Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

jobs-to-be-done待完成的工作

Agent Skill

jobs-to-be-done 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

22,203

周安装

907

GitHub Stars

3,874

下载量

7,111
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:jobs-to-be-done(待完成的工作)
来源仓库:https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills
仓库路径:skills/jobs-to-be-done
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills --skill jobs-to-be-done
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills --skill jobs-to-be-done

简介

用于发现客户工作、痛苦和收益的结构化框架,以验证产品创意并改进消息传递。

  • 将客户需求分为三类:功能性工作(要完成的任务)、社交性工作(他们希望如何被感知)和情感性工作(他们寻求或避免的情绪状态)
  • 确定四种痛苦类型:阻碍进展的挑战、时间/金钱/精力的成本、常见错误以及当前解决方案无法解决的未解决问题
  • 呈现四种增益类型:超出解决方案的期望、节省时间/金钱/精力、推动切换的采用因素以及通过更简单的工作流程改善寿命
  • 包括发现、优先级排序和验证的分步指导,以及要避免的反模式(功能愿望清单、人口统计、通用陈述)

SKILL.md

Purpose

Systematically explore what customers are trying to accomplish (functional, social, emotional jobs), the pains they experience, and the gains they seek. Use this framework to uncover unmet needs, validate product ideas, and ensure your solution addresses real motivations—not just surface-level feature requests.

This is not a survey—it's a structured lens for understanding *why* customers "hire" your product and what would make them "fire" it.

Key Concepts

The Jobs-to-be-Done Framework

Influenced by Clayton Christensen and the Value Proposition Canvas (Osterwalder), JTBD breaks customer needs into three categories:

1. Customer Jobs:

  • Functional jobs: Tasks customers need to perform (e.g., "send an invoice")
  • Social jobs: How customers want to be perceived (e.g., "look professional to clients")
  • Emotional jobs: Emotional states customers seek or avoid (e.g., "feel confident in my work")

2. Pains:

  • Challenges: Obstacles customers face
  • Costliness: What's too expensive in time, money, or effort
  • Common mistakes: Errors customers make that could be prevented
  • Unresolved problems: Gaps in current solutions

3. Gains:

  • Expectations: What would exceed current solutions
  • Savings: Time, money, or effort reductions that delight
  • Adoption factors: What increases likelihood of switching
  • Life improvement: How a solution makes life easier or more enjoyable

Why This Structure Works

  • Separates job from solution: "Communicate with my team" (job) ≠ "email" (solution)
  • Reveals underlying motivations: Functional job may be "track expenses," but emotional job is "feel in control of finances"
  • Surfaces competition you didn't see: Customers "hire" non-obvious alternatives (pen and paper, spreadsheets, workarounds)
  • Prioritizes by intensity: Not all pains are equal—focus on the most acute

Anti-Patterns (What This Is NOT)

  • Not a feature wishlist: "I want AI, automation, and dashboards" is not a job
  • Not demographics: "Millennials want mobile-first" is a persona trait, not a job
  • Not generic: "Be more productive" is too vague—dig into *which* tasks and *why*
  • Not one-dimensional: Focusing only on functional jobs misses social/emotional motivations

When to Use This

  • Early-stage discovery (before you know the solution)
  • Validating product-market fit (does your solution address the right jobs?)
  • Prioritizing roadmap (which jobs are most painful/important?)
  • Competitive analysis (what are customers "hiring" competitors for?)
  • Marketing messaging (speak to jobs, not features)

When NOT to Use This

  • After you've already built the product (too late for discovery)
  • For trivial features (don't over-analyze small tweaks)
  • As a substitute for quantitative validation (JTBD informs hypotheses; data validates them)

Application

Use template.md for the full fill-in structure.

Step 1: Define the Context

Before exploring JTBD, clarify:

  • Target customer segment: Who are you studying? (reference skills/proto-persona/SKILL.md)
  • Situation: In what context does the job arise? (e.g., "When managing a project deadline...")
  • Current solutions: What do they use today? (competitors, workarounds, doing nothing)

If missing context: Conduct customer interviews, contextual inquiries, or "switch interviews" (why they switched from a previous solution).


Step 2: Explore Customer Jobs

Functional Jobs

Ask: "What tasks are you trying to complete?"

### Functional Jobs:
- [Task 1 customer needs to perform]
- [Task 2 customer needs to perform]
- [Task 3 customer needs to perform]

Examples:

  • "Reconcile monthly expenses for tax filing"
  • "Onboard a new team member in under 2 hours"
  • "Deploy code to production without downtime"

Quality checks:

  • Verb-driven: Jobs are actions ("send," "analyze," "coordinate")
  • Solution-agnostic: Don't say "use email to communicate"—say "communicate with remote teammates"
  • Specific: "Manage finances" is too broad; "Track business expenses for tax deductions" is specific

Social Jobs

Ask: "How do you want to be perceived by others?"

### Social Jobs:
- [Way customer wants to be perceived socially 1]
- [Way customer wants to be perceived socially 2]
- [Way customer wants to be perceived socially 3]

Examples:

  • "Be seen as a strategic thinker by my exec team"
  • "Appear responsive and reliable to clients"
  • "Look tech-savvy to my younger colleagues"

Quality checks:

  • Audience-specific: Who is the customer trying to impress? (boss, clients, peers, etc.)
  • Emotional weight: Social jobs often drive adoption more than functional jobs

Emotional Jobs

Ask: "What emotional state do you want to achieve or avoid?"

### Emotional Jobs:
- [Emotional state customer seeks or avoids 1]
- [Emotional state customer seeks or avoids 2]
- [Emotional state customer seeks or avoids 3]

Examples:

  • "Feel confident I'm not missing important details"
  • "Avoid the anxiety of manual data entry errors"
  • "Feel a sense of accomplishment at the end of the day"

Quality checks:

  • Positive and negative: Include both what they seek ("feel in control") and what they avoid ("avoid embarrassment")
  • Rooted in research: Don't fabricate emotions—use customer quotes

Step 3: Identify Pains

Challenges

Ask: "What obstacles are preventing you from completing this job?"

### Challenges:
- [Obstacle customer faces 1]
- [Obstacle customer faces 2]
- [Obstacle customer faces 3]

Examples:

  • "Tools don't integrate, forcing manual data entry"
  • "No visibility into what teammates are working on"
  • "Approval processes take 3+ days, blocking progress"

Costliness

Ask: "What takes too much time, money, or effort?"

### Costliness:
- [What's too costly in time, money, or effort 1]
- [What's too costly in time, money, or effort 2]

Examples:

  • "Generating monthly reports takes 8 hours of manual work"
  • "Hiring a specialist costs $10k, which we can't afford"
  • "Learning the current tool requires 20+ hours of training"

Common Mistakes

Ask: "What errors do you make frequently that could be prevented?"

### Common Mistakes:
- [Frequent error 1]
- [Frequent error 2]

Examples:

  • "Forgetting to CC stakeholders on critical emails"
  • "Miscalculating tax deductions due to missing receipts"
  • "Accidentally overwriting someone else's work in shared files"

Unresolved Problems

Ask: "What problems do current solutions fail to address?"

### Unresolved Problems:
- [Problem not solved by current solutions 1]
- [Problem not solved by current solutions 2]

Examples:

  • "Current CRM doesn't track customer health scores"
  • "Email doesn't preserve conversation context when people are added mid-thread"
  • "Existing tools require technical expertise we don't have"

Step 4: Uncover Gains

Expectations

Ask: "What would make you love a solution?"

### Expectations:
- [What could exceed expectations 1]
- [What could exceed expectations 2]

Examples:

  • "Automatically categorizes expenses without manual tagging"
  • "Suggests next steps based on project status"
  • "Integrates seamlessly with tools we already use"

Savings

Ask: "What savings in time, money, or effort would delight you?"

### Savings:
- [Way of saving time, money, or effort 1]
- [Way of saving time, money, or effort 2]

Examples:

  • "Reduce report generation from 8 hours to 10 minutes"
  • "Eliminate the need for a full-time admin"
  • "Cut onboarding time from 2 weeks to 2 days"

Adoption Factors

Ask: "What would make you switch from your current solution?"

### Adoption Factors:
- [Factor increasing likelihood of adoption 1]
- [Factor increasing likelihood of adoption 2]

Examples:

  • "Free trial with no credit card required"
  • "Migration support to import existing data"
  • "Testimonials from companies like ours"

Life Improvement

Ask: "How would your life be better if this job were easier?"

### Life Improvement:
- [How solution makes life easier or more enjoyable 1]
- [How solution makes life easier or more enjoyable 2]

Examples:

  • "I could leave work on time instead of staying late to finish reports"
  • "I'd feel less stressed about missing important deadlines"
  • "I could focus on strategic work instead of busywork"

Step 5: Prioritize and Validate

  • Rank pains by intensity: Which pains are acute vs. mild annoyances?
  • Identify must-have vs. nice-to-have gains: What would drive adoption vs. what's just a bonus?
  • Cross-reference with personas: Do different personas have different jobs/pains/gains? (reference skills/proto-persona/SKILL.md)
  • Validate with data: Survey a broader audience to confirm JTBD insights from interviews

Examples

See examples/sample.md for full JTBD examples.

Mini example excerpt:

**Functional Jobs:** Coordinate tasks across a distributed team
**Pains - Challenges:** Team members use different tools, creating silos
**Gains - Savings:** Reduce status reporting time from 3 hours to 15 minutes

Common Pitfalls

Pitfall 1: Confusing Jobs with Solutions

Symptom: "I need to use Slack" or "I need AI-powered analytics"

Consequence: You've anchored on a solution, not the underlying job.

Fix: Ask "Why?" 5 times. "I need Slack" → "Why?" → "To communicate with my team" → "Why?" → "To get quick answers" → "Why?" → "To avoid project delays."


Pitfall 2: Generic Jobs

Symptom: "Be more productive" or "Save time"

Consequence: Too vague to inform product decisions.

Fix: Get specific. "Save time" → "Reduce time spent generating monthly reports from 8 hours to 1 hour."


Pitfall 3: Ignoring Social/Emotional Jobs

Symptom: Only documenting functional jobs

Consequence: You miss powerful motivators. People often buy based on emotional/social needs, not just functional.

Fix: Explicitly ask about perception and emotions in interviews. "How would solving this make you feel?" "Who would notice if you solved this?"


Pitfall 4: Fabricating JTBD Without Research

Symptom: Filling out the template based on assumptions

Consequence: You're guessing. JTBD analysis is only valuable if grounded in real customer insights.

Fix: Conduct "switch interviews" (ask why they switched from a previous solution), contextual inquiries, or problem validation interviews.


Pitfall 5: Treating All Pains as Equal

Symptom: Listing 20 pains without prioritization

Consequence: No clarity on what to solve first.

Fix: Rank pains by intensity (acute vs. mild). Ask "If we only solved one pain, which would have the biggest impact?"


References

Related Skills

  • skills/proto-persona/SKILL.md — Defines who has these jobs/pains/gains
  • skills/problem-statement/SKILL.md — JTBD informs the "Trying to" and "But" sections
  • skills/positioning-statement/SKILL.md — JTBD informs the "that need" statement

External Frameworks

  • Clayton Christensen, *Competing Against Luck* (2016) — Origin of Jobs-to-be-Done theory
  • Tony Ulwick, *Outcome-Driven Innovation* (2016) — Quantifying jobs and outcomes
  • Alexander Osterwalder, *Value Proposition Canvas* (2014) — Customer jobs/pains/gains framework

Dean's Work

  • [Link to relevant Dean Peters' Substack articles if applicable]

Provenance

  • Adapted from prompts/jobs-to-be-done.md in the https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-prompts repo.

Skill type: Component Suggested filename: jobs-to-be-done.md Suggested placement: /skills/components/ Dependencies: References skills/proto-persona/SKILL.md Used by: skills/positioning-statement/SKILL.md, skills/problem-statement/SKILL.md, skills/epic-hypothesis/SKILL.md

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.97%
按下载量换算2,771

Claude

32.51%
按下载量换算2,312

Cursor

17.13%
按下载量换算1,218

Gemini CLI

8.93%
按下载量换算635

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills