Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

decidedecide 搜索

Agent Skill

decide 用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑开发,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要维护前端项目、生成组件或检查界面实现时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

81,886

周安装

3,345

GitHub Stars

4

下载量

26,492
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:decide(decide 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ivangdavila/decide
安装命令:
openclaw skills install decide
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install decide

简介

用于辅助前端页面和组件开发,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要维护前端项目或生成界面时使用。

  • 适用于决策模式学习和界面实现检查场景。
  • 可结合项目现有设计系统使用。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态。
  • decide 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
Decide
slug
decide
version
1.0.1
homepage
https://clawic.com/skills/decide
description
Self-learn your decision patterns to safely build its own decision-making over time.
changelog
Adds structured decision logging, safer setup, and stricter context matching before autonomous choices.
metadata
{"clawdbot":{"emoji":"⚖️","requires":{"bins":[]},"os":["linux","darwin","win32"],"configPaths":["~/decide/"]}}

Architecture

Decision state lives in ~/decide/. If that folder is missing or empty, run setup.md.

~/decide/
├── memory.md        # Durable decision rules, approval boundaries, and confirmed defaults
├── decisions.md     # Major decisions with question, components, chosen option, and outcome
└── domains/         # Domain-specific decision components, overrides, and exceptions

When to Use

Use when the agent faces a consequential choice that can change architecture, workflow, cost, publish behavior, vendor selection, or long-term project direction.

This skill is for branching decisions, not for generic preferences or execution lessons. It should stay compatible with self-improving: self-improving learns how to work better, while decide learns how to choose safely when the choice has lasting consequences.

Quick Reference

TopicFile
Setup guidesetup.md
Memory templatememory-template.md
Migration guidemigration.md
Decision componentscomponents.md
Confidence calibrationconfidence.md
Exceptions and always-ask casesexceptions.md

Use those files as a decision safety stack: first know the structure, then calibrate confidence, then verify exceptions before reusing any past choice.

Decision Workflow

  1. Frame the decision as a real question, not as a vague feeling.
  2. Gather the components that materially affect the answer.
  3. Read ~/decide/memory.md, then the smallest relevant file in ~/decide/domains/, then check ~/decide/decisions.md for a materially similar record.
  4. Reuse a past choice only if the question, the key components, and the exception boundaries still line up.
  5. If anything important is missing or changed, ask first and log the answer once the human decides.

Core Rules

1. Default Conservative on Consequential Choices

  • Frameworks, architectures, migrations, vendors, publish paths, spending, and irreversible branches should default to asking the human.
  • Safer failure means asking one question too many, not silently picking the wrong branch.
  • A recommendation is good; an unvalidated autonomous choice is not.

2. A Decision Requires Components, Not Vibes

  • Every major decision should be framed as a question plus the components that materially affect the answer.
  • Components can include product surface, client type, reversibility, budget, timeline, team size, project constraints, and long-term maintenance cost.
  • If the needed components are missing, the decision is not ready for autonomy.

3. Reuse Only When the Context Materially Matches

  • A stored rule is reusable only when the question and the key components match closely enough to make the same choice still rational.
  • Matching one signal is not enough. "Same framework choice" is weak if client, surface, constraints, or risk changed.
  • If there is any serious mismatch, ask first.
  • Exceptions beat defaults. A confirmed default is still invalid when a domain override or high-stakes exception changes the branch.

4. Promote Patterns Only After Human Confirmation

  • Repeatedly seeing the same decision in the same context makes a candidate rule, not an autonomous permission.
  • After enough similar decisions, ask: "When this is true plus this plus this, should I default to X?"
  • Only promote the pattern after explicit confirmation.

5. Log the Full Decision, Not Just the Outcome

  • Store the question, components, chosen option, rationale, confidence, and outcome.
  • A naked note like "use React Native" is too weak; it must say when and why.
  • Good logs prevent false autonomy later.

6. Keep Workspace Routing Non-Destructive

  • Use setup to add small AGENTS and SOUL snippets that force decision retrieval before major choices.
  • Show the exact snippet and wait for explicit approval before writing any workspace file.
  • The routing must make it hard to skip the decision log when a consequential branch appears.

7. Never Let Decision Memory Shadow Other Skills

  • Use self-improving for execution quality, corrections, and reusable work habits.
  • Use escalate for ask-vs-act boundaries across actions broadly.
  • Use decide only for major branching choices where the structure of the context determines the answer.

Common Traps

These failures usually come from pattern-matching too early or from collapsing a major decision into a shallow preference.

TrapWhy It FailsBetter Move
Reusing a rule because the question sounds similarImportant components may have changedCompare question plus key components before reusing
Treating one-off emergency choices as defaultsStress decisions rarely generalize wellLog them, but keep them unconfirmed unless repeated
Autodeciding after reading only memory.mdExceptions and domain overrides get missedList domains, read the smallest relevant override, then check decisions
Turning execution preferences into decision rulesBlurs compatibility with self-improvingKeep major branching choices in decide, workflow lessons elsewhere
Applying a framework or vendor rule across clients blindlyClient and surface often change the optimal answerAsk again when client, platform, scope, or constraints differ

Data Storage

Local state lives in ~/decide/:

  • durable decision rules, approval boundaries, and confirmed defaults in ~/decide/memory.md
  • major decision records in ~/decide/decisions.md
  • domain-specific component models, overrides, and exceptions in ~/decide/domains/

The packaged guides components.md, confidence.md, and exceptions.md stay in the skill itself and act as references, not as the user's live memory.

Security & Privacy

  • This skill stores local decision notes in ~/decide/.
  • It may read workspace steering files such as the AGENTS file and SOUL file so that decision retrieval happens before major choices.
  • It may suggest small non-destructive edits to those files during setup, but it must show the snippet and wait for explicit approval before any write.
  • It should prefer asking to guessing whenever a decision can affect money, production, publishing, deletion, contracts, or long-term architecture.
  • It never modifies its own SKILL.md.

Related Skills

Install with clawhub install <slug> if user confirms:

  • escalate - Control broad ask-vs-act boundaries around risky actions
  • self-improving - Learn execution lessons without conflating them with decision rules
  • memory - Keep broader long-term context and user continuity
  • proactivity - Push the next step while respecting confirmed decision defaults

Feedback

  • If useful: clawhub star decide
  • Stay updated: clawhub sync

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

96.29%
按下载量换算25,509

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills