Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

confessconfess 搜索

Agent Skill

confess 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,223

周安装

52

GitHub Stars

11

下载量

428
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:confess(confess 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/b-open-io/prompts
仓库路径:skills/confess
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/b-open-io/prompts --skill confess
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/b-open-io/prompts --skill confess

简介

系统性自我审计技能,鼓励坦诚披露可能遗漏的问题与奖励 hacking 迹象。

  • 特别适合在任务完成后主动检查完整性,避免虚假完成状态上报。
  • 涵盖代码引用检查、测试更新提醒和文档同步等常见疏漏点扫描。
  • 建议在关键节点触发,如实现结束或用户询问“还有什么没做?”时启用。
  • confess 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Confess

A systematic self-audit skill that encourages honest discovery and disclosure of issues the agent may know about but hasn't mentioned. Especially good for admitting to reward hacking and coming clean.

When to Use

  • After completing implementation work
  • When something feels incomplete
  • Before marking a task as "done"
  • When the user asks "what did I miss?" or "confess"

Confession Categories

1. Incomplete Work

Search for related files that may also need changes:

  • Use grep to find references to modified code
  • Check for tests that need updating
  • Look for documentation that references changed behavior

2. Untested Assumptions

Be honest about what was actually verified:

  • Did you run the code or just build it?
  • Were error paths tested?
  • What edge cases weren't considered?

3. Pattern Violations

Compare against existing codebase:

  • Find similar implementations with glob
  • Does new code match existing patterns?
  • Are there framework best practices being ignored?

4. Hidden Knowledge

Reveal things noticed but not mentioned:

  • Potential issues spotted but not raised
  • Concerns about the approach
  • Shortcuts taken without disclosure
  • Technical debt introduced

5. Cleanup Debt

Check for orphaned code:

  • Dead code that should be removed
  • Unused imports/dependencies
  • Orphaned files/routes

Adversarial Stance

Do not ask "what did I miss?" — that question invites rationalization.

Adopt the Skeptic's posture instead: *assume* something was missed, then hunt to prove it. Your job is to disprove your own "done" claim. A Skeptic is penalized for false dismissals, not for being thorough.

Run through this checklist before closing:

  • Grep for every symbol you changed — are all callers updated?
  • Does the test suite actually exercise the changed path, or just import it?
  • Did you introduce any new import/dependency without documenting it?
  • Is there anything you noticed but didn't mention because it was awkward to admit?
  • What would break if someone reverted just your last commit?

Workflow

  1. Gather Context # What files were recently modified? git diff --name-only HEAD~1 # What functions/exports changed? git diff HEAD~1 --stat
  2. Search for References # Find all references to modified code grep -r "functionName" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx"
  3. Compare Patterns

- Find similar files in the codebase - Compare implementation approaches - Note any inconsistencies

  1. Verification Check

- List what was actually tested - List what was assumed to work - List what needs manual verification

  1. Disclose Everything Format confessions as: ## My Confessions ### Incomplete Work - [specific issue] ### Untested - [what wasn't verified] ### Pattern Issues - [inconsistencies found] ### Hidden Concerns - [things I noticed but didn't mention] ### Cleanup Needed - [dead code, orphaned files]

Key Principles

  1. Adversarial by design — you are trying to catch yourself, not reassure yourself
  2. Assume the worst — something is incomplete, something is untested, something was buried
  3. Tool-assisted - Use grep/glob, don't rely on memory
  4. Systematic - Cover all categories every time
  5. Honest - If uncertain, say so
  6. Actionable - Each confession should suggest a fix

Example Output

After implementing OAuth error handling:

## My Confessions ### Incomplete Work - Modified auth-config.ts but oauth2/authorize/page.tsx:173 still redirects to /error/oauth - proxy.ts:67 also references the old error route - lib/oauth-errors.ts has redirectToErrorPage() function still using old pattern ### Untested - Only ran bun run build, didn't test actual OAuth error flow - Didn't verify error display on homepage with real error params ### Pattern Issues - Homepage uses useSearchParams directly, but other pages extract it into a Suspense-wrapped component - See: oauth2/authorize/page.tsx, device/page.tsx for correct pattern ### Hidden Concerns - The error page at /error/[type] is well-designed and actively used - Removing onAPIError may have been the wrong approach ### Cleanup Needed - Decision needed: fully migrate to homepage errors OR keep /error/oauth route

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

29.22%
按下载量换算125

Gemini CLI

20.81%
按下载量换算89

Antigravity

18.24%
按下载量换算78

windsurf

11.44%
按下载量换算49

OpenCode

7.65%
按下载量换算33

Codex

3.74%
按下载量换算16

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills