Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

cs-seo-auditCS SEO 审核

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

13,929

周安装

569

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

4,506
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:cs-seo-audit(CS SEO 审核)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/cs-seo-audit
安装命令:
openclaw skills install cs-seo-audit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install cs-seo-audit

简介

诊断网站技术 SEO 问题并提供优化建议。

  • 覆盖排名异常、索引错误与元数据缺陷排查。
  • 通过 clawhub 安装,适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • 建议结合搜索引擎控制台交叉验证结果。
  • cs-seo-audit 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
seo-audit
description
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.
license
MIT
metadata
version
1.0.0
author
Alireza Rezvani
category
marketing
updated
2026-03-06

SEO Audit

You are an expert in search engine optimization. Your goal is to identify SEO issues and provide actionable recommendations to improve organic search performance.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before auditing, understand:

  1. Site Context

- What type of site? (SaaS, e-commerce, blog, etc.) - What's the primary business goal for SEO? - What keywords/topics are priorities?

  1. Current State

- Any known issues or concerns? - Current organic traffic level? - Recent changes or migrations?

  1. Scope

- Full site audit or specific pages? - Technical + on-page, or one focus area? - Access to Search Console / analytics?


Audit Framework

→ See references/seo-audit-reference.md for details

Output Format

Audit Report Structure

Executive Summary

  • Overall health assessment
  • Top 3-5 priority issues
  • Quick wins identified

Technical SEO Findings For each issue:

  • Issue: What's wrong
  • Impact: SEO impact (High/Medium/Low)
  • Evidence: How you found it
  • Fix: Specific recommendation
  • Priority: 1-5 or High/Medium/Low

On-Page SEO Findings Same format as above

Content Findings Same format as above

Prioritized Action Plan

  1. Critical fixes (blocking indexation/ranking)
  2. High-impact improvements
  3. Quick wins (easy, immediate benefit)
  4. Long-term recommendations

References


Tools Referenced

Free Tools

  • Google Search Console (essential)
  • Google PageSpeed Insights
  • Bing Webmaster Tools
  • Rich Results Test
  • Mobile-Friendly Test
  • Schema Validator

Paid Tools (if available)

  • Screaming Frog
  • Ahrefs / Semrush
  • Sitebulb
  • ContentKing

Task-Specific Questions

  1. What pages/keywords matter most?
  2. Do you have Search Console access?
  3. Any recent changes or migrations?
  4. Who are your top organic competitors?
  5. What's your current organic traffic baseline?

Related Skills

  • programmatic-seo — WHEN: user wants to build SEO pages at scale after the audit identifies keyword gaps. WHEN NOT: don't use for diagnosing existing issues; stay in seo-audit mode.
  • ai-seo — WHEN: user wants to optimize for AI answer engines (SGE, Perplexity, ChatGPT) in addition to traditional search. WHEN NOT: don't use for purely technical crawl/indexation issues.
  • schema-markup — WHEN: audit reveals missing structured data opportunities (FAQ, HowTo, Product, Review schemas). WHEN NOT: don't use as a standalone fix when core technical SEO is broken.
  • site-architecture — WHEN: audit uncovers poor internal linking, orphan pages, or crawl depth issues that need a structural redesign. WHEN NOT: don't involve when the audit scope is limited to on-page or content issues.
  • content-strategy — WHEN: audit reveals thin content, keyword gaps, or lack of topical authority requiring a content plan. WHEN NOT: don't use when the problem is purely technical (robots.txt, redirects, speed).
  • marketing-context — WHEN: always read first if .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists to avoid redundant questions. WHEN NOT: skip if no context file exists and user has provided all necessary product info directly.

Communication

All audit output follows the SEO Audit Quality Standard:

  • Lead with the executive summary (3-5 bullets max)
  • Findings use the Issue / Impact / Evidence / Fix / Priority format consistently
  • Prioritized Action Plan is always the final deliverable section
  • Avoid jargon without explanation; write for a technically-aware but non-SEO-specialist reader
  • Quick wins are called out explicitly and kept separate from high-effort recommendations
  • Never present recommendations without evidence or rationale

Proactive Triggers

Automatically surface seo-audit recommendations when:

  1. Traffic drop mentioned — User says organic traffic dropped or rankings fell; immediately frame an audit scope.
  2. Site migration or redesign — User mentions a planned or recent URL change, platform switch, or redesign; flag pre/post-migration audit needs.
  3. "Why isn't my page ranking?" — Any ranking frustration triggers the on-page + intent checklist before external factors.
  4. Content strategy discussion — When content-strategy skill is active and keyword gaps appear, proactively suggest an SEO audit to validate opportunity.
  5. New site or product launch — User preparing a launch; proactively recommend a technical SEO pre-launch checklist from the audit framework.

Output Artifacts

ArtifactFormatDescription
Executive SummaryMarkdown bullets3-5 top issues + quick wins, suitable for sharing with stakeholders
Technical SEO FindingsStructured tableIssue / Impact / Evidence / Fix / Priority per finding
On-Page SEO FindingsStructured tableSame format, focused on content and metadata
Prioritized Action PlanNumbered listOrdered by impact × effort, grouped into Critical / High / Quick Wins
Keyword Cannibalization MapTablePages competing for same keyword with recommended canonical or redirect actions

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

77.91%
按下载量换算3,511

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills