Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

contact-research联系研究

Agent Skill

contact-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

21,812

周安装

918

GitHub Stars

11,683

下载量

7,638
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:contact-research(联系研究)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
仓库路径:skills/contact-research
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill contact-research
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill contact-research

简介

Contact Research 基于 Common Room 检索全面联系档案,支持按邮箱、社交账号或姓名+公司查找。

  • 返回包含活动历史、评分、网站访问记录和 CRM 字段的增强数据。
  • 可通过多种方式定位联系人,自动匹配最可靠路径并提供身份解析建议。
  • 需注意数据来源权限与隐私合规性,避免越权访问或泄露敏感信息。
  • contact-research 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Contact Research

Retrieve a comprehensive contact profile from Common Room. Supports lookup by email, social handle, or name + company. Returns enriched data including activity history, Spark, scores, website visits, and CRM fields.

Step 1: Locate the Contact

Common Room supports multiple lookup methods — use whichever the user has provided:

What the user givesLookup method
Email addressLook up by email (most reliable)
LinkedIn, Twitter/X, or GitHub handleLook up by social handle — specify handle type explicitly
Name + companyIdentity resolution by name + org domain; present matches if ambiguous
Name onlySearch by name; if multiple matches, show a brief list and ask the user to confirm

If no match is found, respond: "Common Room doesn't have a record for this person." Do not speculate or fabricate profile data.

Step 2: Fetch Contact Fields

Use the Common Room object catalog to see available field groups and their contents. For full profiles, request all groups. For targeted questions, request only what's relevant.

Key field groups to know about:

  • Scores — always return as raw values or percentiles, never labels
  • Recent activity — use Contact Initiated filter (last 60 days) for their actions, not your team's
  • Website visits — total count + specific pages (last 12 weeks)
  • Spark — retrieve all Sparks when tracking engagement evolution over time

Step 3: Run Spark Enrichment (If Available)

If Spark is available, use it. Spark provides:

  • Professional background and job history
  • Social presence and influence signals
  • Persona classification: Champion, Economic Buyer, Technical Evaluator, End User, or Gatekeeper
  • Inferred role in the buying process

If Spark is unavailable but real activity data exists (recent actions, website visits, community engagement), infer a persona from those signals. If neither Spark nor activity data is available, classify as Unknown — do not guess a persona from title alone.

Retrieve all Sparks (not just the most recent) when the user wants to understand how this contact's engagement has evolved over time.

Step 4: Assess Account Context

Pull an abbreviated account snapshot for this contact's parent company. Note:

  • Open opportunities, expansion signals, or churn risk at the account level
  • Whether other contacts at this company are also active
  • How this person's engagement compares to their colleagues

Step 5: Identify Conversation Angles

Based on activity and signals, surface the strongest 2–3 hooks:

  • A recent Contact Initiated activity (community post, product event, support ticket)
  • A specific web page they visited recently — especially if it signals evaluation intent
  • A job change, promotion, or company news
  • Their Spark persona and what that suggests about communication style
  • Their role in a known active deal

Output Format

Only include sections where data was actually returned. Omit sections with no data rather than filling them with guesses.

When data is rich:

## [Contact Name] — Profile

**Overview**
[2 sentences: who they are, their role, and relationship status]

**Details**
- Title: [title]
- Company: [company]
- Email: [email]
- LinkedIn: [URL]
- Other profiles: [Twitter/X, GitHub, CRM link if available]

**Scores** [If scores returned]
[All scores as raw values or percentiles]

**Recent Activity** (last 60 days) [If activity returned]
[3–5 bullets with dates]

**Website Visits** (last 12 weeks) [If visit data exists]
[Total visit count + list of pages visited]

**Spark Profile** [If Spark data is non-null]
[Persona type, background summary, influence signals]

**Segments** [If segments returned]
[List of segment names this contact belongs to]

**Account Context**
[1–2 sentences on their company's status]

**Conversation Starters**
[2–3 specific, signal-backed openers]

When data is sparse (e.g., only name, title, email, tags returned; sparkSummary is null):

## [Contact Name] — Profile (Limited Data)

**Data available:** [List exactly what Common Room returned]

[Present only the returned fields]

**Web Search**
[Any findings from searching their name + company]

**Note:** Common Room has limited data on this contact. No activity history, scores, or Spark profile available. I can run deeper web searches or look up their company for additional context.

Do not generate conversation starters, persona inferences, or engagement assessments from sparse data. These require real signals.

Quality Standards

  • Lookup must use the correct method for the input type — don't guess on email vs. handle
  • Scores as raw/percentile only — never labels
  • Contact Initiated activity (last 60 days) is the primary engagement signal — lead with it
  • If Spark is unavailable, say so — don't fabricate a persona from title alone
  • Flag any contact where the most recent activity is older than 30 days

Reference Files

  • references/contact-signals-guide.md — full field descriptions, Spark persona guide, and conversation starter principles

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.46%
按下载量换算2,708

Claude

32.33%
按下载量换算2,469

Cursor

18.26%
按下载量换算1,395

Gemini CLI

10.03%
按下载量换算766

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills