Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

databricks-mlflow-evaluationdatabricks mlflow 评估

Agent Skill

用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常、生成统计口径或把分析结果转成可读说明。使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据、导出文件或批量写回时,应先确认权限和脱敏边界。

总安装

309

周安装

13

GitHub Stars

1,283

下载量

108
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:databricks-mlflow-evaluation(databricks mlflow 评估)
来源仓库:https://github.com/databricks-solutions/ai-dev-kit
仓库路径:skills/databricks-mlflow-evaluation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/databricks-solutions/ai-dev-kit --skill databricks-mlflow-evaluation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/databricks-solutions/ai-dev-kit --skill databricks-mlflow-evaluation

简介

指导 MLflow GenAI 评估流程,确保模型输出符合预期行为与质量标准。

  • 适用于首次设置评估框架、构建测试数据集及验证代理响应准确性。
  • 遵循端到端工作流,结合用户旅程分析与 API 接口规范进行系统化校验。
  • 必须仔细阅读 GOTCHAS.md 和 CRITICAL-interfaces.md 文件,避免常见配置错误。
  • databricks-mlflow-evaluation 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

MLflow 3 GenAI Evaluation

Before Writing Any Code

  1. Read GOTCHAS.md - 15+ common mistakes that cause failures
  2. Read CRITICAL-interfaces.md - Exact API signatures and data schemas

End-to-End Workflows

Follow these workflows based on your goal. Each step indicates which reference files to read.

Workflow 1: First-Time Evaluation Setup

For users new to MLflow GenAI evaluation or setting up evaluation for a new agent.

StepActionReference Files
1Understand what to evaluateuser-journeys.md (Journey 0: Strategy)
2Learn API patternsGOTCHAS.md + CRITICAL-interfaces.md
3Build initial datasetpatterns-datasets.md (Patterns 1-4)
4Choose/create scorerspatterns-scorers.md + CRITICAL-interfaces.md (built-in list)
5Run evaluationpatterns-evaluation.md (Patterns 1-3)

Workflow 2: Production Trace -> Evaluation Dataset

For building evaluation datasets from production traces.

StepActionReference Files
1Search and filter tracespatterns-trace-analysis.md (MCP tools section)
2Analyze trace qualitypatterns-trace-analysis.md (Patterns 1-7)
3Tag traces for inclusionpatterns-datasets.md (Patterns 16-17)
4Build dataset from tracespatterns-datasets.md (Patterns 6-7)
5Add expectations/ground truthpatterns-datasets.md (Pattern 2)

Workflow 3: Performance Optimization

For debugging slow or expensive agent execution.

StepActionReference Files
1Profile latency by spanpatterns-trace-analysis.md (Patterns 4-6)
2Analyze token usagepatterns-trace-analysis.md (Pattern 9)
3Detect context issuespatterns-context-optimization.md (Section 5)
4Apply optimizationspatterns-context-optimization.md (Sections 1-4, 6)
5Re-evaluate to measure impactpatterns-evaluation.md (Pattern 6-7)

Workflow 4: Regression Detection

For comparing agent versions and finding regressions.

StepActionReference Files
1Establish baselinepatterns-evaluation.md (Pattern 4: named runs)
2Run current versionpatterns-evaluation.md (Pattern 1)
3Compare metricspatterns-evaluation.md (Patterns 6-7)
4Analyze failing tracespatterns-trace-analysis.md (Pattern 7)
5Debug specific failurespatterns-trace-analysis.md (Patterns 8-9)

Workflow 5: Custom Scorer Development

For creating project-specific evaluation metrics.

StepActionReference Files
1Understand scorer interfaceCRITICAL-interfaces.md (Scorer section)
2Choose scorer patternpatterns-scorers.md (Patterns 4-11)
3For multi-agent scorerspatterns-scorers.md (Patterns 13-16)
4Test with evaluationpatterns-evaluation.md (Pattern 1)

Workflow 6: Unity Catalog Trace Ingestion & Production Monitoring

For storing traces in Unity Catalog, instrumenting applications, and enabling continuous production monitoring.

StepActionReference Files
1Link UC schema to experimentpatterns-trace-ingestion.md (Patterns 1-2)
2Set trace destinationpatterns-trace-ingestion.md (Patterns 3-4)
3Instrument your applicationpatterns-trace-ingestion.md (Patterns 5-8)
4Configure trace sources (Apps/Serving/OTEL)patterns-trace-ingestion.md (Patterns 9-11)
5Enable production monitoringpatterns-trace-ingestion.md (Patterns 12-13)
6Query and analyze UC tracespatterns-trace-ingestion.md (Pattern 14)

Workflow 7: Judge Alignment with MemAlign

For aligning an LLM judge to match domain expert preferences. A well-aligned judge improves every downstream use: evaluation accuracy, production monitoring signal, and prompt optimization quality. This workflow is valuable on its own, independent of prompt optimization.

StepActionReference Files
1Design base judge with make_judge (any feedback type)patterns-judge-alignment.md (Pattern 1)
2Run evaluate(), tag successful tracespatterns-judge-alignment.md (Pattern 2)
3Build UC dataset + create SME labeling sessionpatterns-judge-alignment.md (Pattern 3)
4Align judge with MemAlign after labeling completespatterns-judge-alignment.md (Pattern 4)
5Register aligned judge to experimentpatterns-judge-alignment.md (Pattern 5)
6Re-evaluate with aligned judge (baseline)patterns-judge-alignment.md (Pattern 6)

Workflow 8: Automated Prompt Optimization with GEPA

For automatically improving a registered system prompt using optimize_prompts(). Works with any scorer, but paired with an aligned judge (Workflow 7) gives the most domain-accurate signal. For the full end-to-end loop combining alignment and optimization, see user-journeys.md Journey 10.

StepActionReference Files
1Build optimization dataset (inputs + expectations)patterns-prompt-optimization.md (Pattern 1)
2Run optimize_prompts() with GEPA + scorerpatterns-prompt-optimization.md (Pattern 2)
3Register new version, promote conditionallypatterns-prompt-optimization.md (Pattern 3)

Reference Files Quick Lookup

ReferencePurposeWhen to Read
GOTCHAS.mdCommon mistakesAlways read first before writing code
CRITICAL-interfaces.mdAPI signatures, schemasWhen writing any evaluation code
patterns-evaluation.mdRunning evals, comparingWhen executing evaluations
patterns-scorers.mdCustom scorer creationWhen built-in scorers aren't enough
patterns-datasets.mdDataset buildingWhen preparing evaluation data
patterns-trace-analysis.mdTrace debuggingWhen analyzing agent behavior
patterns-context-optimization.mdToken/latency fixesWhen agent is slow or expensive
patterns-trace-ingestion.mdUC trace setup, monitoringWhen setting up trace storage or production monitoring
patterns-judge-alignment.mdMemAlign judge alignment, labeling sessions, SME feedbackWhen aligning judges to domain expert preferences
patterns-prompt-optimization.mdGEPA optimization: build dataset, optimize_prompts(), promoteWhen running automated prompt improvement
user-journeys.mdHigh-level workflows, full domain-expert optimization loopWhen starting a new evaluation project or running the full align + optimize cycle

Critical API Facts

  • Use: mlflow.genai.evaluate() (NOT mlflow.evaluate())
  • Data format: {"inputs": {"query": "..."}} (nested structure required)
  • predict_fn: Receives **unpacked kwargs (not a dict)
  • MemAlign: Scorer-agnostic (works with any feedback_value_type -- float, bool, categorical); token-heavy on the embedding model so set embedding_model explicitly
  • Label schema name matching: The label schema name in the labeling session MUST match the judge name used in evaluate() for align() to pair scores
  • Aligned judge scores: May be lower than unaligned judge scores -- this is expected and means the judge is now more accurate, not that the agent regressed
  • GEPA optimization dataset: Must have both inputs AND expectations per record (different from eval dataset)
  • Episodic memory: Lazily loaded -- get_scorer() results won't show episodic memory on print until the judge is first used
  • optimize_prompts: Requires MLflow >= 3.5.0

See GOTCHAS.md for complete list.

Related Skills

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.55%
按下载量换算41

Claude

27.31%
按下载量换算29

Cursor

19.32%
按下载量换算21

Gemini CLI

8.83%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills