  • Reduce max_concurrent to 5 if hitting rate limits
  • Use evaluate() function over individual measure() calls

See references/async_performance.md for detailed performance optimisation guide.

Dataset Management

Loading datasets

from deepeval.dataset import EvaluationDataset, Golden

dataset = EvaluationDataset()

# From CSV
dataset.add_goldens_from_csv_file(
    file_path="./test_data.csv",
    input_col_name="question",
    expected_output_col_name="answer",
    context_col_name="context",
    context_col_delimiter="|"
)

# From JSON
dataset.add_goldens_from_json_file(
    file_path="./test_data.json",
    input_key_name="query",
    expected_output_key_name="response"
)

Synthetic generation

from deepeval.synthesizer import Synthesizer

synthesizer = Synthesizer()

# From documents
goldens = synthesizer.generate_goldens_from_docs(
    document_paths=["./docs/knowledge_base.pdf"],
    max_goldens_per_document=10,
    evolution_types=["REASONING", "MULTICONTEXT", "COMPARATIVE"]
)

# From scratch
goldens = synthesizer.generate_goldens_from_scratch(
    subject="customer support for SaaS product",
    task="answer user questions about billing",
    max_goldens=20
)

Evolution types: REASONING, MULTICONTEXT, CONCRETISING, CONSTRAINED, COMPARATIVE, HYPOTHETICAL, IN_BREADTH

See references/dataset_management.md for complete dataset guide including versioning and cloud integration.

Test Case Types

Single-turn (LLMTestCase)

from deepeval.test_case import LLMTestCase

test_case = LLMTestCase(
    input="What if these shoes don't fit?",
    actual_output="You have 30 days for full refund",
    expected_output="We offer 30-day full refund",
    retrieval_context=["All customers eligible for 30 day refund"],
    tools_called=[ToolCall(name="...", arguments={"...": "..."})]
)

Multi-turn (ConversationalTestCase)

from deepeval.test_case import Turn, ConversationalTestCase

convo_test_case = ConversationalTestCase(
    chatbot_role="helpful customer service agent",
    turns=[
        Turn(role="user", content="I need help with my order"),
        Turn(role="assistant", content="I'd be happy to help"),
        Turn(role="user", content="It hasn't arrived yet")
    ]
)

Multimodal (MLLMTestCase)

from deepeval.test_case import MLLMTestCase, MLLMImage

m_test_case = MLLMTestCase(
    input=["Describe this image", MLLMImage(url="./photo.png", local=True)],
    actual_output=["A red bicycle leaning against a wall"]
)

CI/CD Integration

# .github/workflows/test.yml
name: LLM Tests
on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  evaluate:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - name: Install dependencies
        run: pip install deepeval
      - name: Run evaluations
        env:
          OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }}
        run: deepeval test run tests/

References

Detailed implementation guides:

  • references/model_providers.md - Complete guide for configuring OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock, and local models. Includes provider-specific considerations, cost analysis, and troubleshooting.
  • references/custom_metrics.md - Complete guide for creating custom metrics by subclassing BaseMetric. Includes deterministic scorers (ROUGE, BLEU, BERTScore) and LLM-based evaluation patterns.
  • references/async_performance.md - Complete guide for optimising evaluation performance with async mode, caching, concurrency tuning, and rate limit handling.
  • references/dataset_management.md - Complete guide for dataset loading, saving, synthetic generation, versioning, and cloud integration with Confident AI.

Best Practices

Metric Selection

  • Match metrics to use case (RAG systems need retrieval + generation metrics)
  • Start with 2-3 essential metrics, expand as needed
  • Use appropriate thresholds (0.7-0.8 for production, 0.5-0.6 for development)
  • Combine complementary metrics (answer relevancy + faithfulness)

Test Case Design

  • Create representative examples covering common queries and edge cases
  • Include context when needed (retrieval_context for RAG, expected_output for G-Eval)
  • Use datasets for scale testing
  • Version test cases over time

Evaluation Workflow

  • Component-level first - Use @observe for individual parts
  • End-to-end validation before deployment
  • Automate in CI/CD with deepeval test run
  • Track results over time with Confident AI cloud

Testing Anti-Patterns

Avoid:

  • Testing only happy paths
  • Using unrealistic inputs
  • Ignoring metric reasons
  • Setting thresholds too high initially
  • Running full test suite on every change

Do:

  • Test edge cases and failure modes
  • Use real user queries as test inputs
  • Read and analyse metric reasons
  • Adjust thresholds based on empirical results
  • Use component-level tests during development
  • Separate config and eval content from code

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

32.83%
按下载量换算196

Claude

30.23%
按下载量换算181

Cursor

18.36%
按下载量换算110

Gemini CLI

10.02%
按下载量换算60

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills