Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
AI 工具只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

cost-latency-optimizer成本延迟优化器

Agent Skill

cost-latency-optimizer 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,916

周安装

124

GitHub Stars

32

下载量

1,022
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:cost-latency-optimizer(成本延迟优化器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/patricio0312rev/skills
仓库路径:skills/cost-latency-optimizer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/patricio0312rev/skills --skill cost-latency-optimizer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/patricio0312rev/skills --skill cost-latency-optimizer

简介

cost-latency-optimizer 分析 LLM 调用、嵌入与工具使用的成本分布。

  • 适用于推理延迟与费用平衡的微调策略与缓存机制设计。
  • 内置 GPT-4 等主流模型定价,支持自定义费率扩展。
  • 建议启用响应缓存与批处理,降低高频小请求的总体开销。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Cost & Latency Optimizer

Optimize LLM applications for cost and performance.

Cost Breakdown Analysis

class CostAnalyzer:
    def __init__(self):
        self.costs = {
            "llm_calls": 0,
            "embeddings": 0,
            "tool_calls": 0,
        }
        self.counts = {
            "llm_calls": 0,
            "embeddings": 0,
        }

    def track_llm_call(self, tokens_in: int, tokens_out: int):
        # GPT-4 pricing
        cost = (tokens_in / 1000) * 0.03 + (tokens_out / 1000) * 0.06
        self.costs["llm_calls"] += cost
        self.counts["llm_calls"] += 1

    def report(self):
        return {
            "total_cost": sum(self.costs.values()),
            "breakdown": self.costs,
            "avg_cost_per_call": self.costs["llm_calls"] / self.counts["llm_calls"],
        }

Caching Strategy

import hashlib
from functools import lru_cache

class LLMCache:
    def __init__(self, redis_client):
        self.cache = redis_client
        self.ttl = 3600  # 1 hour

    def get_cache_key(self, prompt: str, model: str) -> str:
        content = f"{model}:{prompt}"
        return f"llm_cache:{hashlib.sha256(content.encode()).hexdigest()}"

    def get(self, prompt: str, model: str):
        key = self.get_cache_key(prompt, model)
        return self.cache.get(key)

    def set(self, prompt: str, model: str, response: str):
        key = self.get_cache_key(prompt, model)
        self.cache.setex(key, self.ttl, response)

# Usage
cache = LLMCache(redis_client)

def cached_llm_call(prompt: str, model: str = "gpt-4"):
    # Check cache
    cached = cache.get(prompt, model)
    if cached:
        return cached

    # Call LLM
    response = llm(prompt, model=model)

    # Cache result
    cache.set(prompt, model, response)

    return response

Model Selection

MODEL_PRICING = {
    "gpt-4": {"input": 0.03, "output": 0.06},
    "gpt-3.5-turbo": {"input": 0.0005, "output": 0.0015},
    "claude-3-opus": {"input": 0.015, "output": 0.075},
    "claude-3-sonnet": {"input": 0.003, "output": 0.015},
}

def select_model_by_complexity(query: str) -> str:
    """Use cheaper models for simple queries"""
    # Classify complexity
    complexity = classify_complexity(query)

    if complexity == "simple":
        return "gpt-3.5-turbo"  # 60x cheaper
    elif complexity == "medium":
        return "claude-3-sonnet"
    else:
        return "gpt-4"

def classify_complexity(query: str) -> str:
    # Simple heuristics
    if len(query) < 100 and "?" in query:
        return "simple"
    elif any(word in query.lower() for word in ["analyze", "complex", "detailed"]):
        return "complex"
    return "medium"

Prompt Optimization

def optimize_prompt(prompt: str) -> str:
    """Reduce token count while preserving meaning"""
    optimizations = [
        # Remove extra whitespace
        lambda p: re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', p),

        # Remove examples if not critical
        lambda p: p.split("Examples:")[0] if "Examples:" in p else p,

        # Use abbreviations
        lambda p: p.replace("For example", "E.g."),
    ]

    for optimize in optimizations:
        prompt = optimize(prompt)

    return prompt.strip()

# Example: 500 tokens → 350 tokens = 30% cost reduction

Batching

async def batch_llm_calls(prompts: List[str], batch_size: int = 5):
    """Process multiple prompts in parallel"""
    results = []

    for i in range(0, len(prompts), batch_size):
        batch = prompts[i:i + batch_size]

        # Parallel execution
        batch_results = await asyncio.gather(*[
            llm_async(prompt) for prompt in batch
        ])

        results.extend(batch_results)

    return results

# 10 sequential calls: ~30 seconds
# 10 batched calls (5 parallel): ~6 seconds

Latency Hotspot Analysis

import time

class LatencyTracker:
    def __init__(self):
        self.timings = {}

    def track(self, operation: str):
        def decorator(func):
            def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
                start = time.time()
                result = func(*args, **kwargs)
                duration = time.time() - start

                if operation not in self.timings:
                    self.timings[operation] = []
                self.timings[operation].append(duration)

                return result
            return wrapper
        return decorator

    def report(self):
        return {
            op: {
                "count": len(times),
                "total": sum(times),
                "avg": sum(times) / len(times),
                "p95": sorted(times)[int(len(times) * 0.95)]
            }
            for op, times in self.timings.items()
        }

# Usage
tracker = LatencyTracker()

@tracker.track("llm_call")
def call_llm(prompt):
    return llm(prompt)

# After 100 calls
print(tracker.report())
# {"llm_call": {"avg": 2.3, "p95": 4.1, ...}}

Optimization Recommendations

def generate_recommendations(cost_analysis, latency_analysis):
    recs = []

    # High LLM costs
    if cost_analysis["costs"]["llm_calls"] > 10:
        recs.append({
            "issue": "High LLM costs",
            "recommendation": "Implement caching for repeated queries",
            "impact": "50-80% cost reduction",
        })

        if cost_analysis["avg_cost_per_call"] > 0.01:
            recs.append({
                "issue": "Using expensive model for all queries",
                "recommendation": "Use gpt-3.5-turbo for simple queries",
                "impact": "60% cost reduction",
            })

    # High latency
    if latency_analysis["llm_call"]["avg"] > 3:
        recs.append({
            "issue": "High LLM latency",
            "recommendation": "Batch parallel calls, use streaming",
            "impact": "50% latency reduction",
        })

    return recs

Streaming for Faster TTFB

async def streaming_llm(prompt: str):
    """Stream tokens as they're generated"""
    async for chunk in llm_stream(prompt):
        yield chunk
        # User sees partial response immediately

# Time to First Byte: ~200ms (streaming) vs ~2s (waiting for full response)

Best Practices

  1. Cache aggressively: Identical queries cached
  2. Model selection: Use cheaper models when possible
  3. Prompt optimization: Reduce unnecessary tokens
  4. Batching: Parallel execution for throughput
  5. Streaming: Faster perceived latency
  6. Monitor costs: Track per-user, per-feature
  7. Set budgets: Alert on anomalies

Output Checklist

  • Cost tracking implementation
  • Caching layer
  • Model selection logic
  • Prompt optimization
  • Batching for parallel calls
  • Latency tracking
  • Hotspot analysis
  • Optimization recommendations
  • Budget alerts
  • Performance dashboard

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

32.69%
按下载量换算334

Gemini CLI

23.56%
按下载量换算241

Antigravity

17.46%
按下载量换算178

windsurf

11.94%
按下载量换算122

github-copilot

7.83%
按下载量换算80

Codex

3.98%
按下载量换算41

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills