Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

create-worker创建工人

Agent Skill

create-worker 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

652

周安装

28

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

228
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:create-worker(创建工人)
来源仓库:https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/create-worker
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills --skill create-worker
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/cygnusfear/agent-skills --skill create-worker

简介

该技能指导如何创建和管理 Claude Code 中的专用 AI 助手(Worker),实现任务委派与上下文隔离。

  • 适用于需要特定专长、保持对话上下文独立或提升复杂流程处理效率的场景。
  • 通过配置自定义系统提示词、工具集和权限来定义 Worker 行为,支持多实例并行运行。
  • 安装方式:GitHub 仓库,使用 npx 命令添加;注意权限设置及是否涉及进程或资源管理。
  • create-worker 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Create Worker

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for creating and configuring workers in Claude Code.

Understanding Workers

Workers are specialized AI assistants that Claude Code can delegate tasks to. Each worker:

  • Operates in its own context window (preserving main conversation context)
  • Has a specific purpose and expertise area
  • Can be configured with specific tools and permissions
  • Includes a custom system prompt guiding its behavior

When to Create Workers

Create a worker when:

  • Tasks require specialized expertise that benefits from focused instructions
  • Context preservation is important (workers don't pollute main context)
  • The same specialized workflow is needed repeatedly
  • Different tool permissions are needed for different tasks
  • Parallel execution of independent tasks is desired

Choose skills instead when:

  • The capability extends your knowledge without needing separate context
  • No specialized agent persona is needed
  • Tool restrictions are sufficient without full agent isolation

Choose slash commands when:

  • Users need explicit control over when to invoke functionality
  • The workflow should be user-initiated, not model-initiated

Two Approaches to Workers

Approach 1: File-Based Agents

Persistent worker definitions stored as Markdown files.

Locations (in priority order):

LocationScopePriority
.claude/agents/Current projectHighest
~/.claude/agents/All projectsLower

File Format:

---
name: agent-name
description: Description of when this agent should be used
tools: Read, Write, Bash, Glob, Grep  # Optional - omit to inherit all
model: sonnet  # Optional - sonnet, opus, haiku, or inherit
permissionMode: default  # Optional - see permission modes below
skills: skill1, skill2  # Optional - skills to auto-load
---

Your agent's system prompt goes here. This defines the agent's
role, capabilities, approach, and constraints.

Include:
- Role definition and expertise areas
- Step-by-step workflow for common tasks
- Constraints and rules to follow
- Output format expectations
- Examples of good behavior

Approach 2: Teams Delegation

Dynamic worker delegation using teams for on-demand agents.

teams(action: 'delegate', tasks: [{
  text: '<the agent\'s instructions and task>',
  assignee: 'worker-name'
}])

Workers are delegated with a task description and an assignee name. Multiple workers can be delegated in parallel by including multiple tasks in the array.

Configuration Reference

Required Fields

FieldDescription
nameUnique identifier (lowercase letters, numbers, hyphens only, max 64 chars)
descriptionWhen the agent should be used (include "PROACTIVELY" for auto-invocation)

Optional Fields

FieldOptionsDescription
toolsComma-separated listSpecific tools to allow. Omit to inherit all.
modelsonnet, opus, haiku, inheritModel to use. Default: inherit from session.
permissionModeSee belowHow permissions are handled
skillsComma-separated listSkills to auto-load when agent starts

Permission Modes

ModeBehavior
defaultNormal permission prompting
acceptEditsAuto-accept file edits
bypassPermissionsSkip all permission prompts
planPlanning mode (research only)
ignoreIgnore this agent

Available Tools

File Operations: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep Execution: Bash, BashOutput Web: WebFetch, WebSearch Specialized: Task, NotebookEdit, TodoWrite, Skill

Creating a Worker

Step 1: Define the Purpose

Answer these questions:

  1. What specialized task does this agent handle?
  2. What expertise or personality should it have?
  3. What tools does it need (or shouldn't have)?
  4. Should it be invoked automatically or explicitly?

Step 2: Choose the Approach

Use file-based agents when:

  • The agent will be reused across sessions
  • Team sharing via version control is desired
  • Configuration should persist

Use teams delegation when:

  • One-off or dynamic worker dispatch is needed
  • Workers are spawned as part of a workflow
  • Parallel execution is required

Step 3: Write the System Prompt

Structure the agent's prompt with these sections:

<role>
Define who this agent is and what it excels at.
</role>

<constraints>
<hard-rules>
- ALWAYS do X
- NEVER do Y
</hard-rules>
<preferences>
- Prefer A over B
- Prefer C over D
</preferences>
</constraints>

<workflow>
## How to Approach Tasks

1. **Phase 1**: Description
2. **Phase 2**: Description
3. **Phase 3**: Description
</workflow>

<examples>
Good patterns and anti-patterns.
</examples>

Step 4: Configure Tools and Permissions

Restrictive (read-only analysis):

tools: Read, Glob, Grep

Standard development:

tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep

Full access (omit tools field):

# tools field omitted - inherits all tools

Step 5: Test and Iterate

  1. Invoke the agent with a representative task
  2. Observe where it struggles or deviates
  3. Update the system prompt with clarifications
  4. Add examples of correct behavior
  5. Repeat until reliable

Agent Templates

Code Reviewer Agent

---
name: code-reviewer
description: Expert code review specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after any code changes. Reviews for quality, security, and maintainability.
tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash
model: inherit
---

<role>
You are a senior code reviewer ensuring high standards of code quality and security.
</role>

<workflow>
## Review Process

1. **Gather Context**: Run git diff, understand the changes
2. **Analyze Each File**: Check for issues systematically
3. **Prioritize Findings**: Critical > High > Medium > Low
4. **Provide Actionable Feedback**: Specific fixes, not vague suggestions

## Review Checklist

- [ ] Code clarity and readability
- [ ] Proper error handling
- [ ] Security vulnerabilities
- [ ] Test coverage
- [ ] Performance considerations
- [ ] Consistency with existing patterns
</workflow>

<output-format>
Organize feedback by priority:
1. **Critical**: Must fix before merge
2. **High**: Should fix
3. **Medium**: Consider improving
4. **Low**: Nice to have
</output-format>

Debugger Agent

---
name: debugger
description: Debugging specialist for errors and unexpected behavior. Use PROACTIVELY when encountering failures, test errors, or bugs.
tools: Read, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
---

<role>
You are an expert debugger specializing in root cause analysis.
</role>

<workflow>
## Debugging Protocol

1. **Capture**: Get error message, stack trace, reproduction steps
2. **Hypothesize**: Form theories about root cause
3. **Investigate**: Add logging, trace execution, check state
4. **Isolate**: Find the exact failure point
5. **Fix**: Apply minimal, targeted fix
6. **Verify**: Confirm fix works, no regressions

## Three-Strike Rule

- Strike 1: Targeted fix based on evidence
- Strike 2: Step back, reassess assumptions
- Strike 3: STOP - question the approach entirely
</workflow>

<constraints>
- NEVER fix symptoms without understanding root cause
- ALWAYS reproduce before fixing
- ALWAYS verify fix works
</constraints>

Research Agent

---
name: researcher
description: Deep research agent for complex questions requiring multi-source investigation. Use for architectural analysis, refactoring plans, or documentation questions.
tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebSearch, WebFetch
model: opus
---

<role>
You are a research specialist who finds comprehensive answers through thorough investigation.
</role>

<workflow>
## Research Process

### Phase 1: Plan Investigation
- Identify what needs to be researched
- Map out search strategies
- List relevant code areas

### Phase 2: Deep Exploration
- Search codebase thoroughly
- Read relevant files completely
- Use web search for external docs
- Trace dependencies

### Phase 3: Synthesize
- Cross-reference findings
- Identify patterns and gaps
- Form coherent understanding

### Phase 4: Report
- Direct answer with evidence
- File paths and line numbers
- Confidence level and caveats
- Recommended next steps
</workflow>

<principles>
- Go deep, not shallow
- Cite specific evidence
- Connect dots across sources
- Acknowledge uncertainty
</principles>

Parallel Worker Patterns

Pattern: Parallel Execution

Delegate multiple workers simultaneously for independent tasks:

teams(action: 'delegate', tasks: [
  {text: 'Task 1: Review authentication module...', assignee: 'auth-reviewer'},
  {text: 'Task 2: Review authorization module...', assignee: 'authz-reviewer'},
  {text: 'Task 3: Review session handling...', assignee: 'session-reviewer'}
])

Pattern: Divergent Exploration (Delphi)

Delegate multiple workers with identical prompts for diverse perspectives:

teams(action: 'delegate', tasks: [
  {text: 'Investigate why API latency increased...', assignee: 'oracle-1'},
  {text: 'Investigate why API latency increased...', assignee: 'oracle-2'},
  {text: 'Investigate why API latency increased...', assignee: 'oracle-3'}
])

Each worker explores independently, potentially discovering different clues.

Pattern: Synthesis After Parallel Work

After parallel workers complete:

teams(action: 'delegate', tasks: [{
  text: 'Read all review tickets and synthesize findings...',
  assignee: 'synthesizer'
}])

Best Practices

Prompt Engineering

  1. Be specific about the role: Define expertise and personality clearly
  2. Include constraints: Hard rules prevent unwanted behavior
  3. Provide workflow: Step-by-step process guides execution
  4. Add examples: Show good and bad patterns
  5. Define output format: Structure expectations

Tool Selection

  1. Principle of least privilege: Only grant needed tools
  2. Read-only for analysis: Use Read, Glob, Grep for review agents
  3. Full access rarely needed: Most agents don't need all tools
  4. Bash is powerful but risky: Consider if really needed

Description Writing

For automatic invocation, include trigger phrases:

  • "Use PROACTIVELY when..."
  • "MUST BE USED for..."
  • "Automatically invoke for..."

For explicit invocation, be descriptive:

  • "Use when user asks to..."
  • "Invoke for..."

Common Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternBetter Approach
Vague descriptionsSpecific trigger conditions
Overly long promptsProgressive disclosure via skills
All tools for every agentMinimal necessary tools
Generic "helper" agentsFocused, specialized agents
No constraintsClear hard rules and preferences

CLI-Based Agents

Define agents dynamically via command line:

claude --agents '{
  "quick-review": {
    "description": "Fast code review. Use proactively after changes.",
    "prompt": "You are a quick code reviewer. Focus on obvious issues only.",
    "tools": ["Read", "Grep", "Glob"],
    "model": "haiku"
  }
}'

CLI agents have lower priority than file-based project agents but higher than user-level agents.

Integration with Skills

Agents can auto-load skills:

---
name: data-analyst
description: Data analysis specialist
skills: query-builder, visualization
---

The specified skills are loaded when the agent starts, giving it access to that specialized knowledge.

Troubleshooting

Agent Not Being Invoked

  1. Check description includes clear trigger conditions
  2. Add "PROACTIVELY" if automatic invocation is desired
  3. Verify file is in correct location with correct frontmatter
  4. Check for name conflicts with higher-priority agents

Agent Using Wrong Tools

  1. Verify tools field syntax (comma-separated, no brackets)
  2. Check tool names are exactly correct (case-sensitive)
  3. If tools should inherit, omit the field entirely

Agent Behaving Incorrectly

  1. Add more specific constraints
  2. Include examples of correct behavior
  3. Add "NEVER" rules for unwanted behaviors
  4. Consider if the prompt is too long (move details to skills)

Quick Reference

Create project agent:

mkdir -p .claude/agents
# Create .claude/agents/my-agent.md with frontmatter

Create user agent:

mkdir -p ~/.claude/agents
# Create ~/.claude/agents/my-agent.md with frontmatter

Delegate via teams:

teams(action: 'delegate', tasks: [{text: '...', assignee: 'worker-name'}])

View/manage agents:

/agents

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.14%
按下载量换算80

Claude

29.87%
按下载量换算68

Cursor

19.22%
按下载量换算44

Gemini CLI

8.84%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills