Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

contradiction-analyzer矛盾分析器

Agent Skill

contradiction-analyzer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

4,396

周安装

185

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,539
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:contradiction-analyzer(矛盾分析器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/uynewnas/contradiction-analyzer
安装命令:
openclaw skills install contradiction-analyzer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install contradiction-analyzer

简介

contradiction-analyzer 从多来源提取核心矛盾并生成结构化报告。

  • 适用于观点冲突、立场对立或信息不一致的分析场景。
  • 输出主要与次要冲突分类,辅助决策梳理。
  • 使用前需确认输入数据来源和范围。contradiction-analyzer 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 建议人工复核矛盾权重和解决路径建议。

SKILL.md

name
contradiction-analyzer
description
Contradiction Analyzer - Extract contradictions from multi-source information, identify primary and secondary contradictions, analyze information source bias, and generate structured contradiction analysis reports
metadata
version
1.0.0
author
Slava Chan @UyNewNas
category
analysis
tags
[contradiction, analysis, information-filter, bias-detection, critical-thinking]

Contradiction Analyzer Skill

When browsing multiple sources, don't just collect facts—actively extract and summarize core arguments, claims, and contradictions. This skill helps OpenClaw identify primary and secondary contradictions, analyze information source bias, and generate structured contradiction analysis reports.

Core Design Philosophy

When AI searches for answers to complex questions involving open discussions, controversial topics, or multi-factor analysis, it often encounters information from multiple sources with different perspectives. Without a systematic contradiction analysis framework, the response may:

  • Simply list all viewpoints without identifying the core conflicts
  • Fail to distinguish between primary and secondary contradictions
  • Overlook the bias and stance of information sources
  • Miss extreme or emotionally charged content that should be flagged

The Contradiction Analyzer Skill provides a structured approach to:

  1. Extract Contradictions: Actively identify core arguments and opposition points from multiple sources
  2. Analyze Hierarchy: Distinguish between primary and secondary contradictions
  3. Detect Bias: Analyze information source stance and credibility
  4. Generate Reports: Output structured contradiction analysis briefings

Trigger Conditions

Automatically activates when user questions involve:

  • Open-ended discussions
  • Controversial topics
  • Multi-factor analysis
  • Questions containing keywords like "debate", "controversy", "different views", "pros and cons"
  • When search results contain multiple conflicting perspectives

Workflow

User Question
    ↓
【Step 1: Information Collection & Contradiction Extraction】
    - When browsing multiple sources, don't just collect facts
    - Actively extract and summarize core arguments, claims, and opposition points
    - Example for "AI and Employment":
      【Contradiction A】Productivity gains vs Job displacement
      【Contradiction B】New skill demands vs Existing skill obsolescence
      【Contradiction C】Global competition vs Local job protection
    ↓
【Step 2: Primary & Secondary Contradiction Analysis】
    - Analyze extracted contradictions by correlation, impact, and urgency
    - Identify:
      1. Primary Contradiction: Most decisive,贯穿始终 contradiction at current stage
      2. Secondary Contradictions: Derived from or influenced by primary contradiction
    - Evaluate which contradiction each information source focuses on
    ↓
【Step 3: Stance Identification & Information Weighting】
    - Analyze information source background (media type, author affiliation, tone)
    - Determine potential stance and interest倾向
    - Weight information credibility based on logic, data support, authority
    - Flag extreme/emotional/lack-of-evidence information
    ↓
【Step 4: Generate "Contradiction Analysis Briefing"】
    - Output structured briefing including:
      1. List of primary and secondary contradictions with brief analysis
      2. Information source stance map
      3. Identification of extreme/biased viewpoints
      4. Preliminary trend judgment based on current contradictions
    ↓
【Follow-up Steps】(Optional, can link with other skills)
    - User can request deeper "dialectical synthesis" or "devil's advocate analysis"
    - OC can conduct targeted secondary search based on primary contradiction

Use Cases

  • Policy Analysis: Understanding different stakeholder positions on policy issues
  • Market Research: Analyzing conflicting market predictions and recommendations
  • Academic Research: Identifying debates and controversies in a field
  • News Analysis: Understanding different media perspectives on current events
  • Technology Assessment: Evaluating conflicting views on technology impacts

Output Format

The skill generates a structured "Contradiction Analysis Briefing" with the following sections:

1. Contradiction Overview

  • Primary contradiction with analysis
  • Secondary contradictions with analysis

2. Information Source Stance Map

  • Categorized sources by stance (optimistic, cautious, concerned, neutral)
  • Source credibility assessment

3. Extreme Viewpoint Identification

  • Flagged extreme or biased content
  • Reasons for flagging

4. Trend Judgment

  • Current discussion focus
  • Gaps in the discussion
  • Recommendations for further inquiry

Synergy with Other Skills

With Dialectics Skill

  • Contradiction Analyzer provides the raw material (identified contradictions)
  • Dialectics Skill performs the synthesis and transcendence

With Devil's Advocate Skill

  • Contradiction Analyzer identifies the contradictions
  • Devil's Advocate can be used to strengthen the antithesis construction

New skill created successfully! 🎉

📝 Review Note:

  • Please check if skill functionality meets expectations
  • Verify completeness of contradiction analysis process
  • Confirm before putting into production use

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

97.95%
按下载量换算1,507

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

可疑

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills